Any info how to obtain the PID of FF from FF instance?
On 05/13/2017 07:43 PM, JD wrote:
If you have multiple instances of FF running, each for a different
profile,
is there a way for each FF instance to be queried about it's PID?
These multiple instances of FF for different profiles are each
If you have multiple instances of FF running, each for a different profile,
is there a way for each FF instance to be queried about it's PID?
These multiple instances of FF for different profiles are each run with the
additional option -no-remote .
Thanx!
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 09:11:25AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > Oh ... firefox-49.0-2.fc25 is base fc25 version :-(
> >
> > Does anyone know where to find firefox-52.0-7.fc25.x86_64 ?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=873028
>
>
> (Fo
On 04/15/17 09:06, pat...@aracnet.com wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 05:56:17PM -0700, pat...@aracnet.com wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:41:01AM -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
>>> I've go so many messages like this from the most recent firefox that it is
>>&
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 05:56:17PM -0700, pat...@aracnet.com wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:41:01AM -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > I've go so many messages like this from the most recent firefox that it is
> > unusable. I have tried removing all extensions, etc
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:41:01AM -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> I've go so many messages like this from the most recent firefox that it is
> unusable. I have tried removing all extensions, etc. and disabling hardware
> acceleration, but without any improvement. Therefor I d
Hi,
Same for me, firefox is nearly unusable, in particular with google
mail: crash as soon as I try to attach a file to an email. Also crash
with some simple sites.
I am also running KDE.
Frédéric
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
able here.
That sounds like more than a firefox issue. I'm surprised firefox even
gets to say "Gah. Your tab just crashed" if the system is locking up.
That sounds more like X is having a problem, or perhaps the video
driver. Scenario: X gives firefox an error message, firefox pu
s
> > 4-core true Intel processor
> > 8 Gb RAM
> > Fedora-25 up to date
> > KDE-5.8.6
> > Firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
>
> F25 up to date, same firefox, but AMD hardware, and I use LXDE started
> with startx from multiuser (old runlevel 3).
>
&
. It can get it wrong, and misdiagnose
an English page as some other language, and mess up the page display.
Though it's usually just an ugly mess, rather than a completely
unreadable mess.
Firefox has some related Font settings around the same part of its
preferences as the default
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 20:46 +0200, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > > firefox now shows characters as squares instead of normal letters so
> > > that it is unusable.
> >
> > On all pages, or just some?
>
> It's funny you ask that question
>> firefox now shows characters as squares instead of normal letters so
>> that it is unusable.
>
> On all pages, or just some?
It's funny you ask that question because I did not look further: just
searched anything on google like "bonjour".
Now I have tested other
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 17:55 +0200, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> firefox now shows characters as squares instead of normal letters so
> that it is unusable.
On all pages, or just some?
> I removed all history but it did not change anything.
> I created a new profile but it is still the
firefox now shows characters as squares instead of normal letters so
that it is unusable.
I removed all history but it did not change anything.
I created a new profile but it is still the same.
I found one thing that works: untick "allow websites to use their own fonts".
But why?
I
up to date
> KDE-5.8.6
> Firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
F25 up to date, same firefox, but AMD hardware, and I use LXDE started
with startx from multiuser (old runlevel 3).
> Firefox has problems with the system and with KDE's Plasma desktop.
> If I open too many tabs in Firefox, more
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 13:43 -0700, stan wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:41:01 -0700
> Jonathan Ryshpan <jonr...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > I've go so many messages like this from the most recent firefox that
> > it is unusable. I have tried removing all extensions, etc.
On 04/11/2017 08:22 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:41:01 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
I've go so many messages like this from the most recent firefox that it is
unusable. I have tried removing all extensions, etc. and disabling hardware
acceleration, but without any
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:41:01 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> I've go so many messages like this from the most recent firefox that it is
> unusable. I have tried removing all extensions, etc. and disabling hardware
> acceleration, but without any improvement. Therefor I d
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:41:01 -0700
Jonathan Ryshpan <jonr...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> I've go so many messages like this from the most recent firefox that
> it is unusable. I have tried removing all extensions, etc. and
> disabling hardware acceleration, but without any improvemen
I've go so many messages like this from the most recent firefox that it is
unusable. I have tried removing all extensions, etc. and disabling hardware
acceleration, but without any improvement. Therefor I downgraded to
firefox-49.0-2.fc25, which seems to be working OK. The problem appears
ous Quit, but from a very very old set of tabs and windows.
