Re: Samsung SSD firmware
On 03.12.2023, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > "Will or may delete all the data"? WTF does that mean? Exactly that. > I do have backups of my data, but what are the chances I'll have to > reinstall the system if I do this? Unfortunately, nobody knows.. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: PSA: All Firefox extensions are getting disabled, one by one
On 04.05.2019, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Basically, an "all your extensions are belong to us" situation. You can enter about:config and set "xpinstall.signatures.required" to "false" until the problem is fixed. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Xfce 4.14?
On 30.03.2019, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > 4.13 has been a pain in my neck: > Libre Office pulses at me > https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14863 [] Don't know anything about the other bugs you've listed, but this one is a well-known bug in gtk3 - not XFCE. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F28 - Thunar crashes regularly
On 26.02.2019, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Thunar crashes regularly. Over time, Thunar has turned into a real mess. Just use Nautilus, as I do. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Claws-Mail filters -
On 04.03.2018, Tom Horsley wrote: > I've never found a mail client that could do filtering worth spit. I pull using getmail. Then, procmail sorts the mail into different directories which I read using mutt. Have been doing this over two decades, and it works as intended. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: R as on Ubuntu and Fedora
On 21.02.2018, Max Pyziur wrote: > I've noticed that Ubuntu has considerably greater support for R than Fedora > (more R deb packages than R rpm packages). See https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/available_packages_by_name.html There's a plethora of different packages. You can either install them with the "install.packages()" function or directly from R-studio, which is what I'm using. https://www.rstudio.com/products/rstudio/download/#download ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Libreoffice 100% CPU usage
On 12.01.2018, Alessio wrote: > It is curious: if you open Tools -> Options, the CPU usage drops down. > Until this action, the CPU usage stays around 100%. First, FWIW: no problems here with Libreoffice and F27 on three different machines. A shot in the dark: what happens when you disable the use of JRE? The switch is in Tools - Options - Advanced. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 27, slow sata hdd access
On 08.01.2018, InvalidPath wrote: > I have a suspicion it's still NTFS just because I > have no other device to offload the data too in order to reformat as > something better. You can check with "lsblk -f". ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25 -> F26 printer problems
On 15.08.2017, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > It has already been fixed in qpdf-libs-6.0.0-7 > Confirming. I also ran into this problem and ran into this thread. I > can confirm that the latest qpdf from the repoes does, in fact, fix my > (this) problem with printing to both of my printers. For me, none of those versions works, up to 6.0.0.10. "Filter failed". ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25 -> F26 printer problems
On 11.08.2017, Wells, Roger K. wrote: > However within the "Printers" application available from Gnome "All > Settings" the 4630 "Printer Details" shows the printer address as > "localhost" (even though Cups shows the correct address) and any attempt to > print from an application, e.g. LibreOffite Writer fails. The job is listed > as "Stopped" and has to eventually be removed from the queue. dnf downgrade qpdf It's most probably related to a newly introduced flaw in the pdftopdf filter. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.
On 29.07.2017, ni...@redchan.it wrote: [] ___ /| /| | | ||__|| | Please do | / O O\__ not | / \ feed the| / \ \ troll | / _\ \ __| /|\\ \ || / | | | |\/ || / \|_|_|/ \__|| / / \|| || / | | /|| --| | | |// | --| * _| |_|_|_| | \-/ *-- _--\ _ \ // | / _ \\ _ // |/ * / \_ /- | - | | * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: livecd-iso-to-disk issue
On 26.07.2017, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > I have an 8GB USB 3.0 key drive on which I want to install F26 Live > with room for an overlay and a home directory. I used > > livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr --overlay-size-mb 2048 > Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso /dev/sda > > and that does nothing and returns no error or status message, just a > prompt. Try "cat Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso > /dev/sda" after an "isohybrid Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-1.5.iso". Isohybrid is in the syslinux package. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F26 and blurry fonts
On 19.07.2017, Heinz Diehl wrote: > To me, v40 is far superior to v35. Fortunately, there's a way to > switch back to v35 behaviour. s/superior/inferior; ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F26 and blurry fonts
On 18.07.2017, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote: > Do you know why the font display looks broken with the new v40 engine? > Is that a bug in the freetype library or something that has to be > fixed in all applications? It's not a bug, it's meant to be a feature :-( https://tinyurl.com/ybf3fkwv > Starting with F26, Chrome now respects the anti-aliasing config, > but although I have have turned Hinting on (which is essential for > nice font rendering, even with AA turned off), Chrome displays those > fonts without Hinting. That looks horrible. :-( I've never used Chrome, so I don't know what's going on there. You could do a diff between the latest Chrome that worked and the new one, just to see if there's something that rings a bell. > > If you also want subpixel rendering, which now is disabled by default, > > you can dig into the foption.h file in the config directory of the > > freetype sourcecode, uncomment the option and recompile. > Does that mean, subpixel rendering has been completely removed > from the freetype library compiled for F26? Any reason for this? Seems to be the case. Looking into the latest 2.7.1 source shipped by Fedora, subpixel rendering isn't enabled in foptions.h. Most probably, Fedora follows the freetype principal developers opinion(s). > Subpixel rendering has no effect if AA is turned off, right? As far as I understand it, subpixel rendering is a form of antialiasing on LCD screens that works because the combination of red, green and blue appears as white light. A typical example is Micro$ofts "Cleartype". To me, v40 is far superior to v35. Fortunately, there's a way to switch back to v35 behaviour. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F26 and blurry fonts
On 14.07.2017, Neal Becker wrote: > where are you setting this? Global environment variables belong into /etc/profile, and local ones into .bash_profile in your home directory. Here's the diff to re-enable subpixel rendering (simply uncommenting the option): diff -urN a/freetype-2.7.1/include/freetype/config/ftoption.h b/freetype-2.7.1/include/freetype/config/ftoption.h --- a/freetype-2.7.1/include/freetype/config/ftoption.h 2016-12-11 07:53:49.0 +0100 +++ b/freetype-2.7.1/include/freetype/config/ftoption.h 2017-07-13 20:51:26.727210939 +0200 @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ /* This is done to allow FreeType clients to run unmodified, forcing */ /* them to display normal gray-level anti-aliased glyphs.*/ /* */ -/* #define FT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_RENDERING */ +#define FT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_RENDERING /*/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F26 and blurry fonts
On 14.07.2017, stan wrote: > It was so easy, I just changed it. It doesn't seem to have made any > difference, maybe after the next reboot. As far as I can see, the different hinting levels do no longer have any effect since freetype-2.7. Have to dig a little deeper into the sourcecode to fully understand what's going on. Normally, it is enough to log out and in again to restart the font renderer, you won't have to reboot.. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Anyone with a working GTX 960 video card in f26?
