Thanks!
So it looks like most OpenMPI builds out there are running with ROMIO's that
are obvious to any optimizations to what they are running on.
I have added this to our build notes so we get it in next time. Thanks!
Brock Palen
www.umich.edu/~brockp
CAEN Advanced Computing
Hi Brock,
Le 12/06/2012 05:10 PM, Brock Palen a écrit :
Eric,
You are correct, our builds do not show lustre support:
MCA io: information "io_romio_user_configure_params" (value:, data
source: default value)
surprise! ;-)
So to enable this, when I build OpenMPI I should pass:
I would be disappointed to see the Windows support go away. I use it
mostly for debugging, but it's valuable to me for that purpose.
- Jeff Cummings
From: Durga Choudhury
To: Open MPI Users
List-Post: users@lists.open-mpi.org
Date: 12/07/2012
All
Let me reiterate my (minimal, compared to other developers) support to the
OpenMPI project. If all it takes is to build and run regression tests on a
platform to add a feather in the cap, I am willing to do it.
The low interest in Windows platform does not surprise me; most HPC
I can probably fix the 1.6.3 build. I think it's just bumping CMake
support and tweaks so that VS2012 works. But yeah, it looks a bit grim
going forward.
Damien
On 07/12/2012 8:28 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Sorry for my late reply; I've been in the MPI Forum and Open MPI engineering
meetings
Sorry for my late reply; I've been in the MPI Forum and Open MPI engineering
meetings all week. Some points:
1. Yes, it would be a shame to lose all the Windows support that Shiqing did.
2. Microsoft has told me that they're of the mindset "the more, the merrier"
for their platform (i.e.,