[IronPython] New Mailing List is now available

2011-06-16 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi all, After the downtime yesterday, the new mailing list is now available. It appears that everyone has received unsubscribe notices; these were sent in error. Everyone who was subscribed to the old list should be subscribed to the new list. The page for the new list is http://mail.python.org/ma

Re: [IronPython] Upcoming Mailing List Changes

2011-06-14 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote: > The timeline hasn't been established... It looks like the move is going to go ahead tomorrow (Wednesday) or the next day. Remember, list traffic will be coming from ironpython-us...@python.org, and mails need to be sent to that address

[IronPython] Upcoming Mailing List Changes

2011-06-14 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi all, This a notice that some changes may be coming to this mailing list in the near future. I'm planning on moving the list from it's current host (by a gracious IronPython community member) to being hosted on python.org. The address of the list will change from users@lists.ironpython.com to ir

Re: [IronPython] Seattle IronPython Meetup

2011-06-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
; time. We'll probably use Steve Baer's graciously volunteered office, so obviously Steve has a fair bit of say over the date & time :). - Jeff On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > Is anyone in the Seattle area interested in an IronPython meetup, or &g

Re: [IronPython] Seattle IronPython Meetup

2011-06-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Steve Baer wrote: > Doesn't really matter; we're a pretty laid back company.  We have a meeting > room that comfortably holds at least 15 (could hold more) with a big screen > television that we can hook up to.  We actually have the room pretty well > wired with mi

Re: [IronPython] Seattle IronPython Meetup

2011-06-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Curt Hagenlocher wrote: > Welcome to Seattle! Or as I like to think of it, welcome to > June-and-we-still-have-the-heat-on! :( I'm from Canada, so this is normal (more rain though). I look forward to not dealing with -40, and laughing at the locals who panic in a

Re: [IronPython] Moving forward on 2.7.1

2011-06-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
y skype now supports it: > http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/features/allfeatures/screen-sharing > > I have also had good (cross-platform) luck with the currently-free mikogo > service: http://www.mikogo.com/ > > On 6/10/2011 1:56 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote: >> >> Skype would work,

Re: [IronPython] Moving forward on 2.7.1

2011-06-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
g I would love is a code review over > ichat/skype/mikogo/cell/etc. I have a patch I intend to submit shortly, and > would love someone who knows what they are doing to review it with me > synchronously, if nothing else so I can validate some of my assumptions. > > > On 6/10/2011 12:

[IronPython] Seattle IronPython Meetup

2011-06-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi all, Is anyone in the Seattle area interested in an IronPython meetup, or even a sprint? Anybody fancy a hands-on crash course in how IronPython works? Let me know! If enough people are interested, I'll work something out (probably for the coming week). I'm new to the area, so if anyone has any

Re: [IronPython] Website Update Help

2011-06-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
> Since our sites are all HTML, might be nice just to use GitHub pages rather > than the current GoDaddy hosting, though changing the nameservers through > Microsoft will be a pain. I was considering that as well, but I'm not sure we can have two sets of pages from one account. I'll poke github

Re: [IronPython] Website Update Help

2011-06-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
t; > ~Jimmy > > > On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm wondering if there's anyone out there willing to help update the >> website, in particular replacing the big "IronPython Tools" banner >> with something else

[IronPython] Website Update Help

2011-06-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi, I'm wondering if there's anyone out there willing to help update the website, in particular replacing the big "IronPython Tools" banner with something else. Updating it isn't too hard and I'll offer any assistance that may be necessary. - Jeff ___ Us

Re: [IronPython] Moving forward on 2.7.1

2011-06-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Zachary Gramana wrote: > There are some big Python applications (e.g. Mercurial) that are going to > remain on 2.7 for some time. There are important modules that are still > missing (bz2), or are incomplete (_winreg), that create compatibility > barriers.  It woul

Re: [IronPython] differences in IronPython/CPython regular expressions?

