One other thing you might want to do.
Change the number of kernels to keep. The default is 3.
I have one old IBM R61 that has had lot of updates over the years,
and its boot partition was to small. As other suggested removing
the rescue frees space, but it gets rebuilt when new kernel is
install
Checked
https://www.isitdownrightnow.com/lists.fedorahosted.org.html
And shows it hasn't been down for over a week? So probable
something local.
On 8 Apr 2024 at 10:57, Walter H. via users wrote:
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:failing
https://lists.fedorahosted
On 14 Apr 2024 at 12:47, John Pilkington wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:47:57 +0100
Subject:Re: crippling nvidia display issue.
From: John Pilkington
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Send reply to: Community suppo
...@guam.net, Community support for Fedora
users
From: "Michael D. Setzer II via users"
Copies to: "Michael D. Setzer II"
> On 14 Apr 2024 at 12:47, John Pilkington wrote:
>
> Date sent:Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:47:57 +01
support for Fedora users
> On 14/04/2024 16:22, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > On 15 Apr 2024 at 0:29, Michael D. Setzer II via user wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Just as an additional note. I have an older Acer notebook that has
> >> an NVIDIA GT 6
Had to have machine with older card keep running the 6.7.11
kernel in order to have a working nvidia driver for BOINC.
The newer ones now work with the 6.8 kernels.
Just to let others know.
++
Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science I
On 25 Apr 2024 at 2:41, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Date sent: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 02:41:23 -0400
From: Jon LaBadie
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Keyboard dead with anydesk logon
Send reply to: Community support for F
On 29 Apr 2024 at 17:57, George R Goffe via users wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:57:12 + (UTC)
To: "users@lists.fedoraproject.org"
Subject:rc.local
Send reply to: George R Goffe ,
Community support for Fedora users
From:
On 29 Apr 2024 at 17:27, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:27:23 -0700
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:can I clone from a usb flash drive to an NVMe
drive?
Send reply to: Community support for Fe
On 12 May 2024 at 4:51, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 12 May 2024 04:51:11 -0700
Subject:Re: statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
From:
A quick note. There is a reverse VNC option with VNC that uses
port 5500 (I believe). Been a while since I used it. It is a kind of
reverse VNC. In which the client makes the connection to your
host. So, it doesn't require the port mapping.
Don't have it running much, but did with my mom many
Note sure this with post to list with the Bold marked text, but
sending it to your email as well. If list rejects it will repost without
Rich Text, and Perhaps mark lines with (B) that were bold??
Good Luck.
A couple of things I would recommend.
Have an old Lenovo R61 notebook that also has a 5
On 14 May 2024 at 4:04, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Date sent: Tue, 14 May 2024 04:04:46 -0700
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:Can an vsFTP server get swamped?
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
From:
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/share/gir-1.0/GLib-2.0.gir conflicts between attempted
installs of glib2-devel-2.80.2-1.fc40.i686 and
glib2-devel-2.80.2-1.fc40.x86_64
# rpm -qa | grep glib2-devel
glib2-devel-2.78.6-1.fc39.x86_64
glib2-devel-2.78.6-1.fc39.i686
Don't know if other 3 m
: John Pilkington
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> On 19/05/2024 09:48, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Error: Transaction test error:
> >file /usr/share/gir-1.0/GLib-2.0.gir conflicts between attempted
> > installs of glib2-devel-2
These are the changes that I made to keep machine from not
sleeping by the default setting.
# cat /etc/systemd/sleep.conf
# This file is part of systemd.
#
# systemd is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
# terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as publish
On 24 May 2024 at 16:50, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Date sent: Fri, 24 May 2024 16:50:40 -0400
Subject:Re: Need system to run 24/7
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
From:
Community support for Fedora users
> On Sat, 2024-05-25 at 07:51 -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
> >
> > On 5/25/24 4:01 AM, Barry wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 24 May 2024, at 22:47, Michael D. Setzer II via users
> > > > wrote:
> > > &g
Worked fine with Fedora before 40, but now get message.