Hot sure why it is doing this.
Any hints of what file contains that old set of tabs and windows
so I can clear it?
Quite FF
cd ~/.mozilla/firefox/yourprofile
rm sessions/*
rm sessionstore-backups/*
rm sessionstore.js
Hi all,
Tr
m a very very old set of tabs and windows.
>
> Hot sure why it is doing this.
>
> Any hints of what file contains that old set of tabs and windows
> so I can clear it?
Quite FF
cd ~/.mozilla/firefox/yourprofile
rm sessions/*
rm sessionstore-backups/*
rm sessionstore.js
--
age that says the information is stored in sessionstore
> files in the firefox profile directory. Look at the section starting
> with 'the backup'.
>
> http://www.ghacks.net/2013/06/03/how-to-restore-firefox-
> sessions-if-session-restore-is-not-working-correctly/
>
> If that d
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 20:17:11 -0600
JD <jd1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any hints of what file contains that old set of tabs and windows
> so I can clear it?
I found this page that says the information is stored in sessionstore
files in the firefox profile directory. Look at the sect
For a long time I had my FF start up with the setting:
Show my windows and tabs from last time.
Well, for some reason, when I shut down FF (File -> Quit),
and restart, it restarts not from the tabs and windows of
previous Quit, but from a very very old set of tabs and windows.
Hot sure why it
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:03:47 -0700
Konstantin Svist <fry@gmail.com> wrote:
> I keep hitting this issue, too..
> The problem happens when you dnf update flash-plugin while firefox is
> running. Firefox writes its cache of plugin info, pluginreg.dat, on
> quit -- but it uses
Den 2017-03-29 kl. 18:38, skrev Fred Smith:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:03:47AM -0700, Konstantin Svist wrote:
>>I keep hitting this issue, too..
...
>
> Fred
>>HTH
>>On 03/28/2017 07:52 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>>
>>No, further research sh
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:03:47AM -0700, Konstantin Svist wrote:
>I keep hitting this issue, too..
>The problem happens when you dnf update flash-plugin while firefox is
>running. Firefox writes its cache of plugin info, pluginreg.dat, on
>quit -- but it uses the in
I keep hitting this issue, too..
The problem happens when you dnf update flash-plugin while firefox is
running. Firefox writes its cache of plugin info, pluginreg.dat, on quit
-- but it uses the in-memory info to do that. In the case above, the old
version number is written to the cache file
No, further research shows me it's Firefox and its' API
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>
wrote:
> On 03/28/2017 09:07 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>
>> Firefox is complaining about flash not being up to date. I believe i
>> have the l
On 03/28/2017 09:07 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
Firefox is complaining about flash not being up to date. I believe i
have the latest of both.
dnf list installed | grep -e firefox -e flash-plugin
firefox.x86_64 52.0-6.fc25 @updates
flash-plugin.x86_64 25.0.0.127-release
Is FireFox complaining, or are you getting that error when you
navigate to a website?
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Terry Polzin <foxec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Firefox is complaining about flash not being up to date. I believe i have
> the latest of both.
>
> dnf list i
Firefox is complaining about flash not being up to date. I believe i have
the latest of both.
dnf list installed | grep -e firefox -e flash-plugin
firefox.x86_64 52.0-6.fc25
@updates
flash-plugin.x86_64 25.0.0.127-release
@adobe-linux-x86_64
Allegedly, on or about 14 March 2017, Robert Moskowitz sent:
> Perhaps I stepped on something in Firefox. My system
> did crash last night, and I did restart Firefox (but did a resume
> windows not a fresh restart). I really can't just quit Firefox and
> start 'clean', as
. Perhaps I stepped on something in Firefox. My system
did crash last night, and I did restart Firefox (but did a resume
windows not a fresh restart). I really can't just quit Firefox and
start 'clean', as there are 20+ Firefox windows open, all with multiple
tabs...
