Re: Where is the source code for a Koji build?

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 04:13:18 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I'm new to working with Fedora's Release Engineering. I ran across a > package that Failed To Build From Source (FTBS) for Fedora 40 at > . I have C and > C++ experience, and I believe

Re: emacs is hopeless

On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 20:50:04 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I have not encountered any problems (yet?). Fedora 39 Workstation installation (so Wayland based), launching Emacs from GNOME Shell as well as terminals. No problems yet. I apply some font face customizations in ~/.emacs though.

Re: Sound synthesizer for Linux

On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 19:59:56 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote: > About 15 years or so ago, I was using a sound synthesizer on Fedora > that was GUI drag-n-drop sound modules, and draw wires between them > There were VCOs, filters, ADSR, mixers, etc. > > It looks like I never wrote down what I installed

Re: systemd-oomd insanely aggressive with non-DE logins

On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:37:46 -, Andre Robatino wrote: > I have 3 machines with clean F37 installs. Dunno yet whether it's also F37 or just F38, but here on F38 even gnome-terminal is getting killed when running a simple tar command in it that works on creating a ~20 GB archive.

Re: directories in /usr

On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 14:31:16 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > If they are installed by the package manager, you shouldn't be deleting > them. > Do you mean "x86_64-w64-mingw32" and "i686-w64-mingw32"? > Did you install wine? Those files and directories are related to mingw not wine. And there are

Re: mp4 to dvd

On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 14:17:57 -0600 (CST), Michael Hennebry wrote: > Any suggestions for converting mp4 files to VOB? > Even an example with mencoder might be useful. > Long long ago, I used mencoder for making DVD video files. > Lost track of the script I used. > I tried it again recently, > but

Re: F34 pipewire no audio after updates

On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:30:36 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > i too have this problem after f34 install. (fresh, not updated).given > michael's status, what is the > next thing to try? Between GDM screen and logging in, something falls flat on its nose and sends errors to the logs, but the three

Re: F34 pipewire no audio after updates

On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:14:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Am I the only one where audio is missing after recent updates to F34? > The three pipewire processes are running, but no sound. No volume control > in GNOME Shell either. It's been a week or so without such problems, but t

F34 pipewire no audio after updates

Am I the only one where audio is missing after recent updates to F34? The three pipewire processes are running, but no sound. No volume control in GNOME Shell either. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Troubles with the claws-mail

On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 12:00:11 +0200, Bob Marcan wrote: > Fedora 33 up to date (Sun Jun 6 11:47:43 CEST 2021) > claws-mail-3.17.8-1.fc33.x86_64) > > In claws-mail keyboard key "k" is ignored. > Same key is working in all other applications. > So it is not a keyboard problem. :-) > Does anybody

Re: dnf exclude option not working

On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 19:00:30 +0200, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > [root@Orion ~]# dnf repoquery --whatrequires libcpuid > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:52:55 ago on Tue 29 Dec 2020 06:01:13 > PM EET. > cpu-x-0:4.0.1-5.fc33.x86_64 > i-nex-0:7.6.1-4.fc33.x86_64 > i-nex-0:7.6.1-6.fc33.x86_64 >

Re: dnf exclude option not working

On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:46:05 +0200, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > root@Orion ~]# dnf repoquery --whatrequires cpu-x > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:22 ago on Tue 29 Dec 2020 06:01:13 > PM EET. > cpu-x-data-0:4.0.1-5.fc33.noarch That query isn't helpful, because it doesn't show what you

Re: dnf exclude option not working

Kostas Sfakiotakis schrieb am Mo., 28. Dez. 2020, 23:25: > > Στις 28/12/20 8:15 μ.μ., ο/η Michael Schwendt έγραψε: > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:57:05 +0200, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > > > >> Error: > >>Problem: problem with installed package cpu-x-4.0.1-5.f

