On 02/20/2013 12:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.02.2013 18:35, schrieb Tod Thomas:
I just completed upgrading a FC14 virtual machine running under virtual box and
it went pretty well. Now I am
trying to do the same upgrade only on a FC15 standalone machine to FC16. It
looks like it can't
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:35:26PM -0500, Tod Thomas wrote:
> I just completed upgrading a FC14 virtual machine running under
> virtual box and it went pretty well. Now I am trying to do the same
> upgrade only on a FC15 standalone machine to FC16. It looks like it
> can't find any of the FC15 re
Am 20.02.2013 18:35, schrieb Tod Thomas:
> I just completed upgrading a FC14 virtual machine running under virtual box
> and it went pretty well. Now I am
> trying to do the same upgrade only on a FC15 standalone machine to FC16. It
> looks like it can't find any of the
> FC15 repos which is
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 20:01 +0100, Frank Zimmermann wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 27.12.2012, 19:50 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> >
> > there is no preupgrade for F18 as discussed often here
> > there is a new tool called fedup
> >
> > throw away all this cap and follow exactly the instruction
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 20:01:09 +0100,
Frank Zimmermann wrote:
ok I must confess that I've only recently subscribed to this list due to
my issue with preupgrade. I've been search the web and my understandign
of the docs was that fedup will be used from F18 on for upgrades.
Therefore I though
Am Donnerstag, den 27.12.2012, 19:50 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> there is no preupgrade for F18 as discussed often here
> there is a new tool called fedup
>
> throw away all this cap and follow exactly the instructions
> for yum-upgrade but keep in mind there is CURRENTLY no stable F18
>
Am 27.12.2012 19:40, schrieb Frank Zimmermann:
> Hi,
>
> I'm traying to upgrade my F17 to F18 with preugrade. However, launching
> the GUI leaves me with no options to choose (yes I've ticked "show
> unstable test versions") and a
> preupgrade-cli "Fedora 18 (Spherical Cow)"
> results in "No ve
;
> --- Em *seg, 19/11/12, Christopher Svanefalk <
> christopher.svanef...@gmail.com>* escreveu:
>
>
> De: Christopher Svanefalk
> Assunto: Re: Preupgrade vs other upgrade methods, caveats?
>
> Para: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Data: Segunda-feira
No, preupgrade only up to Fedora 17. For Fedora 18 go with yum and when
functional 'fedup'.
--- Em seg, 19/11/12, Christopher Svanefalk
escreveu:
De: Christopher Svanefalk
Assunto: Re: Preupgrade vs other upgrade methods, caveats?
Para: "Community support for Fedora users&
Thanks everyone for the replies. So, for going 17->18, I should still be
using Preupgrade, and after that this new Fedup application?
Best,
Christopher Svanefalk
mob: +46762628251
skype: csvanefalk
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 11/18/2012 05:45 AM, Sergio wrote
On 11/18/2012 05:45 AM, Sergio wrote:
Preupgrade isn't supported any more, AFAIK.
That's only true for Fedora 18 and later releases. For the current
release, PreUpgrade is still the recommended upgrade path:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_PreUpgrade?rd=PreUpgrade
For Fedora 18, y
Preupgrade isn't supported any more, AFAIK.
I upgraded via yum.
Apart from the usual clean up before-hand (remove uneeded packages so less to
download and I also uninstalled the compiled apps and recompiled them
afterwards), run rpmconf before and after the upgrade (and look at the
differences),
Am 18.11.2012 13:58, schrieb Christopher Svanefalk:
> I was just wondering if there are any known downsides to upgrading via
> preupgrade, as opposed to using the more
> familiar upgrade methods (CD/DVD etc)?
fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum
read the gints for the exact versi
On 08/22/2012 01:43 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:29 -0400, sean darcy wrote:
I've got a running F16. The DHCP server gives it an address of
10.10.10.100 based on the MAC address. I'm trying to use
preupgrade-cli to upgrade to F17.
Preupgrade-cli works fine on F16. Then when I reboot
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:29 -0400, sean darcy wrote:
> I've got a running F16. The DHCP server gives it an address of
> 10.10.10.100 based on the MAC address. I'm trying to use
> preupgrade-cli to upgrade to F17.
>
> Preupgrade-cli works fine on F16. Then when I reboot into the upgrade,
> it fai
Quicksort writes:
Thank you, Sam, but how should I proceed ?
