On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:03:04 -0500
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, stan via users said:
> > The code page was a legitimate issue, but only part of the issue.
> > When I tried utf-8 for the /boot/efi partition booting failed. There
> > must be some hardcoded linking of vfat and ISO8859
Once upon a time, stan via users said:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:39:12 -0700
> stan wrote:
> > wasn't the signing, it was a missing code page for 8859-1. This is
> > the default code page for vfat in the kernel, so it couldn't read
> > the /boot/efi partition. Once I added the code page, the
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:39:12 -0700
stan wrote:
> The solution is that the kernel is already signed by the build
> process, when it is built from the Fedora kernel spec. The problem
This signature is the problem, as it is a red hat signature and has to
be removed. That was the other part of
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 22:24:11 -0700
stan via users wrote:
> The other thing that is a positive, is that the kernel automatically
> signs all modules during build if configured to do so, which I have,
> so I don't have to worry about that. I'm using sha512, while the stock
> kernels use sha256,
