[QE-users] Phonon calculations with different parallelization

2024-03-20 Thread Chirantan Pramanik
Dear All,

My Phonon calculations provide different frequency values for different 
parallelization on the cluster especially for the total number of processors 
used. Is it possible or I am doing something very wrong? As vibrational 
frequency is gauge invariat how it can be possible?

Thanks,
Chirantan
___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] Phonon calculation does not converge

2024-01-29 Thread Chirantan Pramanik

Hello Lorenzo Paulatto and Nicola Marzari,

I performed relax and scf both with the prescribed cutoff as discussed in the 
previous mail and now I am running phonon. I am trying to increase the 
'nmix_ph' to 16 as I have more memory available in the server, but the error 
says, 'Error in routine phq_readin (1): Wrong nmix_ph'.  I checked online where 
'https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/2015-October/033664.html' 
Prof. Paolo Giannozzi said to keep it below 5, but in 2015. So what is going 
on?  Please help, I never included nmix_ph before, but using more memory and 
speeding up the phonon calculation will help me a lot.

Regards,
Chirantan

From: users  on behalf of Lorenzo 
Paulatto 
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 10:02 AM
To: users@lists.quantum-espresso.org 
Subject: Re: [QE-users] Phonon calculation does not converge


The calculation is not only not converging, it is actually diverging. Changing 
alpha_mix and increasing nmix_ph can help, but it may also indicate something 
wrong with the calculation. I.e. a metal treated as semiconductor, or a ghost 
in the pseudopotential (which may be likely if you use norm-conservig cutoff 
with an ultrasoft dataset)

hth


On 1/23/24 08:47, Chirantan Pramanik wrote:
Hello All,

I was running Phonon for a few systems of carbonate minerals for a long time. 
Recently I used SSSP pseudopotential for PBE and faced a problem like the one 
pasted below. Optimization and SCF calculations are properly done. But phonon 
calculation is not converging. Please help. I think changing alpha_mix can be 
useful, but for my stable and optimized system, it should converge easily.

section from ph.x output:

  iter #  97 total cpu time :  1799.1 secs   av.it.:  84.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  1.595E+08

  iter #  98 total cpu time :  1822.7 secs   av.it.:  92.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  3.870E+10

  iter #  99 total cpu time :  1846.5 secs   av.it.:  92.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  4.585E+10

  iter # 100 total cpu time :  1869.3 secs   av.it.:  88.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  5.897E+09

 End of self-consistent calculation

 No convergence has been achieved


Please help in this regard.

Thanks and Regards,
Chirantan

Chirantan Pramanik
Postdoctoral Researcher
Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Weizmann Institute of Science
Rehovot, Israel



___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX 
(www.max-centre.eu<http://www.max-centre.eu>)
users mailing list 
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org<mailto:users@lists.quantum-espresso.org>
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

--
Dr. Lorenzo Paulatto
IdR @ IMPMC - CNRS UMR 7590 & Sorbonne Université
phone: +33 (0)1 442 79822 / skype: paulatz
http://www.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/ - https://anharmonic.github.io/
23-24/423 B115, 4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris CX 05
___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] Issues with vc-relax for a slab

2024-01-26 Thread Chirantan Pramanik
If vc-relax is applicable for surface optimization then increasing 
electron_maxstep should help. I needed electron_maxstep even around 2000 for 
some calculations. But did you previously optimise surface using vc-relax?


Chirantan Pramanik
Postdoctoral fellow,
EPS, Weizmann Institute of Science
Israel

From: users  on behalf of Anupriya 
Nyayban 
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 12:44:35 PM
To: users@lists.quantum-espresso.org 
Subject: Re: [QE-users] Issues with vc-relax for a slab

Dear users and experts,

I have considered a (311) plane of 2 layers of ZnFe2O4 structure. The attached 
input file is for the vc-relax calculation.


