On 08/06/2016 09:40 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
It appears I should enable the AHCI option for RAID functionality
(even if I only have a single boot drive installed) and then that will
allow hot swapping.
What mode is it set to now? AHCI is typically the default.
--
users mailing list
users
and starting up the computer again. It appears I should enable the AHCI
option for RAID functionality (even if I only have a single boot drive
installed) and then that will allow hot swapping. My concern is the
warning message I get about turning on AHCI when I start to make the
change in BIOS
===
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 2:01 PM
From: Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: swapping
On 02/17/2015 02:16 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
It is very long.
Just the end.
time-Tue Feb
===
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 at 7:21 PM
From: Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: swapping
ausearch -m AVC
--
users mailing list
users
===
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 at 2:28 PM
From: Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: swapping
On 02/12/2015 06:42 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
I did both. Unfortunately
...@colorremedies.com
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: swapping
ausearch -m AVC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora
| | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 at 4:24 AM
From: Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: swapping
On 01/15/2015 04:15
| | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 at 2:28 PM
From: Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: swapping
On 02
ausearch -m AVC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines:
Hello,
I guess that the permanent swapping is not due to setroubleshooter
but ma Go of RAM and teh swapping is just increasing permanently
reaching 5Go
(20 firefox processes are running requiring 5% of Mem each)
How can I trouble shoot this permanent issue on this computer?
Thank
===
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 at 4:24 AM
From: Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: swapping
On 01/15/2015 04:15 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Usually if you
: Friday, January 16, 2015 at 4:24 AM
From: Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: swapping
On 01/15/2015 04:15 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Usually if you are in this situation, you have a bad labeling problem
Hi,
[?]
I opened the computer with the new disk
and -this time- miraculously it started perfectly.
It remains me, now, only the problem of the restore grub.
Amazing ... it need to have to have courage
Thanks for your interest
Angelo
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Chris Murphy
thanks for your answers
I explain better .
recently I started with Linux and, as a beginner, I made many mistakes that
forced me to reinstall many times, both fedora that all the SW already
installed.
That is the way I decided to “invest some time” with clonezilla in order to
prevent the
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Angelo Moreschini
mrangelo.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
However trying to restore on a different (new and virgin) Hard Disk, the
operation fails.
That's not specific enough. There are probably hundreds or even
thousands of reasons for failure. Exactly how does it
On 01/21/2015 12:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Angelo Moreschini
mrangelo.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I already used successfully clonezilla to backup my OS (fedora).
I did this (only for exercise til now) restoring the OS on the original disk
from which I had
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Angelo Moreschini
mrangelo.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I already used successfully clonezilla to backup my OS (fedora).
I did this (only for exercise til now) restoring the OS on the original disk
from which I had take the clone.
Now I wanted to use my
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Rick Stevens ri...@alldigital.com wrote:
We do need more info other than the clone operation failed. I have
cloned a large number of machines using Clonezilla using virgin drives
(CentOS, Fedora, Ubuntu, Winblows). Many had the target drives larger
than the
On 01/16/2015 03:45 PM, poma wrote:
On 16.01.2015 20:35, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/16/2015 01:57 PM, poma wrote:
On 16.01.2015 19:47, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/16/2015 07:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 08:28 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 16.01.2015, Tim wrote:
Hi,
I already used successfully clonezilla to backup my OS (fedora).
I did this (only for exercise til now) *restoring the OS on the original
disk from which I had **take** the clone*.
Now I wanted to use my clone to restore fedora on a virgin HD. (for
security reasons, I did not want restore
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Andrew R Paterson
andy.pater...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Having watched this debate I find I must add my own 10c
I have spent over 30 years working on unix systems starting with xenix,
bsd
and ending up with linux .
We survived quite happily using the well
On 17.01.2015 19:52, Ntlworld wrote:
Right - I think I might start looking at Ubuntu!
Sent from my iPhone
This old man and me, were at the bar and we
Were having us some beers and swaping I dont cares
Talking politics, blonde and red-head chicks
Old dogs and new tricks and habits we aint
is actually swapping hundreds of
megabytes in and out you will quickly be in a world of pain. Plus most
of the time when that sort of memory pressure hits it is a runaway
process that the OOM killer will eventually take out and having a lot of
swap only increases how long you suffer with an almost totally
find 512MB or
1GB to be plenty of swap. You need some swap just so the system can
ditch memory that was used once to initialize code but isn't accessed
again and other similar things that can be safely tossed to swap and
forgot about. But if the system is actually swapping hundreds of
megabytes
Right - I think I might start looking at Ubuntu!