2011-06-02 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Bill Janssen wrote: > Would gdb work?  I'll try. Mono's debugger might be better, if their regex engine is managed. It looks like there's some Mono support in gdb but I've never used it. On Windows, windbg is your friend. It's about as user-friendly as gdb, thoug

Re: [IronPython] differences in IronPython/CPython regular expressions?

2011-06-02 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Bill Janssen wrote: > Jeff Hardy wrote: > >> The fact that it works on CPython fairly fast indicates a bug >> somewhere, I'm just not sure if it's IronPython or Mono. > > I just tried it with real MS .NET, on a 64-bit Windows

Re: [IronPython] differences in IronPython/CPython regular expressions?

2011-06-01 Thread Jeff Hardy
> Sure.  Names sensitive to capitalization; the rule I'm implementing says > names are either capitalized or upper-case. Ah, I see that now. I assumed the name lists were in lower case. > >> For the most part, CPython and IronPython regexes should be fairly >> compatible - IronPython takes the re

Re: [IronPython] differences in IronPython/CPython regular expressions?

2011-06-01 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Bill Janssen wrote: > I have a large RE (223613 chars) that works fine in CPython 2.6, but That's truly horrible, but I assume you have a good reason for it. > seems to produce an endless loop in IronPython (see below).  I'm using > Mono 2.10 (.NET 4.0.x) on Ubunt

Re: [IronPython] memoryview

2011-06-01 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Peter Schwalm wrote: > In the moment, I can only hope that no information is lost during the > implicit conversions of file i-o. That means I hope these conversion simply > add a 0-byte to every byte read in to make it unicode and only discards the > 0-byte when wri

Re: [IronPython] memoryview / passing string data to a C functionwithout copying

2011-06-01 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Markus Schaber wrote: > Hi, Peter, > >> Von: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users- > [...] >> >>      Does anyone know how to pass the contents of a string to a C > function >> without copying it? > > A non-pythonic suggestion: > > Maybe you could use

[IronPython] Moving forward on 2.7.1

2011-05-31 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi all, I think it's about time to get 2.7.1 shipped. I don't have a timeline in mind, but I'd like it out by the end of June. There's a few new modules and some bug fixes as well, but I'd like to see some more bugs fixed. If there's anything in 2.7.0 that's blocking you and not already fixed, post

Re: [IronPython] clr.ImportExtensions are not available outside module ?

2011-05-13 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:41 AM, daniel kottow wrote: > What I was trying to say that, unfortunately, I do not see a way to > encapsulate > my extension methods written in C# so that a person doing only python does not > have to worry about it - > on the other hand, i reckon it is also not such a

Re: [IronPython] Python Tools for Visual Studio now accepting contributions

2011-05-11 Thread Jeff Hardy
The IronPython Tools (or "old" tools) are the original VS integration tools, developed when IronPython was still funded by MS. PTVS is a new set of Python (not IronPython-specific; they support CPython and IronPython, and some Jython and PyPy) tools Dino's working on for MS's Technical Computing gr

Re: [IronPython] Python Tools for Visual Studio now accepting contributions

2011-05-11 Thread Jeff Hardy
This is excellent news. I think the plan should now be to deprecate the IronPython tools and remove them from IronPython 3.0. They'll stay in future 2.7 releases, but perhaps they should be disabled by default to make installing PTVS easier? - Jeff On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Dino Viehland

Re: [IronPython] GetRunningObjectTable

2011-04-27 Thread Jeff Hardy
GetRunningObjectTable isn't a static method, so you'll need to call it on an instance of IBindCtx. Not sure where you'd get one of those, though. - Jeff On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Sébastien de Menten wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use the GetRunningObjectTable function to retrieve a list

Re: [IronPython] need help to build Ironpython

2011-04-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
I checked in a commit that does that (see the last commit), but i didn't delete the rest of the source. - Jeff On Thursday, April 21, 2011, Jimmy Schementi wrote: > Just for clarity, here's the URL:http://github.com/IronLanguages/main > We should remove the source from CodePlex with a readme tha

Re: [IronPython] how to generate multiple concurrent scriptign engines?