Re: dnf exclude option not working

On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:57:05 +0200, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > Error: >  Problem: problem with installed package cpu-x-4.0.1-5.fc33.x86_64 >   - cannot install the best update candidate for package > cpu-x-4.0.1-5.fc33.x86_64 >   - package cpu-x-4.0.1-5.fc33.x86_64 requires

Re: dnf exclude option not working

On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 14:07:19 +0200, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > Στις 28/12/20 2:36 π.μ., ο/η Ed Greshko έγραψε: > > On 28/12/2020 08:05, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > >> Can someone please tell me the correct syntax of the exclude option ( > >> the -x option will not work as well ) ?? > >> > >>

Re: smartd log alert

On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:56:56 +0100, François Patte wrote: > What is a "fairly low rate"? And beyond which rate do I have to be scared? Usually, you would want the displayed value to be high, since the underlying "rate" is mapped. If the shown value drops much, that would be reason to be

Re: smartd log alert

On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 14:36:54 +0100, François Patte wrote: > I have this alert in my watchlog report: Have you used the smartctl tool from the smartmontools package yet as to examine SMART data and perhaps run self-tests? ___ users mailing list --

Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

Thread is old, but makes me wonder, is there any current status on Qt with Wayland? In F33 with GNOME Workstation, several Qt applications don't work correctly with Wayland, but do work if switching to Xorg. avidemux-qt, for example, displays a video preview area that doesn't update. Audacious

Firefox Clear History not clickable / F33

This is with default Fedora 33 Workstation x86_64. Firefox > History > Clear Recent History > Time range to clear The combobox can be clicked to show the drop-down list, but none of the shown items can be selected with a mouse-click. Using cursor keys is the workaround. Can anyone reproduce

Re: installing wine on F33 wants to downgrade packages

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:08:57 -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote: > 2. Why is it downgrading my packages? A likely cause is that you have come from an x86_64-only installation that has had access to more recent package repositories than what you using currently. Possibly because you've been

Re: testing update

On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:02:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > Do I need to dnf remove rpmfusion-free-release-32-1.noarch > > rpmfusion doesn't even have a testing repo. You need to provide more > details. Of course they still offer a testing repo for updates, and its .repo file is included

Strange gpg-agent processes with Fedora 32

Has anyone seen the following before and possibly has found out what is going on? Fedora 32 shows a gpg-agent process for each repo but with a non-existant ".tmp" homedir. Examples: root2512 0.0 0.0 161028 900 ?Ss 11:20 0:00 gpg-agent --homedir

Re: rkhunter --update fails.

On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:55:53 -, home user wrote: > [10:44:44] Checking file mirrors.dat [ Update failed ] > [10:44:44] Info: Executing download command '/usr/bin/wget -q -O > "/var/lib/rkhunter/rkhunter.upd.rJwBkFr06W" >

Re: Steam erroneously marked as "Installed" in Gnome Software

On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 01:44:32 +0530, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > Hi, > > I have NEVER installed Steam via Gnome Software on my notebook, in fact > I never installed it ever, but on Gnome Software it is marked as > "Installed". > > Any way I can remove it from there ? That is mark it as "not

Re: Every second GDM login fails

On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 19:25:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > Next time you do it, count the dots just to make sure all keystrokes are > being registered. > I've done that before and have also clicked the "eye" icon to unhide the entered passphrase, and it is shown correctly but will be rejected.

Every second GDM login fails

Has anyone also had this before with GNOME Shell in Fedora 32? It is new behavior compared with older releases of Fedora. When I return to a locked screen, my usual habit is to press Return and then to enter the passphrase. That fails even if unhiding the passphrase and verifying that it has been

Re: Errors compiling

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:56:40 -0400, Frank wrote: > I am trying to compile/install IceWm for my Fedora 32 installation. Ran > into some problems I have resolved, but > I am stumped by these: > > checking for strlcat... no > checking for C++11 by default... yes > checking for CORE... no >

Re: what was that on f30 ??