On 14.07.2017, Earl Ramirez wrote: > I have the following display cards on my laptop and experienced the > same thing until I blacklisted nouveau from the grub argument Nvidia graphic adapters with both a 950 and 960 chip work fine here using nouveau. However I'm using the Fedora XFCE spin that, as far as i know, doesn't use wayland. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F26 and blurry fonts
On 13.07.2017, Patrick Laimbock wrote: > Will give that a try. Thanks for the tip. In addition, to get really sharp fonts, you'll have to delete the slight hinting set as default in /etc/fonts/conf.d and enable full hinting. Just delete the link to 10-hinting-slight.conf and create a new one to 10-hinting-full.conf. > > If you also want subpixel rendering, which now is disabled by default, > > you can dig into the foption.h file in the config directory of the > > freetype sourcecode, uncomment the option and recompile. > freetype-freeworld on rpmfusion.org has subpixel rendering enabled. Thanks! However, compiling freetype is rather trivial. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F26 and blurry fonts
Hi, for those who love razorsharp fonts just like me but got the new v40 interpreter coming with freetype-2.7 enforced on them when installing F26: the good old v35 interpreter is still there (and I hope it will be forever). You can use it by setting the environment variable FREETYPE_PROPERTIES=truetype:interpreter-version=35 If you also want subpixel rendering, which now is disabled by default, you can dig into the foption.h file in the config directory of the freetype sourcecode, uncomment the option and recompile. I have never been able to understand why people like the blurry and muddy Micro$oft-like font rendering... gaah.. Now we have to hack the source to get rid of that crap. https://tinyurl.com/ybf3fkwv Cheers, Heinz ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: /var/cache
On 05.07.2017, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I have directory > /var/log/journal which seems large: [] Just delete all under /var/cache and reboot. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Latest VLC version
On 02.07.2017, Mark wrote: > Is it just for me that VLC has stopped working with latest upgrade? Encountering the same behaviour.. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: ACPI errors revisited
On 26.06.2017, John Pilkington wrote: > I'm confused. I would suggest you compile a bog standard vanilla 4.11.7 or 4.12-rc7 first. If the errors persist, you could report them directly to the Linux kernel mailing list. Most probably, the lkml people can give you a comprehensive answer, thus avoiding a lot of guessing and internet search. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: gnome-password-generator replacement?
On 18.06.2017, stan wrote: > It doesn't have a gui that I know of, but I use pwgen from the Fedora > repositories. It warns that the passwords are less secure than fully > random passwords Pwgen uses /dev/urandom, so the statement that those passwords are less secure than "fully" random passwords (define "fully random"..) is merely of academical nature. In case of any doubt, you can always do something like head /dev/random | tr -dc A-Za-z0-9 | head -c X where X is your password length. Tr also lets you tailor the characterset used. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Strange thunderbird behaviour on a reaceived email: not all attachments are readable.
On 15.05.2017, Ed Greshko wrote: > Well, without seeing the raw message my guessing of the cause has come > to an end. Right-click on the mailbox, choose "Properties -> General information -> Repair folder". ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Strange thing...a hidden kernel, a stealth kernel!!! running on my Fedora 25.
On 02.03.2017, renaud.l...@gmail.com wrote: > I run Fedora 25 on my laptop,on a dedicated partition,other OSs on other > partitions,and a strange thing happens: [] You can have as many kernels in grub.conf as you like. That does not mean they have to exist. So can you actually boot from your ghost kernel? Does it exist in /boot? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gigabyte GeForce GT 740
On 27.12.2016, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> I have an nVidia gtx 770 and it works well on F25 GNOME with the
> proprietary driver (from the negativo17 repo). When I tried the open
> source nouveau driver it had some issues (e.g. vertical sync).
With the proprietary nvidia driver, you can improve vsync/tearing
using nvidia-settings:
nvidia-settings --assign CurrentMetaMode="nvidia-auto-select +0+0 {
ForceCompositionPipeline = On }"
You can also make this permanent in Xorg.conf.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25 XFCE font rendering
On 26.11.2016, Heinz Diehl wrote: > I'll take a closer look at the remaining F24 system, where this wasn't > of any problem. I bet it has to do with the file mentioned before. For those who care: looked into it, and the file /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-hinting-slight.conf simply wasn't there in previous Fedora releases. At least not in F23/24. So the solution is to alter or replace the hinting here. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nvidia drivers on F25
On 27.11.2016, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Got it, thanks. Turned out that dnf needed refreshing. It was 3 days > old (since I updated to F25). I almost never needed to refresh manually > on F24 so I don't know if this is a change or a temporary hiccup. FWIW: I have encountered the same thing. "dnf --refresh update" showed no new updates. After a "dnf clean all", there were 57 packets waiting.. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25 XFCE font rendering
On 26.11.2016, Fred Smith wrote: > So, there's no need to go hacking amongst system config files! The option you mention is not present in F25/XFCE, but in the "Appearance" menue. Anyway, hacking in the system config is definitely needed, because there are programs that presumably do not obey the antialiasing and hinting settings, as e.g. firefox or thunderbird, while others do. I'll take a closer look at the remaining F24 system, where this wasn't of any problem. I bet it has to do with the file mentioned before. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25 XFCE font rendering
