Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 10/04/2016 04:21 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 10/04/2016 04:12 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >>> I don't think I've ever run one of the GUI package managers. I have run >>> "dnf --refresh upgrade" in an Xfce terminal, as root,

Last update an systemd

I have Linux oh1rdf.ampr.org 4.7.4-200.fc24.i686+PAE #1 SMP Thu Sep 15 18:58:19 UTC 2016 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux System running, which I admin mostly remote. Now, after last "dnf update" I can't reboot system, or systemd does not response, no service status can't be checked, I get only example

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On 10/04/2016 04:21 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 10/04/2016 04:12 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> I don't think I've ever run one of the GUI package managers. I have run >> "dnf --refresh upgrade" in an Xfce terminal, as root, any number of >> times (most of the time, in fact). I ran into an X screwup only

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On 10/04/2016 04:12 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: I don't think I've ever run one of the GUI package managers. I have run "dnf --refresh upgrade" in an Xfce terminal, as root, any number of times (most of the time, in fact). I ran into an X screwup only once (early this week) and I think it was an

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On 10/04/2016 02:46 PM, stan wrote: > (Copying to the list) > > On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 17:13:26 -0400 > "Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." wrote: > >> Just curious.i read you all saying you don't run dnf "inside a >> desktop" am I to assume that me running a terminal AFTER LOGGING

Re: adding a package to Fedora's EPEL

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:07:28 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 02:48:25PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > I am the packager for pdf-stapler in Fedora. I would like to make > > this available on EPEL so that CentOS, etc users may benefit. How do > >

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

(Copying to the list) On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 17:13:26 -0400 "Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." wrote: > Just curious.i read you all saying you don't run dnf "inside a > desktop" am I to assume that me running a terminal AFTER LOGGING IN > TO THE DESKTOP is not a good idea..? I'm

Re: RH Linux 5.2, Kernel 2.0.36, SCSI Disks => VM? + Nostalgia . .

On 10/04/2016 03:49 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: On 2016-10-02 11:54, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: From: Samuel Sieb Shouldn't be a problem. The only issue would be whether the installed OS has a driver for the emulated scsi drive. Do you mean if the host OS

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 08:51:07 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > I'm working with the reporter right now to investigate and hopefully > get this fixed, but in the meantime - and this is in fact our standard > advice anyway, but it bears repeating - DON'T RUN 'dnf update'

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Maybe I've just been lucky but I run dnf on a daily basis in a Konsole > terminal window (under KDE) and have never seen this kind of problem. I > don't use the graphical updater(s). I run dnf in the KDE konsole, never the plasma update utility, at least once a

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On 4 October 2016 at 16:51, Adam Williamson > wrote: >> >> Running the update process inside a desktop just gives it all the more >> opportunity to crash somehow. If the terminal app

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On 4 October 2016 at 16:51, Adam Williamson > wrote: > >> Running the update process inside a desktop just gives it all the more >> opportunity to crash somehow. If the terminal app

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On 4 October 2016 at 16:51, Adam Williamson wrote: > Running the update process inside a desktop just gives it all the more > opportunity to crash somehow. If the terminal app crashes, the update > crashes. If the desktop crashes, the update crashes. > > I don't want

Re: Good article on systemd

Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 01 October 2016, Ed Greshko sent: >> Maybe the point Rex was making was simply that discussion could be had >> and frustrations could be vented but minus the Ad Hominem attacks? > > Dunno. There is no dunno here, it is clear our community does not condone

[389-users] Re: Remote Management Console doesn't show "Directory Server" entry anymore

Hi again, I did find that the console architecture and the JRE I was using were different, the console was 64bits while the JRE was 32bits. I uninstalled the JRE and installed the latest one found on oracle's site the v8 update 102. This did solve the problem, but I can't explain why it worked

Re: RH Linux 5.2, Kernel 2.0.36, SCSI Disks => VM? + Nostalgia . .