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:21:46 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > yesterday, something came on screen asking for a repo update & authorised > access. > > seems to have broken repo access, any insights?? Rule of thumb in such a scenario would be to ask _before_ proceeding, and to be precise about what

Re: issue upde fc32 (sagemath)

On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 20:33:30 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > I get the following error message: > dnf update > Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:57 ago on Sat 06 Jun 2020 08:23:49 PM > CEST. > Dependencies resolved. > > Problem 1: package polymake-singular-4.0.1-2.fc32.x86_64

Re: perl-Math-GSL

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:21:43 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I could not compile perl-Math-GSL-0.40 because this package does not deal > with gsl 2.6 > Thus, I installed gsl 2.5 independently of gsl 2.6 (gsl-2.6-2.fc32.x86_64) > and I was able to build the rpm package which requires libgsl.so.23 >

Re: build package

On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 20:08:16 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Can I simulatenously install GSL 2.5 and 2.6? > > or remove GSL 2.6 and intall GSL 2.5? > The library SONAME has changed from libgsl.so.23 to libgsl.so.25, but libgslcblas.so.0 hasn't changed, and the Fedora packages would conflict

Re: build package

On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:36:03 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > I am rebuilding the perl packages that I need. > perl-Math-GSL-0.40.tar.gz > > > rpmbuild -bb perl-Math-GSL.spec > > gives an error: > Checking for GSL using gsl-config > Found GSL 2.6 (via gsl-config) installed in /usr >

Re: upgrade 30 to 32

On Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:29:51 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > Patrick Dupre wrote: > >> This has been solved by > >> > >> rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 > > Michael Schwendt: > > The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" wou

Re: upgrade 30 to 32

On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 00:25:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 > > > > The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the > > most common use case. > > Maybe you missed the original message where he tried the equivalent of > that

Re: upgrade 30 to 32

On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 23:12:06 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > This has been solved by > > rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1-1.fc30.x86_64 The good old "rpm -e perl-PDL-LAPACK" would have been enough for the most common use case. ___ users mailing list --

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:09:36 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > When the policy is not being followed and/or not enforced it means > nothing. Only someone who is in love with > the policy would say otherwise and actively defend it. You're still not getting it. > I am going to guess you helped write

Re: Looking for a .so

On Sun, 31 May 2020 09:02:51 -0700, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > On Sun, 31 May 2020 16:29:54 +0200 > Andras Simon wrote: > > > 2020-05-31 16:08 UTC+02:00, Geoffrey Leach: > > > I have a build that references '-lz'. This fails, because gcc > > > expects to find libz.so in the library search path.

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Sat, 30 May 2020 16:42:10 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > The policy means nothing when Only an "outsider" would say that. That policy has been refined multiple times since the fedora.us era with its strict QA policies. That policy is also reason why potential "maintainers" shy away from the

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Sat, 30 May 2020 11:14:22 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > You really need to understand the devs actual motivations. And your > are attributing things to Fedora devels that are being funded outside > of the Fedora community. Please, think outside the box. It isn't helpful to the discussion, if

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Sat, 30 May 2020 07:33:04 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > My background is I have been used Fedora since Core 1, and prior to > that started with Redhat 5/6/7/8/9 and managed (or was technical lead > for a team) with >1000 installed running combinations of RHEL, Centos, > non-enterprise

Re: Cannot upgrade gnutls with dnf (transaction problems)

On Sat, 30 May 2020 09:33:11 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Error: Transaction test error: >   file /usr/share/doc/manual/gnutls.html conflicts between attempted > installs of gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686 and > gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64 >   file /usr/share/info/gnutls.info-3.gz

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Fri, 29 May 2020 21:08:10 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > The maintainers are for the most part about "packaging" kernels. > They rarely seem to ever work on kernel bugs, nor have the time to do > such investigate even if they have the time. If that were true, something would be even more wrong

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Fri, 29 May 2020 13:56:34 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > I don't believe the kernel.org developers work out of the fedora > bugzilla (or any distro's bugzilla), so no one who knows anything is > likely to find and/or see the bug. > > To get a kernel developer you would need to at least post a