On 26.11.2016, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I haven't noticed any changes in font rendering. Perhaps this is something > specific to your video hardware. No, it's definitely not. I have the same phenomenon on (now) three different machines. One has nvidia graphics, one AMD and one Intel Ironlake. On all three, changing the file mentioned in the mail before made the font sharp and crisp again. If you use stock Fedora fonts, it may be that is why you didn't notice the effect. I have always hated blurry fonts, and highly prefer "as sharp and clear as possible". What I'm doing is: 1. Recompiling freetype with subpixel rendering and the bytecode interpreter enabled. 2. Setting antialiasing and hinting to "max" (Applications -> Settings -> Appearance -> Fonts). That sufficed to get the desired "as sharp as possible" effect, until F25. While most of the fonts where as sharp and crisp as before using 1 and 2, some were not, as e.g. in Firefox, Thunderbird and some other programs. Most probably because they obey the systemwide font config. This obviously wasn't the case in previous Fedora releases. As a "sharp and crisp" freak, I can tell that there's a *huge* difference if a font is slightly or fully hinted. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25 XFCE font rendering
On 26.11.2016, Tom Horsley wrote: > /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-autohint.conf Thanks a lot, you saved my day! But it was not the 10-autohint.conf. When I looked into the /etc/fonts/conf.d directory, I noticed a file called "10-hinting-slight.conf". After changing it to perform "hintfull", all is pretty much sharp and clear, just as it was in pre-F25. Again thanks! Heinz ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F25 XFCE font rendering
Hi, updated two machines from F24 to F25, and now the fonts configured in Applications -> Settings -> Appearance are no longer on the same level of sharpness/clarity as they were in previous Fedora releases. It is considerably visible in Thunderbird and Firefox. While there was no problem to get clear and sharp fonts using antialiasing and hinting, it now seems to be impossible, at least in programs that adapt their fonts from the above mentioned setting. Does anybody know what's going on and what I can do to get back pre-F25 behaviour? Thanks, Heinz ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25: Howto remove wayland from Fedora Workstation (gnome)
On 26.11.2016, Ed Greshko wrote: > I do not believe that Xfce has been updated to support wayland. Thanks, you're right. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firewall methods for fedora25
On 26.11.2016, Alex wrote: > firewalld just doesn't seem to be appropriate for anything more than a > desktop. I'd appreciate any ideas on how you build a firewall for > fedora servers, particularly as it relates to interoperating with > fail2ban and standard Internet services. Just disable it entirely and install shorewall. That's what I'm used to do. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Desktop icons on Fedora 25??
On 23.11.2016, Joe Zeff wrote: > Thank you. I stopped using Gnome when I heard what Gnome 3 was going to be > like, and you just gave me another reason not to go back. Me too ;-) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25: Howto remove wayland from Fedora Workstation (gnome)
On 23.11.2016, Matthew Miller wrote: > On the login screen, click the little gear. Choose "GNOME on X11". Is there a similar method for XFCE? The new font rendering is simply disgusting, especially in Firefox and Thunderbird. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Filesystem for backup system
On 10.10.2016, Gordon Messmer wrote: > Ext4 is probably a better option for a filesystem with a large number of > small files. XFS > continues to be slower for metadata operations. It was, some years ago. This is no longer the case. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F24, changing Thunar (Xfce) default archive manager
On 25.08.2016, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Now of course, why cannot thunar work as it did in F22? Well that is for > some other time... Frankly, though I've been using XFCE a long time, I don't use Thunar. In my opinion, Thunar has a bunch of nasty bugs that never get resolved. I'm perfectly satisfied with Xfe. On one machine, I also use nautilus without any problems. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F24, changing Thunar (Xfce) default archive manager
On 24.08.2016, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > This shows both xarchiver and engrampa with xarchiver first, and the status > is 'user set'. I cannot see a way to reverse their order or make engrampa > the default archive manager. Hmm, maybe you just have to uninstall xarchiver? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: bluetooth applet [SOLVED]
On 27.06.2016, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > After downgrading from blueman-1:2.0.4-2.fc23.i686 > >to the previous blueman-2.1-0.3.git7a2e20e.fc23.i686 > > > > bluetooth is controllable using the applet and works as desired. > That is odd. For some reason, the version was downgraded, so you actually > have a newer version now than you did before. FWIW: I just upgraded a laptop from F23 to F24, and during "system-upgrade download", I remember the download summary showed that there were 13 packages to be downgraded - on a bog standard F23. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: codec missing....
On 21.02.2016, François Patte wrote: > Encoder (codec none) not found for output stream #0:0 > What is missing? dnf install flac flac-libs -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: patch listed as missing
On 21.02.2016, Heinz Diehl wrote: [] Daah, today's not my day. Should have used a spelling & grammar correction, sorry for the broken English :-( -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: patch listed as missing
On 21.02.2016, thibaut noah wrote: > So i have no way to use this patch on 4.4.2 since i have no way to run it, > i'm already lost with patching my kernel i can't build my own package. How to build a recent "Fedora kernel for the unexperienced": 1. Grab recent -stable from kernel.org and unpack it into /usr/src 2. Take a look into /boot and grab the config of your recent Fedora kernel. Example: config-4.2.5-300.fc23.x86_64 3. Rename this file to ".config" and copy it into the root directory of your unpacked source 4. Change into the source root directory 5. Do a "make oldconfig". If your new kernel is newer that your recent Fedora one, you'll have to answer some new question on the configuration of your new kernel. If you have no clue what to answer, a "no" for alle of the questions will do it in 95% of the cases. 6. Continue with "nice -n 19 make -j x", where x is the number of your cpus cores. 7. "make modules_install" 8. "make install" 9. Reboot, you're done. This kernel will live peacefully together with your Fedora kernels, without affecting the rpm database or similar. Btw: your patch should be applied after step 4 and before step 5 ;-) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: patch listed as missing
On 20.02.2016, thibaut noah wrote:
> I got the patch from here :
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/73697/acs-override-patch-on-fedora-22/
> A modify version which is the most recent version of this patch i could
> find.
Here's the same patch ported to 4.4.2, avoiding the level 2 fuzz.