Sent from my iPhone
On 17 Jan 2015, at 14:10, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17.01.2015 12:54, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 16:31:03 Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/15/2015 11:28 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Selinux
On 01/17/2015 06:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:11 PM, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
The nand flash sinks completely into the multi-flash
reader/writer, nothing to protrude. So I think this
is a good solution for my situation.
Seems reasonable I guess.
I really do
You do not need to mess it up, unless you are actually using all 2TB of the
disk. Use gparted to shrink the existing partitions as required.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 8:11 PM, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/17/2015 06:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On 01/17/2015 03:54 AM, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
then basically - I wanted OUT!.
I feel your pain. I used to really like computers, until we networked
them all together, and security became something we had to care about.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 01/17/2015 06:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Uswsusp
It looks like it support swapfiles. I still don't think a sparse file
backing a loop device as a swap device will work for suspend to disk,
but it may just be a matter of creativity. If this is a laptop I
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Uswsusp
It looks like it support swapfiles. I still don't think a sparse file
backing a loop device as a swap device will work for suspend to disk,
but it may just be a matter of creativity. If this is a laptop I think
you're better off with swap on the
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:11 PM, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
The nand flash sinks completely into the multi-flash
reader/writer, nothing to protrude. So I think this
is a good solution for my situation.
Seems reasonable I guess.
I really do not
want to back up 2TB drive, repartition it
On 01/17/2015 07:14 PM, John Mellor wrote:
You do not need to mess it up, unless you are actually using all 2TB
of the disk. Use gparted to shrink the existing partitions as required.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 8:11 PM, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com
mailto:jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 8:05 PM, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I knew about what gparted can do. I had tried it
on a 1tb drive, and it still took at least 2 hours.
Maybe there was an issue with the sata internal bus???
We'd need dmesg to have any idea about that. Anytime I've done only
On 01/16/2015 04:31 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
If your computer is single-user anyway, why does it need a security
subsystem?
Sometimes it protects you from badly-written software. My desktop uses
BOINC to run various projects for the World Community Grid. One project
started throwing up
On Friday 16 January 2015 16:31:03 Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/15/2015 11:28 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Selinux requires at least basic knowledge and administration. Most of
the people I installed Linux for didn't even know it was there or what
it's good for.
If you do not use file system
On 17.01.2015 12:54, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 16:31:03 Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/15/2015 11:28 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Selinux requires at least basic knowledge and administration. Most of
the people I installed Linux for didn't even know it was there or what
it's
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 08:28 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 16.01.2015, Tim wrote:
Of course *you* do not *use* it, it's there as a protective device
against *things* on your system.
Any recent Linux distribution can be secured without using selinux.
Selinux requires at least basic
On 01/16/2015 07:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 08:28 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 16.01.2015, Tim wrote:
Of course *you* do not *use* it, it's there as a protective device
against *things* on your system.
Any recent Linux distribution can be secured without using
On 16.01.2015 19:47, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/16/2015 07:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 08:28 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 16.01.2015, Tim wrote:
Of course *you* do not *use* it, it's there as a protective device
against *things* on your system.
Any recent
On 01/16/2015 01:57 PM, poma wrote:
On 16.01.2015 19:47, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/16/2015 07:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 08:28 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 16.01.2015, Tim wrote:
Of course *you* do not *use* it, it's there as a protective device
against
Can it be done?
So far, swapon says:
swapon: /var/swapfile: skipping - it appears to have holes.
I was hoping that the kernel's swapper would allow the filesystem to
allocate
real blocks to the sparse file when they are needed rather than check
up front to see if they already exist.
Maybe
On 16.01.2015 20:35, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/16/2015 01:57 PM, poma wrote:
On 16.01.2015 19:47, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/16/2015 07:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 08:28 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 16.01.2015, Tim wrote:
Of course *you* do not *use* it,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:08 PM, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Can it be done?
So far, swapon says:
swapon: /var/swapfile: skipping - it appears to have holes.
I was hoping that the kernel's swapper would allow the filesystem to
allocate
real blocks to the sparse file when they are needed
On 01/16/2015 01:57 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:08 PM, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Can it be done?
So far, swapon says:
swapon: /var/swapfile: skipping - it appears to have holes.
I was hoping that the kernel's swapper would allow the filesystem to
allocate
real
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 13:08 -0700, jd1008 wrote:
Can it be done?
So far, swapon says:
swapon: /var/swapfile: skipping - it appears to have holes.