2011-04-15 Thread Jeff Hardy
the equal site. > > > > *From:* users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto: > users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Hardy > *Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2011 7:29 AM > *To:* surangika ranathunga > *Cc:* Discussion of IronPython > > *Subject:* Re: [Iro

Re: [IronPython] how to generate multiple concurrent scriptign engines?

2011-04-15 Thread Jeff Hardy
at Microsoft.Scripting.SourceUnit.Execute(Scope scope) > at Microsoft.Scripting.Hosting.ScriptSource.Execute(ScriptScope scope) >at MonitorService.ExpectationMonitor.Initialize(String rule) in D:\PhD > Work\Research\libomv\test\MonitorService\MonitorService\ExpectationMonitor.cs:line &

Re: [IronPython] IronPython for Silverlight 5?

2011-04-14 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dino Viehland wrote: > Jeff wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Chad Brockman >> wrote: >> > I see Silverlight 5 now has something besides simple reflection >> > (ICustomTypeProvider) - >> > >> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg986857(v=VS.96).a

Re: [IronPython] how to generate multiple concurrent scriptign engines?

2011-04-14 Thread Jeff Hardy
As long as you have a ScriptScope per thread, you should be able to share the ScriptEngine & Runtime between threads. What is the exception that you are getting? If it's a GUI program, remember that UI elements can only be manipulated from the main thread. - Jeff On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:02 AM,

Re: [IronPython] IronPython for Silverlight 5?

2011-04-14 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Chad Brockman wrote: > I see Silverlight 5 now has something besides simple reflection > (ICustomTypeProvider) - > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg986857(v=VS.96).aspx#data > > Will we see an update to Iron*/DLR to support binding to dynamic objects an

Re: [IronPython] Fwd: IronPython and Mono are very old. How can we get an update?

2011-04-08 Thread Jeff Hardy
Vernon, thank you very much for handling this! On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Vernon Cole wrote: > This may still be a sticky spot.  The tarball does contain IronRuby, but > what version? Should be 1.1.3. > There must be a version identifier somewhere, but it is not obvious. The > only Ruby ve

[IronPython] Google Summer of Code

2011-04-07 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi, If anyone is still interested in doing an IronPython, IronRuby, or any other DLR-related project for GSoC, feel free to submit them to either the Mono project (IronPython/IronRuby/DLR) or the Python Software Foundation (IronPython). The deadline is tomorrow (Friday, April 8 at 19:00 UTC), so yo

Re: [IronPython] IronPython and XML Parsing

2011-04-06 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Doug Blank wrote: > Why can't we have a IPy 2.7 for .NET 2.0? It builds nicely, now, and > should be fine as a drop-in replacement for what ubuntu (and others) > were packaging before. Someone else will have to volunteer to maintain it. I'm hoping to make some cha

Re: [IronPython] IronPython and XML Parsing

2011-04-06 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Vernon Cole wrote: > I have sent several emails to Seo asking him about the status of fepy, > and received no response.  I think this would be a great place to > build a "fatter" distribution of IronPython, with more modules > attached, and a set of Linux binaries.

Re: [IronPython] IronPython and XML Parsing

2011-04-06 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Markus Schaber wrote: > Has anyone successfully tried this implementation? What about including > it into the IronPython distribution? The fepy version is incomplete, but it mostly works. I haven't run the tests in a while, though, so I'm not sure how incomplete it

Re: [IronPython] [Code Review] Custom PAL fixes

2011-04-01 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Jimmy Schementi wrote: > Just checked in some small fixes to make the Importer use a custom Platform > Adaptation Layer. I also started to tweak clr.CompileModules a bit, but > backed those changes out, so just ignore those. > Take a look at the recent commits to h

Re: [IronPython] Debugging hosted python scripts

2011-03-31 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Keith Rome wrote: > We currently have a line of business application, written entirely in C#, > that embeds the IronPython runtime. We offer a GUI script editing > environment (using the SyntaxEditor control from Actipro Software, which > works great for this). Thi

Re: [IronPython] IronPython Tools for VS2010 Questions

2011-03-30 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Bill Dines wrote: > 3. Is anyone currently working on the IPy tools specifically?  There are > quite a lot of bugs right now unfortunately and many of them would need > to be fixed if we were to use it.  Note that my company may be willing > to provide some resourc

Re: [IronPython] Transparent import of dlls?