It applies cleanly:
[root@chiara linux-4.4.2]# cat quirk.diff | patch -p2
patching file drivers/pci/quirks.c
diff -urN a/linux-4.4.2/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/linux-4.4.2/drivers/pci/quirks.c
--- a/linux-4.4.2/drivers/pci/quirks.c 2016-02-17 21:31:25.0 +0100
+++ b/linux-4.4.2/drivers/pci/quirks.c 2016-02-21 09:30:52.154070792 +0100
@@ -3659,6 +3659,108 @@
DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADAPTEC2, 0x0285,
quirk_fixed_dma_alias);
+static bool acs_on_downstream;
+static bool acs_on_multifunction;
+
+#define NUM_ACS_IDS 16
+struct acs_on_id {
+ unsigned short vendor;
+ unsigned short device;
+};
+static struct acs_on_id acs_on_ids[NUM_ACS_IDS];
+static u8 max_acs_id;
+
+static __init int pcie_acs_override_setup(char *p)
+{
+ if (!p)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ while (*p) {
+ if (!strncmp(p, "downstream", 10))
+ acs_on_downstream = true;
+ if (!strncmp(p, "multifunction", 13))
+ acs_on_multifunction = true;
+ if (!strncmp(p, "id:", 3)) {
+ char opt[5];
+ int ret;
+ long val;
+
+ if (max_acs_id >= NUM_ACS_IDS - 1) {
+ pr_warn("Out of PCIe ACS override slots (%d)\n",
+ NUM_ACS_IDS);
+ goto next;
+ }
+
+ p += 3;
+ snprintf(opt, 5, "%s", p);
+ ret = kstrtol(opt, 16, );
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_warn("PCIe ACS ID parse error %d\n", ret);
+ goto next;
+ }
+ acs_on_ids[max_acs_id].vendor = val;
+
+ p += strcspn(p, ":");
+ if (*p != ':') {
+ pr_warn("PCIe ACS invalid ID\n");
+ goto next;
+ }
+
+ p++;
+ snprintf(opt, 5, "%s", p);
+ ret = kstrtol(opt, 16, );
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_warn("PCIe ACS ID parse error %d\n", ret);
+ goto next;
+ }
+ acs_on_ids[max_acs_id].device = val;
+ max_acs_id++;
+ }
+next:
+ p += strcspn(p, ",");
+ if (*p == ',')
+ p++;
+ }
+
+ if (acs_on_downstream || acs_on_multifunction || max_acs_id)
+ pr_warn("Warning: PCIe ACS overrides enabled; This may allow non-IOMMU
protected peer-to-peer DMA\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+early_param("pcie_acs_override", pcie_acs_override_setup);
+
+static int pcie_acs_overrides(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ /* Never override ACS for legacy devices or devices with ACS caps */
+ if (!pci_is_pcie(dev) ||
+ pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ACS))
+ return -ENOTTY;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_acs_id; i++)
+ if (acs_on_ids[i].vendor == dev->vendor &&
+ acs_on_ids[i].device == dev->device)
+ return 1;
+
+ switch (pci_pcie_type(dev)) {
+ case PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM:
+ case PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT:
+ if (acs_on_downstream)
+ return 1;
+ break;
+ case PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT:
+ case PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM:
+ case PCI_EXP_TYPE_LEG_END:
+ case PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END:
+ if (acs_on_multifunction && dev->multifunction)
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return -ENOTTY;
+}
+
+
/*
* A few PCIe-to-PCI bridges fail to expose a PCIe capability, resulting in
* using the wrong DMA alias for the device. Some of these devices can be
@@ -3964,6 +4066,7 @@
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x15b8, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
/* Intel PCH root ports */
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID, pci_quirk_intel_pch_acs },
+ { PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, pcie_acs_overrides },
{ 0x19a2, 0x710, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs }, /* Emulex BE3-R */
{ 0x10df, 0x720, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs }, /* Emulex Skyhawk-R */
{ 0 }
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox 44 removes privacy feature.
On 03.02.2016, Sylvia Sánchez wrote: > And it's impossible to add a workaround instead of taking options away? A simple counter would do.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: WARNING you cannot build info or html versions of the R manuals
On 16.01.2016, Rolf Turner wrote: > sudo yum install texinfo > > Package texinfo-4.13a-16.fc17.x86_64 already installed and latest version > > Nothing to do Try with the associated texinfo-devel package. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: pdf-stapler
On 14.01.2016, Raman Gupta wrote: > Pdf-stapler at least provides the select/cat capability of pdftk, > which mcpdf does not. You can do the most with PDF-shuffler, in a graphical way. [htd@chiara ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i pdfshuffler pdfshuffler-0.6.0-7.fc23.noarch -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox 42.0 does not play youtube video
On 25.12.2015, taharka wrote: > Hmm must be distro specific, FF 42 & 43 play youtube videos just > fine here on opensuse 13.2 ;-) After all, I think you're most probably right. Just checked FF 43 on a Wind*ws machine, and all works well. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox 42.0 does not play youtube video
On 22.12.2015, Zoltan Hoppar wrote: > I have noticed suddenly goes crashing when you are using html5 only. > When it trying to change the load of the stream simply on my lappie > crashing every time, and kills firefox. The same here, on different machines. And it continues with FF 43, while downgrading to 41 fixes the thing. That's f*ckin' annoying.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox does not play Rutube videos
On 19.12.2015, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > And indeed, they ship 11.2.202.554: > # rpm -q adobe-release-x86_64 flash-plugin > adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch > flash-plugin-11.2.202.554-release.x86_64 Remove all flash rpms from your distribution. Donwload the plugin directly from Adobe. All you need to do is to copy libflashplayer.so into ~/.mozilla/plugins. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: kernel 4.3.1?
