On 03/12/2018 23:12, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/3/18 1:25 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
'systemctl start sshd' and 'ssh john@192.168.1.66' gives me the
expected prompt.
Make sure you do "systemctl enable sshd" as well if you want to be able
to use it after your next reboot. "systemctl enable --n
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 10:59 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 00:29 +1030, Tim wrote:
> > Allegedly, on or about 2 December 2018, Howard Howell sent:
> > > I'm still using evolution in F28 and it doesn't do that. If I am
> > > interested, I copy the link location and paste it int
On 12/3/18 1:25 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
'systemctl start sshd' and 'ssh john@192.168.1.66' gives me the
expected prompt.
Make sure you do "systemctl enable sshd" as well if you want to be able
to use it after your next reboot. "systemctl enable --now" is a
shortcut to enable and start th
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 12:32 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> Dec 03 10:10:45 bree firewalld[844]: ERROR: '/usr/sbin/iptables-restore -w
> -n' failed: iptables-restore v1.8.0 (legacy): Set fail2ban-sshd doesn't
> exist.
>
Does this help?
https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/2179
Thanks,
On 12/3/18 1:07 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 03/12/2018 19:19, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 12/3/18 10:16 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
>>> On 03/12/2018 17:30, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/3/18 8:15 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
> Hi: I have two boxes connected to the same router. One runs SL7.5
On 03/12/2018 20:08, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/3/18 8:15 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
I can ssh and rsync from F28 to SL7, but permission is denied in the
opposite direction. Port 22 is open. I now have copies of both
versions of /etc/sshd and intend to examine diffs.
We would need the exact e
On 03/12/2018 19:19, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/3/18 10:16 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
On 03/12/2018 17:30, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/3/18 8:15 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
Hi: I have two boxes connected to the same router. One runs SL7.5,
from tomorrow probably SL7.6, which is an el7 clone, and
On 12/3/18 2:47 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> ssh -v -v -v user@remote
>
> Is often a good command to use. It tells you everything
> it is trying so you can see what all it failed on.
>
> I've never had any problems with CentOS 7 and new fedora
> systems though. They talk to each other just fine for me.
Markus Schönhaber, Mon, 3 Dec 2018 13:58:31 +0100:
> M A Young, Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:33:40 + (GMT):
>
>> It looks like the "Linux 4.19.5 fails to boot as Xen dom0" issue being
>> discussed on the xen-devel list, eg. see
>> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-11/msg03557.
On 12/3/18 8:15 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
I can ssh and rsync from F28 to SL7, but permission is denied in the
opposite direction. Port 22 is open. I now have copies of both
versions of /etc/sshd and intend to examine diffs.
We would need the exact error message to give you a good answer.
On 12/3/18 11:46 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> ssh -v -v -v user@remote
>
> Is often a good command to use. It tells you everything
> it is trying so you can see what all it failed on.
>
> I've never had any problems with CentOS 7 and new fedora
> systems though. They talk to each other just fine for
ssh -v -v -v user@remote
Is often a good command to use. It tells you everything
it is trying so you can see what all it failed on.
I've never had any problems with CentOS 7 and new fedora
systems though. They talk to each other just fine for me.
Some very very old systems are trying to use depre
On 12/3/18 10:16 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 03/12/2018 17:30, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 12/3/18 8:15 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
>>> Hi: I have two boxes connected to the same router. One runs SL7.5,
>>> from tomorrow probably SL7.6, which is an el7 clone, and the other runs
>>> Fedora 28.
>>
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 00:29 +1030, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 2 December 2018, Howard Howell sent:
> > I'm still using evolution in F28 and it doesn't do that. If I am
> > interested, I copy the link location and paste it into a new
> > email.
> > Generally I'm not interested, so it is n
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 17:38 +, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 12/1/18 1:49 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 08:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 12/1/18 6:33 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > I'm getting "filesystem not responding" messages from an NFS-mounted
> > > >
$ sudo systemctl status firewalld
● firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled; vendor
preset: enabled)
Active: active (running) since Mon 2018-12-03 10:10:44 GMT; 8h ago
Docs: man:firewalld(1)
Main PID: 84
On 03/12/2018 17:30, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/3/18 8:15 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
Hi: I have two boxes connected to the same router. One runs SL7.5,
from tomorrow probably SL7.6, which is an el7 clone, and the other runs
Fedora 28.
