The Fedora 31 qcow2 cloud image e.g.
http://mirrors.rit.edu/fedora/fedora/linux/releases/31/Cloud/x86_64/images/
was built with a buggy grub bootloader which causes problems like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669252
How do I request a new Fedora 31 cloud image to be built and
This morning I got the dreaded grub prompt on boot.
Took me 3 hours to understand what
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F30_bugs#GRUB_boot_menu_is_not_populated_after_an_upgrade
was talking about. I did a bunch of searching and trying things out before
I hit upon
the configfile grub command.
On 08/15/2018 10:56 AM, David Boreham wrote:
On 8/15/2018 10:36 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Updating the csn generator and the uuid generator will cause a lot of
churn in dse.ldif. There are other housekeeping tasks which will
write dse.ldif
But if those things were being done so
On 08/15/2018 10:13 AM, David Boreham wrote:
in strace.log:
[pid 8088] 12:55:39.739539 poll([{fd=435, events=POLLOUT}], 1, 180
[pid 8058] 12:55:39.739573 <... write resumed> ) = 1 <0.87>
[pid 8088] 12:55:39.739723 <... poll resumed> ) = 1 ([{fd=435,
revents=POLLOUT}]) <0.000168>
I keep getting this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/rmeggins/scripts/repltest.py", line 53, in
m1 = tools.DirSrvTools.createInstance(createargs)
File "/home/rmeggins/ds/ds.git/src/lib389/lib389/tools.py", line 627,
in createInstance
cfgdn = lib389.CFGSUFFIX
On 03/31/2017 07:58 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 03/30/2017 09:05 PM, William Brown wrote:
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 15:16 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Just curious if anyone is building 389 on HPUX? There is very old code
in our server that is specific to HPUX that we'd like to remove. Most
of
On 02/23/2017 01:11 AM, William Brown wrote:
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:20 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 02/22/2017 09:25 PM, William Brown wrote:
Default indexes only apply to new databases (It's a template iirc). You
need to edit the index on the cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm
On 11/15/2016 05:51 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 11/15/2016 12:08 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
It is also useful to get a few stacktraces which will give us
detailed information about what the server is doing. For example, if
you can "catch" the server while it is misbehavin
On 11/15/2016 12:58 PM, Marc Sauton wrote:
What is the test filter like?
Can we see a sanitized sample of the access log with the SRCH and RESULT?
If using SSL, review the output of
cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
Do we have replication? (and large attribute values?)
You may want to
On 06/19/2016 06:18 AM, kash...@arissystem.com wrote:
In a normal setup environment I have created an organizationUnit named View,
which is an nsView object. using nsViewFilter, I have several users in this
organizationUnit. I can bind to these users with their actual DN with no
problem :
AM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com
<mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 05/17/2016 02:04 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
We run a cluster of directory servers (4 masters, 2 hubs, 14 slaves)
behind a set of F5 Bigip load balancers. Our Bigip admins recently
decided to switch the b
On 05/17/2016 02:04 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
We run a cluster of directory servers (4 masters, 2 hubs, 14 slaves)
behind a set of F5 Bigip load balancers. Our Bigip admins recently
decided to switch the boxes to "one-armed" mode and that services
would have to use X-Forwarded-For headers or
On 05/17/2016 08:01 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
Noriko,
Just to let you know, after I replicated/created the exactly same OU
structure on both side, the replication seems to works fine. I'm still
not sure that is the expected behavior:
Yes, it is. Winsync does _not_ sync the OU structure -
On 04/25/2016 01:24 PM, ghiureai wrote:
Hello List,
I am running some search performance tests , basic ldapsearch
augument "cn" , on local ldap host with rsearch, and
seeing readwaiters: values chainng , here is a sample from dbmon
This is not from dbmon. This is from cn=monitor:
On 04/07/2016 10:45 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Hello Gurus,
I was searching the web for some scripts to monitor DS performance ,
and found the Open Ldap: ldap-ping.pl script,
I wonder if there is a version for 389-DS or if are other similar
performance measure scripts available for 389-ds?
Looks
On 03/30/2016 06:45 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 31 Mar 2016, at 12:25 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
[30/Mar/2016:17:19:19 +] setup_ol_tls_conn - failed: unable to create new
TLS context
[30/Mar/2016:17:19:19 +] slapi_ldap_bind - Error: could not configure the
server
On 03/08/2016 03:36 PM, liblfds admin wrote:
On 08/03/16 22:35, Howard Chu wrote:
Even though it's a VM, numactl -H may still show something relevant.