Line in /etc/logrotate.d/mariadb
/usr/bin/mariadb-admin $EXTRAPARAM --local flush-error-log \
flush-engine-log flush-general-log flush-slow-log
#OUTPUT
#/usr/bin/mariadb-admin: connect to server at 'localhost' failed
#error: 'Access de
On 8 Jun 2024 at 18:20, Klaus-Peter Schrage via users wrote:
Date sent: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 18:20:26 +0200
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Boot hangs on recent kernels
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
From:
On 19 Jun 2024 at 14:52, Tim via users wrote:
Subject:Re: Interesting mount problem - F40
To: Community support for Fedora users
Date sent: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:52:36 +0930
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
From:
I've got a number of Fedora machines that have wifi and have had
no issues with being able to work with connecting to various wifis.
But had done a setup for my brothers one notebook with Fedora
40, and it would come up with a message that system policy was
requiring authentication??
It would ha
On 28 Jul 2024 at 18:19, Go Canes wrote:
From: Go Canes
Date sent: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 18:19:38 -0400
Subject:Re: NVMe questions
To: Community support for Fedora users
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
>
> On 7/28/24 4:21 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > On 28 Jul 2024 at 18:19, Go Canes wrote:
> >
> > From: Go Canes
> > Date sent: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 18:19:38 -0400
> > Subject:Re: NVMe questions
> > To:
t; > From: Samuel Sieb
> > Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> >
> >
> >> On 7/28/24 4:21 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> >>> On 28 Jul 2024 at 18:19, Go Canes wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From:
Had an i386 Virtual Box setup that was running Fedora 28.
Did the upgrade from the 28 to 30 using the dnf update process, and it
seemed to run just fine. Downloaded all the files, and then did the reboot.
Watched it do all the updates, cleanups, and verify, and then the reboot after
the process c
Had just done an installation of Fedora 30 i386 in a Virtual Box after an
upgrade from fedora 28 on another one failed after the upgrade seemed to
run fine, but reboot ended with a grub minimal prompt that showed nothing.
Restored the backup for the fedora 28, and it works fine, and the new fedo
I use syslinux in the g4l project I've maintained since 2004, and noticed that
Fedora 30 includes the later 6.04 version versus the latest full released 6.03
version. Did a test, and noted that all the files except display.c32 are
included
with the fedora 30? Note sure if it was left out for a
> On 8/17/19 5:38 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
>> I use syslinux in the g4l project I've maintained since 2004, and
>> noticed that
>> Fedora 30 includes the later 6.04 version versus the latest full
>> released 6.03
>> version. Did a tes
Have run find . -xtype l in past on systems in various directories to find bad
links. Recently did it from the root directory on a few systems, and found a
number of bad links. Not sure if these are just left over links from updates?
+
Just upgraded a machine and noticed that with version
30, when I had a process running in a terminal window,
when it completed it would report that the command
finished, and would provide the scripts name. After the
upgrade, the messages now just show bash completed
rather than the specific co
> On 5/31/20 10:41 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
>> Just upgraded a machine and noticed that with version
>> 30, when I had a process running in a terminal window,
>> when it completed it would report that the command
>> finished, and would provide
Was looking at message log, and find a ton of these messages?
journal[2993]: Failed to store clipboard: Format UTF8_STRING not
supported
Checked process
msetzer+29931037 2 Jun23 ?04:44:32 /usr/bin/gnome-shell
msetzer+31562993 0 Jun23 ?00:00:13 ibus-daemon --pane
I went thru the standard Ctrl and keys to see what I would get, and found a
web page with a list, but it didn't have the ctrl ;
Ctrl C Copy
Ctrl F Find
Ctrl H Seach and Replace
Ctrl I (Line you want to move cursor to)
Ctrl N New Document
Ctrl O Open File
Ctrl P Print
Ctrl Q Quit
Ctrl S Save
Ctrl
Have a old quad core system that I've had since Fedora 10 I believe.
