*attending*
Den ons 5 juni 2024 kl 14:44 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee :
>
> Hey Folks,
>
> Many of you by now know that in Fedora, we try to open up more
> opportunities to test upcoming features which are currently being
> developed. This time DNF team is working closely wit
Hey Folks,
Many of you by now know that in Fedora, we try to open up more
opportunities to test upcoming features which are currently being
developed. This time DNF team is working closely with Fedora QA to run
the DNF 5.2 test week[0].
As a part of this test week, we will be specifically
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024, at 3:42 PM, Philip Rhoades via users wrote:
> So, if I try to reinstall from the current f40 live usb - can I do that
> without touching the backup subvolume? ie:
>
> /dev/nvme0n1p3btrfs 1,951,850,496 464,659,184 1,486,438,224
> 24% /
> /dev/nvme0n1p3
problems up until
after
f40 was release. However now, when I tried to do a:
dnf system upgrade download --releasever=40
I get a lot of errors - trying to do "dnf --erase" the problem rpms
ends
up making the problem worse.
You need to tell us what errors you encounter. Are they filesyste
problems up until after
> f40 was release. However now, when I tried to do a:
>
>dnf system upgrade download --releasever=40
>
> I get a lot of errors - trying to do "dnf --erase" the problem rpms ends
> up making the problem worse.
>
You need to tell us what erro
People,
A while ago I was in a hurry to start using F40 (Sway) and installed
Rawhide from a live usb to get started.
Everything went pretty well and I had minimal problems up until after
f40 was release. However now, when I tried to do a:
dnf system upgrade download --releasever=40
I
On 2024-05-09 14:12, Tim Evans wrote:
On 5/9/24 5:02 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2024-05-09 13:59, Tim Evans wrote:
Since (I think) the gnome-software app is flat-pack based, have I
messed anything up by running its upgrade instead of the
dnf/rpm-based one?
There are no flatpacks installed
On 5/9/24 5:02 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2024-05-09 13:59, Tim Evans wrote:
Since (I think) the gnome-software app is flat-pack based, have I
messed anything up by running its upgrade instead of the dnf/rpm-based
one?
There are no flatpacks installed by default. The gnome-software app
On 2024-05-09 13:59, Tim Evans wrote:
Since (I think) the gnome-software app is flat-pack based, have I messed
anything up by running its upgrade instead of the dnf/rpm-based one?
There are no flatpacks installed by default. The gnome-software app is
definitely not flatpack unless you've
On 5/9/24 4:20 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2024-05-09 12:50, Tim Evans wrote:
Command-line dnf upgrade (F39->F40) failed yesterday, barfing on a
missing GPG key for Fedora 40, leaving 2.5GB of rpms sitting in
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade. 'dnt clean' does not remove these.
dnf system-upgr
On 2024-05-09 12:50, Tim Evans wrote:
Command-line dnf upgrade (F39->F40) failed yesterday, barfing on a
missing GPG key for Fedora 40, leaving 2.5GB of rpms sitting in
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade. 'dnt clean' does not remove these.
dnf system-upgrade clean
Is it safe to manually clear
On 5/9/24 4:00 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:51 PM Tim Evans <mailto:tkev...@tkevans.com>> wrote:
Command-line dnf upgrade (F39->F40) failed yesterday, barfing on a
missing GPG key for Fedora 40,
The key is automatically imported when followin
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:51 PM Tim Evans wrote:
> Command-line dnf upgrade (F39->F40) failed yesterday, barfing on a
> missing GPG key for Fedora 40,
The key is automatically imported when following dnf-system-upgrade, <
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fe
Command-line dnf upgrade (F39->F40) failed yesterday, barfing on a
missing GPG key for Fedora 40, leaving 2.5GB of rpms sitting in
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade. 'dnt clean' does not remove these.
Is it safe to manually clear out this subdirectory?
(FWIW, I tried the now-recommended
The last update had something happen. What is happening with dracut?
Anyone see such?
88x2bu.ko.xz:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
- No original module exists within this kernel
- Installation
- Installing to /lib/modules/6.8.8-300.fc40.x86_64/extra/
depmod.
On 4/14/24 14:20, Tim via users wrote:
On Sun, 2024-04-14 at 09:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
Then in corporate life, I needed to ensure a stable development
environment.
