Good Morning!
I’m working my way through
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:SSL
trying to create the certificates with OpenSSL, and then get them added to the
NSS database. Most of that is fine. It’s only at the end that the directory
server refuses to start, with these errors:
On 22.12.2013, Tom Horsley wrote:
Is there no loop device in the new 3.12.5 kernel by
default?
In 3.12.6 vanilla, it definitely is.
[htd@kiera ~]$ uname -a
Linux kiera.fritha.org 3.12.6-rc1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 19 16:55:38 CET 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
users mailing list
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Greg Woods wo...@ucar.edu wrote:
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 10:22 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Keepass and friends are worthy alternatives, but AFAIK they aren't
usable from phones.
I use Keepassdroid on an Android phone and it works just fine. It's a
bit
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:12 AM, bruce badoug...@gmail.com wrote:
since this has been hijacked to be a thread regarding passwds..
why don't you relabel the topic...
Maybe, if it goes on much longer. However I would hardly call this
hijacking. It has drifted a little from the original topic,
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:36:26 -0500, bruce wrote:
For sake of discussion, assume a fresh base desktop install of the OS
(Fed/RHEL/Centos).
After doing the install from the iso(s), you install :
-rkhunter
-chkconfig
Did you mean chkrootkit? If so, it's only for experienced users (who
know
bruce badoug...@gmail.com writes:
And regarding the ssh/remote access, you specify public/private keys,
and you have the key process run from the key file. This allows a user
to be able to ssh into the box without having to use the ssh passwd,
but only from the corresponding box that has the
I use KMOD-NVIDIA on my system, and I ran FEDUP to upgrade to F20 overnight
and when I came to my computer this morning, there were several warnings:
WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
broken dependencies
kmod-nvidia-304xx-3.11.7-100.fc18.x86_64-304.88-4.fc18.x86_64
On 12/22/13 21:39, John Aldrich wrote:
I use KMOD-NVIDIA on my system, and I ran FEDUP to upgrade to F20 overnight
and when I came to my computer this morning, there were several warnings:
WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
broken dependencies
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 17:14 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
And what about our certificates? Are they more or less useless now?
There are no vulnerabilities related to X.509 certificates generated
by OpenSSL (on Fedora or otherwise) that I am aware of.
The big vulnerability in the
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 08:39:47 -0500, John Aldrich wrote:
I use KMOD-NVIDIA on my system, and I ran FEDUP to upgrade to F20 overnight
and when I came to my computer this morning, there were several warnings:
WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
broken dependencies
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 22:41 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
Something may be more fundamentally wrong than I thought. I don't see
64 bit as a choice anywhere in Vbox Manager.
Which repo is your virtualbox from?
I'm not using a repo for it, I just downloaded it from the
virtualbox.org web site,
Hi,
I updated using yum last night and while the new 3.12.5 kernel was
installed, it does not show up on grub. So, I did the following:
sudo grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64
Found initrd image:
After I started a fedup update to F20, it burned up a lot of time relabeling
the entire filesystem, then rebooted again. On the second reboot there were
a couple of failed to mount update media errors; however it looks like the
update rpm transaction is running. We'll see.
I have selinux
add selinux=0 on all of the kernel lines in grub.conf...I believe this
disables it completely...and cannot be turned back on without removing
that line and rebooting...obviously if you want to enable it and got
back and use it again relabeling would need to be done.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 8:55
If you want if off temporarily, till the next reboot or till you turn
it on, this:
sudo setenforce 0
should also work, correct?
1 in place of 0 switches it back on, no?
Unless I am not understanding the question.
Many thanks,
Ranjan
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:01:50 -0600 Roger
Heflin
With all the NSA building in back doors into everything maybe SElinux
should be pulled from the Fedora distros permanently. Just a thought.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Sam Varshavchik
mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
After I started a fedup update to F20, it burned up a lot of time
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:55:20 -0500
Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
I have selinux turned off, I don't need it. The update script is
turning it on, and relabeling everything. I'm just going to turn it
off again, when the update finishes.
Is there any way to avoid wasting all this
Trying to upgrade F19-F20 using fedup --iso with luks-encrypted partitions.
The upgrade stops after Mounted /boot, and does not proceed, no further
errors. Nothing appears to be running.
