On 5/18/20 12:00 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
Lately, I've noticed that different tabs that I have open in Firefox are
crashing. This seems to have started recently. They can be restored
easily, but there's a nuisance factor here.
Anyone else?
Hardware/Software basic deets:
Dell XPS
On 5/18/20 1:46 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2020, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/18/20 1:21 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
Generally, I have lot of tabs open; also, once in a while I use a
large spreadsheet. The instability that I have described happens then.
What's the memory usage? F32 enabled
On Mon, 18 May 2020, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/18/20 1:21 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2020, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Interesting, how lately? I have a similarly-aged XPS 13 with an i7
processor and it has not crashed. I am on F32. I also have a more recent
(2018) XPS 13 which I am using
On 5/18/20 1:21 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2020, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Interesting, how lately? I have a similarly-aged XPS 13 with an i7
processor and it has not crashed. I am on F32. I also have a more
recent (2018) XPS 13 which I am using all the time nowadays but no
issues there
) Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
Lately, I've noticed that different tabs that I have open in Firefox are
crashing. This seems to have started recently. They can be restored
easily, but there's a nuisance factor here.
Anyone else?
Hardware/Software basic deets:
Dell XPS 13 L322X laptop, vintage
Pyziur wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Lately, I've noticed that different tabs that I have open in Firefox are
> crashing. This seems to have started recently. They can be restored
> easily, but there's a nuisance factor here.
>
> Anyone else?
>
> Hardware/Software ba
Greetings,
Lately, I've noticed that different tabs that I have open in Firefox are
crashing. This seems to have started recently. They can be restored
easily, but there's a nuisance factor here.
Anyone else?
Hardware/Software basic deets:
Dell XPS 13 L322X laptop, vintage circa 2013.
1TB
On Saturday, May 16, 2020 3:42:42 AM MST Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Until recently, Firefox had a feature I really liked and used a lot: if
> you clicked anywhere in a scroll bar other than on the slider, it would
> jump instantly to the top or bottom of the page. This seems to ha
On 05/16/2020 11:27 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
As I'm right-handed, this is pretty awkward. Never mind.
I'm right handed and do it all the time. Of course, I've always used
both hands when convenient, so it's not a problem for me.
___
users
On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 11:17 -0600, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/16/2020 10:04 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > That works, but it means looking away from the screen to find them, and
> > moving your hand away from the mouse.
>
> Then use both hands. One for the mouse, one for the keypad. HTH,
On 05/16/2020 10:04 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
That works, but it means looking away from the screen to find them, and
moving your hand away from the mouse.
Then use both hands. One for the mouse, one for the keypad. HTH, HAND.
___
users
On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 11:00 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> I am glad they fixed that "bug". The absolute setting it did have was
>
> generally useless on larger web pages, and on smaller web pages as Tim
>
> says, it was impossible to figure out where you wanted to be. I am
>
> not entirely
On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 11:58 +0100, ja wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 11:42 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Until recently, Firefox had a feature I really liked and used a lot: if
> > you clicked anywhere in a scroll bar other than on the slider, it would
> > jump
On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 18:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-05-16 18:42, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Until recently, Firefox had a feature I really liked and used a lot: if
> > you clicked anywhere in a scroll bar other than on the slider, it would
> > jump instantly
d
it given it was unusable.
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 8:06 AM Tim via users
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 11:42 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Until recently, Firefox had a feature I really liked and used a lot:
> > if you clicked anywhere in a scroll bar other than on the slider,
On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 11:42 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Until recently, Firefox had a feature I really liked and used a lot:
> if you clicked anywhere in a scroll bar other than on the slider, it
> would jump instantly to the top or bottom of the page. This seems to
&g
On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 11:42 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Until recently, Firefox had a feature I really liked and used a lot: if
> you clicked anywhere in a scroll bar other than on the slider, it would
> jump instantly to the top or bottom of the page. This seems to ha
On 2020-05-16 18:42, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Until recently, Firefox had a feature I really liked and used a lot: if
> you clicked anywhere in a scroll bar other than on the slider, it would
> jump instantly to the top or bottom of the page. This seems to have
> gone, and c
Until recently, Firefox had a feature I really liked and used a lot: if
you clicked anywhere in a scroll bar other than on the slider, it would
jump instantly to the top or bottom of the page. This seems to have
gone, and clicking just scrolls the way it does in most browsers. Does
anyone know
Hello people.