I can ssh and rsync from F28 to SL7, but permission is deni
On 11/30/18 4:26 PM, dsavage--- via users wrote:
>
>> On 11/30/18 3:39 PM, dsavage--- via users wrote:
>>>
On 11/30/18 2:24 PM, dsavage--- via users wrote:
> Does Fedora 29 support the Intel RST (Rapid Storage Technology) chip
> for
> hardware RAID? My new ThinkPad P72 came with a
On 12/1/18 1:49 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 08:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 12/1/18 6:33 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> I'm getting "filesystem not responding" messages from an NFS-mounted
>>> NAS which I suspect is just slow (it spins down its disks when not in
On 12/3/18 8:15 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
> Hi: I have two boxes connected to the same router. One runs SL7.5,
> from tomorrow probably SL7.6, which is an el7 clone, and the other runs
> Fedora 28.
>
> I can ssh and rsync from F28 to SL7, but permission is denied in the
> opposite direction. P
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 00:29 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 2 December 2018, Howard Howell sent:
> > I'm still using evolution in F28 and it doesn't do that. If I am
> > interested, I copy the link location and paste it into a new email.
> > Generally I'm not interested, so i
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 00:20 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 30 November 2018, Patrick O'Callaghan sent:
> > When I tried to list a directory on the system it didn't respond, but
> > doing an ssh to the box spins up the disks and lets me log in. So
> > I've no idea what exactly
Hi: I have two boxes connected to the same router. One runs SL7.5,
from tomorrow probably SL7.6, which is an el7 clone, and the other runs
Fedora 28.
I can ssh and rsync from F28 to SL7, but permission is denied in the
opposite direction. Port 22 is open. I now have copies of both
version
Allegedly, on or about 30 November 2018, George N. White III sent:
> I tried setting a "left-hand" mode, but because terminals were shared
> among several users, it was better to train myself to use a right-
> hand configured mouse so other users could just move the mouse to the
> right side.
User
On 12/3/18 9:50 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 30 November 2018, Patrick O'Callaghan sent:
>> When I tried to list a directory on the system it didn't respond, but
>> doing an ssh to the box spins up the disks and lets me log in. So
>> I've no idea what exactly automount is suppo
Allegedly, on or about 1 December 2018, home user via users sent:
> Samuel: I understand what you said about anti-virus software. I was
> incorrect about wanting it for Thunderbird. In this case, it would
> be for the browser. I think you're mostly correct, but I still wish
> for something to p
Allegedly, on or about 2 December 2018, Howard Howell sent:
> I'm still using evolution in F28 and it doesn't do that. If I am
> interested, I copy the link location and paste it into a new email.
> Generally I'm not interested, so it is not too troubling. but it
> would be nice if the hover fun
Allegedly, on or about 30 November 2018, Patrick O'Callaghan sent:
> When I tried to list a directory on the system it didn't respond, but
> doing an ssh to the box spins up the disks and lets me log in. So
> I've no idea what exactly automount is supposed to be doing.
I have a similar issue. If
M A Young, Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:33:40 + (GMT):
> It looks like the "Linux 4.19.5 fails to boot as Xen dom0" issue being
> discussed on the xen-devel list, eg. see
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-11/msg03557.html
> Basically there is an issue with the 4.19.5 kernel t
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Fedora 28 in a Xen DomU on a Debian Stretch Dom0. This used
> to work fine but kernel 4.19.5 crashes on boot (see console output
> below) - 4.19.4 and earlier don't show any problems.
> Is anyone else seeing this? Is there a worka
On 03/12/2018 11:46, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Fedora 28 in a Xen DomU on a Debian Stretch Dom0. This used
to work fine but kernel 4.19.5 crashes on boot (see console output
below) - 4.19.4 and earlier don't show any problems.
Is anyone else seeing this? Is there a workaround?
Re
Hi,
I'm running Fedora 28 in a Xen DomU on a Debian Stretch Dom0. This used
to work fine but kernel 4.19.5 crashes on boot (see console output
below) - 4.19.4 and earlier don't show any problems.
Is anyone else seeing this? Is there a workaround?
Regards
mks
Output of
# xl create /etc/xen/fedo
On 12/3/18 1:34 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 17:12 +0100, Ger van Dijck wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> After an update to Fedora29 I can print but not scan anymore with a HP
>> officejet 4620 in WLAN.
>>
>> When running HP-check I get two messages : cups required incompat :
On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 02:50:20PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
> An update.
>
> After several more attempted reboots changing the
> command line parameters failed, I logged in and
> found that several commands, notably "systemctl"
> failed with the message:
>
> Failed to connect to bus: No suc
34 matches
Mail list logo