This is one of the big problems with computers in the work place. You
may have single-task computers which you want to work,
On 4/15/24 20:04, Tim via users wrote:
Samuel Sieb:
The only reason this is a problem for some manufacturers is because they
want to keep it proprietary. Printers and scanners (and any other
hardware) that use open standards or provide open-source drivers work
great with Linux. Compare the
Tim:
>> Let's be clear, we're not talking about annoying changes to how the
>> desktop looks, that can be put up with. But when you find essential
>> software and/or hardware doesn't work anymore, or doesn't exist
>> anymore, and support libraries are incompatible, that's a deal-breaker.
>>
>>
On 4/14/24 11:20, Tim via users wrote:
Let's be clear, we're not talking about annoying changes to how the
desktop looks, that can be put up with. But when you find essential
software and/or hardware doesn't work anymore, or doesn't exist
anymore, and support libraries are incompatible, that's
On 4/14/24 06:49, Fulko Hew wrote:
Thanks for giving me the guts to do a brute force power cycle
in the apparent middle of an upgrade in progress.
(FYI. The upgrade to F39 also hung at the boot message,
and it too needed a power-cycle to successfully boot.)
If it's still at the boot
On Sun, 2024-04-14 at 09:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
> Then in corporate life, I needed to ensure a stable development
> environment.
This is one of the big problems with computers in the work place. You
may have single-task computers which you want to work, and not mess
around with. You may
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 9:49 AM Fulko Hew wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 7:16 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> Then it was back to are-install for F33 because it was a hardware
> replacement, and Linux/Fedora does not have a one-true backup/restore
> process that I have ever seen. [...]
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 7:16 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 17:37 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 13:29 -0700, Fulko Hew wrote:
> > > > I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need,
> > > > so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38
>
On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 17:37 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
> > On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 13:29 -0700, Fulko Hew wrote:
> > > I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need,
> > > so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38
Just as an aside: leaving a two year old Fedora system without
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 6:05 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 4:30 PM Fulko Hew wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need,
>> so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38
>> I used the:
>>
>
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 4:30 PM Fulko Hew wrote:
>
> I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need,
> so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38
> I used the:
>
> dnf system-update download --releasever=xx
> process.
>
Related, y
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 5:04 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 13:29 -0700, Fulko Hew wrote:
> > I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need,
> > so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38
> > I used the:
> >
> > dnf syste
On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 13:29 -0700, Fulko Hew wrote:
> I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need,
> so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38
> I used the:
>
> dnf system-update download --releasever=xx
> process.
>
> - My first update from F35 to F3
I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need,
so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38
I used the:
dnf system-update download --releasever=xx
process.
- My first update from F35 to F36 worked.
- Then I did the F36 to F37 update.
KDE wouldn't work until I uninstalled qt5
So do I have to do it that way on her machine, too, one browser at
> a time? Or can I, say, sneakermail my file downstairs, add it into hers,
> and then do a single dnf install command?
Installing some repos would probably involve installing keys, too. I'm
not sure if you have
On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 16:41 +, Beartooth wrote:
> I normally have two or three browsers open. Most have been
> installed for so long I no longer remember what dnf calls them.
>
> My wife, who also runs F39, has been having trouble with the ones
> she has,
On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 15:31 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 04:41:33PM -, Beartooth wrote:
> >
> > I normally have two or three browsers open. Most have been
> > installed for so long I no longer remember what dnf calls them.
> >
> &g
> > Question : How do I look up what it calls them?
> >
> > If you know the path to the browser, perhaps /usr/bin/opera, AND
> > have
> > the repo for it active, you could try the dnf command "provides".
> >
> > $ dnf provides /usr/bin/opera
>
to the browser, perhaps /usr/bin/opera, AND have
the repo for it active, you could try the dnf command "provides".
$ dnf provides /usr/bin/opera
I tried "whatprovides" on her machine (and got nothing); is this a
new version of it??
It won't work on her machine bec
to the browser, perhaps /usr/bin/opera, AND have
the repo for it active, you could try the dnf command "provides".
$ dnf provides /usr/bin/opera
I tried "whatprovides" on her machine (and got nothing); is this a
new version of it??