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Thu, 28 May 2020 21:19:34 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742960 > > > > > > Lately all my bug reports tend to go like this. > > > > > > Why don't you try to reproduce issues with Fedora 31, 32 or Rawhide > > and then reassign the tickets

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Thu, 28 May 2020 18:08:48 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > Perhaps there should be an automated culling of participants. If you > step up the plate to say you'll maintain a package, but don't, *you* > get dumped from bugzilla. Please let's not create a thread of doom. You can't seriously

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Thu, 28 May 2020 07:50:16 +, Suvayu Ali wrote: > It took so long, that the bug report became irrelevant. I have since > moved to a different country, with a different job, and don't have > access to the original machine. In fact, as mentioned in the bug, I > could reproduce a similar

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Wed, 27 May 2020 15:42:39 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:23 PM Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > The fundamental problem here is that it has taken a very long time for > > somebody to respond to the bug reporter. There has been no guidance and >

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Wed, 27 May 2020 12:07:35 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 4:30 AM Suvayu Ali wrote: > > > > Lately all my bug reports tend to go like this. Are others having the > > same experience? > > I understand the frustration. My bugs get closed EOL, too. For what > it's worth,

Re: Fedora 30 EOL

On Wed, 27 May 2020 08:18:48 +, Suvayu Ali wrote: > > As of the 26th of May 2020, Fedora 30 has reached its end of life for > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742960 > > Lately all my bug reports tend to go like this. Why don't you try to reproduce issues with Fedora 31, 32

Re: Upgrade of F30 to F31 Appears to Have not Worked Correctly

On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 08:24:19 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > Hi, >     I have just upgraded to F31 from F30 using dnf system-upgrade > download --releasever=31. Before I did the upgrade I updated F30 to the > latest maintenance level. >     When I booted into Gnome on F31 there was no

Re: Is This Windows?.....

On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:57:42 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > I was the person triaging these bugs for about the last decade. If you > have a failure rate of 1/1, and you have millions of users, you > have tens of angry users EVERY DAY filing bugs that their root > filesystem exploded or that

Re: Upgraded F31 system still believes it is living in the past, on F30!

On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 19:58:45 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Thanks for pointing this out. Actually, I tried installing the RPMs but got > the message that all of them were installed So, I reinstalled > > sudo dnf reinstall >

Re: f31 : pkgconfig.exists( 'uuid-dev' ) false but installed

On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:44:21 +0100, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > > Why are you looking for 'uuid-dev'?  It's just "uuid". > sorry this is a typo .. yes i (they) check for uuid > https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/blob/master/packaging/wheel/setup.py#L61 > > python3 > Python 3.7.5 (default, Oct 17

Re: Time to refresh my hardware

On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:53:39 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > And Nvidia's proprietary driver is another thing I'd rather not deal with. > it seems that most vendors ship new Nvidia chipsets that x.org lists as not > supported. One issue with Nvidia chipsets is that Fedora works fine without

Re: F30 GNOME Shell not usable anymore / OsLookupColor(): Segmentation fault

On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 23:12:55 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Dunno when and why this started recently, but I'm hit hard by segfaults > taking down GNOME Shell. > > Bugzilla knows tons of duplicate bug reports about it, dating back to > F29 apparently: > https://apps.fedorapr

F30 GNOME Shell not usable anymore / OsLookupColor(): Segmentation fault

Dunno when and why this started recently, but I'm hit hard by segfaults taking down GNOME Shell. Bugzilla knows tons of duplicate bug reports about it, dating back to F29 apparently: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/xorg-x11-server/bugs/all OsLookupColor(): Segmentation fault at address

Re: Equalizer for pulseaudio

On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 13:13:22 -0500, SternData wrote: > I just did a clean install of F30 on this system and am trying to get > things back to work. > > I've got pulseeffects installed because the install of > pulseaudio-equalizer fails > > $ sudo dnf install pulseaudio-equalizer > Error: >

Re: How do I de-blur a picture?

