CodePlex for download. Martin From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of jeff sackstederSent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:54 PMTo: Discussion of IronPythonSubject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging I'm preparing an unofficial msi pa
available
on CodePlex for download.
Martin
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of jeff sacksteder
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:54 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging
I'm preparing an unofficial msi package f
I'm preparing an unofficial msi package for my own use using the Wix toolkit. Anyone knowledgeable in this area who is willing to assist, contact me directly and we can collaborate off-line until we have something useful.
___
users mailing list
users@li
Of Keith J. Farmer
Sent: Wednesday, 30 August 2006 23:30
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging
What flame war?
As for integration with VS, MSI would be the only packaging I
would expect (read: that I know of) for that
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging
Where can I go to see the golden roots of this conversation?
On Aug 30, 2006, at 11:30 PM, Keith J. Farmer wrote:
> What flame war?
>
>
>
> As for integration with VS, MSI would be the only packaging I would
> expect (read: t
gt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of S H Yoon
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 August 2006 21:44
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging
>
>
>
> I hate contributing to a flame war.
. I don’t know anybody who would disagree with that sentiment.
-
Keith J. Farmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of S H Yoon
Sent: Wednesday, 30 August 2006 21:44
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging
I hate contributing to a flame war. So, let me try to put some water on it. I think the development team is extremely busy dealing with all the bugs prior to the release. I would hate to be caught up with a nasty bug some day and try find a workaround.Ease of installation with MSI, I think we can a
I hate to say it, but the last time I was dealing with CPython was around 2.2
or 2.3.
C# happens :)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Sanghyeon Seo
Sent: Wed 8/30/2006 5:31 PM
2006/8/31, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Even for CPython, I prefer MS
2006/8/31, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Even for CPython, I prefer MSI -- which is why ActiveState won out in the
> CPython-for-Keith swimsuit competition.
Starting with CPython 2.4, official Python release for Windows is
distributed as MSI too.
More on:
http://www.python.org/download/r
: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging
MSI could be nice for some, but I won't probably ever bother with it. Just let
me know which envionmental var has to be set up and I will be happy.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.ironpython.com
-
From:
fabio.pliger
To: Discussion of IronPython
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 12:59
AM
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release
packaging
I think that exchanging info
about IDE, editor, or debugger people use could be really useful! So, can we
do it here? If don't
... cheers -Original
Message- From: S H Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Discussion
of IronPython Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006
16:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release
packaging MSI could be nice for some, but I won't probably ever
bother with it. Just let me know which
thing L.
(and personally I use notepad2 for most of my Python editing).
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of S H Yoon
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:42 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging
MSI could be nice for
Title: Bericht
MSI could be nice for some, but I won't probably ever bother with it. Just let me know which envionmental var has to be set up and I will be happy.On more serious note, on my machine memory foot print on cpython is 3mb, but IPY takes up whopping 17mb+.Is this release candidate thing
set up as well
and appended to PATH. I use this in some scripts.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of J. de Hooge
Sent: Mon 8/28/2006 1:25 AM
To: 'Discussion of IronPython'
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging
Although other options of course are welcome
se this in some scripts.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of J. de Hooge
Sent: Mon 8/28/2006 1:25 AM
To: 'Discussion of IronPython'
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging
Although other options of course are welcome, I personally favor the
zer
IronPythonOnderwerp: Re:
[IronPython] Final release packaging
Our intention is to continue our
tradition of zero-impact installers and release the 1.0 as the zip
file.
It seems though that it may be
worth looking at the msi release (in addition to the zip file) as a
possibility
...
Martin
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of jeff sacksteder
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 6:09 PM
To: users@lists.ironpython.com
Subject: [IronPython] Final release packaging
I haven't heard any discussion
about how the
: Saturday, August 26, 2006 6:09 PM
To: users@lists.ironpython.com
Subject: [IronPython] Final release packaging
I haven't heard any discussion about how the final release will be packaged. Will it be similar to the existing releases or a more polished msi? I'd like to see an installer
I haven't heard any discussion about how the final release will be packaged. Will it be similar to the existing releases or a more polished msi? I'd like to see an installer with that drops the binaries into a known location and adds it to the system path, add itself to add/remove programs, etc- at
21 matches
Mail list logo