Thanks for any help
Hello,
There was a problem I was facing when installing flatpak fedora so I googled
and found the issue here :
https://github.com/xhorak/firefox-devedition-flatpak/issues/1
Now here :
https://github.com/xhorak/firefox-devedition-flatpak/issues/1#issuecomment-272406295
there is a solution
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 09:35:50 -0800
Paolo Galtieri <pgalti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Like I said in one of my other posts, firefox runs just fine on one
> of my other F25 systems. The system of which it fails is one that I
> initially tried to upgrade from F22 -> F25, this failed
Like I said in one of my other posts, firefox runs just fine on one of
my other F25 systems. The system of which it fails is one that I
initially tried to upgrade from F22 -> F25, this failed, so I did a F22
-> F24 upgrade. However, after the system finished upgrading and I
logge
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:21:37 -0800
Paolo Galtieri <pgalti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried logging in as myself using the Gnome Classic desktop and
> firefox still crashes. I created a new user and after logging in as
> that user I ran firefox and it still crashes.
I don't have
Corey,
I tried what you suggested. I downloaded the archive and ran the dnf
buildep firefox and that version of firefox works. What's interesting
is that the firefox directory contains several libraries that do not
exist in /usr/lib64/firefox. For example there are several nss related
I tried logging in as myself using the Gnome Classic desktop and firefox
still crashes. I created a new user and after logging in as that user I
ran firefox and it still crashes.
Paolo
On 01/14/2017 10:18 AM, stan wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:04:24 -0800
Paolo Galtieri <pgalti...@gmail.
Yes I did run dnf distro-sync and it did update packages, but it made no
difference.
Paolo
On 01/14/2017 02:01 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
dnf distro-sync
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 14 January 2017 at 01:18, Paolo Galtieri <pgalti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After my rather strange upgrade to F25 from F22 documented in a previous
> email to this list "Issue upgrading to F25" I'm now having an issue with
> firefox. Firefox will crash on startup. I tr
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:04:24 -0800
Paolo Galtieri <pgalti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've checked all the libraries and the checksums match the libraries
> on the system where firefox works fine.
You've discovered non-deterministic binaries! :-)
Is it possible it is an obsolete ad
I've checked all the libraries and the checksums match the libraries on
the system where firefox works fine.
Paolo
On 01/14/2017 09:38 AM, stan wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:04:10 -0800
Paolo Galtieri <pgalti...@gmail.com> wrote:
I tried removing firefox and re-installing it and it di
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:04:10 -0800
Paolo Galtieri <pgalti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried removing firefox and re-installing it and it did pull in
> updated packages, but it still crashes.
Since this is an upgraded system, is it possible that there is an
obscure library hanging around
I tried removing firefox and re-installing it and it did pull in updated
packages, but it still crashes.
Paolo
On 01/13/2017 03:54 PM, stan wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:18:43 -0800
Paolo Galtieri <pgalti...@gmail.com> wrote:
Anyone have any idea what's going on and how I c
On 01/13/2017 11:18 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> After my rather strange upgrade to F25 from F22 documented in a
> previous email to this list "Issue upgrading to F25" I'm now having an
> issue with firefox. Firefox will crash on startup. I tried starting
> in safe-mode and
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:18:43 -0800
Paolo Galtieri <pgalti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone have any idea what's going on and how I can fix the problem?
I don't know, but it seems that libraries are out of sync with the
binaries. You could try a dnf reinstall of firefox to see if it w
After my rather strange upgrade to F25 from F22 documented in a previous
email to this list "Issue upgrading to F25" I'm now having an issue with
firefox. Firefox will crash on startup. I tried starting in safe-mode
and firefox still crashes. I removed the .mozilla directory a
Le 07/01/2017 11:10, François Patte a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> I just installed fedora 25 on my laptop. firefox 50 (or 49) is unable to
> display fonts if I put this css instruction:
>
> * {
> font-family: Freeserif, Helvetica, sans-serif;
> }
>
> If I comment t
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:06 PM, François Patte <
francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote:
> Le 07/01/2017 21:38, Jack Craig a écrit :
> > you might enjoy Firefox Developers Edition, it will out the failure in a
> > wonderful venue...