On 11.12.2015, Tom Horsley wrote: > I see kernel 4.3.1 has been officially released: > Will it show up in the repos soon for fedora 23 (or 22)? You can compile it yourself quite easily. But don't use 4.3.1, it has a bug affecting X.509 certificate handling that can lead to a non-bootable system. 4.3.2 is already released. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to install fresh kernel from rawhide
On 09.12.2015, Michael Kuryshev wrote: > what's the proper steps to install kernel (modules, headers, etc) from > rawhide. I don't know. > And I want to keep 'em updated, without breaking any other stuff or > pulling another rawhide packages. Then, I would suggest you download 4.3.x from kernel.org directly. Take a look into /boot, copy the .config of your actual kernel into the 4.3 sourcetree. You can follow these steps to compile your kernel: make oldconfig (you'll have to make some decisions here) make make modules_install make install Your new kernel will live peacefully together with all your other Fedora kernels installed. If you do not need it any longer some time in the future, just delete the related files in /boot and /lib/modules, and remove the sourcetree. Have done that all my life, since I'm using a heavily customised configuration which requires compiling a new kernel anyway. [htd@chiara ~]$ ls -l /boot total 185729 drwx-- 4 root root16384 Jan 1 1970 efi -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 184380 Oct 21 2014 elf-memtest86+-5.01 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 3072 Nov 7 13:35 extlinux drwxr-xr-x. 6 root root 1024 Dec 9 08:13 grub2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 57299785 Dec 7 21:26 initramfs-4.2.7-rc1.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18445609 Dec 9 08:13 initramfs-4.3.1-rc1.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 76380045 Dec 8 21:47 initramfs-4.4.0-rc4.img -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 571538 Nov 7 13:41 initrd-plymouth.img drwx--. 2 root root12288 Feb 22 2015 lost+found -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 182704 Oct 21 2014 memtest86+-5.01 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Dec 9 08:13 System.map -> /boot/System.map-4.3.1-rc1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3026413 Dec 7 21:25 System.map-4.2.7-rc1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2724608 Dec 9 08:13 System.map-4.3.1-rc1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3404849 Dec 8 21:47 System.map-4.4.0-rc4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Dec 9 08:13 vmlinuz -> /boot/vmlinuz-4.3.1-rc1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5783344 Dec 7 21:25 vmlinuz-4.2.7-rc1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5228416 Dec 9 08:13 vmlinuz-4.3.1-rc1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 112 Dec 8 21:47 vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc4 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: encrypting /home partition post-install
On 30.11.2015, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > Seat belts are also useless for >99.9% of car passengers. :-) The little > inconvenience is accepted because > they may turn useful one day. LVM can not possibly be life-threatening, in opposite to a non-used seatbelt, which is why your argument is bogus ;-) Automatically introducing complexity into 95% of the users systems just because it could be useful some day is, quite frankly, embarassing. It makes sense the other way 'round: complexity adds to the diffculties when having to handle data operations (backup, encryption, transfer, recovery..) , which in turn makes data loss more likely. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: encrypting /home partition post-install
On 29.11.2015, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I really don't understand why Fedora is still foisting all the overhead of > LVM on everyone, by default. I would tend to think that for typical use > cases, LVM brings absolutely nothing value-added. I'd like to second that! Mentioned the same issue here on this list several months ago when F22 came up.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Changing systems
On 26.11.2015, Mike Chambers wrote: > Could I take 2 HD's out of 1 computer, move them to a different > computer, obviously having to reinstall grub and such, would they work > without having to do much of anything else? If the kernel has the drivers necessary for your new system, it should work well. You'll not have to reinstall GRUB. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: xorg 1.18 released
On 11.11.2015, a...@clueserver.org wrote: > I had already switched to Fedora 23 before I found out about the problem(s). Me too. But I've always one machine left, in case of trouble. And I have complete backups of all machines, thus reverting to a previous state is just a matter of 30 minutes. This time, I partially broke with old habits not to upgrade within the first four weeks. Should have known better... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: xorg 1.18 released
On 11.11.2015, Tom Horsley wrote: > I find the safest and easiest way to do this is keep my fedora 22 > partition the default and wait for f23 to get all the support I need > before switching :-). Yep! Have just reverted all four F23 machines to F22. Too many annoying bugs at the moment. Have left one F23 machine to test, though.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
F23, Thunar crashes when doing copy & paste
Hi, after updating to F23, Thunar crashes when copying/pasting a file. This is the error message which shows up in the logs: Thunar[1653]: segfault at 2 ip 7f87c2a2c07d sp 7fff45204d98 error 4 in libgobject-2.0.so.0.4600.1[7f87c29f8000+5] Donwgrading to latest F22 Thunar doesn't help. The bugs is also reported by Arch users and others, e.g. here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=203663=2 Fortunately, I haven't upgraded my own machine yet. Unfortunately, I have three extremely annoyed F23 users who want a solution. Anyone else encountering this? Any solution yet? [htd@chiara ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i "thunar" thunar-vfs-1.2.0-16.fc23.x86_64 thunar-volman-0.8.1-2.fc23.x86_64 thunar-media-tags-plugin-0.2.1-6.fc23.x86_64 thunar-vfs-devel-1.2.0-16.fc23.x86_64 Thunar-1.6.10-1.fc23.x86_64 thunar-archive-plugin-0.3.1-6.fc23.x86_64 Thanks, Heinz -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F23, Thunar crashes when doing copy & paste
This must be "cut & paste", not "copy & paste". Sorry! On 07.11.2015, Heinz Diehl wrote: > Hi, > > after updating to F23, Thunar crashes when copying/pasting a > file. This is the error message which shows up in the logs: > > Thunar[1653]: segfault at 2 ip 7f87c2a2c07d sp 7fff45204d98 > error 4 in libgobject-2.0.so.0.4600.1[7f87c29f8000+5] > > Donwgrading to latest F22 Thunar doesn't help. The bugs is also > reported by Arch users and others, e.g. here: > > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=203663=2 > > Fortunately, I haven't upgraded my own machine yet. Unfortunately, > I have three extremely annoyed F23 users who want a solution. > > Anyone else encountering this? Any solution yet? > > [htd@chiara ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i "thunar" > thunar-vfs-1.2.0-16.fc23.x86_64 > thunar-volman-0.8.1-2.fc23.x86_64 > thunar-media-tags-plugin-0.2.1-6.fc23.x86_64 > thunar-vfs-devel-1.2.0-16.fc23.x86_64 > Thunar-1.6.10-1.fc23.x86_64 > thunar-archive-plugin-0.3.1-6.fc23.x86_64 > > Thanks, > Heinz > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is upgrading to fedora 23 safe?
