Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging

[Dino Viehland]

Title: Bericht

Working set is definitely something we want to improve post 1.0.  We know some of the areas where we are using a lot of memory (for example we load every type in System.dll and mscorlib) and we’ll be working to improve this over time.  Unfortunately though it’s not just a RC thing L.   (and personally I use notepad2 for most of my Python editing).   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of S H Yoon Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:42 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging   MSI could be nice for some, but I won't probably ever bother with it. Just let me know which envionmental var has to be set up and I will be happy. On more serious note, on my machine memory foot print on cpython is 3mb, but IPY takes up whopping 17mb+. Is this release candidate thing or is this something that we have to live with? I know that Jim did mention this as an issue before, but certainly seem bloated. BTW: What is everyone using for IDE, editor, or debugger? Pls, e-mail me directly with subject: "my IPY editor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I would not like to clogg this space up. I would like to take a small sample. Thanks much! Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I’ve opened a bug for us to track this – (#2705, http://www.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?ProjectName=IronPython&WorkItemId=2705)  if anyone else has any suggestions as for what the MSI should do please either comment here or add a comment to the bug.   It’s too much work to get this ready for 1.0, but we’ll look at distributing an MSI shortly after 1.0 (either 1.01 or 1.1 hopefully). Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business.

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com