> >
> > Kudo's to MDN,
Le 07/01/2017 21:38, Jack Craig a écrit :
> you might enjoy Firefox Developers Edition, it will out the failure in a
> wonderful venue...
>
> Kudo's to MDN, IMHO, jackc...
More precisely?
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:10 AM, François Patte
> <francois.pa
you might enjoy Firefox Developers Edition, it will out the failure in a
wonderful venue...
Kudo's to MDN, IMHO, jackc...
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:10 AM, François Patte <
francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> I just installed fedora 25 on my laptop. fi
Le 07/01/2017 19:06, Tony Nelson a écrit :
> On 17-01-07 12:12:07, François Patte wrote:
> ...
>> I can see, using these tools, that the used font-family are correct, but
>> no text is displayed in firefox! Only decoration and images.
>>
>> I use xfce4.
>>
On 17-01-07 12:12:07, François Patte wrote:
...
I can see, using these tools, that the used font-family are correct,
but
no text is displayed in firefox! Only decoration and images.
I use xfce4.
I tried with another user account on the same machine and the problem
s
the same.
fc-list
Le 07/01/2017 15:16, Klaus-Peter Schrage a écrit :
> Am 07.01.2017 um 14:34 schrieb François Patte:
>> Le 07/01/2017 13:45, Tim a écrit :
>>> Allegedly, on or about 07 January 2017, François Patte sent:
>>>> I just installed fedora 25 on my laptop. firefox 50 (or 49)
Am 07.01.2017 um 14:34 schrieb François Patte:
Le 07/01/2017 13:45, Tim a écrit :
Allegedly, on or about 07 January 2017, François Patte sent:
I just installed fedora 25 on my laptop. firefox 50 (or 49) is unable
to
display fonts if I put this css instruction:
* {
font-family: Freeserif
Le 07/01/2017 13:45, Tim a écrit :
> Allegedly, on or about 07 January 2017, François Patte sent:
>> I just installed fedora 25 on my laptop. firefox 50 (or 49) is unable
>> to
>> display fonts if I put this css instruction:
>>
>> * {
>> font-f
Allegedly, on or about 07 January 2017, François Patte sent:
> I just installed fedora 25 on my laptop. firefox 50 (or 49) is unable
> to
> display fonts if I put this css instruction:
>
> * {
> font-family: Freeserif, Helvetica, sans-serif;
> }
>
> If I comment this
Bonjour,
I just installed fedora 25 on my laptop. firefox 50 (or 49) is unable to
display fonts if I put this css instruction:
* {
font-family: Freeserif, Helvetica, sans-serif;
}
If I comment this in the css file, I can see the text if not: all
decorations, and images are displayed
On 12/07/16 16:15, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Bob, do you have any sites to try
the plugin with? I just installed it
in Fedora 24 in FF53.0a1 and it
installed successfully and appears to
be enabled, but I'm not sure how/where
to use it.
+
Umatrix is working as it should now in
Firefox
On 12/07/2016 01:18 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to mention in my previous mail that for the time being
Mozilla are still supporting the NPAPI Flash plugin, but given that
Flash seems to be dying in favour of HTML 5, its probably debatable how
long that support will last.
that either.
Was there any more info in the error message?
+
Sorry but that's all I have for now. I'll try FF05 again when I have
time but for the moment I will just "# dnf upgrade --exclude=firefox"
since FF49 works.
Thanks,
Bob
Hi Bob, do you have any sites to try the plugin wi
that either.
Was there any more info in the error message?
+
Sorry but that's all I have for now. I'll try FF05 again when I have
time but for the moment I will just "# dnf upgrade --exclude=firefox"
since FF49 works.
Thanks,
Bob
Sorry, I forgot to mention in my pre
On 11/26/2016 12:21 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
If I open too many tabs in Firefox, it becomes extremely slow, sometimes
too slow to be usable. If I terminate it when it's slow, very
frequently KDE's Plasma Workspace (shell) crashes; fortunately Plasma
Workspace always restarts quickly
If I open too many tabs in Firefox, it becomes extremely slow, sometimes too
slow to be usable. If I terminate it when it's slow, very frequently KDE's
Plasma Workspace (shell) crashes; fortunately Plasma Workspace always restarts
quickly. The bug can't be reported by gnome-abrt, since
2016-11-25 12:54 GMT+01:00, Bob Goodwin <bobgood...@fastmail.us>:
> On 11/25/16 05:23, Andras Simon wrote:
>> FWIW Umatrix works here on F23 with Firefox 50.
