ma., 04.05.2015 kl. 01.48 +0200, skrev Frantisek Hanzlik:
Hmm, I guess You want advice me, to bought some strictly limited
(maybe
commercial) OS - and then shut up and be satisfied with I have. But
this
fortunately is not Linux case...
That was not what I wrote at all. I gave reasons why
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 01:48:57AM +0200, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
Hmm, I guess You want advice me, to bought some strictly limited (maybe
commercial) OS - and then shut up and be satisfied with I have. But this
fortunately is not Linux case...
Fundamentally, if you want something to be
birger wrote:
First of all, supporting multiple init systems is not something a distro
wants to do.
It would involve forcing package maintainers to support them when getting
enough package maintainers is a problem already.
The alternative is to create a respin with another init system and
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 01:48:57 +0200,
Frantisek Hanzlik fra...@hanzlici.cz wrote:
Hmm, I guess You want advice me, to bought some strictly limited (maybe
commercial) OS - and then shut up and be satisfied with I have. But this
fortunately is not Linux case...
However it is very unlikely
First of all, supporting multiple init systems is not something a distro wants
to do.
It would involve forcing package maintainers to support them when getting
enough package maintainers is a problem already.
The alternative is to create a respin with another init system and its own
builds of