Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] running opensips behind AWS NetworkLoadBalancer

NLB os not suited for SIP, last I heard. On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 04:27, Pasan Meemaduma via Users < users@lists.opensips.org> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Does anyone able to get opensips running behind AWS NLB? > > I tried opensips 2.4 with fedaration topology and things doesn't work well. > > _

[OpenSIPS-Users] running opensips behind AWS NetworkLoadBalancer

Hi Guys, Does anyone able to get opensips running behind AWS NLB? I tried opensips 2.4 with fedaration topology and things doesn't work well. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] rtpproxy status health checking

Hi, Can somebody clarify when the rtpproxy status and health checks are done and what configuration is required. I am finding that the status/health of an rtprpoxy node is only done/checked during opensips startup or rtpproxy module config reload. If the rtprpoxy node goes down or comes back up,

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Exit route & continue

return(0) == exit() Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com OpenSIPS Summit 2019 https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2019Amsterdam/ On 08/13/2019 01:48 PM, Mark Farmer wrote: Ahh, I was nearly there, I was using return(0); Changing

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Exit route & continue

Ahh, I was nearly there, I was using return(0); Changing to return(-1) solved it but should they not have the same result? Mark. On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 11:42, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > use "return" :) > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.op

[OpenSIPS-Users] Exit route & continue

Good morning all I suspect I'm missing something basic here. I call a route that tests for certain $rU digits & routes to an Asterisk server for voicemail etc. The problem I have is that my calls are getting into a loop and being tested over & over again. How do I exit the route & continue from th

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] add_path_received not behaving (2.4)

OK, the issue was introduced with this commit: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/045eea09bfb294f5a615d508bd3fc70317389563#diff-077e335c49f591dee316bb34fbddcd98 This commit moved the "received" param to the second Path header (when doing interface switching), but this second hdr is opti

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Exit route & continue

use "return" :) Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com OpenSIPS Summit 2019 https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2019Amsterdam/ On 08/13/2019 01:40 PM, Mark Farmer wrote: Good morning all I suspect I'm missing something basic here

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] add_path_received not behaving (2.4)

And in your case, it is a double Path scenario, or you get only one added ? Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com OpenSIPS Summit 2019 https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2019Amsterdam/ On 08/13/2019 11:17 AM, Pete Kelly wrote: H

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] add_path_received not behaving (2.4)

Hi Bogdan It's set to 1 (as is use_received) Pete On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 07:53, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Pete, > > What is the setting for the `enable_double_path` modparam ? > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.opensips-solutions.com >