Recently, upgraded to Fedora 31, and it was still seeing all 4 cores.
Run BOINC, and recently notice that it was only showing 3 cpus
running? Machine is one of the 5 computers I have at house, but is
headless and access remotel
Fedora users
> On 2020-08-08 09:09, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Have a old quad core system that I've had since Fedora 10 I believe.
> > Recently, upgraded to Fedora 31, and it was still seeing all 4 cores.
> >
> > Run BOINC, and recently notice
[0.091889] smpboot: Allowing 6 CPUs, 2 hotplug CPUs
[0.097017] setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:8192 nr_cpumask_bits:6
nr_cpu_ids:6 nr_node_ids:1
[0.097749] percpu: Embedded 55 pages/cpu s188416 r8192 d28672
u262144
[0.097754] pcpu-alloc: s188416 r8192 d28672 u262144
alloc=1*2097152
[0.
I'd recommand doing one version upgrade at a time.
You are suppose to be able to upgrade 2 versions, but I once had it fail
and system was not easily fixable, so just did a clean install that was a
pain to get back to the state of the system.
I just updated two machines from fc31 to fc32 using d
> On 9/1/20 6:54 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > I'd recommand doing one version upgrade at a time.
> > You are suppose to be able to upgrade 2 versions, but I once had it fail
> > and system was not easily fixable, so just did a clean install that was a
> &g
On 2 Sep 2020 at 13:10, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 13:10:28 -0500
From: Ranjan Maitra
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails
Organization: Mailbox Ignore
did the upgrade and everything seemed to go just fine with the upgrade,
but after it rebooted and did the actual upgrade the reboot afterwards
resulted in this coming up. No grub boot menu at all?
"fatal error: token too large, exceeds YYLMAX"
Found this in bugzilla and it talked about a problem
On 3 Sep 2020 at 9:11, Patrick Dupre wrote:
From: Patrick Dupre
To: fedora
Subject:whatsapp
Date sent: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 09:11:56 +0200
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> Hello,
>
> Is there a whatsapp
Have two machines running Fedora 32, and just noticed with the latest
update of tigervnc-server the vncserver is GONE?
Did a downgrade on both machines, and it is back and running just fine.
The one machine had rebooted, and therefor wasn't able to load the
server. The other machine still had t
Had one Fedora 32 machine that has the ssh port open.
the /var/btmp file was showing a number of lines with the ssh:nottyroot
line followed by various different IP addresses.
Can stop the sshd service that the btmp file stops growing.
Use to use denyhosts on systems, but it seems to have been re
Fedora users
From: stan via users
Copies to: stan
> On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 18:00:39 +1000
> "Michael D. Setzer II via users" wrote:
>
> > Had one Fedora 32 machine that has the ssh port open.
> > the /var/btmp file was sho
Notice that when running firefox I was seeing a zombie program running
that is linked to restorecon??
Looked at script and found this line in it.
restorecon -vr ~/.mozilla/firefox/* &
It does clear once firefox is closed, but nothing would clear it while
running.
I changed the line to
??
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Jon Ingason
Date sent: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 16:31:27 +0200
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> Den 2020-10-24 kl. 08:57, skrev Michael D. Setzer II via users:
> > Notice that when running
sent: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 16:05:44 -0400
From: Todd Zullinger
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Question on firefox script and zombie??
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Notice that when r
On 24 Oct 2020 at 16:36, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Date sent: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 16:36:45 -0400
From: Todd Zullinger
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Question on firefox script and zombie??
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> Michael D. Setzer II
sent: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 20:18:42 -0400
From: Todd Zullinger
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Question on firefox script and zombie??
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> Hi,
>
> Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Found that there is
On 25 Oct 2020 at 14:20, Bob Goodwin wrote:
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Bob Goodwin
Subject:Enable ssh -
Date sent: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 14:20:46 -0400
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> I have
Recently, had an issue with firefox script creating a zombie because of
an error. They fixed it, but then created another error since missed a
space after a [, that was then corrected.