Try rpm -qa | grep -i opera
Si
ser, perhaps /usr/bin/opera, AND have
> the repo for it active, you could try the dnf command "provides".
>
> $ dnf provides /usr/bin/opera
I tried "whatprovides" on her machine (and got nothing); is this a
new version of it??
--
Beartooth Staffwright, No
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 04:41:33PM -, Beartooth wrote:
I normally have two or three browsers open. Most have been
installed for so long I no longer remember what dnf calls them.
My wife, who also runs F39, has been having trouble with the ones
she has, and I have yet to get
vivaldi.repo
btth@localhost:/etc/yum.repos.d$
So do I have to do it that way on her machine, too, one browser at
a time? Or can I, say, sneakermail my file downstairs, add it into hers,
and then do a single dnf install command?
--
Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User
Rememb
On 03/26/2024 10:55 AM, Will McDonald wrote:
And those launchers live under /usr/share/applications/ and
~/.local/share/applications/
I don't know about Gnome, but in Xfce, you can right-click on a launcher
on the desktop and select Edit Launcher. KISS.
--
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 16:48, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/26/2024 10:41 AM, Beartooth wrote:
> > It couldn't find brave, falcon, opera, nor vivaldi. VERY Dumb
> > Question : How do I look up what it calls them?
>
> Assuming that they have launchers on your desktop, edit the launcher and
> look
On 03/26/2024 10:41 AM, Beartooth wrote:
It couldn't find brave, falcon, opera, nor vivaldi. VERY Dumb
Question : How do I look up what it calls them?
Assuming that they have launchers on your desktop, edit the launcher and
look at the command. HTH, HAND.
--
> On 26 Mar 2024, at 16:42, Beartooth wrote:
>
>
>I normally have two or three browsers open. Most have been
> installed for so long I no longer remember what dnf calls them.
>
>My wife, who also runs F39, has been having trouble with the ones
> she has, and
I normally have two or three browsers open. Most have been
installed for so long I no longer remember what dnf calls them.
My wife, who also runs F39, has been having trouble with the ones
she has, and I have yet to get around to trying to diagnose them. Today as
a stopgap I
Update are managed from PK and packages are stored in its cache [1].
If I want update from line command only some package with dnf, same
packages are download again in its cache [2]
To use the same packages already downloaded from PK, I must first
search for the file if it has already been
On 03/12/2023 12:37, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
On 3 Dec 2023 at 10:06, John Pilkington wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 10:06:32 +
Subject:Re: NVIDIA RPM DNF Update Issue?
From: John Pilkington
To: users
On 3 Dec 2023 at 10:06, John Pilkington wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 10:06:32 +
Subject:Re: NVIDIA RPM DNF Update Issue?
From: John Pilkington
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Send reply to: Community support
On 03/12/2023 09:46, John Pilkington wrote:
On 02/12/2023 23:39, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Finally got it working, but tried lots of info from different pages,
and would get all kinds of different messages.
Cleared out everything, and tried things until this seems to have
run
On 02/12/2023 23:39, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Finally got it working, but tried lots of info from different pages,
and would get all kinds of different messages.
Cleared out everything, and tried things until this seems to have
run completely and is now showing the Nvidia GPU being
On 2 Dec 2023 at 10:40, Joe Zeff wrote:
Subject:Re: NVIDIA RPM DNF Update Issue?
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Joe Zeff
Date sent: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 10:40:35 -0700
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora
On 12/02/2023 10:27 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda comes from rpmfusion and only provides the cuda
driver, not the whole cuda software. If this is sufficient for BOINC, using
only the rpmfusion repository will work and will be simpler to manage.
I've been using
On Sat, 02 Dec 2023 09:49:35 +1000 "Michael D. Setzer II" wrote:
> Followed instruction that removed all nvida packages.
> rpm -qa | grep -i nvidia
> now shows nothing.
> Tried to install but get message about filtering??
> dnf install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda
> La
On 1 Dec 2023 at 18:43, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
From: francis.montag...@inria.fr
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:Re: NVIDIA RPM DNF Update Issue?