...
Maybe the devs can have a look and see if they can modify the swapper to
allow sparse swap files??
There is a reason why it acts like it
On 01/15/2015 11:28 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Selinux requires at least basic knowledge and administration. Most of
the people I installed Linux for didn't even know it was there or what
it's good for.
If you do not use file system permissions for something useful,
chmod -R a+w /
File system
to initialize code but isn't accessed
again and other similar things that can be safely tossed to swap and
forgot about. But if the system is actually swapping hundreds of
megabytes in and out you will quickly be in a world of pain. Plus most
of the time when that sort of memory pressure hits
the system can
ditch memory that was used once to initialize code but isn't accessed
again and other similar things that can be safely tossed to swap and
forgot about. But if the system is actually swapping hundreds of
megabytes in and out you will quickly be in a world of pain. Plus most
of the time
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 16:31 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
If your computer is single-user anyway, why does it need a security
subsystem?
*eyeroll*
That actually isn't as crazy as you seem to think. Security should
always be seen as tradeoff between the cost of the security vs the
potential
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 08:28 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Selinux requires at least basic knowledge and administration.
I can't agree with that. In general, it requires none. The average
user doesn't have to do anything, it just does what it's supposed to do.
They're not likely to even know it's
On 15.01.2015, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I need to restart the machine to have it fix!
If you do not use selinux for something useful, add a selinux=0 to
your kernel boot parameters.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Heinz Diehl htd...@fritha.org wrote:
On 15.01.2015, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I need to restart the machine to have it fix!
If you do not use selinux for something useful, add a selinux=0 to
your kernel boot parameters.
That's bad advice. First use enforcing=0
cannot work because fedora
is swapping permanently.
I attach the top file.
I need to restart the machine to have it fix!
I've seen this on my box, too, but only once. Kill the setroubleshoot
process and it will return to normal. I've filed a bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Patrick Dupre writes:
How I can do so?
Before I rebooted the machine after I clicked on troubleshooting alerts and
a report had been sent.
but it did not change the situation..
Depending, sometimes, I can recover the memory by closing firefox, but
other times I have to reboot.
The selinux
Allegedly, on or about 15 January 2015, Heinz Diehl sent:
If you do not use selinux for something useful, add a selinux=0 to
your kernel boot parameters.
Bad advice! It's like saying that if you do not use the earth wiring in
your house, rip it out.
Of course *you* do not *use* it, it's
On 16.01.2015, Tim wrote:
Of course *you* do not *use* it, it's there as a protective device
against *things* on your system.
Any recent Linux distribution can be secured without using selinux.
Selinux requires at least basic knowledge and administration. Most of
the people I installed Linux
Patrick Dupre writes:
Hello,
Very often I reach a situation where I cannot work because fedora
is swapping permanently.
I attach the top file.
I need to restart the machine to have it fix!
Wow, setroubleshoot ate ten gigs of virtual memory on a machine with 8gb of
physical ram
for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: swapping
Patrick Dupre writes:
Hello,
Very often I reach a situation where I cannot work because fedora
is swapping permanently.
I attach the top file.
I need to restart the machine to have it fix!
Wow, setroubleshoot ate ten
On 01/15/2015 06:06 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Very often I reach a situation where I cannot work because fedora
is swapping permanently.
I attach the top file.
I need to restart the machine to have it fix!
I've seen this on my box, too, but only once. Kill the setroubleshoot process
Hello,
Very often I reach a situation where I cannot work because fedora
is swapping permanently.
I attach the top file.
I need to restart the machine to have it fix!
Thank for your help.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ
On 01/15/2015 04:15 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Usually if you are in this situation, you have a bad labeling problem.
touch /.autorelabel; reboot
Will fix the labels, or you could just do
restorecon -R /
Except that is not the case in this instance.
--
users mailing list
On 10/16/2014 11:12 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 16Oct2014 22:44, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you explain _why_ you want to renumber the partitions? Does
something have a hardwired desire to use partition 1 or something?
I think I need to do it because the windows partition for
I am trying to avert having to dd out 2 partitions to external drive
and repartition and dd them back in.
What I am trying to do is renumber partition 1 as partition 2
and partition 2 as partition 1.
Is this possible? parted and fdisk and sfdisk do not seem to provide
such operations.
--
On 16Oct2014 12:55, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to avert having to dd out 2 partitions to external drive
and repartition and dd them back in.
What I am trying to do is renumber partition 1 as partition 2
and partition 2 as partition 1.