Thanks to everyone who worked on F32. It looks and runs great.
F32 seems a lot faster on my workstation. (AMD 3600X 64 GB RAM @ 3600MHz,
NVMe SSD.) Is KDE faster ? Firefox ? Kernel ?
It is amazing how Fedora/Linux keeps improving release after release.
Keep up the great work
On 4/30/20 3:06 PM, Peter Skensved wrote:
local> ssh -Y remote-ip
remote> firefox -no-remote
Note the -no-remote . It forces requests to come from the remote box rather
than the local one ( which is the default )
Normally, running "firefox" will try to contact an already
/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox
Do not fiddle with $DISPLAY. "ssh -Y" sets $DISPLAY for you, to a
display which is tunnelled _back_ over the ssh connection to your local
machine's X11 server.
You do need the "xauth" programme installed on the Mac in order for ssh
t
> Hi there,
>
> > I tried this:
> >
> > ssh -Y mac_ip
> >
> > export DISPLAY=:0
> >
> > $ /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox
> >
> > But no joy
> >
> > Thoughts? Is this possible?
>
> No idea abo
On Thu, 2020-04-30 at 17:46 -0400, Kevin Becker wrote:
> Even if you install an X server, the native Firefox is not going to use
> it to render. You may be able to compile a version to work but it will
> take more than just having X.
>
True, I was (mis)reading the situation as t
Even if you install an X server, the native Firefox is not going to use
it to render. You may be able to compile a version to work but it will
take more than just having X.
On Thu, 2020-04-30 at 22:37 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-30 at 10:11 -0600, S.Bob wrote:
> &g
On Thu, 2020-04-30 at 10:11 -0600, S.Bob wrote:
> I have a mac, I can ssh to it, I want to run a web browser FROM the mac
> but displayed on my Fedora 31 laptop.
>
>
> I tried this:
>
>
> ssh -Y mac_ip
>
> export DISPLAY=:0
>
> $ /Application
Hi there,
I tried this:
ssh -Y mac_ip
export DISPLAY=:0
$ /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox
But no joy
Thoughts? Is this possible?
No idea about the Mac, but the same thing on a Linux box instead of the Mac
works just with
local$ ssh -X remote_linux_box
remote
eem to remember way back in the day we used to ssh to a server, set
> our local display on that connection and then run a web browser FROM the
> ssh target but display the web browser on the source machine.
>
>
> I think we used to do this:
>
> ssh -Y target_machine
>
> e
>
>
> I think we used to do this:
>
> ssh -Y target_machine
>
> export DISPLAY=:0
>
> $ firefox &
>
>
>
> I have a mac, I can ssh to it, I want to run a web browser FROM the mac
> but displayed on my Fedora 31 laptop.
>
>
> I tried this:
>
>
$ firefox &
I have a mac, I can ssh to it, I want to run a web browser FROM the mac
but displayed on my Fedora 31 laptop.
I tried this:
ssh -Y mac_ip
export DISPLAY=:0
$ /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox
But no joy
Thoughts? Is this possible?
Thanks in advance
--
`When
Samuel,
Thank you.
I obviously have been confused between the meaning of "restart" and
"reboot."
I will try restarting Firefox next time the message appears, "Firefox must
me restarted."
___
users mailing list --
On 2020-03-17 23:22, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> On 2020-03-17 22:45, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> For a while now. firefox has a different behavior (font) for a specific web
>>> site.
>>> Actually, I have 2 machines, with the same installation, but the fonts
>>>
>
> On 2020-03-17 22:45, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > For a while now. firefox has a different behavior (font) for a specific web
> > site.