I did run into bug 1043981, and applied the patch to fix fedup barfing.
pgpug_17KnCEH.pgp
Description:
Wolfgang,
Right in what you wrote. And what you wrote allows for ssh commands to
be used where you specify the keyFile.
However you can also mod the ssh_config (i believe) to have it auto
use the keyFile with the pub/private key to negotiate the user/passwd
process for the ssh cmd. This is
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Trying to upgrade F19-F20 using fedup --iso with luks-encrypted partitions.
The upgrade stops after Mounted /boot, and does not proceed, no further
errors. Nothing appears to be running.
I did run into bug 1043981, and applied the patch to fix fedup barfing.
…
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 08:54:54 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Hi,
I updated using yum last night and while the new 3.12.5 kernel was
installed, it does not show up on grub. So, I did the following:
sudo grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found linux image:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 20:14:27 +0100 Michael Schwendt
mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 08:54:54 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Hi,
I updated using yum last night and while the new 3.12.5 kernel was
installed, it does not show up on grub. So, I did the following:
sudo
On 12/20/2013 03:58 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 15:07 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
gnome-tweak-tool you can select Shell Extensions, then turn on
Alternate Status Menu.
I don't see Shell Extensions. Only Extensions. There is an 'Install
Shell Extension' option there, but
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 14:03:08 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
OK, I have downdated the kernel, run grub2-mkconfig so we should be
back on the same plane as before.
Should be? Do you mean the problem is reproducible after simple
downgrade of the kernel package?
An important thing to note is that
On 12/20/2013 10:28 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/20/2013 05:07 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 02:47 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 13:46 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
How do I get these available somewhere? I would assume on that top
bar
pulldown that has
On 12/22/2013 05:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 10:28 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/20/2013 05:07 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 02:47 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 13:46 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
How do I get these available somewhere? I
On 12/20/2013 10:32 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/20/2013 05:09 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 01:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On f17 I can move a window or dialog box by holding down alt and
left mouse and moving the window where I want. This is very
valuable on reduced
On 12/22/2013 03:15 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/22/2013 05:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 10:28 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/20/2013 05:07 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 02:47 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 13:46 -0500, Robert Moskowitz
Thanks!
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:08:05 +0100 Michael Schwendt
mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 14:03:08 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
OK, I have downdated the kernel, run grub2-mkconfig so we should be
back on the same plane as before.
Should be? Do you mean the problem is
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:26:32 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I removed the new kernel, updated grub2-mkconfig and rebooted into the
old kernel. Does this not bring it back to the old setup (before
installation of the new kernel). Or if your question was if the problem
is reproducible in the sense
David Highley wrote:
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On 21.12.2013 20:40, David Highley wrote:
We upgraded a test system to Fedora 20 using the fedup process. There
were 60 packages that were left from Fedora 19 after the upgrade that
were subsequently fixed by doing a yum
bruce badoug...@gmail.com writes:
However you can also mod the ssh_config (i believe) to have it auto
use the keyFile with the pub/private key to negotiate the user/passwd
process for the ssh cmd. This is useful when remotely/programatically
accessing the ssh cmdline process for running
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 22:47:05 +0100 Michael Schwendt
mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:26:32 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I removed the new kernel, updated grub2-mkconfig and rebooted into the
old kernel. Does this not bring it back to the old setup (before
installation of
On 12/22/13 22:53, Greg Woods wrote:
The RPM I have installed is VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64
(they don't seem to have one for Fedora 19).
Yes, but the download is labeled for Fedora 18 (Spherical Cow) / 19
(Schrödingers Cat)
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and
hi guys.
question regarding how to remotely auto boot/install into a system..
normal operation:
-1 drive/1 OS
machine gets turned on, boots/starts the OS
but if I want to do a remote/auto/programtic install of a new OS, on
top of the current OS, how the heck can this be accomplished.
I was
On 12/22/2013 5:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/22/13 22:53, Greg Woods wrote:
The RPM I have installed is VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64
(they don't seem to have one for Fedora 19).
Yes, but the download is labeled for Fedora 18 (Spherical Cow) / 19
(Schrödingers Cat)
And now running yum distro-sync results in the system trying to roll back
everything. When I look in YUMEX it shows all the repos as F18, not F20. How
do I fix that???
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 22.12.2013 23:54, John Aldrich wrote:
And now running yum distro-sync results in the system trying to roll back
everything. When I look in YUMEX it shows all the repos as F18, not F20. How
do I fix that???