On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:36:06 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 7/23/19 9:45 AM, Kam Leo wrote: > > Just asking, have you tried the tools in GIMP? > > Yes. Does not help. Which is what the end of the article sums up. ___ users mailing list

Re: Firmware?

On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:17:52 - (UTC), Beartooth wrote: > When 'dnf upgrade' gives me a list of several items labeled > 'firmware', does that mean any or all of them are aimed at my specific > hardware? Or just at machines known to run Fedora? The latter. You can examine the package

Re: Booting impossible

On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:20:32 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > The situation is becoming worst and worst. > I tried an grub2-install /dev/sda When did you run that command? Within a running working installation? And why did you run it? > Now, I cannot boot at all. > I just enter in to a

Re: rpmbuild

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 23:38:56 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22-1.fc30.noarch > The solutions that I found are: > 1) add Provides: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) = %{version}-%{release} > in perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry.spec > or > 2) remove > BuildRequires: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) >= 4.63

Re: rpmbuild

On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 23:09:58 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Maybe, however, some perl packages require packages with a version > number higher than a certain value. > Thus, if the Provides/Requires instructions are not set properly, > all the packages requiring other packages fail, either at the

Re: rpmbuild

On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:43:24 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > Again, I am not sure to understand: > > cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz > > only add: > BuildRequires: perl-generators > in the .spec file > > which does not help. It helps with

Re: rpmbuild

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:13:10 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I am not sure to take the point: You focus on something else. > I can run > cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz > --add-provide "perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) %{version}-%{release}" > > If it is correct.

Re: rpmbuild

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:45:23 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Sorry, when I run > cpanspec Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz I referred to _build time_ creation of inter-package dependencies. The step when rpmbuild adds Requires/Provides to the built packages. You are not supposed to hack a spec file as

Re: rpmbuild

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:35:22 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Provides: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) = %{version}-%{release} > > seems missing in the .spec file No. These are automatically created Provides/Requires for Perl Modules. You need to work with a package that _really_ includes and "Provides"

Re: rpmbuild

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 08:38:05 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 6/9/19 7:29 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > How can I make a rpmbuild and keep the compiled files? > > > Have you tried "rpmbuild --noclean"? Alternatively, end the building after the %build stage: rpmbuild -bc foo.spec And you

Re: gnuplot

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:31:51 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I cannot find a gnuplot-latex for fedora 30, and I cannot find a > gnuplot-latex. > Previously, I compiled at the same time as gnuplot (gnuplot-wx, etc..), see > point 1). # dnf list gnuplot\* Available Packages gnuplot.x86_64

Re: xmms2 fails to update

On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 12:00:01 -0400, Temlakos wrote: > Now when I tried to install other xmms2-related files, the system simply > didn't install them--especially if they came from RPMfusion. Why not? > May I assume that the Fedora System xmms2 package now has everything I > need to play just

Re: xmms2 fails to update

On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 19:30:01 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> Transaction check error: file /usr/lib64/xmms2/libxmms_mad.so from install > >> of > >> xmms2-0.8-60.fc29.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > >> xmms2-mad-0.8-24.fc29.x86_64 > >> Error Summary - > > > > Comments?

Claws Mail 3.17.1 with experimental TLS SNI support

For Fedora 29 and Rawhide: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mschwendt/claws-mail-testing/ If upgrading to these packages, be sure to upgrade also "libetpan" and not only the "claws-mail*" packages. As a side-note, the Dillo based HTML rendering plugin package "claws-mail-plugins-dillo" is

Re: need iptables.conf syntax

On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:49:06 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote: > I am told elsewhere that this is not the proper syntax: > > /etc/modprobe.d/iptables.conf add > > nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21 > > Anyone know what the right syntax is? man modprobe.d and man modprobe.conf

Re: md5 files - how to use them ?

On Wed, 30 May 2018 06:49:46 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > I downloaded this file to the link > http://www.eclipse.org/windowbuilder/download.php. > There are nothing other that files .zip,MD5. > > > Perhaps I misunderstand the instruction because my poor English ? > That can be. > > But

Re: md5 files - how to use them ?