It's interesting indeed to see if this works.please keep us posted as to how this turns out! On Oct 4, 2016 8:04 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 21:49:55 +1100 > Philip Rhoades wrote: > > > work out how to load into virt-manager or something > > If you

Re: RH Linux 5.2, Kernel 2.0.36, SCSI Disks => VM? + Nostalgia . .

On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 21:49:55 +1100 Philip Rhoades wrote: > work out how to load into virt-manager or something If you DD the whole disk to a file, then that file will be in the correct format for a "raw" disk image. If you then go into virt-manager and create a new VM and select the "use

Re: Create a symbolic link to run firefox 49 ..

OK Patrick, my is not really a problem...I can run frefox both both from command line both using Gnome. Other time yet I understood "by chance", after some time, how to do better something that was not what I really would like it thank you Angelo On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Patrick

Re: Odd behaviour for GREP

Dave, On 2016-10-02 23:10, Dave Mitchell wrote: On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 09:15:36PM +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote: On F25 x86_64 as user "fedora" with default environment I get: grep Cock application.html.erb Provider for the National Disability Insurance Trial Site in Kwinana/ Cockburn

Re: RH Linux 5.2, Kernel 2.0.36, SCSI Disks => VM? + Nostalgia . .

Samuel, On 2016-10-02 11:54, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: From: Samuel Sieb Subject: Re: RH Linux 5.2, Kernel 2.0.36, SCSI Disks => VM? + Nostalgia . . To: Community support for Fedora users Message-ID:

Re: Weird Disk Usage Monitor messages

On 10/04/2016 01:13 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > On 10/04/2016 01:06 PM, Scott van Looy wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I’ve just started receiving low disk space warnings from my server. >> >> "Inodes: /dev/sda8 (/home) is 98% full -- 3.7M of 3.8M used, 99K remain” >> >> But >> >> df -h "/dev/sda860G

Re: Weird Disk Usage Monitor messages

On 10/04/2016 01:06 PM, Scott van Looy wrote: > Hi, > > I’ve just started receiving low disk space warnings from my server. > > "Inodes: /dev/sda8 (/home) is 98% full -- 3.7M of 3.8M used, 99K remain” > > But > > df -h "/dev/sda860G 53G 3.9G 94% /home” > > Does anyone have any

Weird Disk Usage Monitor messages

Hi, I’ve just started receiving low disk space warnings from my server. "Inodes: /dev/sda8 (/home) is 98% full -- 3.7M of 3.8M used, 99K remain” But df -h "/dev/sda860G 53G 3.9G 94% /home” Does anyone have any idea what could be up? Scott Latest version of Fedora, all up to

Re: Create a symbolic link to run firefox 49 ..

On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 10:32 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > practically you say me to create my own script to realize the connection to > the file (script) locate in /usr/ bin (as an alternative to the creation of > a link). [You're still top-posting. Please stop doing that. It makes the thread

[389-users] Re: 389 Directory Password Expiry Behaviour

Just to confirm this is on Centos 6.x using 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-69.el6_7.x86_64 I have also tried this on CentOS 7 and get the same behaviour using the current version on the EPEL 7 repo ___ 389-users mailing list --

[389-users] 389 Directory Password Expiry Behaviour

Hi, We are seeing some odd behaviour with 389 compared to what the diagram below suggests (from RHDS Documentation) https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.1/html/Deployment_Guide/images/pwdpolicy.png We have a user with an expired password with no grace logons,

Re: Create a symbolic link to run firefox 49 ..

Hi Patrick, practically you say me to create my own script to realize the connection to the file (script) locate in /usr/ bin (as an alternative to the creation of a link). I understand your idea: this can 'be just an alternative -More "COMPLEX than to use a link- to get the same result.

Re: wscat gone

On 10/03/2016 10:38 PM, Aleksandar Kostadinov wrote: Hello, I don't see wscat in fedora 24, why is it gone? Perhaps this: https://github.com/websockets/ws/issues/563 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email