Please use fedup for upgrading from f18 to f20.
[1]
On 22.12.2013 22:49, David Highley wrote:
David Highley wrote:
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On 21.12.2013 20:40, David Highley wrote:
We upgraded a test system to Fedora 20 using the fedup process. There
were 60 packages that were left from Fedora 19 after the upgrade that
were subsequently
On 12/23/13 06:40, David wrote:
You guys are making this much, much more difficult than it is.
Not really.
The OP is using VBox from the Oracle site on F19 and is wanting to run F20 in a
VM and he can't get it to install. Others, including myself, have had no
problems. So.trying to help
Can I just do a yum remove *.fc18.* to remove those packages since I should
have the F20 versions now?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 18:24:25 -0500
John Aldrich jmaldr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Can I just do a yum remove *.fc18.* to remove those packages since
I should have the F20 versions now?
I'd advise against blindly doing so.
First, try a 'yum distro-sync'. This will make sure you have the newest
Trying again...
I used FedUp to upgrade to F20 from F18, however the first time I tried, I
switched the display (I'm on a KVM switch) to another computer and when I
switched back it looked like the display had not updated and that FedUp was
hung, so I rebooted, cleaned everything out and tried
On 12/22/2013 6:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/23/13 06:40, David wrote:
You guys are making this much, much more difficult than it is.
Not really.
The OP is using VBox from the Oracle site on F19 and is wanting to run F20 in
a VM and he can't get it to install. Others, including
On 12-22-13 18:24:25 John Aldrich wrote:
Can I just do a yum remove *.fc18.* to remove those packages since
I should have the F20 versions now?
You want to run
package-cleanup --dupes
This will print the F18 packages that also have F20 installed. Erase
only those (which could easily be
On 12/23/13 07:58, David wrote:
On 12/22/2013 6:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/23/13 06:40, David wrote:
You guys are making this much, much more difficult than it is.
Not really.
The OP is using VBox from the Oracle site on F19 and is wanting to run F20
in a VM and he can't get it to
On 12/23/13 09:57, Ed Greshko wrote:
The last significant post from the OP would indicate he has it running under
virt-manager and is not concentrating on trying to find a method to convert
VBox VM's to run under virt-manager
Should read
The last significant post from the OP would
On 12/22/2013 6:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/23/13 06:40, David wrote:
You guys are making this much, much more difficult than it is.
Not really.
The OP is using VBox from the Oracle site on F19 and is wanting to run F20 in
a VM and he can't get it to install. Others, including
On 12/22/2013 9:01 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/23/13 09:57, Ed Greshko wrote:
The last significant post from the OP would indicate he has it running under
virt-manager and is not concentrating on trying to find a method to convert
VBox VM's to run under virt-manager
Should read
The
On Dec 22, 2013, at 8:30 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
Trying to upgrade F19-F20 using fedup --iso with luks-encrypted partitions.
I suggest posting the results of lsblk.
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
Hello, Everyone
I just ran yum update and rebooted. Some time not long after that
reboot, I started getting message like this:
Dec 22 20:11:26 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4130.161465] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck
for 22s! [httpd:1889]
I ran grep -i soft lockup with the following results:
On Dec 22, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Trying to upgrade F19-F20 using fedup --iso with luks-encrypted partitions.
The upgrade stops after Mounted /boot, and does not proceed, no further
errors. Nothing appears to be running.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Greg Woods wo...@ucar.edu wrote:
At some point I'd like to move away from depending on Oracle
You might want to remove all the Oracle contributed patches to the Linux
kernel too, and btrfs, and OpenJDK... *rolleyes*
http://goo.gl/u3dOk7
FC
--
During times of
On 12/22/2013 02:54 PM, John Aldrich wrote:
And now running yum distro-sync results in the system trying to roll back
everything. When I look in YUMEX it shows all the repos as F18, not F20. How
do I fix that???
Try running package-cleanup --dupes and look for the F18 version of
releasever.
On 12/23/13 06:54, John Aldrich wrote:
And now running yum distro-sync results in the system trying to roll back
everything. When I look in YUMEX it shows all the repos as F18, not F20. How
do I fix that???
What does cat /etc/os-release reveal?
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions
55 matches
Mail list logo
