Re: [OMPI users] mixed versions of openmpi ? (1.4.1 and 1.4.3)

2010-10-29 Thread guillaume ranquet
mething compiled with x.y.* will run on x.y+1.* without the need for you to recompile. mixing x.y and x.y+1 on the same machinefile (and that's what we are talking about) can only work by accident, not by design. >> >> On Oct 29, 2010, at 12:12 PM, guillaume ranquet wrote: >&

Re: [OMPI users] Segmentation fault in MPI_Finalize with IB hardware and memory manager.

2010-06-18 Thread guillaume ranquet
: > George -- > > Scott's patch was different than the one you applied. Apparently, his fixes > this user's problem (I don't know if Guillaume tested yours). > > Which one wins? > > > > On Jun 3, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Scott Atchley wrote: > >> On Jun 3, 2010, at

Re: [OMPI users] Segmentation fault in MPI_Finalize with IB hardware and memory manager.

2010-06-02 Thread guillaume ranquet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I snipped some parts of the exchange and responding to 2 mails in this one. (this may not be proper netiquette on this ML?) On 06/02/2010 03:54 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > What happens if you run: > > ~/openmpi-1.4.2-bin/bin/mpirun --mca btl

Re: [OMPI users] Segmentation fault in MPI_Finalize with IB hardware and memory manager.

2010-06-02 Thread guillaume ranquet
loc2_disable to 1 (for good measure, ensure that it's > set on all nodes where you are running Open MPI). > > > > On May 31, 2010, at 11:02 AM, guillaume ranquet wrote: > > we use a slightly modified openmpi-1.4.1 > > the patch is here: > > --- ompi/mca/btl/tcp/btl_

Re: [OMPI users] Segmentation fault in MPI_Finalize with IB hardware and memory manager.

2010-05-31 Thread guillaume ranquet
wrote: > What OMPI version are you using? > > On May 31, 2010, at 5:37 AM, guillaume ranquet wrote: > > Hi, > I'm new to the list and quite new to the world of MPI. > > a bit of background: > I'm a sysadmin and have to provide a working environment (debian base) > for rese

[OMPI users] Segmentation fault in MPI_Finalize with IB hardware and memory manager.

2010-05-31 Thread guillaume ranquet
sue, that disables the openmpi "leave_pinned" option? the various questions I have: is this bug/behaviour known? if so, is there a better workaround? as I'm not an openmpi user, I don't really know if it's considered acceptable to have this option disabled? does the list want more details