> > Actually, I have 2 machines, with the same installation, but the fonts
> > used for a specific website differs fro
On 2020-03-17 22:45, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> For a while now. firefox has a different behavior (font) for a specific web
> site.
> Actually, I have 2 machines, with the same installation, but the fonts
> used for a specific website differs from one machine to the other one.
>
Hello,
For a while now. firefox has a different behavior (font) for a specific web
site.
Actually, I have 2 machines, with the same installation, but the fonts
used for a specific website differs from one machine to the other one.
The preferences are identical (as much as I can say
Hi!
Did updates yesterday (or Saturday.. more likely) and suddenly Firefox
got 20% bigger. I've installed an extension to automatically reduce all
tab sizes to 80% but it doesn't work consistently.
I was wondering if i was the only one and if there was a more reasonable
fix than the addon I'm
an ABI break in it, that the
current firefox build has a dependency on:
My guess is nspr and nss.
Thanks for the hint!
Can confirm it: seems upgrading nss helped:
Updated to Firefox 72.0.1-1.fc30 here, and got empty pages. Updated
then nss, which in turn also upgraded a few more nss* packages
Stephen Morris writes:
Just for info, I installed F29 in a vm from scratch, and then upgraded to
F31 from F29. The upgrade installed Firefox V72 and for me it worked fine
(except under Wayland along with other packages). I don't normally use this
version of Firefox, I use the nightly
On 12/1/20 13:18, stan via users wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:03:05 -0500
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I held all Fedora updates for the last couple of weeks, and only
updated firefox in order to pick up the critical vulnerability fix. I
was planning to update fully again next week, but decided
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:03:05 -0500
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I held all Fedora updates for the last couple of weeks, and only
> updated firefox in order to pick up the critical vulnerability fix. I
> was planning to update fully again next week, but decided to just
> grab the firefo
Tom Horsley writes:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 15:42:02 -0500
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Is anyone also having problems with this update.
No problem here with firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64
I just went to cnn.com and it displayed stuff
normally (I don't usually use firefox, so this
is probably the fi
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 15:42:02 -0500
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Is anyone also having problems with this update.
No problem here with firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64
I just went to cnn.com and it displayed stuff
normally (I don't usually use firefox, so this
is probably the first time I months I've
Is anyone also having problems with this update.
It does …nothing. Opening any URL results in a brief "connecting", then an
empty page.
dnf downgrade returns me back to 69.0.1, looking for a more recent build in
bodhi…
pgpdfk2dA7lnd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 11:06:33 +0100
François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> I updated f30 and a new version of firefox came... and again, firefox
> does not use userChrome.css
>
> toolkit.legacyUserProfileCustomizations.stylesheets is set to true but
> firefox
On Sun, 08 Dec 2019 11:06:33 +0100, François Patte
wrote:
Bonjour,
I updated f30 and a new version of firefox came... and again, firefox
does not use userChrome.css
toolkit.legacyUserProfileCustomizations.stylesheets is set to true but
firefox 71 seems to not take this into account
Bonjour,
I updated f30 and a new version of firefox came... and again, firefox
does not use userChrome.css
toolkit.legacyUserProfileCustomizations.stylesheets is set to true but
firefox 71 seems to not take this into account!
SIGH! SIGH!
Does anyone know how to change this? I want to have
> On 2 Dec 2019, at 02:25, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> On 2019-12-02 10:01, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 12/1/19 7:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> MOZ_DISABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox
>> This test allowed Firefox to work properly, I have detachable tabs an
On 2019-12-01 15:32, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
After upgrading to Fedora 31 I've run into an issue with Firefox, I
can no longer detach a tab from the browser to put it into its own
window. I can drag a tab to another open browser window or to another
position within the same browser window but I
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 at 16:33, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> After upgrading to Fedora 31 I've run into an issue with Firefox, I can
> no longer detach a tab from the browser to put it into its own window.
> I can drag a tab to another open browser window or to another position
> within the
On 02.12.19 00:35, Ed Greshko wrote:
...
he dropped the diretory ~/.mozilla where extensions are in
at least on my system, where no extensions are installed via rpm packages.