On Tue, 29 May 2018 17:05:33 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > I tried this : > > commad > > output > > > *md5sum * > > ./WB_v1.8.0_UpdateSite_for_Eclipse4.5.zip > > d06dc1c7000dc910ce4642fc7b09c312 ./WB_v1.8.0_UpdateSite_for_Eclipse4.5.zip > > *cat*

Re: qucs simulation fail on missing library

On Tue, 8 May 2018 08:03:46 -0700, pelican wrote: > Although I did have a problem compiling freehdl it is available in the > repos. You should be able to fetch the src.rpm and rebuild that one, adding the .la files to the package. > I did notice while checking /usr/lib64 that there are a few

Re: qucs simulation fail on missing library

On Mon, 07 May 2018 14:54:59 -, patrick stanistreet wrote: > I have been trying out a package qucs for electronic circuit design and > simulation. > I can use the software to create a simple design but the simulation fails on > a missing > library.I tried compiling qucs from source

Re: Program won't start

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:30:43 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > > $ file st > > > st: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), > > > dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2, for GNU/Linux > > > 2.2.5, not stripped > > > > > > $ st > > > > > > bash: ./st: No such file

Re: Program won't start

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 06:05:12 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > Seagate's SeaTools for Linux won't start on my system. The file is > rather old and in a funky format, but it looks like it ought to > run. Nevertheless, it won't run. Can anyone tell me what's goi > ng on? Here's what happens: >

Re: F27 tracker-preferences missing?

On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 03:03:49 +, Christopher wrote: > So... I just did a fresh install of F27, and I can't seem to find > tracker-preferences, so I can disable the annoying document indexer that > keeps crawling my drives. Anybody have any insight into why this is missing > from F27, or a

Re: Renaming USB WD 2TB drives

On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:38:32 -0500, Bill Shirley wrote: > What's the output of > fdisk -l /dev/sdb > > Bill Note that fdisk would only show the partition type value, not the actual fs. "parted /dev/sdb p" tries to detect the fs type. ___ users mailing

Re: how to convert a ma4 file to other format??

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:20:15 +0100, Antonio M wrote: > I installed sounconverter with a bunch of plugins, lame, ffmpeg, faac --- I > can convert for example a flac to mp3 but not a m4a file to a mp3 file?? > what is missing?? Several things possibly. * Soundconverter features automatic

Re: X driver for old Radeon card

On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 19:55:30 -0500, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:29:29 -0500, Alex wrote: > > > >> Is there a proprietary AMD/ATI driver for a Radeon HD5770? I believe > >> the one that's shipped with fedora is called nouveau? > > > >>

Re: X driver for old Radeon card

On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:29:29 -0500, Alex wrote: > Is there a proprietary AMD/ATI driver for a Radeon HD5770? I believe > the one that's shipped with fedora is called nouveau? > xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0.15-3.fc27.x86_64 # rpm -qi xorg-x11-drv-nouveau|tail -3 Summary : Xorg X11 nouveau video

Re: !#@$**%^ Firefox

On Sat, 6 Jan 2018 21:39:56 + (UTC), Beartooth wrote: > Hmmm... I get > > [btth@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa |grep -i iridium > iridium-browser-62.0-1.fc27.x86_64 > but I'm not clear what that tells me. Maybe that I did install it with > dnf after all?? If it actually came out of the Fedora

Re: libgcrypto file conflicts during dnf update

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:02:03 + (UTC), Amadeus W.M. wrote: > I was doing a regular dnf -y update on a F26 and I got this file conflict: > > Error: Transaction check error: > file /usr/share/doc/libgcrypt/AUTHORS from install of > libgcrypt-1.7.9-1.fc26.i686 conflicts with file from package

Re: vi

On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:58:56 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno gio, 09/11/2017 alle 13.37 +0100, Patrick Dupre ha scritto: > > Can I make 2 substitutions on a single call with sed? > > Two or more ... > > $ sed -i -e 's/E/e/g' -e 's/Alfa/xx/g' file.txt No -e option is needed, since

Re: Tweaking Fedora

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 17:02:25 + (UTC), Beartooth wrote: > A correspondent on another list says one used to be able to use > Mondo Rescue to grab all the settings on an existing install and clone > them onto a new one. That would save me vast tedium. > > But the Mondo Rescue site

Re: error in clamav running clamscan as root from /.