Date sent: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:43:31 +0100
Send reply
On Sat, 02 Dec 2023 03:32:04 +1030 Tim via users wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 09:43 +, John Pilkington wrote:
>> /!\ Please remember to wait after the RPM transaction ends, until the
>> kmod get built. This can take up to 5 minutes on some systems.
> Don't they bother to do anything to
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 09:43 +, John Pilkington wrote:
> /!\ Please remember to wait after the RPM transaction ends, until the
> kmod get built. This can take up to 5 minutes on some systems.
Don't they bother to do anything to let you know when it's finished?
--
uname -rsvp
Linux
Hi
On Fri, 01 Dec 2023 09:43:09 + John Pilkington wrote:
> On 01/12/2023 05:57, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
>> rpm -qa | grep -i nvidia
>> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-kmodsrc-535.129.03-2.fc38.x86_64
>> akmod-nvidia-535.129.03-1.fc38.x86_64
>>
of updated fc37 and older fc38 packages. Do you
have the fc37 repo enabled?
https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/NVIDIA
sudo dnf install akmod-nvidia xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda
/!\ Please remember to wait after the RPM transaction ends, until the
kmod get built. This can take up to 5 minutes on some
On 1 Dec 2023 at 15:52, Michael D. Setzer II via user wrote:
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 15:52:13 +1000
Subject:NVIDIA RPM DNF Update Issue?
Priority: normal
Send reply to: mi...@guam.net
Recently replaced an ATI video card with a NVIDIA GTX 1070 card
on one of my Fedora 38 machine.
Seemed to have it working, but today got an error with dnf update.
Went to a number of sites, and with some instructions it shows a
message about module filtering??
Use BOINC and was trying to get
On 19/11/23 18:29, Tim via users wrote:
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
* SecureBoot should be turned off if using tainted kernel drivers. Or,
you can cutover to driver signing. I usually turn off SecureBoot
because I don't like messing around with driver signing. In my case,
it usually is due to
On 19/11/2023 07:29, Tim via users wrote:
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
* SecureBoot should be turned off if using tainted kernel drivers. Or,
you can cutover to driver signing. I usually turn off SecureBoot
because I don't like messing around with driver signing. In my case,
it usually is due to
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> * SecureBoot should be turned off if using tainted kernel drivers. Or,
>> you can cutover to driver signing. I usually turn off SecureBoot
>> because I don't like messing around with driver signing. In my case,
>> it usually is due to VirtualBox, not NVIDIA.
Stephen
On 18/11/23 14:28, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:08 PM Stephen Morris
wrote:
Hi,
I used dnf system-upgrade to upgrade from F38 to F39. After the
upgrade when I booted into gdm to login and start KDE, the machine hung
on KDE startup into X11.
Thinking it might
On 18/11/23 20:05, John Pilkington wrote:
On 18/11/2023 05:11, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/17/23 19:08, Stephen Morris wrote:
I reinstalled the nvidia drivers and a subsequent reboot then
booted into KDE with any issues (which is where I'm sending this
email from). Why did this freezing of
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 7:16 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 22:28 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > A couple of thoughts in no particular order. I don't know how you
> > should move forward with your issues.
> >
> > * The KDE spin uses Wayland, not X11.
> >
>
> I use KDE
On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 22:28 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> A couple of thoughts in no particular order. I don't know how you
> should move forward with your issues.
>
> * The KDE spin uses Wayland, not X11.
>
I use KDE with X11. You just have to select it on the login screen.
AFAIK KDE 6 will
On 18/11/2023 05:11, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/17/23 19:08, Stephen Morris wrote:
I reinstalled the nvidia drivers and a subsequent reboot then
booted into KDE with any issues (which is where I'm sending this email
from). Why did this freezing of the nvidia drivers happen, is it
because
On 11/17/23 19:08, Stephen Morris wrote:
I reinstalled the nvidia drivers and a subsequent reboot then
booted into KDE with any issues (which is where I'm sending this email
from). Why did this freezing of the nvidia drivers happen, is it because
the F39 nvidia drivers don't work properly
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:08 PM Stephen Morris
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I used dnf system-upgrade to upgrade from F38 to F39. After the
> upgrade when I booted into gdm to login and start KDE, the machine hung
> on KDE startup into X11.
> Thinking it might be an nvidia UE
Hi,
I used dnf system-upgrade to upgrade from F38 to F39. After the
upgrade when I booted into gdm to login and start KDE, the machine hung
on KDE startup into X11.