Maybe there it looks different.
Good point.
The only exception may be that the OP has a FF account and that it
On 2019-12-02 10:01, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
>
>
> On 12/1/19 7:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> MOZ_DISABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox
> This test allowed Firefox to work properly, I have detachable tabs and the
> dropdowns working again. So now we think we know what is causing the
> p
On 12/1/19 7:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
MOZ_DISABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox
This test allowed Firefox to work properly, I have detachable tabs and
the dropdowns working again. So now we think we know what is causing
the problem, the question now is how to fix it?
In my case I've simply chosen
K, GNOME. I should have asked. I'm not a GNOME user.
>
> But, I have found the tab issue does not exist if you use GNOME-Xorg.
> Default is GNOME-Wayland.
>
> I don't know if this can be fixed.
>
If you want to run GNOME in wayland you can start FF from the terminal to tes
On 2019-12-02 07:52, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> I tried safemode, and was still unable to detach tabs.
>
> I also found something interesting, from the "about:preferences" page when I
> first start the web browser I can select the drop down menus, eg, default
> fonts, size etc, however once I attempt
e:
> > On 2019-12-02 07:17, sixpack13 wrote:
> > > On 02.12.19 00:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > > On 2019-12-02 06:36, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> > > > > I now deleted ~/.mozilla and ~/.cache/mozilla and allowed
> > > > > firefox to recreate the fil
ow deleted ~/.mozilla and ~/.cache/mozilla and allowed firefox to recreate
the files/directories upon restart.
I've also noticed that not only can I not tear tabs off to a new window, many
dropdown menu boxes will not work. This is not only on web pages but from
within the browser.
Is there
On 2019-12-02 07:17, sixpack13 wrote:
> On 02.12.19 00:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2019-12-02 06:36, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
>>> I now deleted ~/.mozilla and ~/.cache/mozilla and allowed firefox to
>>> recreate the files/directories upon restart.
>>>
>>> I
On 02.12.19 00:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2019-12-02 06:36, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
I now deleted ~/.mozilla and ~/.cache/mozilla and allowed firefox to recreate
the files/directories upon restart.
I've also noticed that not only can I not tear tabs off to a new window, many
dropdown menu boxes
On 2019-12-02 06:36, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> I now deleted ~/.mozilla and ~/.cache/mozilla and allowed firefox to recreate
> the files/directories upon restart.
>
> I've also noticed that not only can I not tear tabs off to a new window, many
> dropdown menu boxes will not work. T
I now deleted ~/.mozilla and ~/.cache/mozilla and allowed firefox to
recreate the files/directories upon restart.
I've also noticed that not only can I not tear tabs off to a new window,
many dropdown menu boxes will not work. This is not only on web pages
but from within the browser
On 2019-12-02 04:32, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> After upgrading to Fedora 31 I've run into an issue with Firefox, I can no
> longer detach a tab from the browser to put it into its own window. I can
> drag a tab to another open browser window or to another position within the
> same br
After upgrading to Fedora 31 I've run into an issue with Firefox, I can
no longer detach a tab from the browser to put it into its own window.
I can drag a tab to another open browser window or to another position
within the same browser window but I can not drag it to a new window by
itself
On 11/28/19 8:36 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 15:17 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:43:06PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
In the upcoming Fedora 32, is Firefox defaulting to DNS over HTTPS
(RFC
8484)?
No. firefox in fedora will not default enable
On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 13:36 +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> Great to hear that Fedora is shielding us from these half-baked ideas
+1
It does sound like a bad new idea to me. For it to work effectively,
you'd have to change every bit of software (not just web browsers) to
do DNS look-ups in a
On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 15:17 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:43:06PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > In the upcoming Fedora 32, is Firefox defaulting to DNS over HTTPS
> > (RFC
> > 8484)?
>
> No. firefox in fedora will not defau
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:43:06PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> In the upcoming Fedora 32, is Firefox defaulting to DNS over HTTPS (RFC
> 8484)?