>>
>> Andras
> +
> Strange, one more reason for me to go
> back and try again. I certainly had a
On 11/25/16 05:23, Andras Simon wrote:
FWIW Umatrix works here on F23 with Firefox 50.
Andras
+
Strange, one more reason for me to go
back and try again. I certainly had a
problem I never saw before, doing
nothing out of the ordinary ...
This is Fedora 25, began as the alpha
version
in the error
message?
+
Sorry but that's all I have for now.
I'll try FF05 again when I have time but
for the moment I will just "# dnf
upgrade --exclude=firefox" since FF49 works.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10 FEDORA-25/
2016-11-25 1:47 GMT+01:00, Bob Goodwin <bobgood...@fastmail.us>:
> Does anyone know why Firefox no longer
> allows the umatrix addon, not since the
> update to Firefox 50 two days ago.
> Umatrix was removed and would not
> install. I had to downgrade to Firefox
> 49
On 11/25/2016 12:20 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 11/25/16 01:44, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/24/2016 10:34 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
My question is why has Mozilla decided not to allow it? In the past it
has said an addon
is not compatible with a new version, however in this case it just says
Firefox
On 11/25/16 01:44, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/24/2016 10:34 PM, Bob Goodwin
wrote:
My question is why has Mozilla
decided not to allow it? In the past it
has said an addon
is not compatible with a new version,
however in this case it just says
Firefox will not
install it implying something
On 11/24/2016 10:34 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
My question is why has Mozilla decided not to allow it? In the past it
has said an addon
is not compatible with a new version, however in this case it just says
Firefox will not
install it implying something else ...
Most likely it's not signed
number of ways
to do this,
the umatrix addon is [for me] the best
I've tried so far. I don't have to mute
the audio
or suffer the distraction of a video
clip playing while I read.
I had been using it and suddenly it
stopped working after a daily Fedora 25
update, Firefox
had been replaced wit
On Nov 24, 2016 8:16 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 11/24/16 19:53, jd1008 wrote:
> > Just curious!
> > What does umatrix do for FF?
>
> +
>
> Most important to me is it is a simple
> way to eliminate the "talking heads" on
> Fox News, etc. I just want to read the
> text I
On 11/24/16 19:53, jd1008 wrote:
Just curious!
What does umatrix do for FF?
+
Most important to me is it is a simple
way to eliminate the "talking heads" on
Fox News, etc. I just want to read the
text I select, otherwise I might watch TV.
Bob
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
On 11/24/2016 05:47 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Does anyone know why Firefox no longer allows the umatrix addon, not
since the update to Firefox 50 two days ago. Umatrix was removed and
would not install. I had to downgrade to Firefox 49 and install a copy
from the umatrix web page to get it back
Does anyone know why Firefox no longer
allows the umatrix addon, not since the
update to Firefox 50 two days ago.
Umatrix was removed and would not
install. I had to downgrade to Firefox
49 and install a copy from the umatrix
web page to get it back again.
Bob
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni
On 16/11/16 08:41, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently using Nightly V53 of Firefox and a lot of the plugins
provided by Fedora that I have installed Firefox refuses to use, this
included the Gnome Shell Integration plugin. It appears
On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently using Nightly V53 of Firefox and a lot of the plugins
> provided by Fedora that I have installed Firefox refuses to use, this
> included the Gnome Shell Integration plugin. It appears that as of
> F
Hi,
I'm currently using Nightly V53 of Firefox and a lot of the plugins
provided by Fedora that I have installed Firefox refuses to use, this
included the Gnome Shell Integration plugin. It appears that as of
Firefox Release V52 onwards which appears to be scheduled for around the
end
into the REMOTE machine.
>
> 4. Verify you have a DISPLAY variable set by doing
> "echo $DISPLAY" on the REMOTE machine. You should get a value
> like "localhost:10.0", indicating you have X forwarded.