I'll try it next time I have one running.
BerkeleyDB did adaptive locking, using a spinlock before falling back to
a heavier weight system
On 02/18/2016 02:52 PM, jfill...@central1.com wrote:
Hi Rich,
Is the code your referenced found in 389-ds-base-1.2.11 ?
yes
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/ds.git/tree/ldap/servers/plugins/syntaxes/cis.c?h=389-ds-base-1.2.11#n694
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@%(host_name)s
http
On 01/25/2016 02:59 AM, Mor Ndoye wrote:
Hi,
Using WinSync, is there any way to synchronize Active Directory custom
extension attributes. Here is what I read from the Red Hat documentation:
Only a subset of Directory Server and Active Directory attributes are
synchronized. These attributes
On 01/04/2016 09:23 AM, Phil Daws wrote:
Hello Rich,
Have ran in debug mode and connected to the admin interface which has been
secured with a cert:
{SUBJECT_DN=CN=ads01-admin.lab, SUBJECT={CN=ads01-admin},
SERIAL=8741097289627376099, AFTERDATE=Tue Dec 19 14:05:35 2017,
ISSUER={CN=LAB-CA, O
On 12/14/2015 11:16 PM, Frank Munsche wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to understand why ldapsearch returns some objects of the
dit only
when the dn is set to the object I'm looking for and the search scope
has to
be base, e.g.:
There is an object at the dn: cn=repl keep alive
On 12/02/2015 09:58 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi Rich,
Yes I totally agree I should see the prompt as you put here, this is
working in my case only when running:
setup-ds.pl -u
but not for ds-admin.
If you are (or can find) a perl hacker, you can use perl -d
/usr/sbin/setup-ds-admin.pl and see
On 12/01/2015 03:07 PM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich, still see bellow : and bellow only for ds no admin
_setup-ds-admin.pl -u -d_
==
This program will set up the 389 Directory and Administration Servers
On 12/01/2015 11:42 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Thank you Rich for reply one more related issues I see :
When need to run the ds admin update I do not see the options for
update, seems goes back and asks all the Q's as a new fresh
installation ( ??)
setup-ds-admin.pl -u
What we are missing
On 12/01/2015 02:23 PM, ghiureai wrote:
On 12/01/2015 11:42 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich, pls see the answers to your Q's ( the DS upgrade worked but
the DS Admin set up will not behave same way )
...
<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users%40lists.fedoraproject.org/thr
On 12/01/2015 10:07 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi List,
we are tying to upgrade to 389-ds 1.3.4 from 1.2.2 , after rpm
installed and update the server , when restarting the DS geting the
following in DS errorlog, there is no such "entryallowWeakCipher" in
cfg file , what should we dissable see
On 11/24/2015 10:28 AM, ghiureai wrote:
On 11/24/2015 09:11 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 11/24/2015 10:02 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich and the List Thank for your continue support,
We are still seeing a index issues with memberof plugging, we are
not sure at this point if this is related
On 11/19/2015 10:02 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich the version for 389-base is :( I know is old ,we are planing
upgrading in next future, but I do not see this messages on all DS
hosts running same DS version)
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-34.el6_5.x86_64
Not sure. Either this is something we fixed
On 11/19/2015 09:00 AM, ghiureai wrote:
HI LIst,
I am looking for clues to solve this messages after a export or DS
reboot we are seeing this messages,
I checked the 2 plugins: caseExactString and CaseIgnore String theya
re both enabled , where else should I look?
DS version:
On 11/10/2015 10:14 AM, Adrian Damian wrote:
Rich,
Thanks for your help. Let me jump in with more details.
We've seen index corruption on a number of occasions. It seems to
affect searchable attributes for which there are indexes. Queries on
an attribute in LDAP that used to work suddenly
On 11/10/2015 12:12 PM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich, thank you for all support for last day , unfortunately there is
a strong wave in developers team:" the multimaster replication is
creating issues with UI" ( I do not totally agree since can not be
reproduce+ full describe
On 11/09/2015 11:05 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi List,
We have cfg multimaster replication /fractional replication memberof
plugging excluded ,we are seeing from time to time index
corruption with some indexes , there is a strong feeling from
developers this are related to DS multimaster
On 11/09/2015 05:47 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:
Hi Rich,
Thank you for your feedback , as always greatly appreciate when comes from
389-DS RH support.