  calculation='vc-relax'
  restart_mode='from_scratch',
  prefix='zn'
  pseudo_dir = '.'
  outdir='tmp'
  verbosity='high'
  etot_conv_thr = 1.0D-5
  forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-4
/

  ibrav = 0
  A =   21.62370
  nat = 112
  ntyp = 3
  ecutwfc = 30.0,
  ecutrho = 240.0,
  occupations = 'smearing',
  smearing = 'mv',
  degauss = 0.02,
  vdw_corr  = 'DFT-D3'
/

   conv_thr =  1.d-9
   mixing_beta = 0.3
  electron_maxstep = 300
  startingpot = "atomic"
  startingwfc = "atomic+random"
/

  ion_dynamics = "bfgs"
/

  cell_dynamics = "bfgs"
  press_conv_thr = 5.0e-01
/
CELL_PARAMETERS {alat}
  1.000   0.000   0.000
  0.29977738132   0.331662474918549   0.000
  0.000   0.000   2.019068156482969
ATOMIC_SPECIES
  Zn   65.38000  Zn_ONCV_PBE-1.0.upf
  Fe   55.84500  Fe_ONCV_PBE-1.0.upf
   O   15.99900  O_ONCV_PBE-1.0.upf
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal}
Zn   0.8636360   0.9545450   0.4757970
Zn   0.8636360   0.4545450   0.4757970
Zn   0.3636360   0.4545450   0.4757970
Zn   0.3636360   0.9545450   0.4757970
Zn   0.5454540   0.1818190   0.4876030
Zn   0.0454550   0.1818180   0.4876030
Zn   0.0454550   0.6818180   0.4876030
Zn   0.5454550   0.6818180   0.4876020
Zn   0.5909090   0.8636360   0.5230200
Zn   0.5909090   0.3636360   0.5230200
Zn   0.0909090   0.3636360   0.5230200
Zn   0.0909090   0.8636360   0.5230200
Zn   0.2727270   0.0909090   0.5348250
Zn   0.7727270   0.0909090   0.5348260
Zn   0.7727270   0.5909090   0.5348260
Zn   0.2727270   0.5909090   0.5348250
Fe   0.9545460   0.0681820   0.4817000
Fe   0.7045450   0.3181820   0.4817000
Fe   0.2045460   0.5681820   0.4817000
Fe   0.5909090   0.8636360   0.4580880
Fe   0.2045460   0.8181810   0.4817000
Fe   0.7045450   0.5681820   0.4817000
Fe   0.5909090   0.3636360   0.4580880
Fe   0.9545450   0.5681820   0.4817000
Fe   0.7045460   0.8181820   0.4817000
Fe   0.2045450   0.0681820   0.4817000
Fe   0.2045450   0.3181820   0.4817000
Fe   0.7045460   0.0681810   0.4817000
Fe   0.4545450   0.0681820   0.4817000
Fe   0.0909090   0.8636370   0.4580880
Fe   0.0909090   0.3636360   0.4580880
Fe   0.4545450   0.5681820   0.4817000
Fe   0.6818180   0.9772720   0.5289220
Fe   0.4318180   0.2272730   0.5289220
Fe   0.9318180   0.4772730   0.5289230
Fe   0.3181820   0.7727270   0.5053110
Fe   0.9318180   0.7272720   0.5289230
Fe   0.4318180   0.4772730   0.5289220
Fe   0.3181820   0.2727270   0.5053110
Fe   0.6818180   0.4772730   0.5289230
Fe   0.4318180   0.7272730   0.5289230
Fe   0.9318180   0.9772730   0.5289230
Fe   0.9318180   0.2272730   0.5289230
Fe   0.4318180   0.9772720   0.5289230
Fe   0.1818180   0.9772730   0.5289230
Fe   0.8181820   0.7727280   0.5053110
Fe   0.8181820   0.2727270   0.5053110
Fe   0.1818180   0.4772730   0.5289230
 O   0.0212080   0.3515410   0.4687100
 O   0.6424390   0.0363410   0.4939000
 O   0.2696900   0.8454660   0.4718660
 O   0.5212080   0.5848340   0.4687110
 O   0.5212080   0.0848340   0.4687100
 O   0.0212080

Re: [QE-users] Phonon calculation does not converge

2024-01-23 Thread Chirantan Pramanik
I am using SSSP Precision (version 1.3.0). Thank you for the details, I was 
using cutoff_wfc= 60 but the table says 75 Ry for O which is the highest among 
all the atoms in my system. I am rerunning the relax calculations.
I chose 60 for O checking the corresponding convergence tests for 
O.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.0.3.1.UPF but now I notice that the O pseudopotential file is 
O.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.0.1.UPF (which seems not tested in the link: 
https://www.materialscloud.org/discover/sssp/plot/precision/O). Are they the 
same?