Thinking it might be an nvidia UEFI enrolment issue with the F39
nvidia drivers, I reset the machine and booted back
On 14 Nov 2023 at 16:06, Michael D. Setzer II via user wrote:
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:06:52 +1000
Subject:Strange problem with phpmyadmin after recent
dnf upate??
Priority: normal
Send reply
Failed to set session cookie. Maybe you are using HTTP instead of
HTTPS to access phpMyAdmin.
Had been using firefox to access phpMyAdmin on a system to
update databases.
Just now get the above error message.
Have found that if I run firefox from root user rather than my user
it works fine
On 11/12/23 07:03, Ger van Dijck wrote:
With my respects to Andre Robatino , Samuel Sieb , Harald Labes , ja (?)
, and Tom Horsley : Your advises did not have any results.
Giving Dnf install ffmpeg creates the following message :
Error/Problem
ffmpeg.6.0-16.fc39.x86_64 from rpmfusion
On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 16:03:07 +0100
Ger van Dijck wrote:
> Question : How to solve this problem ?
After running
dnf swap ffmpeg-free ffmpeg --allowerasing
on my system, I installed with no problems. Here are the
rpms with ffmpeg in the name I have:
ffmpeg-libs-6.0-16.fc39.x86_64
ffmpeg-6.0
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:28:40 +0100
"Ger van Dijck" kirjoitti:
> Hay All,
>
> When I try to install skypeforlinux 8.108.0.205-1.x86_64.rpm I get
> the message Certificate and Primery key invalid and both seem to be
> not alive.
>
> Question : How can the keys become valid and alive ?
>
> Question
Linux Lovers,
With my respects to Andre Robatino , Samuel Sieb , Harald Labes , ja (?) ,
and Tom Horsley : Your advises did not have any results.
Giving Dnf install ffmpeg creates the following message :
Error/Problem
ffmpeg.6.0-16.fc39.x86_64 from rpmfusion requires
ffmpeg-libs(x86_64
Hay All,
When I try to install skypeforlinux 8.108.0.205-1.x86_64.rpm I get the
message Certificate and Primery key invalid and both seem to be not alive.
Question : How can the keys become valid and alive ?
Question : Is this a Microsoft problem ?
Regards,
Ger van Dijck.
--
Gemaakt met
On 10/29/23 20:06, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
On 30/10/2023 12.03, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/29/23 17:25, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
F38
Yesterday I did a 'dnf update' when the machine had issues (I know, a
bad idea).
During the update I noticed these failures (see below). Each time
On 30/10/2023 12.03, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/29/23 17:25, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
F38
Yesterday I did a 'dnf update' when the machine had issues (I know, a bad idea).
During the update I noticed these failures (see below). Each time there was
some wait before proceeding.
I think
On 10/29/23 17:25, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
F38
Yesterday I did a 'dnf update' when the machine had issues (I know, a
bad idea).
During the update I noticed these failures (see below). Each time there
was some wait before proceeding.
I think that systemd was the cause as other cron jobs
F38
Yesterday I did a 'dnf update' when the machine had issues (I know, a bad idea).
During the update I noticed these failures (see below). Each time there was
some wait before proceeding.
I think that systemd was the cause as other cron jobs encountered this error:
Failed to retrieve
On 13/9/23 04:51, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/12/23 01:14, Stephen Morris wrote:
How do I change the mirror that DNF is going to try to use for a
particular repository so I can avoid the following messages, which
have been occurring for the last two days?
Errors during downloading metadata
to... not use a fc6 package at this point.
I am not using any. It is fluff left over after many upgrades since the early
days of fedora.
Wow. You have a machine that you upgraded from fc6?
Congrats!
Both dnf and rpm say the package is not installed and I cannot remove it.
I see that all the files
package at this point.
>
> I am not using any. It is fluff left over after many upgrades since the early
> days of fedora.
Wow. You have a machine that you upgraded from fc6?
Congrats!
> Both dnf and rpm say the package is not installed and I cannot remove it.
> I see that all the
this rpm?
I am not running fc6, I run fc38.
I'd strongly advise you to... not use a fc6 package at this point.