2011-03-29 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Markus Schaber wrote: > For IronPython, there is the pyc.py compiler script. This allows a python > module to be precompiled into a .NET dll. However, it seems that it is not > used transparently when placed in a directory in sys.path, one has to > explicitly add a

Re: [IronPython] Building IronPython/IronRuby for Mono? Yes!

2011-03-25 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Doug Blank wrote: > Excellent! IronPython 3.0 (trunk) with .NET framework 2.0 *builds* and > *runs* great under Mono 2.10. And it seems to *run* great under Mono > 2.6.7 as well! It does NOT build under Mono 2.6.7, but I suspect that > many mono build issues betwe

Re: [IronPython] IronPython2.7 import locking error

2011-03-25 Thread Jeff Hardy
e to self: FileStream.SafeFileHandle. - Jeff > > -Original Message----- > From: Jeff Hardy [mailto:jdha...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 11:08 AM > To: Discussion of IronPython > Cc: Dino Viehland > Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython2.7 import locking error >

Re: [IronPython] IronPython2.7 import locking error

2011-03-25 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Dino Viehland wrote: > Oh I see I missed the line containing msvcrt.  This just looks like it hasn't > been implemented (we still have only a very partially implemented version of > msvcrt).  It should be trivial to do add this , it should just be a P/Invoke > o

Re: [IronPython] Building IronPython/IronRuby for Mono? Yes!

2011-03-23 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Doug Blank wrote: > Questions: > > 1) How to build a Release version rather than Debug? > 2) How to set the framework to use 2.0 rather than 4.0? 1) msbuild Solutions/Dlr.sln /p:Configuration="Release" 2) msbuild Solutions/Dlr.sln /p:Configuration="v2Debug" (or "v

Re: [IronPython] multiprocessing in 2.7

2011-03-23 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Romain Gilles wrote: >  but who can I add to my IronPython the _multiprocessing module ? > -- > c:\temp>ipy test-ipy-multiprocessing.py > Traceback (most recent call last): >   File "test-ipy-multiproc

Re: [IronPython] Building IronPython/IronRuby for Mono?

2011-03-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Doug Blank wrote: > I'm not too concerned about ipy.exe itself, but about being about to > use the dlls. > > I'm trying to verify that the IronPython 2.7 dlls absolutely need Mono > 2.8 or later. If that is true, I'll have to stay with IronPython 2.6 > until the r

Re: [IronPython] Building IronPython/IronRuby for Mono?

2011-03-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Brian Curtin wrote: > docs.ironpython.net? > Might I suggest sphinx-quickstart as the first command to run. That's kinda what I'm leaning towards, preferably hosted on readthedocs.com. Most of the docs are already ReST so using sphinx should be easy. As always, it

Re: [IronPython] Building IronPython/IronRuby for Mono?

2011-03-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Doug Blank wrote: > Is there a place on IronPython's codeplex site that we could document > this information? > > Currently, there are many assumptions on: > > http://ironpython.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Respository%20Instructions&referringTitle=Home > http://iro

Re: [IronPython] Building IronPython/IronRuby for Mono?

2011-03-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Doug Blank wrote: > I went to Codeplex to see about updating Pyjama [1] to use the latest > IronPython and IronRuby, but had some issues: > > 1) There are only two downloads for 2.7: msi and a zip of binaries. > Shouldn't there be a zip of sources? Or a note how ho

Re: [IronPython] Building IronPython/IronRuby for Mono?

