Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 14:02 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
As for TuxOnIce, you can hardly blame people for wanting software which
will not
only suspend but includes resume. Suspend/Hibernate are pretty broken, for
many
people TOI works.
How
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
- a scheduler from Con Kolivas is developed for years and widely used,
merging it is always denied until someone else creates a similar
scheduler and it is accepted immediately
[the scheduler is a core part of the kernel, so why a freshly written
one is preferred to a
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
- a scheduler from Con Kolivas is developed for years and widely used,
merging it is always denied until someone else creates a similar
scheduler and it is accepted immediately
[the scheduler is a core part of the kernel, so why a freshly written
Greg Woods wrote:
I am not a kernel developer, but I know a little about this indirectly.
Whether a project gets accepted into mainline depends on a lot of
things, but one of the big ones is how intrusive it is. If it requires
changes to many drivers and many places in the kernel, it is much
As for TuxOnIce, you can hardly blame people for wanting software which
will not
only suspend but includes resume. Suspend/Hibernate are pretty broken, for
many
people TOI works.
How true!
Thanks for pointing out TuxOnIce. I have been very frustrated by the
stock hibernate on my
On Thursday 11 February 2010 15:10:49 Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 14:02 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
As for TuxOnIce, you can hardly blame people for wanting software which
will not only suspend but includes resume.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote:
So what are the reasons for its absence from the mainline kernel then? If it
works better than the current mechanisms and is open source, why does it take
years to get it into mainline? Is there some
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Antonio Olivares wrote:
I have read a bit about the zen kernel
http://zen-kernel.org/
Looks like this is a fork of the kernel Linux which hopes for confusion with
Xen to grab people's attention.
They're merging several patches. Some of the stuff they ship (e.g.
Dear fellow Fedora users,
I have read a bit about the zen kernel
http://zen-kernel.org/
and I kindly ask if there are any advantages to running a zen-kernel as opposed
to running a Fedora kernel or a native kernel from kernel.org?
I have run Fedora kernels, but on occasions run kernels from
Antonio Olivares wrote:
Dear fellow Fedora users,
I have read a bit about the zen kernel
http://zen-kernel.org/
and I kindly ask if there are any advantages to running a zen-kernel as
opposed to running a Fedora kernel or a native kernel from kernel.org?
I have run Fedora kernels,
Antonio Olivares wrote:
I have read a bit about the zen kernel
http://zen-kernel.org/
Looks like this is a fork of the kernel Linux which hopes for confusion with
Xen to grab people's attention.
They're merging several patches. Some of the stuff they ship (e.g. btrfs) is
also shipped in
11 matches
Mail list logo