On 05.11.2015, Gary Artim wrote: > 3 servers and 1 desktop work flawless doing this, > 8 servers to go: > >dnf clean all >dnf update -y >systemctl reboot >dnf system-upgrade download --release=23 >dnf system-upgrade reboot Just updated 2 laptops and 1 server from F22 to 23, without a single problem. Fedora-people: great work, well done! As usual, I'll wait for another 2-3 weeks before updating my own Fedora machine.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox suddenly defaults to flash again on youtube
On 06.11.2015, Matthew Miller wrote: > Have you gone to https://www.youtube.com/html5? The thing is, Firefox now _always_ uses the flashplayer, unless I go to https://www.youtube.com/html5 and switch to the html5 player. Html5 works flawlessly, but is no longer the default player. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox suddenly defaults to flash again on youtube
On 04.11.2015, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 03 November 2015, Heinz Diehl sent: > > Where is the config option, switch or whatever changes the default > > player in firefox back to html5 again? > What's the difference between the two user profiles? Accepting/refusing > cookies (could try clearing out the stored cookies for YouTube)? > Allowing/refusing scripting? Flashblock options? Logged into YouTube? After a closer look, the only thing that's different is the absence of the flashplayer plugin for the test user. After putting it in place, it's the same behaviour here as well: when opening a video on youtube, the flashplayer is always opened first. The only thing that helps is disabling it entirely. That wasn't the case before. The flashplayer plugin was always there, but when a video was available as html5, the html5 player got used. Now, it's just the opposite, and I just can't see why. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Firefox suddenly defaults to flash again on youtube
Hi, the subject says it all. It came out of nowhere, the only thing I remember is having used youtube-dl on this machine a singe time today. Firefox used the HTML5 player on youtube, now flash is back as the default player, and nothing helps to get rid of it. No downgrade, no upgrade, only the manual switch to HTML5 on the youtube config page. Next time, flash is back as the default player. However, after creating a new user, the default player is html5 for this one. Where is the config option, switch or whatever changes the default player in firefox back to html5 again? Thanks, Heinz -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: usb bootable stick
On 15.10.2015, Antonio M wrote: > what is the easiest way to create a bootable usb stick put of any iso file?? isohybrid image.iso cat image.iso > /dev/sdx -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Parole needs H.264 decoder to play this file
On 04.10.2015, Paul Smith wrote: > "Parole needs H.264 decoder to play this file. > What can I do to fix the problem? dnf install gstreamer-ffmpeg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora 23
On 28.09.2015, Paul Cartwright wrote: > the only issue I have with a clean install, is reinstalling all of the > packages I add... it is a pain... Do a diff on the output of "rpm -qa", truncate the filenames to the essentials and feed that to the package manager. Worked for me. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dracut fails to build bootable initramfs on fc22
On 09.09.2015, Alex wrote: > I have a fc22 system that's been working fine and now for some reason > kernel updates result in an unbootable system. It appears to be > related to dracut failing to build a proper initramfs image. I've never used any distribution kernel, and on my F22, there is no such problem with either 4.1 or 4.2. So try with a bog standard kernel from kernel.org. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: After a power cut my machine cannot boot
On 09.09.2015, Paul Smith wrote: > "/lib64/libidn.so.11: file too short". Have you repaired your crashed filesystems already? If you have, try "dnf reinstall libidn libidn2". -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dracut fails to build bootable initramfs on fc22
On 09.09.2015, Shaheen Bakhtiar wrote: > What is the exact error message(s) you are getting?? Where in the boot > process is it failing? It's not me having problems.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: After a power cut my machine cannot boot
On 09.09.2015, Paul Smith wrote: > What can I do to repair the filesystem? Go to http://www.sysresccd.org and download the sysresccd image to another machine. Then burn in onto a CD and boot from it. If you have the syslinux tools installed, you can run isohybrid sysresccd.iso and then copy this image to an USB-stick: cat image.iso > /dev/sdX and boot from it. After that, you can use "lsblk -f" to see what kind of filesystems you have on your damaged machine and the respective blockdevices. The sysresccd holds all the tools you need to repair most fs: fsck, xfs_repair and more. ext3/4 can be repaired using "fsck.ext3 /dev/sdX" or fsck.ext4 respectively. For XFS, "xfs_repair -v /dev/sdX" will do it. A DOS Partition can be repaired this way: dosfsck -w -r -l -a -v -t /dev/sdX After repairing, boot your machine, delete the defective libidn.so.11 and reinstall that package. Most probably, this lib got truncated by a fs crash and became thus unusable. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: pdftk
On 01.09.2015, Patrick Dupre wrote: > There is one command easy with pdftk: > pdftk file.pdf cat 3-4 output file2.pdf > that I cannot have with pdfshuffler. This can easily be done with pdfshuffler. Just load the .pdf, mark page 3 and 4, right click and choose "export selection". > pdftk, is a well established and solid tool while pdfshuffer fails eventually. I have never seen it fail for me. > While not keep supporting pdftk? As others already have pointed out in this thread, there are some software incompatibilities. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: pdftk
On 01.09.2015, Patrick Dupre wrote: > What is the future of pdftk as part of fedora? > It did not find any good alternative. dnf install poppler-utils pdfshuffler These tools together can replace most pdftk functionality. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf --refresh reverts to older metadata (was: Re: dnf update vs Software Udpates)
On 24.08.2015, Michael Schwendt wrote: The feedback in the ticket I've opened is not encouraging so far. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4866 Maybe it's time to take a look at how other distributions do it. Arch's pacman has worked for me without any trouble a long time. And there is Opensuse Co.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox, HTML5 and high res. videos
On 23.08.2015, Ahmad Samir wrote: I am not sure what exactly is happening on your system, but I'd try enabling MSE with h264, make sure these are set to true: media.fragmented-mp4.enabled media.fragmented-mp4.exposed media.fragmented-mp4.ffmpeg.enabled media.mediasource.mp4.enabled Thanks a lot for highly valuable information, you made my day! With these options enabled and webm disabled, I'm able to play both highres videos and all the other non-highres ones that didn't work. The blocker for those other videos was MSE WebM VP9 being enabled. Now, Firefox uses MSE H.264 and does exactly what I want it to do. Thanks again! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22: unable to send mail
On 23.08.2015, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: Sending mail from both webmail accounts (on the servers) works as expected. Any ideas? First, I would test if you can reach the mailserver at all: telnet smtp.gmail.com 25 If this succeeds, then nstall tcptraceroute (or something similar) and run it against the mailserver/port you're trying to reach. It will show you where your packets are being blocked and thus help you to narrow down the underlying cause. Example: tcptraceroute smtp.gmail.com -p 25 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox, HTML5 and high res. videos
