On 3/29/19 11:29 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> A brief grep finds these typedefs defined in :
>
> #include
>
> typedef u_int8_t foo;
>
>
> This compiles just fine.
>
> So, I surmise that the code in question was using something that itself
> includes sys/types.h, but whatever that is, the
On 3/29/19 8:22 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
For me, I adore Xfce and know how to put up with 4.13 (odd numbers are
testing releases).
For customers, I would not let 4.13 loose on them. I will probably
use Mate instead.
So, skip the corresponding Fedora
Leander Hutton writes:
I have libusb-devel installed and /usr/include/usb.h and
/usr/include/stdint.h are both present. Running the included makefile
for the Linux build just dumps unknown type name errors for u_int8_t and
u_int16_t:
/usr/include/usb.h:81:2: error: unknown type name ‘u_int8_t’
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
For me, I adore Xfce and know how to put up with 4.13 (odd numbers are
testing releases).
For customers, I would not let 4.13 loose on them. I will probably
use Mate instead.
So, skip the corresponding Fedora release. F28 is still good enough. Or,
bribe
I'm trying to compile Soarer's Converter on Fedora 29 and running into
typedef problems. This is a somewhat old utility for programming USB
converters for old terminal and XT keyboards based on an Arduino Teensy.
More info here on that here:
https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=17458.0
I have
On 3/29/19 7:16 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
On 3/29/19 6:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I bought a new laptop last month. The vendor had no issues preloading
F29 XFCE spin.
Who did you order it from?
thelinuxlaptop.com
Thank you!
On 3/29/19 7:32 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
On 3/29/19 6:34 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
xfce 4.13 has been fine for me.
4.13 has been a pain in my neck:
Libre Office pulses at me
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14863
That's the one that I find the
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
On 3/29/19 6:34 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
xfce 4.13 has been fine for me.
4.13 has been a pain in my neck:
Libre Office pulses at me
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14863
That's the one that I find the most annoying. But it's not a showstopper.
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
On 3/29/19 6:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I bought a new laptop last month. The vendor had no issues preloading F29
XFCE spin.
Who did you order it from?
thelinuxlaptop.com
pgpWwqnsixgha.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 3/29/19 6:34 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
xfce 4.13 has been fine for me.
4.13 has been a pain in my neck:
Libre Office pulses at me
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14863
Black backgrounds in panels
https://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=50266#p50266
Panel 0 is missing
On 3/29/19 6:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I bought a new laptop last month. The vendor had no issues preloading
F29 XFCE spin.
Who did you order it from?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
Hi All,
I just had a vendor tell me they do not support Fedora Server
because the the developers of Fedora had stated that it is not
a stable release and is used only as a testing ground for Red
Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). And as such, they only supported
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
Hi All,
Fedora 29
Xfce 4.13
I have a customer interested in me putting Fedora 29
on a laptop.
Problem: Xfce 4.13 is too buggy to release on the general
public. Me, I am loyal and know how to cope with the bugs,
but a typical user, I would not wish that on
On 3/29/19 5:39 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 3/30/19 6:20 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I just had a vendor tell me they do not support Fedora Server
because the the developers of Fedora had stated that it is not
a stable release and is used only as a testing ground for Red
Hat Enterprise
On 3/30/19 6:20 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>
> I just had a vendor tell me they do not support Fedora Server
> because the the developers of Fedora had stated that it is not
> a stable release and is used only as a testing ground for Red
> Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). And as such, they
On 3/29/19 1:51 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I just got my new XPS 13 (the 2019 model) and installed Fedora 29 on it.
Everything looks great except that when I work in the shell I experience
a freeze of the system that lasts for about 1-2 seconds and that occurs
every 30-60 seconds which
On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 00:55 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 3/28/19 10:58 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > It shows up fine (actually in Dolphin). I've been hoping to find it
> > somewhere in the main file system, so I could use shell tools to find
> > out various things about it: the data base of
389 Directory Server 1.4.0.22
The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-ds-base version
1.4.0.22
Fedora packages are available on Fedora 28, and 29
Fedora 29
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1240342
Fedora 28
389 Directory Server 1.4.1.2
The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-ds-base version
1.4.1.2
Fedora packages are available on Fedora 30 and rawhide.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33820830 - Rawhide
Hi All,
I just had a vendor tell me they do not support Fedora Server
because the the developers of Fedora had stated that it is not
a stable release and is used only as a testing ground for Red
Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). And as such, they only supported
RHEL and Cent OS.
Huh ??
Hi,
I just got my new XPS 13 (the 2019 model) and installed Fedora 29 on it.
Everything looks great except that when I work in the shell I experience
a freeze of the system that lasts for about 1-2 seconds and that occurs
every 30-60 seconds which is quite annoying.
I tried isolating the issue by
Hi All,
Fedora 29
Xfce 4.13
I have a customer interested in me putting Fedora 29
on a laptop.
Problem: Xfce 4.13 is too buggy to release on the general
public. Me, I am loyal and know how to cope with the bugs,
but a typical user, I would not wish that on them.
Is 4.14 anywhere near?
If
On 3/29/19 3:28 PM, Enrique Artal wrote:
I think so, but I was apparently the only affected person (and not completely
since I coud use chrome). Anyway I transmitted the information to IT people.
Point them to:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=rrhh.unizar.es
--
Roberto
I think so, but I was apparently the only affected person (and not completely
since I coud use chrome). Anyway I transmitted the information to IT people.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 23:16 +, Enrique Artal wrote:
> Thanks, Fernando!
> It has worked. The man page is too technical to me. Is it a risk to use
> firefox like that? Regards, Enrique.
AFAIK the problem is not with Firefox, it's with your university's
website. They should update their
Hi Enrique,
> Is it a risk to use firefox like that?
Not sure, but I don't think so.
Regards,
Fernando.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 3/28/19 10:58 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
It shows up fine (actually in Dolphin). I've been hoping to find it
somewhere in the main file system, so I could use shell tools to find
out various things about it: the data base of contacts, etc.
All the app databases are protected and you can't
On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 19:21 -0700, Todd Chester via users wrote:
> Does your phone show up in ?
> $ gio mount -li
Yes.
> Are you able to see your phone with Nautulis?
It shows up fine (actually in Dolphin). I've been hoping to find it
somewhere in the main file system, so I could use shell
28 matches
Mail list logo