Also, if I disable Adobe' s Yum repository
can I re-enable it later (how ?) so as to get
flashplayer updates.
You should find the repository file in /etc/yum.repos.d
Look for something that refers to Adobe's stuff. Edit it, and chan
do not top-post, however, now it does no longer matter...
one major rule for dist-upgrades is to remove/disbale all
packages and repos which may introduce troubles before
you can install anything after the sucessful upgrade
and have only to care not remove packages needed by
the basesystem (needs
Thank you, Sam, but how should I proceed ?
Also, if I disable Adobe' s Yum repository
can I re-enable it later (how ?) so as to get
flashplayer updates.
Thanks.
Le mercredi 30 mai 2012 à 18:02 -0400, Sam Varshavchik a écrit :
> Quicksort writes:
>
> > Platform: F15 x64 (—>F17)
> >
> > Hello ev
Quicksort writes:
Platform: F15 x64 (—>F17)
Hello everybody,
Preupgrade aborts upon the following:
“Failure: repodata/filelists.xml.gz
from preupgrade-adobe-linux-i386
(Errno 256). No more mirrors to try”
I am wondering if this file is actually
needed on a x64 install.
If it’s not, pre
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:01:19 +1000
"Michael D. Setzer II" wrote:
> Did a preupgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 16 on a system, and
> everything seemed to go fine except the grub was not updated to
> the grub2 as other upgrades I had done had.
Welcome to Fedora 16 hell 8) Grub2 can handle this fi
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 12:25 -0700, don fisher wrote:
> 3. Why do they force a boot partition? As far as I know using /boot
> has worked since Fedora2.
Because the boot process can only start from certain filing systems,
it's more restricted than other things. But the system, once booted,
can make
On 02/10/12 16:25, linux guy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
All in all, the upgrade to F16 was by far the most difficult Fedora
upgrade I have ever done.
I agree ! F15 and F16 were terrible upgrades for me.
However, if you used the Install DVD, it goes very smooth
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> All in all, the upgrade to F16 was by far the most difficult Fedora
> upgrade I have ever done.
I agree ! F15 and F16 were terrible upgrades for me.
However, if you used the Install DVD, it goes very smoothly.
Because of the last 2 upgrades,
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:57 -0700, Greg Woods wrote:
> This last part seems not to be true. Someone else pointed out that there
> is a way to force grub2 to install on a disk with only 63 free blocks at
> the beginning
Which brings up another related question. Is it possible to install
grub2 into
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 13:36 -0500, sean darcy wrote:
> Almost all (all?) users of preupgrade are using grub1.
>
> As I understand it, most (all?) grub1 systems have the first partition
> starting at 63.
>
> Any system with a first partition starting at 63 will be bricked if it
> runs preupgrad
Am 08.02.2012 19:36, schrieb sean darcy:
> On 02/08/2012 12:48 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> Greg Woods wrote:
>>> This is the area at the beginning of the disk, before the first
>>> partition. Grub2 needs the first partition to start at 2048, but default
>>> partition layouts from Grub-1 sys
On 02/08/2012 12:48 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Greg Woods wrote:
This is the area at the beginning of the disk, before the first
partition. Grub2 needs the first partition to start at 2048, but default
partition layouts from Grub-1 systems start at 63. I have run into this
several times and
Greg Woods wrote:
This is the area at the beginning of the disk, before the first
partition. Grub2 needs the first partition to start at 2048, but default
partition layouts from Grub-1 systems start at 63. I have run into this
several times and it is a royal pain. There may be some games you can
On 02/07/12 22:05, linux guy wrote:
I got around all this mess by upgrading from the full install DVD. I
found the problem to exist only when updating from the live CDs or pre
upgrading. If I did my upgrade from the full install DVD, everything
worked out OK.
If you need more information, I c
I got around all this mess by upgrading from the full install DVD. I
found the problem to exist only when updating from the live CDs or pre
upgrading. If I did my upgrade from the full install DVD, everything
worked out OK.
If you need more information, I could go back and look at my notes.
--
On 02/05/12 22:31, sean darcy wrote:
preupgrade failed for some reason to install the grub2 bootloader.
/boot/grub2 exists.