I am not using any. It is fluff left over after many upgrades since the early
days of fedora.
Both dnf and rpm say the package is not installed and I cannot remove it.
I see that all
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:29:56AM +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> The below message shows, then the update proceeds to completion.
> Is it a problem? Is there something I should do or is it something at the
> repository side (which one?).
>
> I found articles suggested rebuilding the rpm db.
The below message shows, then the update proceeds to completion.
Is it a problem? Is there something I should do or is it something at the
repository side (which one?).
I found articles suggested rebuilding the rpm db. However, since this problem
happened on two machines
I find it unusual to
On 9/12/23 01:14, Stephen Morris wrote:
How do I change the mirror that DNF is going to try to use for a
particular repository so I can avoid the following messages, which have
been occurring for the last two days?
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'updates':
- Curl
Hi,
How do I change the mirror that DNF is going to try to use for a
particular repository so I can avoid the following messages, which have
been occurring for the last two days?
Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Updates
On 1 Sep 2023 at 7:32, stan via users wrote:
Date sent: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 07:32:07 -0700
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: No match for grup package - during dnf upgrade
process??
Organization: zohofree
Send reply
anization of the fonts packages. It's
possible that these are only warnings from dnf about the group, and the
packages were actually replaced and obsoleted as part of the larger
upgrade. Run
rpm -qi [single package name]
to see if they are still installed. If they are, try a
dnf update [pack
Am upgrading a machine from Fedora 37 to Fedora 38.
Saw this as part of process.
Is there a process to clean this up?
Did they drop this groups, or renamed them??
Thanks.
No match for group package "python3-dnf-plugin-system-upgrade"
No match for group package "google-noto-sa
On 8/15/23 20:34, Tim via users wrote:
On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 22:02 +0100, Barry wrote:
Better these days to replace ifconfig with:
ip addr
I'm not so sure I agree with that, there's some useful info provided by
ifconf that ip addr doesn't supply. For example:
RX packets
gt; >
> > > Den fre 11 aug. 2023 kl 05:27 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee
> > > :
> > >>
> > >> Hey Folks,
> > >>
> > >> DNF 5 landed in rawhide sometime back and has now been taken off F39
> > >> schedule. DNF 5 awaits testing and feedback b
to help next week too
> > if i am not too busy
> >
> > Den fre 11 aug. 2023 kl 05:27 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee
> > :
> >>
> >> Hey Folks,
> >>
> >> DNF 5 landed in rawhide sometime back and has now been taken off F39
> >> schedule.
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 13:04:07 +0930 Tim via users wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 22:02 +0100, Barry wrote:
>> Better these days to replace ifconfig with:
>> ip addr
> I'm not so sure I agree with that, there's some useful info provided by
> ifconf that ip addr doesn't supply. For example:
On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 22:02 +0100, Barry wrote:
> Better these days to replace ifconfig with:
>
> ip addr
I'm not so sure I agree with that, there's some useful info provided by
ifconf that ip addr doesn't supply. For example:
RX packets 24927062 bytes 16569920396 (15.4 GiB)
> On 15 Aug 2023, at 09:21, Tim via users wrote:
>
> If you type ifconfig into the command line, does your ethernet port
> have a valid IP (not 127.0.0.1 nor an IP starting 169.254)? If it has
> one of them, it won't be able to do anything. Likewise if it has none.
>
> Does your PC have a
On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 17:50 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> Does your PC have a nameserver configured in the settings?
>
> e.g. grep nameserver /etc/resolv.conf
And, I just noticed that my resolv.conf file suggests this command:
resolvectl status
--
uname -rsvp
Linux
On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 22:34 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
> 2 f38 hosts. 1 dnf install xxx works fine. Very fast. 2) spins
> forever: dnf.log shows
>
> Error during transfer: Curl error (28): Timeout was reached for
> https://mirrors.fedo...
>
> Web searches show this t
ro Mukherjee
> :
>>
>> Hey Folks,
>>
>> DNF 5 landed in rawhide sometime back and has now been taken off F39
>> schedule. DNF 5 awaits testing and feedback before it can be
>> considered stable for Fedora users. DNF and Fedora Quality are hosting
>> a week-long
1 - 100 of 2266 matches
Mail list logo
