Re: Missing openssl library files?

On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 11:51 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:43:49 + > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > dnf install makemkv > > There isn't a makemkv in either fedora or rpmfusion > repos for fedora 27. It's in the Negativo17 repo, see separate reply. poc

Re: Missing openssl library files?

On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 11:49 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > On 12/22/2017 11:43 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 11:36 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > > > Any ideas? > > > > dnf install makemkv > > > > poc > > ___ > > "Error: unable to find

Re: Missing openssl library files?

Rick Stevens wrote: > For example: > > sudo dnf groupinstall "Development Tools" > or > sudo dnf groupinstall 'Network Servers' > > Note that many of the groups have embedded spaces in their names, so > when you use them, enclose the names in single or double quotes. Also FWIW, you

Re: Missing openssl library files?

On 12/22/2017 10:26 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Temlakos > wrote: > > > How do I get a list of the groups dnf recognizes? That kind of group > installation would solve a lot of problems. Heretofore, it has

Re: Missing openssl library files?

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Temlakos wrote: > > How do I get a list of the groups dnf recognizes? That kind of group > installation would solve a lot of problems. Heretofore, it has been > available as a GUI only, and then only on initial installation of the OS. > To be

Re: Missing openssl library files?

On 12/22/2017 01:14 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:  Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Temlakos > wrote: checking openssl/opensslconf.h usability... no checking openssl/opensslconf.h presence... no checking for

Re: Missing openssl library files?

Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Temlakos wrote: > checking openssl/opensslconf.h usability... no >> checking openssl/opensslconf.h presence... no >> checking for openssl/opensslconf.h... no >> configure: error: in `/home/Temlakos/Downloads/make >> mkv/makemkv-oss-1.10.8': >>

Re: Missing openssl library files?

On 12/22/2017 12:35 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 12/22/2017 09:24 AM, Temlakos wrote: On 12/22/2017 11:49 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:36:44 -0500 Temlakos wrote: Anyone ever run into this? And how to fix it? Virtually everything in fedora has separate *-devel packages that

Re: Missing openssl library files?

On 12/22/2017 09:24 AM, Temlakos wrote: > On 12/22/2017 11:49 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:36:44 -0500 >> Temlakos wrote: >> >>> Anyone ever run into this? And how to fix it? >> Virtually everything in fedora has separate *-devel packages >> that contain the stuff you need to

Re: Missing openssl library files?

On 12/22/2017 11:49 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:36:44 -0500 Temlakos wrote: Anyone ever run into this? And how to fix it? Virtually everything in fedora has separate *-devel packages that contain the stuff you need to build code using those libs (separate from just the libs

Re: Missing openssl library files?

On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:43:49 + Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > dnf install makemkv There isn't a makemkv in either fedora or rpmfusion repos for fedora 27. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Missing openssl library files?

On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:36:44 -0500 Temlakos wrote: > Anyone ever run into this? And how to fix it? Virtually everything in fedora has separate *-devel packages that contain the stuff you need to build code using those libs (separate from just the libs needed to run already built programs). For

Re: Missing openssl library files?

On 12/22/2017 11:43 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 11:36 -0500, Temlakos wrote: Any ideas? dnf install makemkv poc ___ "Error: unable to find a match." MakeMKV is one of the Last of the Tarballs. In fact you need /two/

Re: Missing openssl library files?

On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 11:36 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > Any ideas? dnf install makemkv poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Missing openssl library files?

Everyone: Anyone ever run into this? And how to fix it? This is a fresh install of F27. I tried to build a program called MakeMKV. Here's the output of the configure script: checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

- Original Message - From: Gordon Messmer gordon.mess...@gmail.com To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 7:38:13 PM Subject: Re: dnf whatprovides and library files On 06/10/2015 12:24 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: But, just

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On 06/11/2015 02:03 AM, Radek Holy wrote: Anyone, feel free to file an RFE if you really need something mentioned in this thread. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230866 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

Matthew Miller wrote on 06/10/2015 08:11 PM: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:20:13AM -0400, Radek Holy wrote: BTW, RPM can do that: $ rpm --query --file /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 So, if RPM tracks these symlinks and if it provides an API to get this information, DNF could do the magic at least for the

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:20:13AM -0400, Radek Holy wrote: BTW, RPM can do that: $ rpm --query --file /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 So, if RPM tracks these symlinks and if it provides an API to get this information, DNF could do the magic at least for the installed packages. But maybe it could

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:38:38PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: I believe RPM isn't tracking the symlink — it's just canonicalizing the filename when you do the --query --file (or -qf). Easy to do _on_ the system, not so good when you're asking about a non-existent file. On installed files rpm

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On 06/10/15 16:20, Radek Holy wrote: BTW, RPM can do that: $ rpm --query --file /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 So, if RPM tracks these symlinks and if it provides an API to get this information, DNF could do the magic at least for the installed packages. But maybe it could become even more