2011-03-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Doug Blank wrote: > Is that you need Mono 2.8 to build IronPython, or to run it? > IronPython2.6 beta 2 is running fine under Mono 2.6.7. IronPython 2.7 requires .NET 4 (to build and run). Mono 2.10 is probably your best bet. - Jeff __

Re: [IronPython] No GSoC for IronPython/IronRuby for 2011

2011-03-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
> Jonathan > > On Mar 21, 2011 11:50 AM, "Jeff Hardy" wrote: >> I got the notice on Friday that IronLanguages was not accepted into >> Google Summer of Code for 2011. However, both the Mono project and the >> PSF have indicated that they would consider IronPyth

[IronPython] No GSoC for IronPython/IronRuby for 2011

2011-03-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
I got the notice on Friday that IronLanguages was not accepted into Google Summer of Code for 2011. However, both the Mono project and the PSF have indicated that they would consider IronPython/IronRuby projects, so if you're interested, you should ask one of those organizations. - Jeff __

Re: [IronPython] Authenticode Signing of Releases

2011-03-18 Thread Jeff Hardy
is signed by the Python Software Foundation. > > Do you not suppose that, if asked, they would also be willing to sign > other implementations? > -- > Vernon > > P.S.: I loaded IronPython 2.7 first! > >>> >> On 2/23/2011 10:58 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote: >>> >

Re: [IronPython] ArenaNet's Use of IronPython

2011-03-17 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Markus Schaber wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a wiki page or (semi-)official web page collecting all this usages? Not yet. - Jeff ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/us

Re: [IronPython] Reading from a open excel document

2011-03-16 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Nåjde Henrik wrote: > Hello! > > I am trying to transfer prameters from an excel sheet to ANSYS Workbench (a > FEA software), the code is run as a macro in ANSYS workbench. > > I have adapted a code that is opening an already existing document and > successfully tr

Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.7.1 & 3.x Development

2011-03-15 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Markus Schaber wrote: > As I wrote, we host IronPython inside our application, so shebang and > file name suffixes are irrelevant - but we could use the shebang as a > marker for python 3 (given that we can host both versions side-by-side) > and parse the source ma

Re: [IronPython] Rich comparison usage by IronPython's heapq implementation

2011-03-14 Thread Jeff Hardy
Regardless of what's "correct", we should follow what CPython does (plus, using only __lt__ and __eq__ makes sense). Can you try this in 2.7 to see if it's still an issue, and open a bug if it is? I doubt we'll make any more changes to 2.6. - Jeff On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Robert Smallshir

Re: [IronPython] ArenaNet's Use of IronPython

2011-03-14 Thread Jeff Hardy
That's awesome. I think it might be time to start a "Who's using IronPython" page somewhere. The upgrade to 2.7 should be pretty seamless, BTW. Is there anything that you're missing? Anything that would make your use case easier? - Jeff On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Jennings wrote: >

Re: [IronPython] numpy / IronClad?

2011-03-14 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Chad Brockman wrote: > So I’m assuming no Silverlight then? For the same reasons? > > > > Thanks, Chad I'm pretty sure Silverlight doesn't support native code, at least not in the browser and phone. - Jeff ___ Users ma

Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.7.1 & 3.x Development

2011-03-14 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Vernon Cole wrote: > I was running a test of adodbapi -- IPy 2.7 RC2 ran it fine, but CPython 2.7 > had errors. I was starting to debug the CPython when I discovered that I was > running the Python _3_ version of the test suite! The "error" was in the > Unicode vs

[IronPython] IronPython 2.7.1 & 3.x Development

2011-03-13 Thread Jeff Hardy
With the 2.7 out the door, it's time to start thinking about 3.x. I've created a ipy-2.7-maint branch for continued 2.7 work (and it needs some), and any 3.x work will go on master. Any 2.7 fixes that also go into 3.x (and really, most of them should) go into the 2.7 branch *first*, and then be che

[IronPython] IronPython 2.7 Now Available

2011-03-12 Thread Jeff Hardy
On behalf of the IronPython team, I'm very pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.7. This release contains all of the language features of Python 2.7, as well as several previously missing modules and numerous bug fixes. IronPython 2.7 also includes built-in Visual Studio support through I

Re: [IronPython] IronPython @ PyCon 2011

2011-03-07 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Michael Foord wrote: > Just don't clash with the testing BoF! (And sign up for it, last year it was > epic.) I'm specifically trying to avoid that one ... it better live up to the hype :). > Maybe we can look at the Mac issue (sysconfig) during the sprints. I wo