On 22.08.2015, Ed Greshko wrote: Is this really supposed to be a video? [] The music plays along with a static photo on all platforms I tried. The thing is: it only plays when the two config options mentioned before are set to false. But then, not a single video on Youtube can be played with a 720p / 1080p resolution. And there are a lot of other videos (real videos, not music playing alongside a static picture) which won't play when highres HTML5 is enabled in Firefox. Using Flash rather than HTML5, both cases just work. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox, HTML5 and high res. videos
On 22.08.2015, Ed Greshko wrote: Well, I set both of those to true and the link you provided played just fine as well as any video that I could find so far. So now the question is: why does it play for you, but not for me when both options are set to true? Both options default to false in latest Fedora Firefox 40, which means you can't watch any video on Youtube with a higher resolution than max. 480p. At least I can't. Higher resolutions as 720 or 1080p are only accessible to me when both options are true. Otherwise, I simply can't choose them. They are not offered. Maybe point me to a video that doesn't play for you with them sent to true? I already did. It works for you, but not for me, and I wonder why. FWIW, I'm not sure of the value of setting media.mediasource.webm.enabled to true since I've not encountered any Matroska formatted videos. As already written: *not a single* HD video on Youtube offers me to go above 480p when these two options default to false. What am I missing? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Firefox, HTML5 and high res. videos
Hi, F22, latest Firefox 40. With standard configuration, I can't play any highres video on Youtube (720 or 1080p). When setting media.mediasource.enabled media.mediasource.webm.enabled to true as recommended by the Mozilla Community, highres videos play just fine. BUT some other videos now do not play any longer. In particular, when setting media.mediasource.webm.enabled to false, those non-working videos work again. But then, no highres is possible. Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFzN6j6FjJc WTF?! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf --refresh reverts to older metadata (was: Re: dnf update vs Software Udpates)
On 15.08.2015, Michael Schwendt wrote: A day later, no matter how often I run dnf update --refresh, it never gets access to the newer metadata from yesterday again. Not the 76 packages as shown earlier in this thread, only the older 50. Jupp! It's exactly what I'm encountering since moving to F22, as shown several times in this list. So, indeed, there's something seriously wrong here, and I assume it can only be fixed if the developers of mirror manager and dnf come together and look into it. Indeed. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
More dnf annoyance
Hi, F22, in short: first running dnf --refresh upgrade shows some new packets. Then dnf clean all followed by dnf --refresh upgrade shows the same packets to be updated, and *some more*. Dnf hasn't been working properly since F22, while I had not a single problem with yum ever. Still I have to use dnf clean all before updating, just to be sure to get all available updates. There are bug reports reporting the same behaviour, but no solution. As far as I realise, there isn't a way to get yum back. Any chance that Fedora gets a properly working packet manager in the near future? [root@chiara ~]# dnf --refresh upgrade RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free - Updates 210 kB/s | 29 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree - Updates 149 kB/s | 15 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free 1.3 MB/s | 551 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree 746 kB/s | 170 kB 00:00 Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Tue Aug 11 10:24:20 2015. Dependencies resolved. == Package Arch Version Repository Size == Installing: geany-libgeany x86_64 1.25-2.fc22 updates 1.0 M Upgrading: geany x86_64 1.25-2.fc22 updates 2.8 M gnumericx86_64 1:1.12.23-1.fc22updates 12 M goffice x86_64 0.10.23-1.fc22 updates 1.9 M libgudev1 x86_64 219-21.fc22 updates 63 k libgudev1-devel x86_64 219-21.fc22 updates 76 k libsolv x86_64 0.6.11-2.fc22 updates 333 k qtsingleapplication x86_64 2.6.1-23.fc22 updates 42 k systemd x86_64 219-21.fc22 updates 5.9 M systemd-compat-libs x86_64 219-21.fc22 updates 136 k systemd-devel x86_64 219-21.fc22 updates 163 k systemd-libsx86_64 219-21.fc22 updates 351 k systemd-python x86_64 219-21.fc22 updates 96 k systemd-python3 x86_64 219-21.fc22 updates 98 k Transaction Summary ==
Re: More dnf annoyance
On 11.08.2015, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: So two update commands at different times give different results? If two update commands issued directly after another qualify as at different times, then yes. In fact, there was not more than max. one minute between the two. Dnf hasn't been working properly since F22, while I had not a single problem with yum ever. Still I have to use dnf clean all before updating, just to be sure to get all available updates. No you don't, as has been explained several times recently. You can use clean metadata or --refresh. Doing both is redundant. Obviously, you haven't read my mail with enough attention. The time between the commands is clearly stated, and so are the commands itself. I already used the --refresh parameter, and it wasn't enough to get all available updates. Thus clean all. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: More dnf annoyance
On 11.08.2015, Michael Schwendt wrote: Yet two completely separate contacts with Fedora's metalink server. Trouble-shooting these kinds of problems would need to include a closer look at what mirrors you are assigned to in both cases. Ok, I see. So what command should I use to keep my system updated? Usually, I update once a week (or two). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Umount USB
On 11.08.2015, Patrick Dupre wrote: In fedora 22, when a USB key is connected, a icon comes It was the same in fedora 20, but now there is not way to unmount it, while before it was always possible. F22, XFCE spin: there's an unmount option, which works for me. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: backup snapshot
On 11.08.2015, Diogene Laerce wrote: Is there a trick I don't see here ? Because if the backup of those directories is enough for a full restoration of a system state, this method is far more efficient than the others, isn't it ? If you backup all your partitions with rsync, all you have to do in an emergency case is to boot from e.g. CD or a memory stick [1] and reverse the rsync command. Example: rsync -avxHSAX /home/ /backup/home -- backup rsync -avxHSAX --delete /backup/home/ /home -- restore The --delete parameter will take care of all the files that are not in the same state as when they were saved. So in case of a complete disaster, just restore your data as described. If your boot sector is damaged, you'll however have to restore it by hand (which isn't all too difficult). [1] http://www.sysresccd.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: backup snapshot
On 07.08.2015, Diogene Laerce wrote: After a sad experience with a system update, I would like to ask if there is a software on Fedora or more generally on Linux which would allow me to make a complete snapshot of the system ? rsync -avxHSAX /source/ /target -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: No Audio in F22
On 05.08.2015, Stephen Morris wrote: Does anyone have any ideas on what I can look at to work out why there is no sound? What do you see when you directly call alsamixer in a console, e.g. alsamixer -c 0? Is the volume turned on/up? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FAIL: Thunderbird: Replying to thread