We are not using vm just plain hardware, here is the description I got from developers team
related to the issues they are seeing when
On 10/21/2015 01:00 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote:
On 20/10/15 15:57, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 10/20/2015 09:37 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote:
Hi!
We are using using nsAccountLock=true to lock user accounts. We also
have dovecot authenticating users against the 389DS.
If we set nsAccountLock=true,
On 10/19/2015 09:43 AM, Mayberry, Alexander wrote:
We refer to a dedicated consumer as "read only". (we use these in our security
zones.)
Though, I'm sure that's probably not strictly true, it captures the spirit of
things.
Yes. What the console means by "dedicated consumer" is a read only
On 10/19/2015 03:17 PM, Joel Levin wrote:
Hi Rich:
Can there be multiple-masters simultaneously?
Yes.
i.e. 5 masters - all 5 accepting read-writes simultaneously?
Yes.
Is there a maximum limit?
Technically the limit is 65534 read-write masters, but you will probably
run into memory
On 10/09/2015 12:33 AM, Juan Ramón Moral wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to change config to make uid case insensitive?
this search return no entries.
ldapsearch -x -D "uid=*U*ser01,cn=users,dc=XXX,dc=XXX" -w XXX -s base
-b "cn=users,dc=XXX,dc=XXX"
ldap_bind: No such object (32)
matched
On 10/07/2015 02:45 PM, Paul Whitney wrote:
When SSL-enabling the directory server, am I allowed to use a wildcard
certificate or is it mandatory the certificate include the FQHN?
You can use a wildcard, but you are strongly recommended to use subject
alt name instead.
Thanks,
Paul M.
On 10/07/2015 08:34 AM, Karel Lang AFD wrote:
hi,
In reply to my own question (presented as topic no. 1 in vol.125 -see
below- chainmail):
It is solved, problem is the script, that is recommended by fedora
wiki (setupssl2.sh) as a way for automatic SSL generation for 389-DS
server, is not
On 10/02/2015 12:16 PM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi List and Rich,
as per last documentation update I am trying to cfg fractional
replication ( excluding memberOf plunging) for a multimaster cfg
server 3 ldap server, when starting with first one aftr mentioning
"memberOf " to b
On 10/01/2015 12:49 PM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi List ,Rich
Here is the URL for the doc mentioned in this email, please can you
confirm if this is the case for multimaster replication and memberOf
plugin , is this the last update doc version ?
Here is the latest doc version
https
On 10/01/2015 02:58 PM, Adrian Damian wrote:
Hello Rich and Noriko,
Is there a work around to slow listing or children problem?
You could use cn=Directory Manager which is not affected by ACIs.
All I need is to list their IDs (entrydn or cn or uid),
To what does "their" refer
Thanks, that worked
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Jon Ingason <jon.inga...@telia.com> wrote:
> Den 2015-09-26 kl. 16:42, skrev Rich Emberson:
> > # dnf install mariadb mariadb-server
> > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:19:25 ago on Sat Sep 26
> > 07:1
Seems like a rather fundmental problem:
$ uname -a
Linux medusa 4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 14 20:19:24 UTC 2015
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ rpm -qa --qf '%{NAME} %{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{ARCH}\n' | grep -i mariadb
# dnf install mariadb mariadb-server
Last metadata expiration
On 09/16/2015 03:11 PM, Adrian Damian wrote:
Hi There,
The scenario is simple: we have a subtree in the DIT with a few thousand
children node. The parent node of the subtree has a few acis including a
couple of macro acis that apply to each of the child nodes. We've
observed a significant
On 09/17/2015 10:22 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich,
I turn the error log level to "Plug-ins" seeing this in ldap error log
now:
Why did you turn the error log level to "Plug-ins"?
I'm trying to find out if the issue is related to unindexed searches.
The plug
On 09/17/2015 09:41 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Rich, which internal logging you are referring ? I have auditing and access log
on ,are other loggin option ?
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10/html/Administration_Guide/Configuring_Logs.html#configuring-log
On 09/17/2015 09:50 AM, Striker Leggette wrote:
Greetings,
What is the recommended way to remove a database with the following
example path?:
5G /db/slapd-389/db/testentry
Would it be simply stopping slapd, remove the path and start slapd?
Did you do
, Adrian Damian wrote:
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-34.el6_5.x86_64
On 09/17/2015 09:56 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Adrian Damian wrote:
Hi Rich,
Sorry for missing this info. It's 1.2.11 running on SL6.