Re: [IronPython] IronPython @ PyCon 2011

2011-03-07 Thread Jeff Hardy
I'm going to try to organize an IronPython OpenSpace/BoF/sprint for Fri/Sat. Page coming soon. - Jeff On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote: > I'll be there, and so will Dino (with something very cool to show > off). Anybody

[IronPython] IronPython @ PyCon 2011

2011-03-07 Thread Jeff Hardy
I'll be there, and so will Dino (with something very cool to show off). Anybody else? - Jeff ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

[IronPython] IronPython 2.7 RC 2 Available

2011-03-07 Thread Jeff Hardy
On behalf of the IronPython team, I am pleased to announce IronPython 2.7 Release Candidate 2. The releases contains a few minor bug fixes, including a working webbrowser module. http://ironpython.codeplex.com/releases/view/62114 This will be the last release before 2.7 Final. There are still a f

Re: [IronPython] IronPython Hosting ?

2011-03-04 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:42 AM, L. Lee Saunders wrote: > My biggest hurdle was running IronPython out of C++/cli.  I tried hand > converting some working C# code but was failing.  I finally had to resort to > RedGate's "Reflector" with the C++/cli plugin.  That did not produce working > code eithe

Re: [IronPython] Ironpython and Berkeley License

2011-03-03 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Markus Schaber wrote: >  * 3. Redistributions in any form must be accompanied by information on >  *    how to obtain complete source code for the DB software and any >  *    accompanying software that uses the DB software.  The source code >  *    must either be in

Re: [IronPython] numpy / IronClad?

2011-03-01 Thread Jeff Hardy
Re: numpy - it sure looks like it: https://github.com/numpy/numpy-refactor/tree/refactor/numpy/NumpyDotNet. (last commit 2 days ago) As for IronClad, I'm not sure - it doesn't look like it, and I'm not sure Resolver is still using IronPython. I would love to see it rolled into the main IronPython

Re: [IronPython] IronPython Hosting ?

2011-02-28 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Mark Senko wrote: > *Bill, what are your goals for asking how we use hosting? While I can't speak for Bill, I can say hosting is something that hasn't been given much thought in the last little while because I've been focused on getting the engine and stdlib up to

[IronPython] Slight Delay in IronPython 2.7 Release

2011-02-26 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi all, The the RC2 and final IronPython 2.7 releases will be pushed back a week, to March 6 and March 13. - Jeff ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

Re: [IronPython] GSoC 2011: Interested Students

2011-02-24 Thread Jeff Hardy
never knew it exists. > > So I think you should just apply for it. What more Google wants to get more > organizations and students this year. > > It will be a waste if you don't apply. > > Regards, > > Afriza N. Arief > > On Feb 23, 2011 6:24 AM, "Jeff H

[IronPython] Authenticode Signing of Releases

2011-02-23 Thread Jeff Hardy
Older releases of IronPython were authenticode signed (by Microsoft), but so far the community releases have not been. As best I can tell, authenticode certificates are expensive (the cheapest are around $100/year) - I've heard of deals for open source projects but can't find anything by searching.

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
; with "ipy.exe" to make "ipy64\ipy.exe" as the interpreter path (which > doesn't exist). > > If I set HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\IronPython\2.7\(default) to my > actual install path (where ipy.exe is) it works fine. I assume this > should be done in the installer.

Re: [IronPython] Silent install of IronPython

2011-02-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:50 PM, haniti grk wrote: > I am fine that some of the stuff goes to GAC but just wanted to install most > of the stuff in c:\ipy. I checked IronPython.wxs and it seems like it should > use INSTALLDIR option but it does not do it though. This was reported against 2.7B1 in

[IronPython] GSoC 2011: Interested Students

2011-02-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi all, Are there any students that are interested in doing some work on IronPython/IronRuby/DLR for this year's Google Summer of Code? I'd like to make sure there's enough interest before I commit to putting together an application. The current suggested projects list is at http://bit.ly/g7YhPT b