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

- Original Message - From: Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 9:24:09 AM Subject: Re: dnf whatprovides and library files On 06/10/15 14:55, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 06/09/2015 04:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: I can't

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On 06/10/15 14:55, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 06/09/2015 04:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: I can't seem to get dnf to tell me what package supplies a library. ... [root@f22k ~]# ll /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 19664 Aug 17 2014 /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 [root@f22k ~]# dnf whatprovides

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On 06/09/2015 04:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: I can't seem to get dnf to tell me what package supplies a library. ... [root@f22k ~]# ll /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 19664 Aug 17 2014 /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 [root@f22k ~]# dnf whatprovides /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 That's the correct

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On 06/10/2015 12:24 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: But, just to be clear, the issue I'm addressing is what an average user may do in a given circumstance. Upon seeing an error message such as this one, error while loading shared libraries: /lib64/libexempi.so.3: file too short assuming they know of

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On 06/09/2015 04:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: What can I do to get whatprovides to work consistently? I know that yum is now deprecated, but does it still work for this? If so, there's a problem with dnf and you should file a bug report; if not dnf isn't part of the issue. -- users mailing

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On 06/10/15 08:02, Joe Zeff wrote: On 06/09/2015 04:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: What can I do to get whatprovides to work consistently? I know that yum is now deprecated, but does it still work for this? If so, there's a problem with dnf and you should file a bug report; if not dnf isn't

dnf whatprovides and library files

I can't seem to get dnf to tell me what package supplies a library. For example, on an F22 system [root@f22k ~]# ll /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 19664 Aug 17 2014 /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 [root@f22k ~]# dnf whatprovides /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 Last metadata expiration check

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 07:53:44AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: For example, on an F22 system [root@f22k ~]# ll /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 19664 Aug 17 2014 /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 $ file /lib64 /lib64: symbolic link to `usr/lib64' $ dnf whatprovides

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On 06/10/15 09:26, Ed Greshko wrote: I wonder why they left it up to the user to determine symbolic links are involved and not followed. Oh, well. To make things even more confusing, in my mind, is that it isn't as simple as symbolic links. [egreshko@meimei /]$ ll /usr/lib64/libXv.so.1

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:26:36AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: I wonder why they left it up to the user to determine symbolic links are involved and not followed. Oh, well. It's because what's being searched is the database of files provided by a package. The package doesn't actually provide the

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On 06/10/15 09:35, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:26:36AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: I wonder why they left it up to the user to determine symbolic links are involved and not followed. Oh, well. It's because what's being searched is the database of files provided by a package.

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On 06/10/15 09:09, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 07:53:44AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: For example, on an F22 system [root@f22k ~]# ll /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 19664 Aug 17 2014 /lib64/libXv.so.1.0.0 $ file /lib64 /lib64: symbolic link to `usr/lib64'

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:30:08AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: To make things even more confusing, in my mind, is that it isn't as simple as symbolic links. [egreshko@meimei /]$ ll /usr/lib64/libXv.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 14 Aug 17 2014 /usr/lib64/libXv.so.1 - libXv.so.1.0.0

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:12:58AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: While that does make sense it ends up being less than helpful for the average user to have to be aware of that. I dare say most end users don't care if a programmer has to jump through hoops to give a result which they feel

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On 06/10/15 11:13, Matthew Miller wrote: A 'usrmove provides' seems like a reasonable suggestion for a DNF plugin — cover the normal symlinks in Fedora. I'm seriously considering reviving my script writing skills to put a wrapper around dnf to deal with /bin, /lib, /lib64, and /sbin. :-) --

Re: dnf whatprovides and library files

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:24:09AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: A 'usrmove provides' seems like a reasonable suggestion for a DNF plugin — cover the normal symlinks in Fedora. I'm seriously considering reviving my script writing skills to put a wrapper around dnf to deal with /bin, /lib,

Re: ?? on library files

On 02/06/2010 08:38 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Jim wrote: I have installed NX-x86_64 and library files are in /usr/NX/lib and x86_64 can't find them there, i have linked a few of them from /usr/lib64/ but there are many more in /usr/NX/lib that are probably not being seen. How do I get all

?? on library files

I have installed NX-x86_64 and library files are in /usr/NX/lib and x86_64 can't find them there, i have linked a few of them from /usr/lib64/ but there are many more in /usr/NX/lib that are probably not being seen. How do I get all those library file in /usr/NX/lib to be in PATH so they can

Re: ?? on library files

Jim wrote: I have installed NX-x86_64 and library files are in /usr/NX/lib and x86_64 can't find them there, i have linked a few of them from /usr/lib64/ but there are many more in /usr/NX/lib that are probably not being seen. How do I get all those library file in /usr/NX/lib