>
> 5. Run "firefox&qu
On 6 February 2016 at 19:11, Sam Varshavchik <mr...@courier-mta.com> wrote:
> The popular theme font size changer Firefox plugin,
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/, no
> longer supports Linux.
>
> The default Firefox font size is
variable set by doing
> "echo $DISPLAY" on the REMOTE machine. You should get a value
> like "localhost:10.0", indicating you have X forwarded.
>
> 5. Run "firefox" on the REMOTE machine. The display should pop
> up on your local
On 10/19/2016 07:35 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:29 +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> Be aware though that Firefox seems to try to be clever. I use this
>> technique from home to access intranet web sites by first making an
>> inbound SSH connection. However, if I
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:29 +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Be aware though that Firefox seems to try to be clever. I use this
> technique from home to access intranet web sites by first making an
> inbound SSH connection. However, if I already have Firefox running
> locally, then
aha...
ok.. think i've got a partial solution.
as root
xhost +
--not exactly sure what this does -- need to reseach,
but it appears to allow other users/processes access to the
x env.. (this explanation is prob way wrong!!)
login as user foo
su - foo
do a 'firefox -p -no-remote
There are many pages on SSH X forwarding. I'd suggest a quick Google to find
them.
However, very quickly, you need to ensure that you have
X11Forwarding yes
in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config file on the remote box
Be aware though that Firefox seems to try to be clever. I use this technique
from
On 10/19/16 12:23, bruce wrote:
Hi.
This is a "continuation" of the issue of starting firefox for a diff
user on a box.
If one logs into (SSH) into a remote box, and wants to start firefox
on the remote machine, such that all firefox operations occur on the
remote machine..
Diffe
Hi.
This is a "continuation" of the issue of starting firefox for a diff
user on a box.
If one logs into (SSH) into a remote box, and wants to start firefox
on the remote machine, such that all firefox operations occur on the
remote machine..
Different sites suggest setting the D
On 11/10/16 22:23, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 10 October 2016 at 22:47, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 11/10/16 03:37, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 9 October 2016 at 23:03, Stephen Morris
wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Thunderbird 52.0a1 and I have an issue
On 10 October 2016 at 22:47, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 11/10/16 03:37, Ahmad Samir wrote:
>>
>> On 9 October 2016 at 23:03, Stephen Morris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm using Thunderbird 52.0a1 and I have an issue with the forward
>>>
On 11/10/16 03:37, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 9 October 2016 at 23:03, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Thunderbird 52.0a1 and I have an issue with the forward and
backward steppers (top and bottom arrows on scrollbars) missing. In another
thread Tom Horsley
On 9 October 2016 at 23:03, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Thunderbird 52.0a1 and I have an issue with the forward and
> backward steppers (top and bottom arrows on scrollbars) missing. In another
> thread Tom Horsley provided a gtk-3 css script that
Hi,
I'm using Thunderbird 52.0a1 and I have an issue with the forward
and backward steppers (top and bottom arrows on scrollbars) missing. In
another thread Tom Horsley provided a gtk-3 css script that needed to be
placed in ~/.config/gtk-3.0/gtk.css. This script rectified the missing
essarily. A script can do more than a link because it can set up
> environment variables before calling the target program.
>
> > However even before writing the script, I did an experiment
> >
> > the file /usr/bin/firefox exists and has execute permission:
> > [ang
gt; However even before writing the script, I did an experiment
>
> the file /usr/bin/firefox exists and has execute permission:
> [angelo_dev@localhost ~]$ ls -l /usr/bin/firefox
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 6995 Nov 2 2015 /usr/bin/firefox
>
> *but is is not run :*
> [an
esult.
However even before writing the script, I did an experiment
the file /usr/bin/firefox exists and has execute permission:
[angelo_dev@localhost ~]$ ls -l /usr/bin/firefox
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 6995 Nov 2 2015 /usr/bin/firefox
*but is is not run :*
[angelo_dev@localhost ~]$ sudo /usr/bin/fi
On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 08:00 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> do you mean to change the location (the directory) of the script ?
[Please don't top-post, see the list Guidelines]
No, I mean create your own small script that calls the supplied one,
and put it in your own bin directory. Edit your
801 - 900 of 3244 matches
Mail list logo