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Tristan Zajonc wrote: > It appears to be because int is a very large long.  This is probably the > core issue: > In IronPython: a=143098242404177361603877621312831893704 > Traceback (most recent call last): > OverflowError: Number overflow. a=14309824240

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Tristan Zajonc wrote: > IronPython 2.7 RC 1 (2.7.0.30) on .NET 4.0.30319.1 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. import uuid > Number overflow. > at System.Numerics.BigInteger.op_Explicit (System.Numerics.BigInteger) > <0x00

[IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi all, The following issues are blockers for IronPython 2.7: * #29841 - sysconfig traceback when starting 2.7B1 - http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/29841 I don't know enough about Mono/MacOS/POSIX to fix this one properly. I haven't yet chercked what the Mono guys did to get it working on L

[IronPython] IronPython 2.7 Release Candidate 1 is now available

2011-02-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
On behalf of the entire IronPython team: We are pleased to announce the first Release Candidate for IronPython 2.7[1]. This release contains over two dozen bugs fixed in preparation for 2.7 Final. See the release notes for 2.7 Beta 2[2] for details and what has already been fixed in the earlier 2

Re: [IronPython] Arright dangit! Where is the OFFICIAL IronPython source code?

2011-02-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Brian Curtin wrote: > I think this would be better suited in the standard library at > svn.python.org, rather than just within IronPython. Thoughts on that? I > haven't followed long enough to know how standard library changes are > usually handled around here, bu

Re: [IronPython] How do you detect operating systems from within IronPython?

2011-02-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Vernon Cole wrote: > How should I really be doing it? os.name usually has the actual underlying OS, but depending on what you need to do it may be better to have a block that is just for 'cli' that calls into a .NET API, and let .NET/Mono smooth over the platform

[IronPython] 2.7 RC1 postponed

2011-02-20 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi all, The first 2.7 RC was scheduled for today, but due to other commitments I probably won't get it packaged until tomorrow. - Jeff ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

Re: [IronPython] Arright dangit! Where is the OFFICIAL IronPython source code?

2011-02-20 Thread Jeff Hardy
Github is the master source. And yes, the various websites need straightening out. - Jeff On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Vernon Cole wrote: > I've lost my link, and cannot muddle my way to meaningful results on either > Codeplex, Wikepedia or Github. Github actually refers me back to Codeplex,

Re: [IronPython] Fwd: Status updated to Closed for Issue: distutils "install" command will not install a simple module. [IronPython: 28530]

2011-02-20 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi Vernon, A little of both, actually - we have a copy of the Python stdlib, and there are some modifications to it, but the goal is to stay as close as possible to the CPython stdlib. If you supply a patch upstream, I'll apply it to our copy because it affects us more than CPython, and it likely

Re: [IronPython] Bugfix for 2.7B2 allows pdb to run.

2011-02-17 Thread Jeff Hardy
Patch applied. Thanks! - Jeff On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Andrés Martinelli wrote: > Hi, > >  I have fixed a bug in 2.7B2 which prevented pdb from running. > >  The problem is due to an exception thrown when accessing the > f_globals property of a frame. > >  I've reported the bug details (

Re: [IronPython] Additional modules to ship with IronPython 2.7.1?

2011-02-16 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Brian Curtin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:30, Jeff Hardy wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Vernon Cole >> wrote: >> > Dear Group: >> >    I would like to start a discussion about adding modules to the

Re: [IronPython] Additional modules to ship with IronPython 2.7.1?