No. firefox in fedora will not default enable this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751410#c2
kevin
signature.asc
Descriptio
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-dns-over-https
Firefox allows users (via settings) and organizations (*via enterprise policies
and a canary domain lookup*)
to disable DoH when it interferes with a preferred policy.
If you run your own DNS server you can configure the canary
On 2019-11-28 05:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> In the upcoming Fedora 32, is Firefox defaulting to DNS over HTTPS (RFC 8484)?
>
> BTW, I am currently on F30 and will skip to F32 when it ships.
>
> If you want a high-level discuss on DNS over TLS or over HTTPS see:
>
> http
In the upcoming Fedora 32, is Firefox defaulting to DNS over HTTPS (RFC
8484)?
BTW, I am currently on F30 and will skip to F32 when it ships.
If you want a high-level discuss on DNS over TLS or over HTTPS see:
https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/telecom/security/the-fight-over-encrypted-dns
rchives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
additional info:
Firefox are not working properly on mylaptop with intel i915
driver, but they are fine on Wayland with AMD graphics: I filed a bug
against Firefox but I suppose that it is a wrong component
--
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 31 (Workstati
On 11/12/19 1:33 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 01:06:36PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
## Enable Wayland backend?
##
if true && ! [ $MOZ_DISABLE_WAYLAND ]; then
Are you on F31? They must have changed it there. On F30, that line
starts with "if false".
On 11/12/19 1:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/13/19 5:06 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Are you on F31? They must have changed it there. On F30, that line
starts with "if false".
Yes, and the OP did reference F31 in this thread.
I did go back to check, but I see now. An indirect reference in the
On 11/13/19 5:06 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/12/19 2:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/12/19 5:21 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/11/19 11:19 AM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 17:55 +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
shall I moveto Firefox-wayland when I use wayland? if I switch
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 01:06:36PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >## Enable Wayland backend?
> >##
> >if true && ! [ $MOZ_DISABLE_WAYLAND ]; then
>
> Are you on F31? They must have changed it there. On F30, that line
> starts with "if false".
On 11/12/19 2:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/12/19 5:21 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/11/19 11:19 AM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 17:55 +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
shall I moveto Firefox-wayland when I use wayland? if I switch to
Gnome
classic what happens??
IIRC
On 11/12/19 5:21 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/11/19 11:19 AM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 17:55 +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
shall I moveto Firefox-wayland when I use wayland? if I switch to
Gnome
classic what happens??
IIRC, for GNOME, Wayland is the default
On 11/11/2019 23:35, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/12/19 7:03 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
so, my Fedora 31 has been updated from Fedora 6 and the only package for
firefox is firefox-70.0-1.fc31.x86_64 . Is it correct???
firefox-wayland-70.0-1.fc31 is available for F31.
I'm new to Fedora
On 11/12/19 7:03 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
so, my Fedora 31 has been updated from Fedora 6 and the only package for firefox is firefox-70.0-1.fc31.x86_64 . Is it correct???
firefox-wayland-70.0-1.fc31 is available for F31.
FWIW, this package provides 2 files.
/usr/bin/firefox-wayland
Samuel Sieb ha scritto il 11/11/19 alle 22:21:
On 11/11/19 11:19 AM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 17:55 +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
shall I moveto Firefox-wayland when I use wayland? if I switch to
Gnome
classic what happens??
IIRC, for GNOME, Wayland is the default
I'm running FF-wayland on Gnome classic.
I feel (not mesured) it starts/acts soemwhat faster (Intel onbord graphic if
this matters)
same goes for Thunderbird.
To me running the desktop on wayland has some nasty copy bugs.
if you want to do it as me don't forget to swap FF and TB with their
On 11/11/19 11:19 AM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 17:55 +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
shall I moveto Firefox-wayland when I use wayland? if I switch to
Gnome
classic what happens??
IIRC, for GNOME, Wayland is the default and firefox-wayland is the
default. You can install
On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 17:55 +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
> shall I moveto Firefox-wayland when I use wayland? if I switch to
> Gnome
> classic what happens??
IIRC, for GNOME, Wayland is the default and firefox-wayland is the
default. You can install and run firefox-x11 even whe
shall I moveto Firefox-wayland when I use wayland? if I switch to Gnome
classic what happens??
I am confused
--
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 31 (Workstation)
Thunderbird 68
Fujitsu
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 07:57:52 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
> I made a test switching from Gnome wayland to Gnome classic ans
> urprise it works as expected. So, I am going to file for a bug
> (component to blame is wayland I suppose)
That explains why I didn't see it, I run X.
antonio montagnani ha scritto il 10/11/19 alle 07:57:
stan via users ha scritto il 10/11/19 alle 01:42:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 22:20:36 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
after upgrading to F31, when I use the Noscript add-on for Firefox, I
note that I cannot set different options (Trusted
stan via users ha scritto il 10/11/19 alle 01:42:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 22:20:36 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
after upgrading to F31, when I use the Noscript add-on for Firefox, I
note that I cannot set different options (Trusted, untrusted and so
on) because mouse must be shifted left
stan via users ha scritto il 10/11/19 alle 01:42:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 22:20:36 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
after upgrading to F31, when I use the Noscript add-on for Firefox, I
note that I cannot set different options (Trusted, untrusted and so
on) because mouse must be shifted left
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 22:20:36 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
> after upgrading to F31, when I use the Noscript add-on for Firefox, I
> note that I cannot set different options (Trusted, untrusted and so
> on) because mouse must be shifted left compared to the right
> position, I ap
On 11/9/19 12:42 PM, Frank Elsner wrote:
the firefox of the Fedora Live system doesn't play videos which require a H.264
handler.
How to enable playing of H.264 videos? Without that I can't install.
I saw some mention that the openh264 codec was being improved to handle
playing all h264
after upgrading to F31, when I use the Noscript add-on for Firefox, I
note that I cannot set different options (Trusted, untrusted and so on)
because mouse must be shifted left compared to the right position, I
apologize if I am not clear
Is anybody using Noscript add-on??
Antonio Montagnani
Hello,
the firefox of the Fedora Live system doesn't play videos which require a H.264
handler.
How to enable playing of H.264 videos? Without that I can't install.
And is the Fedora Workstation release better?
Kind regards,
Frank Elsner
After upgrading to F31, I cannot change options in the list, i.e. from
Trusted to temporarily trusted. What I am missing??
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 31 Workstation
da/from Gmail
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:05:55 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> Le 17/09/2019 à 17:43, Ted Roche a écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:59 AM François Patte
> > cite: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/69.0/releasenotes/
>
> OK! Fine! So I follow the instructions
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/09/2019 à 17:43, Ted Roche a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:59 AM François Patte
> <mailto:francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr>> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>
> Bonjour,
>
&
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:59 AM François Patte <
francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bonjour,
>
> While upgrading to firefox 69, the css syntax to configure firefox
> seems to have been changed (once
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
While upgrading to firefox 69, the css syntax to configure firefox
seems to have been changed (once more. programmers think that
people have time to waste!) .
Once upon a time, I found the syntax to have my tab-bar below the
other bars
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:40:12 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> No, I don't want to use it, I just want to use one profile and not to
> have to reconfigure everything because a new version of firefox has
> come It seems to be the case for version 68, because when
> downgrading to
just an idea: copy your full folder ./mozilla somewhere (on a USB stick)
then upgrade Firefox, don't start Firefox, then copy from the USB stick to
your system and restart Firefox
Let me know
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 30 Workstation
da/from Gmail
Il giorno sab 31 ago 2019 alle ore 17:41
Le 31/08/2019 à 17:30, stan via users a écrit :
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 15:08:22 +0200
> François Patte wrote:
>> I have just upgraded to f30 from f29.
>>
>> As I wanted to use firefox, I had a warning: "create a new
>> profile".
>>
>>
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 15:08:22 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> I have just upgraded to f30 from f29.
>
> As I wanted to use firefox, I had a warning: "create a new
> profile".
>
> Why I can't use my previous profile?
>
> I tried to create a new profile an
401 - 500 of 3244 matches
Mail list logo