We need the exact version, which is why I asked for the output of
rpm -q
389-ds
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Adrian Damian wrote:
Hi Rich,
Sorry for missing this info. It's 1.2.11 running on SL6.
We need the exact version, which is why I asked for the output of rpm -q
389-ds-base
Adrian
On 09/17/2015 08:54 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/16/2015 03:11 PM, Adrian Damian
On 09/14/2015 09:42 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Please keep replies on-list.
HI Rich,
here is some details and Q from developers which designed the DS tree
, has performance issues, any input from you much appreciate it:
The slow query problem seems to be related to the acis. Please send
On 09/14/2015 09:10 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi ,
we are having issues with one of our DS , part of multimaster
replication , after was onlin for several hours and brought up the DS
is not respoding running a basic ldapsearch to count the users or
grous will hang not results or messages in error
On 09/11/2015 08:50 AM, ghiureai wrote:
Fast query:
ldapsearch -x -h xxx -b "ou=ds,dc=cb,dc=net" -W
-D "uid=axxx,ou=Users,ou=ds,dc=cb,dc=net"
"(objectclass=groupofuniquenames)" "cn" | sort -u | wc
Slow query:
ldapsearch -x -h xxx-b
"ou=groups,ou=ds,dc=cb,dc=net" -W -D
On 09/10/2015 04:00 PM, ghiureai wrote:
Hi Gurus,
we are seening some performance issues when running ldapsearch with
tree ou=Groups, ou=ds , dc=abc, dc=net takes longer than when looking
for same user but from one level up of tree up aka :ou=ds,
dc=abc,dc=net, the difference in time very
On 09/02/2015 09:45 PM, Prashant Bapat wrote:
Hi,
We have been using 389-ds as part of FreeIPA. In one of our
environments, we have 2 389-ds installations with replication.
What version? rpm -q 389-ds-base
Randomly, the 389-ds on either of them completely freezes and there
are high
On 09/03/2015 09:02 AM, Prashant Bapat wrote:
Rich,
Version is 389-ds-base-1.3.3.8-1.fc21.x86_64
Below is the "ldapsearch" command that works on the LDAP server.
ldapsearch -x -b "uid=testuser,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=example,dc=com"
In python this would be
l
On 08/28/2015 04:46 AM, Fabien Gasbayet wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 questions.
1 - On this diagram :
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/9.0/html/Administration_Guide/Windows_Sync.html#Windows_Sync-About_Windows_Sync
Password replication seems bi-directional…
But
Well, after decades of KDE my solution was:
dnf groupinstall Xfce
Xfce works
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Rich Emberson emberson.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
Upgraded from F20 KDE environment using
fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct
and X/KDE has rendering/refresh/redraw issues
Upgraded from F20 KDE environment using
fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct
and X/KDE has rendering/refresh/redraw issues.
Application widgets and KDE pop menus are not draw, or,
at best some edge or corner is drawn. In an xterm,
the line being entered is drawn, but nothing else -
move the
.
So, somehow Fedora 22's nouveau-based rendering seems to have an issue ..
or something
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Rich Emberson emberson.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
I used to update:
fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct
Coming up in graphical target as default.target, KDE X does
not render
I might add that logging in remotely to this machine and then launching an
X-application
that displays on the remote machine works.
So, it seems to be purely a X rendering issue on the machine, the X
protocol works fine.
Richard
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Rich Emberson emberson.r
x86_64
kmod-libs 21-1.fc22 x86_64
kmod 21-1.fc22 x86_64
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:34 AM, fedora2015 fedora2...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 08/08/2015 09:42 PM, Rich Emberson wrote:
I used to update:
fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct
Coming up in graphical target as default.target, KDE X does
I used to update:
fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct
Coming up in graphical target as default.target, KDE X does
not render properly.
With right click I a small box appears under the cursor,
navigating to what I guess is the first menu item, I can
start a console.
A box appears. I click
On 08/05/2015 06:23 AM, Alpesh Shinde wrote:
Hi Team,
How to get the directReport values for a particular manager using RHDS queries?
I am new to RHDS however have mostly worked on Microsoft AD and there is a
powershell cmdlet to get this value. Can someone please help me with this? Or
may
Review my post from previous week or so for background
First Laptop:
Having failed to upgrade Fedora 22 using fedup on my KDE-base
Fedora 20, I reinstalled Fedora 20.
I downloaded the Workstation Live dvd twice, each time it passed
the 256sha and both time the burned dvd passed the media test
I use gmail.