On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:58:47 -0700, stan wrote: > For what it's worth, I also have that file on my system with the same > permissions. I think these files are created by the ebtables program. /sys is a "sysfs" mount created at runtime. ___ users

Re: How to install ytnef?

On Wed, 04 Oct 2017 15:43:52 +0200, Ambrogio wrote: > I'm working hard on migration from my old Fedora to the new Fedora 26, > and I find everyday a problem (sometimes a very big problem). > I submitted the question in the evolution mailing list, as I think the > article is very very old. > I

Re: How to install ytnef?

On Wed, 04 Oct 2017 13:20:36 +0200, Ambrogio wrote: > Installed... but no integration with Evolution. > There is a way for enable support to ms-tnef on evo? Since you seem to be an expert in that area, it would be an opportunity to contribute. Is the following guide still accurate?

Re: How to install ytnef?

On Wed, 04 Oct 2017 12:27:35 +0200, Ambrogio wrote: > Tnx for that. > I can't understand why there are a lot of packages errors and > dependency issues. > I know there is a lot of work on maintaining a so big distro, but I > start thinking Fedora isn't so good as before. > I hope it's only my

Re: update fails

On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 13:10:35 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I uninstalled freeipmi, and then > > dnf install nut That is not the suggested command. > freeipmi is needed by nut!! > > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-testing.repo:enabled=0 > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-testing.repo:enabled=0 >

Re: update fails

On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 09:38:57 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > dnf update nut > Package nut available, but not installed. > No match for argument: nut > * Maybe you meant: nut > Error: No packages marked for upgrade. Now we're entering the space of "DNF mess", such as hiding some things from the

Re: update fails

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 22:28:26 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > dnf install --refresh nut It makes no sense to run that command before you see the latest packages available in the "updates" repo. Also, adding --refresh again and again only forces dnf to redownload the repo metadata again and again,

Re: update fails

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 21:23:44 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Sure, > > dnf list nut\* > Repository mgeups has no mirror or baseurl set. > Last metadata expiration check: 3 days, 9:44:08 ago on Fri 29 Sep 2017 > 11:36:48 AM CEST. > Installed Packages > nut-cgi.x86_64

Re: update fails

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 21:27:25 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Installing: > nutx86_642.7.4-7.fc26 > fedora1.8 M > This is only an old package in the base 'fedora' repo. Why don't you troubleshoot this a bit more to

Re: DNF packages?

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:42:43 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote: > > Oops: > > > > dnf list installed|wc -l > > 3991 > > rpm -qa|wc -l > > 3840 > > > > Why this difference?? > > > > Joachim Backes > > > > -- > > > > Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) > > Kernel-4.12.14-300.fc26.x86_64 > > > Line formatting

Re: rpmbuild

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 23:31:50 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > If you go on rpmfind.net > > perl-Forest > is supposed to provides > perl-Forest > perl(Forest) > > Since fedora does not offer perl-Forest, I have to build it from the tar file > Forest-0.10 > There is probably an issue with the

Re: rpmbuild

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:42:47 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Can somebody tell me whatis wrong in the spec file > > > > > I get: > > > rpmbuild -bb perl-Graphics-Primitive.spec > > > error: Failed build dependencies: > > > perl(Forest) >= 0.06 is needed by > > >

Re: rpmbuild

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 21:48:26 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > Can somebody tell me whatis wrong in the spec file > I get: > rpmbuild -bb perl-Graphics-Primitive.spec > error: Failed build dependencies: > perl(Forest) >= 0.06 is needed by >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >