On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:09 AM, JB jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
it is a state of flux.
I always managed to move to next Fedora with either preupgrade or 'yum
upgrade'
methods, but other people are not always so lucky and hit an air pocket.
In my case hitting air pockets could mean
I tried to upgrade to Fedora 13 with preupgrade, just as I had done
previously with Fedora 11 = 12.
First, I get this kind of result:
preupgrade
Loaded plugins: blacklist, whiteout
No plugin match for: rpm-warm-cache
No plugin match for: remove-with-leaves
No plugin match for:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, JB jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:
Marcel Rieux m.z.rieux at gmail.com writes:
...
Hi,
if you just care about upgrading to next Fedora, try this method:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq
Thanks for the suggestion but, I always thought preupgrade
I have a somewhat similar problem with a wired ADSL connection. I
used to disable the connection by right clicking the icon and
unclicking Enable connection. Now Enable connection is checked and
grayed out. It's impossible to disable the connection by unchecking.
BUT, it you left click and choose
More on this issue:
http://lwn.net/Articles/400746/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/19/2010 10:24 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
you could ask Rahul Sundaram to use a correct return address. His
problem has been going on forever.
Is that your excuse to send abusive and rude mails in private? I don't
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Paul Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
It has little to do with the venue, and more to do with the tone
you've brought to it, Marcel.
Yeah, of course, the tone! Whenever I try to bring
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net wrote:
On 19 July 2010 21:09, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
This said, as this very message proves, it seems your only goal is to
add noise to this thread.
There are 60 posts currently in this thread.
Of those
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/20/2010 04:06 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
Did you notice that Sundaram's never replied to my message explaining
that pretending that OOo not having an autoreplace option because of
copyright matters is absolutely
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
I think the best way for me to improve this list is to provide help
where it's needed and try to avoid tedious arguments. I don't think
that anyone made me the hall monitor.
In the end, the only real way to improve the
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Darr d...@core.com wrote:
On Saturday, 17 July, 2010 @23:44 zulu, Marcel Rieux scribed:
Where can I read the board's position on the name copyright?
You're mixing nomenclatures...
you can't copyright a name - names can be trademarked, though.
Right
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:14 PM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/17/2010 9:58 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Darr d...@core.com
mailto:d...@core.com wrote:
On Friday, 16 July, 2010 @02:48 zulu, Marcel Rieux scribed:
and it will most probably
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Christofer C. Bell
christofer.c.b...@gmail.com wrote:
The irony, Marcel, is that if your request was actually taken seriously,
and this list became moderated (which is a headache anyway, since there is
no post-posted moderation possible in a mailing list) is
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Result:
https://mail.google.com/mail/channel/bind?VER=(...)it=(...)SID=(...)RID=(...)AID=(..https://mail.google.com/mail/channel/bind?VER=%28...%29it=%28...%29SID=%28...%29RID=%28...%29AID=%28..
.)
Page displayed
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:08 AM, suvayu ali
fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.comfatkasuvayu%2bli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I couldn't help but notice, you didn't follow the instructions
correctly as provided by Nicholas.
Please stop spreading this nonsense all over the place. I followed
instructions as
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:34 PM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/18/2010 9:29 PM, Darr wrote:
Since you won't stop using HTML quotes, I won't bother quoting you at all
anymore.
If ebay can't stop the site paypalsucks.com, I doubt there's much
redhat can (or should) do about the fedorafaq
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:53 PM, JD jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/18/2010 08:36 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com
mailto:m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Result:
https://mail.google.com/mail/channel/bind?VER=(...)it=(...)SID
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:01 AM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/18/2010 11:52 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:34 PM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/18/2010 9:29 PM, Darr wrote:
For some reason Gmail defaults to rtf. That can be easily changed in the
'compose
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Darr d...@core.com wrote:
Since you won't stop using HTML quotes, I won't bother quoting you at all
anymore.
David told me teh solution wasn't in Settings, but in the reply
interface. How long did it take to fix the problem? 2 days. Now, maybe
you could ask
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Germán A. Racca
Please, it would be nice if you stop sending html mails:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#No_HTML_Mail.2C_Please
This page has a link on how to send text messages unfortunately it points
to
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Darr d...@core.com wrote:
On Friday, 16 July, 2010 @02:48 zulu, Marcel Rieux scribed:
and it will most probably prove my point that while Nouveau developers
pretend they work really hard to get new users, installing Kmod is a
one way ticket. Unless
In the thread 'Who's moderating this forum? , On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:12
PM, Darr d...@core.com gave a few suggestions to remove the Nvidia driver
and to make Nouveau work.
Since somebody from Nouveau told me on this list that installing Nvidia
drivers is not a one way ticket that will prevent
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 13:13 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
The prerequisite is that Red Hat employees have some common sense
themselves... Of course, we all know that Fedora being an entity
completely separate from Red
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
You have a problem. Several people offered you solutions but you are
reluctant to try it out.
What is the solution to a non-existing tab? One person said 3.2.1 would
settle the problem. I explained why I wouldn't
2010/7/15 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:48:08 -0400
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
...snip...
http://fedorasolved.org/Members/dcr226/nouveau-kmods-mesa-dri-exper
RPMFusion updated its site today. Here's what they suggest:
Disable or uninstall the nvidia
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Kevin J. Cummings
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote:
On 07/16/2010 12:12 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Kevin J. Cummings
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net mailto:cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
wrote:
On 07/15/2010 07:11 PM, Kevin
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote:
On 07/14/2010 03:54 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Smith, Herbherb.sm...@boeing.com
wrote:
*From:* users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:
users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
As everybody suggested I wrote to RPMFusion on how to make a clean uninstall
of Kmod Nvidia. E.g.: suggested by:
*Alan Evans, who wrote:
*
It is their responsibility to explain how to uninstall that software. Simple.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-June/376088.html*
Todd
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Christofer C. Bell
christofer.c.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
No. as the tile and the line above say, I mean in OOo 3.3.1
Still no answer to this question. Isn't it amazing
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 15:17 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
It's no mystery why no one knows how to make autocorrections, the
functionality doesn't exist. It's documented in the help files how to
something similar,
Since I'm in rant mode, I might as well continue. There's a lot to be said
about how Fedora doesn't work!
On *Thu Jun 24 01:36:32 UTC 2010, **Joel Rees* wrote about there being no
instructions to revert from Nvidia to Nouveau drivers:
No, re-installing to clear up a mess that may take more time
Once in a while, a pop-up shines saying Download complete when I
downloaded nothing. So, I checked the Downloads directory where, since 04:12
till 04:57 today I have 7 bind 0 byte files. I don't know what time this is
since I received that last download notice about an hour ago and it is 17:43
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:47 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
You have OOo 3.2.1 available on CentOS 5 when only 3.1.1 is available
on Fedora 12? Rather surprising!
OO 3.2.1 is readily available for download directly from
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Christofer C. Bell
christofer.c.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
How does Red Hat manages to ask thousand of dollars from companies when
Linux's main word processing software doesn't offer
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:44:02 -0400
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Once in a while, a pop-up shines saying Download complete when I
downloaded nothing.
From what application? Can you tell by it's window? Web
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
Ok, so that's why it's OK if it doesn't work! Windows at $35 (OEM) for
5-7
years seems a better alternative though. Red Hat salesmen must be really
competent. I certainly couldn't sell one Red Hat copy for sure.
If
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/16/2010 03:00 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
I don't understand how come nobody responsible for this group tries to
make discussions move forward to better results for Red Hat, whether
it be about uninstalling
at the time.
I thought maybe somebody would drop a few lines to protest this obvious
nonsense. 3 weeks later, nothing.
What usually happens is some people add more of the same.
On 15 July 2010 22:46, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/16/2010 03:00 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
I
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On *Thu Jun 24 01:36:32 UTC 2010, **Joel Rees* wrote about there
being no instructions to revert from Nvidia to Nouveau drivers:
I answered him with a link that answered his question, but he didn't
reply if that solved
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Check closely, I didn't split the thread. Somebody, unaware of the
result, I suppose, removed OT: from the title line. It's unfortunate
but those things happen.
No. You did split the thread by starting yet
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 18:48 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
YOU say it's a solution. I don't know you, I don't deal with you. If
Fedora believes it's a solution, I'll apply it.
You don't know anyone on this mailing list
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/16/2010 05:27 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
Is there any word (that you've heard by rumor) that indicates what the
possible immediate intellectual property problem may be? The bug
report doesn't specify
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
I was referring to the June post not to answer it but to give a flagrant
example of some omnipresent nonsense. Of course, I might be wrong
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Kevin J. Cummings
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote:
On 07/15/2010 07:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This looks like you were at some site that had a 0 length file called
'bind' and when you clicked on it it downloaded... it uses the numbers
each time you
I often type voyels too fast so I'd like errors such as teh to be
automatically corrected to the. I searched the web but all the solutions I
found involved using menu entries that are not in OOo 3.1.1. Does anybody
know how to do this?
I often use the zoom in Firefox, Is there any way to make
Firefox is often killed by signal 11:
Package:firefox-3.5.10-1.fc12
Latest Crash:Mon 12 Jul 2010 11:45:16 PM
Command:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.5/firefox --sm-config-prefix
/firefox-P8PZv6/ --sm-client-id
10a7781fec216fecbb1278870778770015530047 --screen 0
Reason:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.netwrote:
On 14 July 2010 21:25, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
I often use the zoom in Firefox, Is there any way to make Firefox
remember a default zoom?
Is there a keyboard shortcut to navigate to the right
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Smith, Herb herb.sm...@boeing.com wrote:
*From:* users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:
users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Marcel Rieux
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 14, 2010 3:26 PM
*To:* Community support for Fedora users
*Subject:* OT
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Kevin J. Cummings
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote:
On 07/14/2010 04:33 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
Firefox is often killed by signal 11:
Package:firefox-3.5.10-1.fc12
Latest Crash:Mon 12 Jul 2010 11:45:16 PM
Command:/usr/lib64/firefox
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 05:34:05 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
As a simple user, I'm not in a position to fight RPMFusion. So, if the
Nouveau developers don't want to provide instructions on how to install
Nouveau when
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
there are multiple ways to install nvidias drivers. Its really not simple
to
cover them all. some ways like using the installer directly from nvidia
replace a bunch of Xorg bits
It's most likely that people who have
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:39:16 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
reverse whatever it was you did to enable the nvidia driver, then you
get
Nouveau
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
One way is to back up your data and reinstall Fedora. That's simple to
explain and reliable. It's an annoying amount of work, but it might have
taken less of your time as things turned out.
Reinstalling to install a
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
That makes no sense. If you ask them for information about why this
particular kmod package was delayed, I doubt that they would give you
an answer anything like you suggest.
Oops, sorry! I read too fast and thought,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll check.
The question has been asked here on the 17th:
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-users/2010-June/000682.html
There's one reply to the message, it's somebody explaining Fedora 12 has the
same
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 15:55:32 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
And RPMfusion provides instructions on how to get Nouveau out of the way
to
do a clean install. Why, as I was explaining to Dennis
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
reverse whatever it was you did to enable the nvidia driver, then you get
Nouveau since its the default.
How do you, for instance, reverse:
su -
mv /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r)-nouveau.img
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 16:25:38 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Another thing that would be nice is an howto on disinstalling nvidia
drivers
made available on Fedora's or rpmfusion's site. Last time
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 15:17:14 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
(Snip) So, finally, 4 days after the kernel update, a corresponding
nvidia
kernel module was provided. Not a word anywhere as to why
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 22:02:49 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, I don't believe rpmfusion, a repository not supported by Red
Hat/Fedora, could block a kernel update.
They can using
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
If you think that getting an updated
kernel installed without the corresponding nVidia kmod being installed is
a problem, you could suggest that they use conflicts to block those
updates.
As I said, I don't believe
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 19:52:49 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't RPMfusion preparing its upcoming module according to the kernel
version that is in Testing? I would think that RPMfusion has
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.comwrote:
the way it works is that rpmfusion cannot build their kmod's until
Fedora ships a new kernel. So there is a lag of time between the kernel
update and the packages from rpmfusion
No. Usually, the kernel and the module
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Steven P. Ulrick
lists-fed...@afolkey2.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com
wrote:
On 06/16/2010 04:54 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
So. if somebody could fill the bug report, I would appreciate. It's
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net wrote:
This has nothing to do with who broke what. This has everything to do
with attempting to make Fedora, and other Linux variants, mainstream
enough for the common person to use.
Have you seen Taxi Driver? There's a
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:03:41 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
How can rpmfusion provide the module for a kernel it's not expecting
because
the one in testing -- posted yesterday
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Darr d...@core.com wrote:
On Monday, 14 June, 2010 @ 23:13 zulu, Marcel Rieux scribed:
Here's the last update suggestion I received today:
[snip]
kernel x86_64 2.6.32.14-127.fc12
Most of the other replies have focused
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.comwrote:
the way it works is that rpmfusion cannot build their kmod's until
Fedora ships a new kernel. So there is a lag of time between the kernel
update and the packages from rpmfusion because they need the kernel
source to
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net wrote:
snip
Shouldn't there be a way for yum/packagekit to understand the
interdependencies when kmod packages are installed such that a new
kernel update is *not* offered if the corresponding kmod package that
uses it is
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Marcel Rieux wrote:
I use Klipper in Gnome. When I do a search in Klipper, the search box
doesn't disappear and hides the first entry until the computer is
rebooted. I found no instructions anywhere on how to close
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, David Boles dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Fedora provides you, free of charge, a perfectly good, working,
operating system. And they maintain that system. As provided.
You modified it by adding a package, or packages, from a non Fedora
site(s). Fedora provided
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, David Boles dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
wrote:
I used to use kmod-nvidia(-PAE) and what I used to do was:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
On 06/16/2010 04:54 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
So. if somebody could fill the bug report, I would appreciate. It's
not an activity I'll ever get really good at, I afraid.
P.s.: Maybe you can wait for Ed Gresko
Here's the last update suggestion I received today:
==
PackageArch
Version RepositorySize
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
On 06/15/2010 07:00 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
More fun with Klipper!
Just as it used to do before, most of the time, it's impossible to
paste in gedit unless the first entry is reselected.
In OOo, either using
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps or perhaps you are seeing problems others have not. In either
case, file a bug report with the details would be useful.
Thanks to Ed's answer, I could figure this is a possibility. So, I made a
few tests.
1)
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Dale J. Chatham d...@chatham.org wrote:
On 06/14/2010 06:29 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 19:13:59 -0400,
Marcel Rieuxm.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
For this issue you are really complaining to the wrong people.
kmod-nvidia
is from
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/15/2010 04:43 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
=
So, the oldest kmod-nvidia is removed with the oldest kernel and it
will still be possible to boot with the present
I use Klipper in Gnome. When I do a search in Klipper, the search box
doesn't disappear and hides the first entry until the computer is rebooted.
I found no instructions anywhere on how to close it. Is there a default way
to close boxes?
Klipepr's help says:
You can search through the clipboard
New updates today and the PYCURL ERROR 6 comes back again.
It looks like this:
Total download size: 87 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
http://mirror.pnl.gov/fedora/linux/updates/12/x86_64/kdebase-4.4.3-2.fc12.1.x86_64.rpm:
[Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 6 -
Trying other mirror.
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 07 May 2010 06:06:39 you wrote:
If I were you, I'd complain to the cbc.ca webmaster and tell him to
fix it.
It's going to be an uphill battle:
Linux
- At this time Linux is not supported.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Peter Larsen
plar...@famlarsen.homelinux.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 22:58 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
That's not what I said. I said I've been using Fedora and
RedHat long
before things like LVM existed. I'm more comfortable
I try to view this video:
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/lies/video.html
and don't succeed.
I was able to get an mms URL at Akamai, but here's what happens, even using
mplayer directly:
mplayer mms://
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Hugh Caley hu...@aldon.com wrote:
LVM can be very handy for desktops. If you run out of space on / (or any
other mount that uses LVM) you can attach another disk, add it to LVM, and
expand the filesystem with resize2fs. Easy and quick.
Before I bought my
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote:
On 05/02/2010 11:23 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
I have selected my disk partitioning for a long time and when new
wizardry comes along, I always wonder how much help it's going to be. In
most cases
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Kevin J. Cummings
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote:
On 04/30/2010 05:31 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
mailto:methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/01/2010 02:28 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.comwrote:
Now Fedora by default installs a 500 MB /boot, which should be
sufficient for the foreseeable future. (Admittedly in free software,
things change rapidly so the horizon of foreseeable isn't as long as
you might find
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/01/2010 02:28 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On
===
Isn't it now possible to revert to not using a /boot partition and
having the full / space for installation?
No. Because while the latest GRUB
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/09/2010 05:17 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
[ You mailed me offlist and then quoted me on a public list. You need
to stop doing that]
You are right in observing that the cost of living is not the same in
America
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.netwrote:
On 9 April 2010 00:47, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
We know that Canonical is strong in cloud computing. Etc. But...
With all due respect, you pulled that line out of your ass and have no
data to support
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Being privately held, Canonical is pretty secretive about the size of its
business. Shuttleworth said when Silber was appointed last December that the
company was not yet profitable but heading in the right direction
Sorry, folks but it seems there is no test group and I want to see how gmail
interacts with Fedora's list when there is a Cc. I hope... p wont't mind if
I use his address.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, folks but it seems there is no test group and I want to see how
gmail interacts with Fedora's list when there is a Cc. I hope... p won't
mind if I use his address.
Sorry, p. I'll need a second one. THis should
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/08/2010 02:29 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 04/06/2010 02:39 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
Meanwhile, back on the farm, Mark Shuttleworth pays his
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/06/2010 02:39 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
Meanwhile, back on the farm, Mark Shuttleworth pays his developers and
doesn't get a cent back... for now.
Far from true. You need to check your facts.
Oops! I missed
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:36 PM, psmith psm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 01/04/10 23:44, Craig White wrote:
I do have faith that Fedora governance is
independent of Red Hat.
Craig
you are joking right? fedora is just a testing ground for redhat (think
selinux, pulseaudio, abrt
On the brighter side, an upgrade has arrived since I noticed that Klipper
only worked properly in GNOME after Parcellite was installed and functional.
The upgarde caused problems selecting text. I removed Parcellite and now
Klipper works perfectly in GNOME.
Glipper is still unavailable.
--
users
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Montag, den 05.04.2010, 17:17 -0400 schrieb Marcel Rieux:
On the brighter side, an upgrade has arrived since I noticed that
Klipper only worked properly in GNOME after Parcellite was installed
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:23:48PM -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
As a matter of fact, as Fedora is mainly financed by Red Hat as a test
bench for RHEL.
Fedora is more than a test bench for RHEL.
I can hardly
Gee, I almost missed this one!
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Thomas Cameron
thomas.came...@camerontech.com wrote:
I must confess that I'm not very strong on opinions; I'm better on facts.
Then you should probably try finding some. The drivel below is complete
fantasy.
2006.
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