When I reply to a thread using Thunderbird, the response never
shows up, but, if I include the email of the person who wrote
the thread I am responding to, that person gets the email.
On the other hand, if I log in to my gmail account, the
I can post a response, that that response
Thanks for the suggestion.
Contents of /var/cache/akmods/akmods.log
START
2015/07/25 16:06:18 akmods: Checking kmods exist for 4.0.8-200.fc21.x86_64
2015/07/25 16:06:18 akmods: Building and installing nvidia-340xx-kmod
2015/07/25 16:06:18 akmods: Building RPM using the command
'/bin/akmodsbuild
What is causing the MTRR error in the xinit output?
cat /proc/mtrr
reg00: base=0x0 (0MB), size= 4096MB, count=1: write-back
reg01: base=0x1 ( 4096MB), size= 1024MB, count=1: write-back
reg02: base=0x0c000 ( 3072MB), size= 1024MB, count=1: uncachable
Part of xinit output
Still no mouse or keyboard. Don't know if this is the problem.
from /var/log/Xorg.0.log
START
[96.019] (II) Loading sub module fb
[96.019] (II) LoadModule: fb
[96.020] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libfb.so
[96.030] (II) Module fb: vendor=X.Org Foundation
[96.030]
Also see MTRR issue below.
On 07/25/2015 07:01 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
You're a KDE user and quite a bit has changed. One question and one
suggestion
Q. Just for information... Are you using kdm or sddm as your display
manager?
How does one find which display manager is being used?
So, I am now at the point where xinit (calling startkde)
has the KDE screen appearing, but ...
The pointer-cursor appears but can not be moved by the mouse, and
(after some timeout and the login screen appears) keyboard
entry fails.
What does one do to enable both the mouse and keyboard.
Thanks
Ah, fedora upgrades using fedup ...
Starting with Fedora 20, did
yum update
and then
fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct
Took a while but there were no issues but
remember, as root
export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin
or use
su -
to become root otherwise fedup has an issue.
Again, fedora upgrades using fedup ...
Starting with Fedora 20, did
... stuff ...
fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct
... stuff ...
fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct
So, now rebooted and it started.
I have all my machines in multi-user mode just
in case there is an issue with
On 07/22/2015 07:10 AM, Paul Tobias wrote:
On 21/07/15 15:21, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/21/2015 06:19 AM, Paul Tobias wrote:
Hi guys,
In short: Can I use Class of Service[1] together with Host Based Attributes[2]?
It doesn't work for me.
The directory server uses Host Based Attributes
On 07/21/2015 06:19 AM, Paul Tobias wrote:
Hi guys,
In short: Can I use Class of Service[1] together with Host Based Attributes[2]?
It doesn't work for me.
The directory server uses Host Based Attributes to give different loginshell on
servers and desktops. The idea is that on a desktop
On 07/16/2015 05:47 PM, Fong, Trevor wrote:
Hi Guys,
We’re running 389-ds 1.2.11.29-1.el6
Can you upgrade to a newer version? There have been several releases
since then.
and are experimenting with the DNA plugin. When trying to set an
existing account’s uidNumber to the magic regen
On 07/11/2015 09:29 PM, Burn Alting wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 08:00 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/03/2015 05:49 AM, Burn Alting wrote:
Has anyone authored code to parse a 389 Directory Server's access.log
file(s) with an aim of generating audit events based around the LDAP
request
On 07/07/2015 10:07 AM, Mark Boyce wrote:
Good Morning,
Has anyone else seen this behavior; after configuring Winsync I add
one or perhaps two “pairs” to the sync agreement (ds:AD)
Firstly - what version of 389-ds-base? rpm -q 389-ds-base
What version of Windows/AD? 2012 R2?
I don't
On 07/07/2015 11:49 AM, Mark Boyce wrote:
Rich,
The version of 389-ds-base is 1.3.3.10-1.fc22.x89-64 and it’s the same
behavior running the agreement against AD 2003 or AD 2012.
By “two pairs” in mean to indicate that I have two winsyncsubtree pair
attributes; i.e
ou=people,dc=example,dc
On 07/07/2015 05:35 PM, Mark Boyce wrote:
Rich,
I am able to get the core dump and it appears to be a segmentation
fault when modifying the replication agreement… anything specific from
the dump that would be helpful?