I made an F16 livecd. edited /boot/grub/grub.conf:
default=0
timeout=2
title 3.2.2
kernel /vmlinuz-3.2.2-1.fc16.x86_64
root=UUID=017cd53d-21ae-43b5-b8ce-b23b15092273 ro rd
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 18:23:55 -0500,
sean darcy wrote:
>
> Can I just stay with grub1? I really don't want to mess with
> gparted wizardry on my boot partition. Unless there are some really
> clear instructions on how to move the beginning address. As I
> remember, you shrink by moving the
I went through the same thing back in early January. My sympathies.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a qu
On 02/06/2012 08:49 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 19:48 -0500, sean darcy wrote:
grub2-install --no-floppy /dev/sdg
/sbin/grub2-setup: warn: Your embedding area is unusually small.
core.img won't fit in it..
/sbin/grub2-setup: warn: Embedding is not possible. GRUB can only be
ins
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:49:19 -0700
Greg Woods wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 19:48 -0500, sean darcy wrote:
>
> > grub2-install --no-floppy /dev/sdg
> > /sbin/grub2-setup: warn: Your embedding area is unusually small.
> > core.img won't fit in it..
> > /sbin/grub2-setup: warn: Embedding is not
Am 07.02.2012 02:49, schrieb Greg Woods:
> On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 19:48 -0500, sean darcy wrote:
>
>> grub2-install --no-floppy /dev/sdg
>> /sbin/grub2-setup: warn: Your embedding area is unusually small.
>> core.img won't fit in it..
>> /sbin/grub2-setup: warn: Embedding is not possible. GRUB
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 19:48 -0500, sean darcy wrote:
> grub2-install --no-floppy /dev/sdg
> /sbin/grub2-setup: warn: Your embedding area is unusually small.
> core.img won't fit in it..
> /sbin/grub2-setup: warn: Embedding is not possible. GRUB can only be
> installed in this setup by using blo
On 02/06/2012 05:10 PM, sean darcy wrote:
On 02/06/2012 12:31 AM, sean darcy wrote:
preupgrade failed for some reason to install the grub2 bootloader.
/boot/grub2 exists.
I made an F16 livecd. edited /boot/grub/grub.conf:
default=0
timeout=2
title 3.2.2
kernel /vmlinuz-3.2.2-1.fc16.x86_64
root
On 02/06/2012 12:31 AM, sean darcy wrote:
preupgrade failed for some reason to install the grub2 bootloader.
/boot/grub2 exists.
I made an F16 livecd. edited /boot/grub/grub.conf:
default=0
timeout=2
title 3.2.2
kernel /vmlinuz-3.2.2-1.fc16.x86_64
root=UUID=017cd53d-21ae-43b5-b8ce-b23b15092273
Never mind answering this. I got it upgraded another way.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? As
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:29 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
> Is your /var on another partition? If so, you're probably hitting this bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748119
>
> There's an updates.img in comment 42 that should fix it.
That must be it! Thanks!
Richard
--
users
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I tried using preupgrade to upgrade my F15 64bit to F16 and ran into
> an issue with anaconda.
>
> It gave me a somewhat confusion error:
>
> https://plus.google.com/photos/112912133662927916698/albums/5692032713007961425?authkey=CJmNmIWD6M7WH
On 09/01/2011 09:05 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> I don't see an option in preupgrade to go from F13 i686 to F14 x86_64.
> Is it possible?
Yes, it is possible, but (for me at least) it entauked a whole bunch of
grief.
What I did was to use the F14 x86_64 install DVD, and do an upgrade.
This is
On 21 June 2011 23:06, Dj YB wrote:
> On Tuesday June 21 2011 23:36:51 Dave Cross wrote:
>> I have two Dell PCs - a Dimension desktop and an XPS laptop. They are
>> both running Fedora 14 and I have tried to upgrade them both to Fedora
>> 15 using preupgrade.
>>
>> In both cases, when I reboot and
On Tuesday June 21 2011 23:36:51 Dave Cross wrote:
> I have two Dell PCs - a Dimension desktop and an XPS laptop. They are
> both running Fedora 14 and I have tried to upgrade them both to Fedora
> 15 using preupgrade.
>
> In both cases, when I reboot and select the "upgrade to Fedora 15"
> option
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:37 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/06/2011 10:11 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > To the preupgrade devs - I would strongly recommend you test with a
> > known broken machine that has dependency problems that anaconda can NOT
> > resolve and make sure it gracefully stops
On 06/06/2011 10:11 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> To the preupgrade devs - I would strongly recommend you test with a
> known broken machine that has dependency problems that anaconda can NOT
> resolve and make sure it gracefully stops and generates sane,
> intelligible error messages... The cu
On 06/06/2011 01:59 PM, echapin wrote:
>>> Try a wired connection if you haven't already, and ignore warnings.
>>>
>> Thanks a lot echapin! That helped. Beside: Why did this help?
>
> I don't know. This notion has been around for a version or two, and I don't
> remember the technicalities. Maybe
-Original message-
From: Benjamin benjami...@gmx.at
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:27:41 -0400
To: echapin echa...@teksavvy.com, Community support for Fedora users
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Preupgrade F14-->F15 [Solved]
> Am 06.06.2011 15:20, schrieb e
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 09:05 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > You'll get a lot of bitch about packages already installed but anything
> > missing will get installed or you will get an error. Currently, it
> > looks like avidmux from rpmfu
Am 06.06.2011 15:20, schrieb echapin:
> -Original message-
> From: Benjamin benjami...@gmx.at
> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:17:58 -0400
> To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Preupgrade F14-->F15
>
>> Hello everyone!
>> I encountered the following pr
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> You'll get a lot of bitch about packages already installed but anything
> missing will get installed or you will get an error. Currently, it
> looks like avidmux from rpmfusion isn't reinstalling for me. Oh well.
> It eventually will.
-Original message-
From: Benjamin benjami...@gmx.at
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:17:58 -0400
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Preupgrade F14-->F15
> Hello everyone!
> I encountered the following problem when trying to upgrade my system:
>
> After
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 17:31 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 12:33 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> >
> > > Classically, for those servers (some of which originally started out on
> > > FC1) have been upgraded using the yum upgrade method.
>
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 12:33 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>
> > Classically, for those servers (some of which originally started out on
> > FC1) have been upgraded using the yum upgrade method.
>
> As a matter of interest, what exactly is _the_ yum upgrade method?
> I
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 12:33:50 +0100,
Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> As a matter of interest, what exactly is _the_ yum upgrade method?
> I've seen the term used by several people,
> but as far as I can see they refer to different methods.
yum update --releasever=f??
> And don't all upgrade meth
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Classically, for those servers (some of which originally started out on
> FC1) have been upgraded using the yum upgrade method.
As a matter of interest, what exactly is _the_ yum upgrade method?
I've seen the term used by several people,
but as far as I can see they r
Update...
And now a real request for help...
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 14:34 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Ok...
> ITMT... I rebooted MtKing into the preupgrade process and turned it
> loose. Strangely, it DIDN'T run into the unhandled exception like
> Forest had. The machines should have
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 14:47 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 11:34 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Well, that tells me right there that preupgrade is still not
> > deployment grade yet. Not for remote servers at least.
> So let me get this straight: preupgrade failed for you and therefo
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:33:31 -0700, Kam Leo wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Kam Leo wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
>>
>> --snip
>>
>>
>>> Also, updates are listed twice when running yum from the command line.
>>> For example:
>>>
>>> ---> Package parted.i68
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Kam Leo wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
>
> --snip
>
>>
>> Also, updates are listed twice when running yum from the command line.
>> For example:
>>
>> ---> Package parted.i686 0:2.3-8.fc15 will be updated
>> ---> Package parted.i686 0:2
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
--snip
>
> Also, updates are listed twice when running yum from the command line.
> For example:
>
> ---> Package parted.i686 0:2.3-8.fc15 will be updated
> ---> Package parted.i686 0:2.3-9.fc15 will be an updated
Perhaps too verbose but not e
On 06/03/2011 11:34 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Well, that tells me right there that preupgrade is still not
> deployment grade yet. Not for remote servers at least.
So let me get this straight: preupgrade failed for you and therefor it's
not ready to be used (at least on remote servers) by
[...]
> Regards,
> Mike
My experience was exactly opposite. I upgraded from F13 to F15 without a
hitch. While I was working at my workstation at home, I started
preupgrade from the terminal and it downloaded the new packages. Once it
was done, I rebooted it and made sure the upgrade process had s
On 06/02/2011 11:08 PM, GeeKer Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Kevin J. Cummings
> mailto:cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net>> wrote:
> I have the following on my botched f15 upgrade:
>
> /boot
> config-2.6.35.12-90.fc14.i686 efi
> initramfs-2.6.35.12-90.fc14.i686.img in
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Kevin J. Cummings <
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 10:31 PM, GeeKer Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Kevin J. Cummings
> > mailto:cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net>>
> wrote:
> > OK, so while looking at the live system chrooted to
On 06/02/2011 10:31 PM, GeeKer Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Kevin J. Cummings
> mailto:cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net>> wrote:
> OK, so while looking at the live system chrooted to your system, what is
> the response to:
>
> rpm -q kernel
>
> Let's find out if the prop
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Kevin J. Cummings <
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 09:00 PM, GeeKer Wang wrote:
> > Hello, Kevin
> >
> > I can't enter my system now, however, I check the upgraded system using
> > livecd.
> > After login in my system by chroot in livecd, by ch
When I tried "rpm -ivh kernel-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686" in chroot environment,
it complains " grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template".
I guess preupgrade get the same problem and just skip the kernel install.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:00 PM, GeeKer Wang wrote:
> Hello, Kevin
>
> I c
On 06/02/2011 09:00 PM, GeeKer Wang wrote:
> Hello, Kevin
>
> I can't enter my system now, however, I check the upgraded system using
> livecd.
> After login in my system by chroot in livecd, by checking "rpm -qa |grep
> fc15 ", I am sure that many fc15 packages have installed.
> And all the 3 st
Hello, Kevin
I can't enter my system now, however, I check the upgraded system using
livecd.
After login in my system by chroot in livecd, by checking "rpm -qa |grep
fc15 ", I am sure that many fc15 packages have installed.
And all the 3 steps you mentioned have passed, which takes a couple of
h
On 06/02/2011 01:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> I can't tell from what you written above, but, pre-upgrade is a multi
> step process. Here are the steps in a nut-shell:
0) Install preupgrade using yum or yumex if you haven't ever used it
before. (AFAIK it's not part of the default install.)
On 06/02/2011 10:13 AM, GeeKer Wang wrote:
> Hello, guys,
> I used preupgrade to upgrade fc14 to fc15, and everything seemed
> fine. But when I reboot, I just find that kernel-fc15 is not installed.
I can't tell from what you written above, but, pre-upgrade is a multi
step process. Here ar
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:13:39 + (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
> Even with F15 abandoning metacity, and possibly also whatever
> is causing the other minor issues, my guess is that I'll be better
> off doing all fresh installs this time, except perhaps on one brand
> new PC.. In fact, I'm already
On 04/25/2011 07:43 PM, Beartooth wrote:
> Iirc, preupgrade (which I've been pleased with in the past) won't
> do anything, or at any rate won't install F15, until that is officially
> released; right?
Not true. You have a checkbox to tick but it would work otherwise.
Rahul
--
users ma
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:26:58 +1100
L wrote:
> Yes, I can access fedora mirror repo via web broweser
>
> here is command line output during preupgrade process
>
> preupgrade
> Loaded plugins: blacklist, fs-snapshot, local,
> post-transaction-actions, : priorities, protectbase,
> refresh-updatesd
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:26 PM, L wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:10 PM, stan wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:13:06 +1100
>> L wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:06 PM, L wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I have a PC with Fedora 13 (x86_64). I want to upgrade to Fedora 14
>>> > via preupgr
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:10 PM, stan wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:13:06 +1100
> L wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:06 PM, L wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have a PC with Fedora 13 (x86_64). I want to upgrade to Fedora 14
>> > via preupgrade.
>> > after following steps
> [snip]
>
> The step
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:13:06 +1100
L wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:06 PM, L wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a PC with Fedora 13 (x86_64). I want to upgrade to Fedora 14
> > via preupgrade.
> > after following steps
[snip]
The steps look OK.
> > but there is no packages from fedora 14 downlo
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:06 PM, L wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a PC with Fedora 13 (x86_64). I want to upgrade to Fedora 14
> via preupgrade.
> after following steps
>
>
> yum clean all
> yum update
> yum update preupgrade
>
> preupgrade
>
> the process started, it seems did
>
> Download release inf
On 12/11/10 22:04, John Pilkington wrote:
> Hi: I'm new to this list and haven't found a searchable archive, but I
> haven't seen this topic in Google.