2011-02-16 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Vernon Cole wrote: > Dear Group: >    I would like to start a discussion about adding modules to the IronPython > distribution which are not in the C-Python standard library. The idea would > be to include more batteries.  (FePy started out to do that, but has not

Re: [IronPython] sqlite3 + IP 2.7

2011-02-14 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi Guillermo, I haven't tried that module against 2.7 in a while, but it should mostly work. You'll have to build from source and adjust the references to point to 2.7B2 - the downloadable packages are 2.6 only. I'll update the downloads to 2.7 shortly after it's released. - Jeff On Mon, Feb 14,

Re: [IronPython] Non-English Version of Win XP needed

2011-02-14 Thread Jeff Hardy
Thanks, guys! I'll close it off now. - Jeff On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Slide wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Simon Dahlbacka > wrote: >> Works for me also.  Swedish xp(sv-FI) >> >> On Feb 14, 2011 7:11 AM, "Jeff Hardy" wrote: >>&

Re: [IronPython] Non-English Version of Win XP needed

2011-02-13 Thread Jeff Hardy
I'd like one other person to confirm this is fixed before I close - Spanish or German preferably, since they are mentioned in the bug. - Jeff On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Jörgen Stenarson wrote: > Jeff Hardy skrev 2011-02-13 06:25: >> >> It looks like http://iro

Re: [IronPython] Issue triage

2011-02-13 Thread Jeff Hardy
I've closed the closeable issues. Thanks for looking at these! - Jeff On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Andrés Martinelli wrote: > Hi, > > I have checked out a few work items: > >  Not reproducible in 2.7B2: > >    - #26940/Medium/2.7: >      Wrong line numbers in traceback when ecoding is speci

[IronPython] Must-fix bugs for 2.7

2011-02-12 Thread Jeff Hardy
Here is the current list of must-fix bugs for 2.7: http://bit.ly/gQRTSn Basically, anything with a Release of 2.7 and a Priority of High. If you have a bug you think should be on that list, just let me know, or set those fields. - Jeff ___ Users mailing

[IronPython] Non-English Version of Win XP needed

2011-02-12 Thread Jeff Hardy
It looks like http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/14022 will only repro on non-english versions of XP that use , as the decimal separator instead of . If you have one of those, can you see if the issue is still present in 2.7B2. From the notes, it looks like just changing the locale is not eno

Re: [IronPython] Reminder: First IronPython Bug Weekend is this this weekend

2011-02-11 Thread Jeff Hardy
o the Custom field. Figuring out which bugs are still valid and which aren't is a big part of this weekend, so bugs that are missing reproduction steps or test cases should have them added. If a bug has a patch or test case, add 'hastest' or 'haspatch' to the Custom fie

[IronPython] Reminder: First IronPython Bug Weekend is this this weekend

2011-02-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
This is just a firendly reminder that the first IronPython Bug Weekend is this weekend, February 12-13. You can find more information at http://ironpython.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=first%20IronPython%20Bug%20Weekend. Remember, you don't have to dedicate the whole weekend - even finding a couple

Re: [IronPython] Red Flag(?) change in "import"

2011-02-10 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Dino Viehland wrote: > If no one else steps up to look at it I can take a look this weekend.  But > let me tell everyone fixing import bugs is awesome fun! That sounds like sarcasm to me... > I thought adodbapi was still part of the test suite but I don’t know ho

Re: [IronPython] Google Summer of Code 2011

2011-02-09 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Daniel D. wrote: > I know what I want for Christmas: > > PEP compliant, WSGI Server for IIS 6.x and 7.x. Well, that gives me quite a bit of time then :). NWSGI 3 will have to wait until after 2.7 final, but hopefully not too long after. - Jeff __

Re: [IronPython] Google Summer of Code 2011

2011-02-09 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Slide wrote: > Fyi, I am almost done with an implementation of _csv Excellent! The next release (Feb.20) will be the last one to get it into before 2.7 final. If it's not going to be ready by then, don't worry; I'm thinking I might target 2.7.1 for early April ju

[IronPython] Google Summer of Code 2011

2011-02-09 Thread Jeff Hardy
Google is running their "Summer of Code" program [1] again this year. For those who aren't familiar, Google basically pays post-secondary students to work on open source projects for the summer. Now that IronPython and IronRuby are community projects, I think it would be worthwhile to for us to pa

Re: [IronPython] Merges

2011-02-08 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi Daniel, When working, I do all of my work in a branch, and then merge that branch into master. On that branch I usually rebase changes from upstream/master. However, I don't like rebasing onto master because it just looks weird. I want to see the merge commit to master so that I know it happened

  1   2   3   4   5   >