Re: SV: Re: F21: why Fedora still has not alternative init?

2015-05-04 Thread birger
ma., 04.05.2015 kl. 01.48 +0200, skrev Frantisek Hanzlik: Hmm, I guess You want advice me, to bought some strictly limited (maybe commercial) OS - and then shut up and be satisfied with I have. But this fortunately is not Linux case... That was not what I wrote at all. I gave reasons why

Re: SV: Re: F21: why Fedora still has not alternative init?

2015-05-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 01:48:57AM +0200, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: Hmm, I guess You want advice me, to bought some strictly limited (maybe commercial) OS - and then shut up and be satisfied with I have. But this fortunately is not Linux case... Fundamentally, if you want something to be

Re: SV: Re: F21: why Fedora still has not alternative init?

2015-05-03 Thread Frantisek Hanzlik
birger wrote: First of all, supporting multiple init systems is not something a distro wants to do. It would involve forcing package maintainers to support them when getting enough package maintainers is a problem already. The alternative is to create a respin with another init system and

Re: SV: Re: F21: why Fedora still has not alternative init?

2015-05-03 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 01:48:57 +0200, Frantisek Hanzlik fra...@hanzlici.cz wrote: Hmm, I guess You want advice me, to bought some strictly limited (maybe commercial) OS - and then shut up and be satisfied with I have. But this fortunately is not Linux case... However it is very unlikely

SV: Re: F21: why Fedora still has not alternative init?

2015-05-03 Thread birger
First of all, supporting multiple init systems is not something a distro wants to do. It would involve forcing package maintainers to support them when getting enough package maintainers is a problem already. The alternative is to create a respin with another init system and its own builds of