In some emails, learned about shellcheck package..
Have done some testing to check scripts, but just started.
Is it a 32bit CPU?? Fedora no longer works on 32bit CPUs.
Had a system that had been running the 32bit version on a machine that
had a 64 bit CPU, had to do a clean install, but it the CPU is only 32bit,
you would be stuck with running the last versin that supported 32bit.
Have you tried if it w
/etc/yum.repos.d/google-chrome-beta
[google-chrome-beta]
name=google-chrome-beta
baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/rpm/stable/x86_64
enabled=0
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub
or do you mean
dnf install google-chrome-unstable
google-chrome-stable-86.0.4
Just for info. I've maintained the g4l disk imaging project since 2004,
and the basic line it uses for doing a partition/disk image locally is.
(dd bs=1M if=$localback 2>/dev/null |jetcat-mod -f 5000 -p $readsize
2>$progout |lzop -c - >/mnt/local$localpath$localimagename) &
It boots from a cd or
Fedora users
> On 11/23/20 1:02 AM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > dd bs=1M if=$localback |lzop -c - > /mnt/local$localpath$localimagename
> >
> > I use lzop for compression of image, since it gives good compress and is
> > considerable faster than gzip
The pause varies in time, and sometimes shows message and sometimes
doesn't??
Example
$:gedit gccdirectory.1126
(org.gnome.gedit:4156283): Gtk-WARNING **: 07:13:25.756: Calling
org.xfce.Session.Manager.Inhibit failed:
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: No such
method “Inhib
On 25 Nov 2020 at 11:58, Mayavimmer wrote:
To: fedora
From: Mayavimmer
Subject:Sync rpms with other computer
Date sent: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:58:08 +0100
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> How do I sync
Have 5 linux machine at home with 3 on FC32 and 2 on FC31.
One of the FC31s is my notebook, and noticed that the wine on the FC32
has gone up to 5.22, while the FC31 are at 5.19? Checked the testing
repos to see if it might be there, but nothing.
Usually, the latest version will get an update, a
: Community support for Fedora users
> On 01/12/2020 18:30, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Have 5 linux machine at home with 3 on FC32 and 2 on FC31.
> > One of the FC31s is my notebook, and noticed that the wine on the FC32
> > has gone up to 5.22, while
: Community support for Fedora users
> On 01/12/2020 18:30, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Have 5 linux machine at home with 3 on FC32 and 2 on FC31.
> > One of the FC31s is my notebook, and noticed that the wine on the FC32
> > has gone up to 5.22, while
: Community support for Fedora users
> On 12/1/20 6:57 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Just updated notebook to FC32 - took almost 14 hours.
> > 25 minutes to download the 5.4G of the 5008 packages.
> > After reboot to upgrade
> > took little ov
: Community support for Fedora users
> On 12/1/20 3:35 AM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Didn't realize is was EOL already?? Missed that FC33 was already fully
> > out. Will have to do an upgrade. Don't care for the latest changes they
> > have
On 2 Dec 2020 at 0:55, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Subject:Re: Differences between versions of wine on FC31 and
FC32? 5.19/5.22
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Samuel Sieb
Date sent: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 00:55:10 -0800
Send reply to:
On 9 Dec 2020 at 8:28, stan via users wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:28:19 -0700
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options.
Organization: zohofree
Send reply to: Community support for Fe
On 9 Dec 2020 at 8:28, stan via users wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:28:19 -0700
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Questions on grub2 kernel options.
Organization: zohofree
Send reply to: Community support for Fe
On 10 Dec 2020 at 23:03, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Date sent: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 23:03:19 -0600 (CST)
From: Michael Hennebry
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:Re: which symbols came from which library?
Send reply to:
On 22 Dec 2020 at 20:28, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Subject:Re: vncserver program disappered on FC32??
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Samuel Sieb
Date sent: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 20:28:21 -0800
Send reply to: Community suppor
On 22 Dec 2020 at 23:04, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Subject:Re: vncserver program disappered on FC32??