On 29.07.2015, Greg Woods wrote: Stop right there. This unfortunately sounds like a well-known Google-ism. If you send mail to a mailing list that you are on, it does not put the message in your Inbox. Though I'm not a Thunderbird user, I wonder why it shouldn't be able to store a copy of your mail in the INBOX folder. I mean Thunderbird, not Google. After all, IMAP is nothing more than a bunch of directories. Maybe I'm missing something.. Mutt, which is what I'm using, allows specifying where I want to have my sent emails stored (set record), maybe Thunderbird can do the same? Another part of the problem may be that you haven't sorted your listmail into seperate folders. This being the case, your email will be sorted correctly when returned by the listserver.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf update vs Software Udpates
On 22.07.2015, Suvayu Ali wrote: I'm sorry but clean all is not necessary at all! clean metadata or clean expire-cache should be sufficient. Ok. That said, I sometimes do not understand what's the harm in getting updates few hours later. dnf already tells you how old the metadata is when it starts, you can choose to get the latest metadata if it is too old. So what's the big deal? I usually update weekly (or at least once within two weeks). And since F22, I get nothing to do every time I do this - although there are updates waiting. Which is.. annoying. So every time I have to clean the cache to be able to update. This was at least not how yum behaved. But if it's intended behaviour now, well... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf update vs Software Udpates
On 22.07.2015, Rick Stevens wrote: Open mouth, insert foot. While what I did did result in the chrome update, a dnf clean metadata;dnf update did come up with 21 more items to update--even though it said the metadata was 45 seconds old. Welcome to the club.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf update vs Software Udpates
On 21.07.2015, Radek Holy wrote: IIUUC, this is not completely true. I believe that once both PackageKit and DNF are integrated with the new CAShe [1], we will *be able* to improve this situation [2]. I hope this will be done *fast*, because I have to clean all *everytime* checking for updates. Otherwise, no updates are shown, even though they exist. This is a major bug. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Mouse wheel acceleration problem
Hi, after updating F21-F22, I noticed immediately that the mouse wheel has got some nasty acceleration. Example: I open a large pdf document, and as soon as I begin to scroll, I'm on the last page. After that, scrolling works at normal speed. The same happens when scrolling a website in Firefox: at first wheel action the scroll speed is extremely high, and at the next touch, all is back to normal. This behaviour is driving me insane, and I could't find a solution so far. Is it something with XFCE, Xorg, whatever? I don't know. Is anybody here encountering the same phenomenon, and what to do about it? What I know so far is that it came with the F22 update. Thanks, Heinz -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mounting HD from Live CD
On 13.07.2015, Aaron Gray wrote: Cheers Mike. I did try mounting previously but did not work will try again tomorrow. If you want proper help, please post the output of your mount attempt, e.g. mkdir /test mount /dev/sdX /test Where X is the proper partition/device number. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: To the aeskulap guy
On 12.07.2015, tangen...@hushmail.com wrote: You can take the src rpm from Fedora 21 and use the command: rpmbuild --rebuild src rpm. This generates a version of aeskulap to Fedora 22. It works in several times. It doesn't. Aeskulap may compile, but won't work because the Dicom Toolkit provided by F22 is not fully backwards compatible to the (older) version needed by the F21 aeskulap package. The proper solution mentioned here in the corresponding thread is either installing the F21 rpm together with the F21 Dicom Toolkit, or replacing the F22 Dicom Toolkit with the latest from F21 and recompiling a recent version of aeskulap. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 11.07.2015, John Austin wrote: dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm On my F22 machine, this ends up with: Error: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc21.x86_64 requires libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed Btw: there is also ginkgo-cadx. It's not as good as aeskulap, and doesn't compile on Fedora (but does on Arch). Here's the error: /usr/local/src/srcpkg/ginkgocadx-3.6.1.1367.34/src/cadxcore/api/initwx.cpp:67:42: fatal error: vtkThreadedStreamingPipeline.h: No such file or directory This is because vtkThreadedStreamingPipeline.h was removed from vtk. So if anybody wants to spend some time on it... (not me). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22: rebooting to emergency mode
On 03.07.2015, Chris Murphy wrote: And after that, over the weekend if you can afford to be without the use of this computer, run memtest86+ as long as you can stand it. Sometimes it takes days for problems to show up. Most often, mprime95 is a better alternative and fails within a short amount of time in case of failing RAM or heat problems: http://www.mersenne.org/download/ One full hour with each of the three stress-tests (respectively) will usually suffice. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to NetworkManager
On 02.07.2015, René Harder Olsen wrote: How to make a new mobilbroadband connection in Network Manager, I can't find any WAN connection in Network Manager it only offers the following options VPN,Binding,Hold,Bridge and Vlan and I don't believe that's right for what I am trying to do. Would you mind posting the relevant lines from the output of dmesg after plugging in your device? Most of the mobile broadband devices I've dealt with showed up as an Ethernet connection. Sorry for my bad English. No need to worry, your English is fine. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Toshiba support in the kernel.
On 30.06.2015, stan wrote: That's the hard part of compiling a custom kernel; eliminating all the irrelevant modules and functionality. I've looked, and there doesn't seem to be a program that scans the system, and only turns on hardware modules for the system scanned. make localmodconfig is what you're after. Be aware that localmodconfig does exactly what you want. So if you e.g. don't have connected a device containing an ext4 filesystem at the moment you issue the command, ext4 support won't be in your new kernel. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22 useradd??
On 28.06.2015, Beartooth wrote: I have F22 with xfce4 up and running fine on my #2 PC; but I can't find the GUI form of useradd for it. I tried to RTFM for the command line, but I'm clearly misunderstanding something. How do I get to the users and whatever function that I'm used to using?? yum install system-config-users I'm still on F21, because I don't want to have the dnf mess on a production machine. So you'll have to translate the command to dnf. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22 unusable - system freezes on login
On 18.06.2015, Matthew Woehlke wrote: I don't know offhand how to set up serial login Set up the console and output in grub.cfg: serial --speed=115200 --unit=0 --word=8 --parity=no --stop=1 terminal_input serial terminal_output serial Then tell the kernel to use it (grub.cfg, as a kernel parameter): console=tty0 console=ttyUSB0 Now, you just have to connect another PC to the serial port of your machine. Reboot, and fire up minicom or something similar, and you'll get a login screen (and the redirected output). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmfusion down
On 08.06.2015, g wrote: It's not just you! http://www.edgreshko.com looks down from here. His email suggests the domain is greshko.com, not edgreshko.com. The former resolves just fine. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