>
> My box came with MS Vista and I initially added f10, which was fully
> updated until near EOL. Later I added a second disk and f12, and
> rece
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:33 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 12/11/10 22:11, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I don't think a preupgrade which skips three releases (10->14) is
> > supported. Single upgrades (10->11, 11->12, 12->13, 13->14) generally
> > work, but skipping intermediate stages is
On 12/11/10 22:11, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
> I don't think a preupgrade which skips three releases (10->14) is
> supported. Single upgrades (10->11, 11->12, 12->13, 13->14) generally
> work, but skipping intermediate stages is quite problematic. There's
> a lot of stuff that changed significantly
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:04:30 +
John Pilkington wrote:
> My box came with MS Vista and I initially added f10, which was fully
> updated until near EOL. Later I added a second disk and f12, and
> recently I used preupgrade for f12-to-f13. That went well, and I
> decided to try f10-to-f14.
On 11/12/2010 02:04 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
> Hi: I'm new to this list and haven't found a searchable archive, but I
> haven't seen this topic in Google.
>
> My box came with MS Vista and I initially added f10, which was fully
> updated until near EOL. Later I added a second disk and f12, and
>
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:05:11 -0600 (CST)
"Steve Berg" wrote:
>
> > On 10/11/10 12:57, Steve Berg wrote:
> >> If preupgrade is smart enough to know that limitation once the
> >> upgrade starts, why isn't it smart enough to warn me about that
> >> before it downloads and sets everything up?
> The
> On 10/11/10 12:57, Steve Berg wrote:
>> If preupgrade is smart enough to know that limitation once the upgrade
>> starts, why isn't it smart enough to warn me about that before it
>> downloads and sets everything up?
>>
>>
>
> Maybe it figured you would do that yourself in advance.
>
> --
> Rega
On 10/11/10 12:57, Steve Berg wrote:
> I just attempted using preupgrade on a Fedora 11 system. It ran fine on
> the system, downloaded all the packages, set up grub.conf and all the
> other things it normally does. I rebooted into the upgrade kernel and
> then it tells me that it can't upgrade t
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 18:35 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> I've just used preupgrade to upgrade some systems in my clasroom lab that
> has XP and Fedora 12. I had earlier done a test with fedora 13, but it had
> some issues the upgrade. The upgrade from 12 to 14 seems to have handled
> the
On 9/11/10 12:52 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:09 AM, JB wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> it is a state of flux.
>> I always managed to move to next Fedora with either preupgrade or 'yum
>> upgrade'
>> methods, but other people are not always so lucky and hit an air pocket.
> In my case
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:09 AM, JB wrote:
> Hi,
> it is a state of flux.
> I always managed to move to next Fedora with either preupgrade or 'yum
> upgrade'
> methods, but other people are not always so lucky and hit an air pocket.
In my case hitting "air pockets" could mean catastrophe. I'm b
Marcel Rieux gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, JB gmail.com> wrote:
> > Marcel Rieux gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> ...
> > Hi,
> > if you just care about upgrading to next Fedora, try this method:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq
>
> Thanks for the suggesti
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, JB wrote:
> Marcel Rieux gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ...
> Hi,
> if you just care about upgrading to next Fedora, try this method:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq
Thanks for the suggestion but, I always thought preupgrade was the
recommended way for up
Marcel Rieux gmail.com> writes:
> ...
Hi,
if you just care about upgrading to next Fedora, try this method:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq
JB
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Tue, 7/27/10, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
>>> [snip]
>>> I never could see any advantage to LVMs (over "real"
>> partitions) other than being able to resize them while they
>> are mounted.
>> They do make it easy to move stuff to new hardware,
On 07/27/2010 06:01 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Tue, 7/27/10, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
>>> [snip]
>>> I never could see any advantage to LVMs (over "real"
>> partitions) other than being able to resize them while they
>> are mounted.
>>>
>> They do make it easy to m
--- On Tue, 7/27/10, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > [snip]
> > I never could see any advantage to LVMs (over "real"
> partitions) other than being able to resize them while they
> are mounted.
> >
> They do make it easy to move stuff to new hardware, that
> can be important as
Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Mon, 7/19/10, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>>> --- On Tue, 7/13/10, Peter Diercks
>> wrote:
I am running a server under F11. It is a remote
>> machine
which I have no
physical access to. It has a network connection. I
>> wanted
>>>
> --
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:10:30 + (UTC)
> From: JB
> Subject: fc13 preupgrade failure on swap
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Don Vogt yahoo.com> writes:
>
> >
> > I have
--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > --- On Tue, 7/13/10, Peter Diercks
> wrote:
> >
> >> I am running a server under F11. It is a remote
> machine
> >> which I have no
> >> physical access to. It has a network connection. I
> wanted
> >> to upgrade to
> >> F12
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