To: Community support for Fedora users
From: Samuel Sieb
Date sent: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 23:04:46 -0800
Send reply to: Community
Just got two of them that I bought on ebay. Shows up as 1.9T.
When I first looked at it, sfdisk showed it with 3 2TB partitions and 1
385? forget if it was MB or GB for the 4th one.
Showed it as ExFat.
Tried to use gparted to reformat it, but when it ran the mkfs.ext4 but had
-O ^64bit and shows
tainly be playing some sort of games.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 7:03 AM Michael D. Setzer II via users
> wrote:
> >
> > Just got two of them that I bought on ebay. Shows up as 1.9T.
> > When I first looked at it, sfdisk showed it with 3 2TB partitions and 1
Re: Anyone got 2TB usb flash to work with Fedora
32?
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Samuel Sieb
Date sent: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 22:36:39 -0800
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> On 1/22/21 10:06 PM,
Did some very limited testing.
p7zip help still shows 03/6/2016 date, while 7-zip has 08/11/24?
In a simple test of 7G directory p7zip compressed in 13 1/2 minutes
while the 7-zip (7zz) did it in 11 1/2 minutes (same 2 core notebook)
Files were different slighly, but did pass test of each others
...@guam.net,
Community support for Fedora users
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 7:13 PM Michael D. Setzer II via users
> wrote:
> >
> > Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well
> > except for WINEHQ?
> > The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed,
Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well
except for WINEHQ?
The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade
the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17??
So, not clear why that happened. Believe is mentioned 8 packages
needed downgrading, but didn't no
On 10 Nov 2024 at 16:04, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 16:04:13 -0800
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:vsftp problems
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
From: To
On 27 Sep 2024 at 19:05, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
From: Jeffrey Walton
Date sent: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 19:05:31 -0400
Subject:Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 ->
Single disk
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Send reply to:
On 25 Nov 2024 at 8:10, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:10:18 -0800
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:winehq.repo baseurl not update revision
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
Fr
On 17 Nov 2024 at 15:44, Stephen Morris wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:44:51 +1100
Subject:Re: Fedora F41 Hard Disk Performance
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Stephen Morris
Copies to: steve.morris...@gmail.com
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora u
Don't know about java apps, but for wine this is what I've done on
my machines.
wine winecfg
Click on Graphics
Change Screen Resolution to higher number
Default 96 dpi is too small, 120 dpi or 144 dpi work for me.
You might have to see what setting works best for you.
On 13 Nov 2024 at 16:16
Have 4 Fedora 34 machines in room, and the firefox was
very flakey. But would work on some and not on others,
and then switch. Found this solution that seems to fix it
for now??
Go to settings and search Firefox Data Collection and
uncheck allow firefox to install and run studies.
Then restar
Have the Fedora version of LibreOffice working just fine.
Also, have the LibreOffice 7.2.5 working just fine.
Downloaded the 7.3 and and it seemed to install fine,
but attempts to use it result in crash??
Restart has it upload, and it successfully submits the
crash report, but goes in safe mode, b
Shows these updates with broken dependences
nodejsi6861:14.19.0-2.fc34
updates 199 k
nodejsx86_64 1:14.19.0-2.fc34
updates 199 k
nodejs-ful
Wanted to see what differences are. Not sure how long it
will be until update in dnf.
Just got email that stunnel 5.63 was released.
Downloaded and ran ./configure and make with default settings.
Compared output of -version for the 5.63 and 5.62. Most items same.
Note sure what differences are o
Have 5 linux machines at home. 3 with Fedora 34 and 2
with Fedora 35. 4 did the dnf update that included
5.16.16 and rebooted fine.
The one system didn't?? Have 3 machine I vnc into, and
have one monitor that I connect when I need to look at
them.
When I couldn't get to the machine after the
Have 5 Fedora Linux machines at home. 3 with Fedora 34
and 2 with Fedora 35.