Is this possible? parted and fdisk and
On 10/16/2014 03:32 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 16Oct2014 12:55, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to avert having to dd out 2 partitions to external drive
and repartition and dd them back in.
What I am trying to do is renumber partition 1 as partition 2
and partition 2 as
On 16Oct2014 18:45, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/16/2014 03:32 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 16Oct2014 12:55, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to avert having to dd out 2 partitions to external drive
and repartition and dd them back in.
What I am trying to do is renumber
On 10/16/2014 10:25 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 16Oct2014 18:45, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/16/2014 03:32 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 16Oct2014 12:55, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to avert having to dd out 2 partitions to external drive
and repartition and dd them
On 16Oct2014 22:44, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you explain _why_ you want to renumber the partitions? Does
something have a hardwired desire to use partition 1 or something?
I think I need to do it because the windows partition for some reason
will not boot as partition 2 even though
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 00:37 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
dd if=/dev/sdsource of=/dev/sdtarget bs=16M
and wait. there is no progress visible!
Well, not exactly. One can use kill -USR1 PID of dd to see the current
progress report.
dd if=/dev/sda | ssh root@192.168.196.129 dd
:Swapping HDD
I am currently using a Gateway T-6321 laptop with a 320 GB SATA HD.
I'm finding it's running out of room, with all the pdf's and other
files I have accumulated. I want to swap it out to a 750GB SATA HDD.
How can I do this when I don't have another laptop with the same exact
specs
Phil Savoie wrote:
On 12/26/2012 09:50 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
I am currently using a Gateway T-6321 laptop with a 320 GB SATA HD. I'm
finding it's running out of room, with all the pdf's and other files I
have accumulated. I want to swap it out to a 750GB SATA HDD. How can I
do this
2012/12/27 Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. eoconno...@gmail.com:
WOW!so much information to digest! Thanks to one and all, but after
reading the responses, I think the Clonezilla way might be for me, I'm not
too familiar with the Terminal and the command lines and suchalthough I
think it would
On 12/27/2012 11:15 AM, Paweł Brodacki wrote:
2012/12/27 Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. eoconno...@gmail.com:
WOW!so much information to digest! Thanks to one and all, but after
reading the responses, I think the Clonezilla way might be for me, I'm not
too familiar with the Terminal and the command
Am 28.12.2012 00:22, schrieb Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.:
Besides, I agree with your conclusion, that Clonezilla may be the best
way for you. I used it and I like it.
I am thankful for all the comments, I have just finished my backup of my
entire system, I'm still skiffy when it
comes to
I am currently using a Gateway T-6321 laptop with a 320 GB SATA HD. I'm
finding it's running out of room, with all the pdf's and other files I
have accumulated. I want to swap it out to a 750GB SATA HDD. How can I
do this when I don't have another laptop with the same exact specs as
the
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 09:50:07PM -0500, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
I am currently using a Gateway T-6321 laptop with a 320 GB SATA HD. I'm
finding it's running out of room, with all the pdf's and other files I
have accumulated. I want to swap it out to a 750GB SATA HDD. How can I
do
fred smith writes:
if that doesn't get you where you need to go, you might try:
--with the new drive connected via USB
--boot from the aforementioned live CD
--create the partitions as you want them
--pray a while...
--copy all the files from each partition on the OLD drive into the
matching
On 12/26/2012 09:50 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
I am currently using a Gateway T-6321 laptop with a 320 GB SATA HD. I'm
finding it's running out of room, with all the pdf's and other files I
have accumulated. I want to swap it out to a 750GB SATA HDD. How can I
do this when I don't have
On 12/26/12 21:50, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
I am currently using a Gateway T-6321 laptop with a 320 GB SATA HD. I'm
finding it's running out of room, with all the pdf's and other files I
have accumulated. I want to swap it out to a 750GB SATA HDD. How can I
do this when I don't have
On 12/27/2012 12:04 AM, staticsafe wrote:
On 12/26/12 21:50, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
I am currently using a Gateway T-6321 laptop with a 320 GB SATA HD. I'm
finding it's running out of room, with all the pdf's and other files I
have accumulated. I want to swap it out to a 750GB SATA HDD.
On 27.12.2012, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
I want to swap it out to a 750GB SATA HDD. How can I do this
when I don't have another laptop with the same exact specs as the Gateway?
- Connect your new HDD to your laptop (e.g. as an external drive).
- Get the new HDD partitioned and formatted
-
81 matches
Mail list logo
