Re: saving backward compatibility :-)

2023-04-30 Thread George N. White III
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 1:53 PM Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Patrick O'Callaghan said: > > On Sat, 2023-04-29 at 10:23 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > > > I'd wager there are shell scripts using fgrep that were written on > > > the first pdp-11 unix and are still in use today > > > > IIRC

Re: saving backward compatibility :-)

2023-04-29 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Patrick O'Callaghan said: > On Sat, 2023-04-29 at 10:23 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > > I'd wager there are shell scripts using fgrep that were written on > > the first pdp-11 unix and are still in use today > > IIRC early PDP-11 UNIX (pre System V) only had grep. fgrep and egrep

Re: saving backward compatibility :-)

2023-04-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2023-04-29 at 10:23 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > I'd wager there are shell scripts using fgrep that were written on > the first pdp-11 unix and are still in use today IIRC early PDP-11 UNIX (pre System V) only had grep. fgrep and egrep are later additions. (Not trying to counter your

saving backward compatibility :-)

2023-04-29 Thread Tom Horsley
I'd wager there are shell scripts using fgrep that were written on the first pdp-11 unix and are still in use today, but appeasing someone's OCD is more important than backward compatibility for tens of thousands of systems all over the world. OK fine, I know I'll lose any argument here, so I've