One of the Fedora 34 machines after kernel upgrade two
times ago has stopped auto booting?? Comes up with
grub menu and sits there doing nothing?
Pressing the Enter key has it boot the highlighted top
latest kernel, an
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 23:37:43 +1000
> Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
>
> > Any ideals? Was planning on upgrading machine to 35,
> > but with boot process acting up don't know.
>
> I had a lot of trouble with "helpful" logic in the grub script
: Community support for Fedora
users
From: stan via users
Copies to: stan
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:59:54 +1000
> "Michael D. Setzer II via users" wrote:
>
> > Machine that doesn't timeout boot, before it has a similar
> > saved_e
: Community support for Fedora
users
> On 3/29/22 06:37, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Have 5 Fedora Linux machines at home. 3 with Fedora 34
> > and 2 with Fedora 35.
> > One of the Fedora 34 machines after kernel upgrade two
> > times ago has stopped auto booti
> On 3/29/22 06:37, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Have 5 Fedora Linux machines at home. 3 with Fedora 34
> > and 2 with Fedora 35.
> > One of the Fedora 34 machines after kernel upgrade two
> > times ago has stopped auto booting?? Comes up with
> > gru
I had a Fedora 34 machine with a regular 1TB hard disk.
Imaged it to a 1TB SDD disk and then removed regular
disk.
Did a reinstall of the kernel files, since wasn't sure if
perhaps something would be modified.
Just wondering if there are any other things that might
take full advantage of the n
Noticed a number of lines in the message log that repeat this?
Seems it is linked to the installation from a livesys flash?
Wondering if there is a reason why they still exist, or if they should
have been removed at some point??
systemd-sysv-generator[822960]: SysV service '/etc/rc.d/init.d/lives
Think there is a misunderstanding of how libreoffice base
works. It isn't a full database, but has options to link to
various databases. Only tired it a few times and its been a
while. I was using mariadb that was already running on
my machine.
On my Fedora 34 machine, it has the base under
You might need to look into the computers EFI setup
options. I had a machine that recently had the on board
battery go dead, and on restart it would not boot from the
hard disk?? The setup had somehow gone to a default
setting, in which it was set for the primary boot to be
windows EFI?? Machi
Just did a dnf update and notice a whole lot of messages
like this.
hardlink: cannot link ./include/net/devlink.h to
/usr/src/kernels/5.17.11-200.fc35.x86_64/./include/net/de
vlink.h.hardlink-temporary: File exists
++
Michael D. Setz
support for Fedora
users
>
>
> On 16/06/2022 15.04, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Just did a dnf update and notice a whole lot of messages
> > like this.
> >
> > hardlink: cannot link ./include/net/devlink.h to
> > /usr/src/kernels/5
https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-compiler-driver-nvcc/in
dex.html
Has a link for linux and commands.
dnf whatprovides */nvcc
didn't find anything, so looks like it has to be downloaded
from other site.
On 26 Jun 2022 at 23:03, Paul Smith wrote:
From: Paul Smith
Date sen
Recent dnf update added
rpm -qa| grep ntfs-3g
ntfs-3g-libs-2022.5.17-1.fc35.x86_64
ntfs-3g-system-compression-1.0-9.fc35.x86_64
ntfs-3g-2022.5.17-1.fc35.x86_64
On 26 Jun 2022 at 18:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 18:03:06 -0700
To:
Are files in /var/lib/dnf/yumdb of any use??
Dates of files and directories seem to all be June 20 2019
and seem to be for Fedora 29 and earlier.
Machine is currently running Fedora 35??
Is there a command to clean them correctly.
Are the just leftovers from pervious versions.
dnf autoremove didn
users
From: stan via users
Copies to: mi...@guam.net, stan
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:31:51 +1000
> "Michael D. Setzer II via users" wrote:
>
> > Are files in /var/lib/dnf/yumdb of any use??
> > Dates of files and director
1 - 100 of 393 matches
Mail list logo
