On 3 June 2011 14:31, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:04:17PM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
On 3 June 2011 13:19, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:57:18AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 06/03/2011 05:39 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
ings.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se wrote:
On 06/02/2011 10:52 PM, Ron Yorston wrote:
If you're quick you can be the first to download it!
Downloaded :-) Will go to bed now though, but will take a look
tomorrow. Seem to solve some issues I have been having
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:52:48PM +0100, Ron Yorston wrote:
Have you tried my GNOME Shell frippery extensions?
http://intgat.tigress.co.uk/rmy/extensions/index.html
Some of that functionality is already available in extensions.
For the new functionality, could you propose them in GNOME
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 03:15:48PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
One possible problem with add-on extensions is that there is no
guarantee they will continue to work as things evolve (much like firefox
addons break as it evolves) unless they get absorbed into the core Gnome
shell or the addon
On 06/03/2011 05:39 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
ings.
Ideally extensions should be made available on an addons site similar to
what Firefox has. Then the timing problems becomes slightly less of an
issue.
Nothing like that is available at this moment though (help welcome:).
At the moment an
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:57:18AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 06/03/2011 05:39 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
ings.
Ideally extensions should be made available on an addons site similar to
what Firefox has. Then the timing problems becomes slightly less of an
issue.
Nothing like that
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:30:48PM +0200, sguazt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:52:48PM +0100, Ron Yorston wrote:
Have you tried my GNOME Shell frippery extensions?
On 3 June 2011 13:19, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:57:18AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 06/03/2011 05:39 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
ings.
I don't agree - I think the right solution is that extensions vie to
be accepted as part of Gnome Core - otherwise
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:04:17PM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
On 3 June 2011 13:19, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:57:18AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 06/03/2011 05:39 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
ings.
I don't agree - I think the right solution is
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:04:17PM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
On 3 June 2011 13:19, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:57:18AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 06/03/2011 05:39 AM, Olav Vitters
On 06/03/2011 05:19 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
I agree it is not nice. Still, Firefox works exactly the same.
Not quite. The addon site is run by Mozilla itself, there's at least a
semblance of quality control (New addons are marked experimental and
are only downloadable if you have an account
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 11:44:36AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
Not quite. The addon site is run by Mozilla itself, there's at least a
Only the site. The addons itself are made by various developers.
I said something like the addons site was being thought of. Just no
time, etc. So the site would be
On 06/03/2011 12:30 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 11:44:36AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
Not quite. The addon site is run by Mozilla itself, there's at least a
Only the site. The addons itself are made by various developers.
Of course. I didn't mean to suggest otherwise. I'm
On 06/03/2011 05:56 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/03/2011 12:30 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 11:44:36AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
Not quite. The addon site is run by Mozilla itself, there's at least a
Only the site. The addons itself are made by various developers.
Of course.
On 06/02/2011 02:10 AM, Digimer wrote:
With that in mind, I'm quickly coming to like Gnome 3. It has wrinkles,
but it is also a 3.0 release. I think it has a lot of promise, and I
think people will come to like it as they get used to it. :)
My biggest problem with Gnome 3 is that things that I
On 06/02/2011 02:57 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
My biggest problem with Gnome 3 is that things that I could do by moving
the mouse, and a single mouse click, now needs several moves and several
mouse clicks, this severely disrupts my work flow. At the moment I have
moved to Xfce (which
On 06/02/2011 11:57 AM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
My biggest problem with Gnome 3 is that things that I could do by moving
the mouse, and a single mouse click, now needs several moves and several
mouse clicks, this severely disrupts my work flow.
Interesting. Wasn't one of the big selling
On 06/02/2011 03:22 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/02/2011 11:57 AM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
My biggest problem with Gnome 3 is that things that I could do by moving
the mouse, and a single mouse click, now needs several moves and several
mouse clicks, this severely disrupts my work flow.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 06/02/2011 02:57 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
My biggest problem with Gnome 3 is that things that I could do by moving
the mouse, and a single mouse click, now needs several moves and several
mouse clicks, this
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Pasha R pashar...@gmail.com wrote:
My problem with extensions is that there is no easy way to enable and
disable them on the fly and per user. All extensions I tried were
activated for all users when installed and required logoff to be
activated. It is
Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
Sadly the things mentioned in the links earlier in the thread does not
solve my issues fully.
Have you tried my GNOME Shell frippery extensions?
http://intgat.tigress.co.uk/rmy/extensions/index.html
While you lot have been chattering here I've been busy releasing
On 06/02/2011 10:52 PM, Ron Yorston wrote:
If you're quick you can be the first to download it!
Downloaded :-) Will go to bed now though, but will take a look
tomorrow. Seem to solve some issues I have been having though.
Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
Dear folks,
For some users that still want to give Gnome 3.0 a chance, I found a site which
explains ways to get some of the things that they liked in prior Gnome
releases. Please check it out and see if they are beneficial
On 06/01/2011 07:54 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Dear folks,
For some users that still want to give Gnome 3.0 a chance, I found a site
which explains ways to get some of the things that they liked in prior Gnome
releases. Please check it out and see if they are beneficial
24 matches
Mail list logo
