On Fri, 2023-09-15 at 15:17 -0600, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 09/15/2023 03:11 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
> > The advantage btrfs has is that the volumes share the same space.
> > So
> > you can have / and /home be separate, but you don't have to decide
> > on
> > how much space each one gets. And
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 6:56 AM Tim via users
wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-09-16 at 09:17 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
> > From the *practical* side, perhaps it would be worth considering
> > whether your use case is the usual and common case - 6-16 GB RAM,
> > 500GB - 1TB disk, regular (hourly) backup,
> Am 15.09.2023 um 22:20 schrieb John Mellor :
>
>> ...
>>
> Umm, no.
> Fedora server uses LVM because that's what most people have upgraded from.
We had an intensive discussion on our working group about the default file
system. Obviously, I missed you? Or did I just imagine the extensive
> Am 15.09.2023 um 23:11 schrieb Samuel Sieb :
>
> The advantage btrfs has is that the volumes share the same space. So you can
> have / and /home be separate,
Think again, you hopefully recognize the 'contradictio in adiecto' yourself.
> And you can still do a re-install while keeping the
On Sat, 2023-09-16 at 09:17 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
> From the *practical* side, perhaps it would be worth considering
> whether your use case is the usual and common case - 6-16 GB RAM,
> 500GB - 1TB disk, regular (hourly) backup, etc.
I would say the *most* usual and common would be no backups
> Am 15.09.2023 um 23:05 schrieb Joe Zeff :
>
> On 09/15/2023 02:20 PM, John Mellor wrote:
>> Fedora desktop uses BTRFS by default for a number of really good reasons.
>> BTRFS detects bit-rot on the fly. With mirrored or RAIDed disks it can also
>> correct that bit-rot on the fly.
>
> And
On 09/15/2023 03:11 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
The advantage btrfs has is that the volumes share the same space. So
you can have / and /home be separate, but you don't have to decide on
how much space each one gets. And you can still do a re-install while
keeping the files in /home. Also, if
On 9/15/23 14:05, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 09/15/2023 02:20 PM, John Mellor wrote:
Fedora desktop uses BTRFS by default for a number of really good
reasons. BTRFS detects bit-rot on the fly. With mirrored or RAIDed
disks it can also correct that bit-rot on the fly.
And what advantages does
On 09/15/2023 02:20 PM, John Mellor wrote:
Fedora desktop uses BTRFS by default for a number of really good
reasons. BTRFS detects bit-rot on the fly. With mirrored or RAIDed
disks it can also correct that bit-rot on the fly.
And what advantages does either it or LVM have for a home user
On 2023-09-15 2:07 p.m., Peter Boy wrote:
Am 15.09.2023 um 17:23 schrieb Bill Cunningham :
WHat is the reason Peter behind xfs being used on the server edition
and btrfs on the workstation? I pretty much stick with ext3. I don't
even use ext4 really. I've never used xfs.
It is basically about
> Am 15.09.2023 um 17:23 schrieb Bill Cunningham :
>
>
>> ...
>>
>> WHat is the reason Peter behind xfs being used on the server edition and
>> btrfs on the workstation? I pretty much stick with ext3. I don't even use
>> ext4 really. I've never used xfs.
>
> Bill
It is basically about
Bill Cunningham composed on 2023-09-15 11:23 (UTC-0400):
>> WHat is the reason Peter behind xfs being used on the server edition and
>> btrfs on the workstation? I pretty much stick with ext3. I don't even use
>> ext4 really.
I use EXT3 and EXT4. EXT4 is much faster.
--
Evolution as taught in
On 9/15/2023 2:56 AM, Peter Boy wrote:
Am 15.09.2023 um 04:57 schrieb Felix Miata :
BTRFS devs seem to
think only one is somehow better due to its inclusion of LVM technology.
There is no „inclusion of LVM technology“ in BTRFS. LVM provides you with
several separate filesystems, completely
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 3:57 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 15.09.2023 um 04:57 schrieb Felix Miata :
> >
> > BTRFS devs seem to
> > think only one is somehow better due to its inclusion of LVM technology.
>
> There is no „inclusion of LVM technology“ in BTRFS. LVM provides you with
> several
Peter Boy composed on 2023-09-15 08:56 (UTC+0200):
>> Felix Miata composed:
>> BTRFS devs seem to
>> think only one is somehow better due to its inclusion of LVM technology.
> There is no „inclusion of LVM technology“ in BTRFS. LVM provides you with
> several separate filesystems, completely
> Am 15.09.2023 um 04:57 schrieb Felix Miata :
>
> BTRFS devs seem to
> think only one is somehow better due to its inclusion of LVM technology.
There is no „inclusion of LVM technology“ in BTRFS. LVM provides you with
several separate filesystems, completely independent from each other. A
Joe Zeff composed on 2023-09-14 20:49 (UTC-0600):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> I always have my/home/ on a separate
>> filesystem.
My guess is it is an administrative thing. They probably get or think they get
more and/or wilder complaints about mal-sizing separate filesystems than they do
not
On 09/14/2023 08:17 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
I always have my/home/ on a separate
filesystem.
Same here. I've never understood why Anaconda doesn't do that by default.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Bill Cunningham composed on 2023-09-14 21:15 (UTC-0400):
> I am just starting to get into the UEFI with my newer computer. I
> notice that f38's auto partitioning creates a partition and formats it
> with xfs. I suppose manually ext4 could be used. This drive I don't
> believe is too big
On 9/14/23 18:15, Bill Cunningham wrote:
I am just starting to get into the UEFI with my newer computer. I
notice that f38's auto partitioning creates a partition and formats it
with xfs. I suppose manually ext4 could be used. This drive I don't
believe is too big for ext4. But it would
I am just starting to get into the UEFI with my newer computer. I
notice that f38's auto partitioning creates a partition and formats it
with xfs. I suppose manually ext4 could be used. This drive I don't
believe is too big for ext4. But it would take a little time to format.
My
Hello!
I'm considering the hypothesis of booting a raw GPT partition on QEMU.
I was pondering basing my attempt on:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/QEMU#Simulate_virtual_disk_with_MBR_using_linear_RAID.
Basically, I would create a fake GPT partition table (actually, two, since
On Feb 11, 2014, at 6:07 PM, Pedro Francisco pedrogfrancisco.pub...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello!
I'm considering the hypothesis of booting a raw GPT partition on QEMU.
I was pondering basing my attempt on:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/QEMU
23 matches
Mail list logo