Not sure. Can you provide the full stack trace? Be sure to
obscure
On 07/03/2015 05:49 AM, Burn Alting wrote:
Has anyone authored code to parse a 389 Directory Server's access.log
file(s) with an aim of generating audit events based around the LDAP
request type. Basically, take the log sequence
[21/Apr/2007:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 fd=608 slot=608
On 07/04/2015 02:06 AM, William wrote:
Hi,
I am going to publish this as a blog post in the next few days on
http://firstyear.id.au
However, as it's relevant for this audience I decided to re-post it
here.
My workplace is a reasonably sized consumer of 389ds. We use it for
storing pretty
On 07/06/2015 05:18 PM, William wrote:
I will clean up and publish the usl tool set in the future to help
other people test their own LDAP secuity controls.
Nice! This would be a good addition to our admin/management tools,
if
you would like to submit it. Please open a ticket and attach the
On 06/26/2015 12:30 AM, Joshua Brodie wrote:
Hi:
Is it possible to source IP address restrict ldap transactions to
ports 389 and 636 - outside of using external firewall or IP tables?
Something like this?
On 06/24/2015 06:05 AM, Robert Kuska wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am Robert Kuska, I am a python co-maintainer
and co-owner of change Python3 as default which aims to provide
python3 only packages by default across different fedora platform
releases[0].
The reason why I am contacting you is, that
On 06/22/2015 05:13 PM, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
On Saturday, June 20, 2015 04:40:58 PM Noriko Hosoi wrote:
389 Directory Server 1.3.4.0
The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-ds-base version
1.3.4.0.
Fedora packages are available from the Fedora 22 and Rawhide repositories.
On 06/19/2015 04:29 AM, Ivanov Andrey (M.) wrote:
Hi Noriko,
There are three MMR replicating servers. It's one month of
uptime and the servers wanted to trim the replication log.
Here is what i've
On 06/12/2015 09:44 AM, Derek Belcher wrote:
Where can I go to see the difference between:
389-admin-1.1.36 and 389-admin-1.1.35-1.el6.x86_64
If you checkout the repo from git:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/admin.git
You could do
$ git diff 389-admin-1.1.35..389-admin-1.1.36
On 06/03/2015 03:54 AM, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote:
Hi 389 developers,
I was reading news about Sourceforge is hijacking nmap page in
Sourceforge.
When I listed the page owned by user sf-editor1, it looks like 389
directory server was also hijacked.
Are you aware of this?
I was not
On 05/20/2015 05:28 AM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
Hello,
We've setup an 389 Directory Server on a Fedora21 and configured
synchronization with an Active Directory (running on an Windows2012R2
Datacenter). We've managed to synchronize all the accounts from the
389DS to AD (about 44000). All the
On 05/15/2015 12:36 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:
HI LIst,
we are seeing some strange behavoiurs in our DS ( members of pluging is enabled)
if we add a user to a group we can't see that new user in group for some
minutes /days , the follwing curl returns 0 members in group but ( there were
On 04/17/2015 08:19 AM, Angel Bosch wrote:
I went through this with Mageia. You either need to enable selinux
(permissive) or compile 389-ds
without selinux.
do you mean I won't be able to execute it without selinux?
or is just the installer?
Please file a ticket -
On 04/14/2015 12:41 PM, Gary Algier wrote:
Hello,
I am in search of a tool to solve a new directory server issue in
relation to Active Directory...
For a long time here at work, we have had LDAP as our authentication
source and nsswitch source for Solaris and Linux. First it was the
On 04/07/2015 12:00 AM, William wrote:
I ran the following search:
ldapsearch -H ldap://localhost -b
'cn=nsAccountInactivationTmp,dc=example' -s sub -Z -x -D 'cn=Directory
Manager' -W '(objectClass=*)' '*'
I was trying to locate the object:
On 03/20/2015 11:28 AM, Joshua Brodie wrote:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.2/html/Administration_Guide/Managing_Replication-Using_the_Retro_Changelog_Plug_in.html
You should use the latest docs -
On 03/11/2015 11:54 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
Hey every one
I have a question I know at least once in the past i setup the admin
console so it could utilize Kerberos passwords based on a howto I
found once which after I changed jobs I could never find again.
today I was looking for
, then yes, for changes to the core 389-ds-base package.
On Mar 9, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho
On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote:
I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The
info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working
either , maybe they are not valid anymore.
They are not, and have been removed. It was just too difficult
using the old rmeggins repo or a copr repo, see
http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html
Thanks.
Is compiling from source our only option? Because, I can do that.
I'd just rather not have to.
On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg
On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com
mailto:nho...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have
1 - 100 of 1458 matches
Mail list logo