Also, SSSP precision pseudopotential files are different types across the 
elements. For example, O and C are paw, Ca is ussp. I was curious about the 
combinations for any material as I was using BURAI previously which would 
notify if the types of pseudopotentials are different.

Thanks,
Chirantan Pramanik


From: users  on behalf of Nicola 
Marzari via users 
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 10:09 AM
To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum 
Subject: Re: [QE-users] Phonon calculation does not converge


Out of curiosity, wouldn’t a low cutoff (not that one should use it) miss a 
ghost state (that is very localized)?

In passing, sssp pseudos are tested re not having ghosts, and have default 
suggested cutoffs. Just make sure you use the latest version 1.3

Nicola

Sent from a tiny keyboard... Contact info:
http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Contact

On 23 Jan 2024, at 09:02, Lorenzo Paulatto  wrote:



The calculation is not only not converging, it is actually diverging. Changing 
alpha_mix and increasing nmix_ph can help, but it may also indicate something 
wrong with the calculation. I.e. a metal treated as semiconductor, or a ghost 
in the pseudopotential (which may be likely if you use norm-conservig cutoff 
with an ultrasoft dataset)

hth


On 1/23/24 08:47, Chirantan Pramanik wrote:
Hello All,

I was running Phonon for a few systems of carbonate minerals for a long time. 
Recently I used SSSP pseudopotential for PBE and faced a problem like the one 
pasted below. Optimization and SCF calculations are properly done. But phonon 
calculation is not converging. Please help. I think changing alpha_mix can be 
useful, but for my stable and optimized system, it should converge easily.

section from ph.x output:

  iter #  97 total cpu time :  1799.1 secs   av.it.:  84.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  1.595E+08

  iter #  98 total cpu time :  1822.7 secs   av.it.:  92.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  3.870E+10

  iter #  99 total cpu time :  1846.5 secs   av.it.:  92.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  4.585E+10

  iter # 100 total cpu time :  1869.3 secs   av.it.:  88.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  5.897E+09

 End of self-consistent calculation

 No convergence has been achieved


Please help in this regard.

Thanks and Regards,
Chirantan

Chirantan Pramanik
Postdoctoral Researcher
Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Weizmann Institute of Science
Rehovot, Israel



___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX 
(www.max-centre.eu<http://www.max-centre.eu>)
users mailing list 
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org<mailto:users@lists.quantum-espresso.org>
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

--
Dr. Lorenzo Paulatto
IdR @ IMPMC - CNRS UMR 7590 & Sorbonne Université
phone: +33 (0)1 442 79822 / skype: paulatz
http://www.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/ - https://anharmonic.github.io/
23-24/423 B115, 4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris CX 05
___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[QE-users] Phonon calculation does not converge

2024-01-22 Thread Chirantan Pramanik
Hello All,

I was running Phonon for a few systems of carbonate minerals for a long time. 
Recently I used SSSP pseudopotential for PBE and faced a problem like the one 
pasted below. Optimization and SCF calculations are properly done. But phonon 
calculation is not converging. Please help. I think changing alpha_mix can be 
useful, but for my stable and optimized system, it should converge easily.

section from ph.x output:

  iter #  97 total cpu time :  1799.1 secs   av.it.:  84.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  1.595E+08

  iter #  98 total cpu time :  1822.7 secs   av.it.:  92.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  3.870E+10

  iter #  99 total cpu time :  1846.5 secs   av.it.:  92.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  4.585E+10

  iter # 100 total cpu time :  1869.3 secs   av.it.:  88.0
  thresh= 1.000E-02 alpha_mix =  0.700 |ddv_scf|^2 =  5.897E+09

 End of self-consistent calculation

 No convergence has been achieved


Please help in this regard.

Thanks and Regards,
Chirantan

Chirantan Pramanik
Postdoctoral Researcher
Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Weizmann Institute of Science
Rehovot, Israel
___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[QE-users] Can not perform multiple optimization calculations

2023-03-22 Thread Chirantan Pramanik
Hi All,

I am using QE for 1.5 years and calculating phonon frequencies for isotopic 
molecules. I am using a server in my Institute and I am running jobs in 
parallel with mpi enabled through qsub using PBS job scripts. The problem is 
when I run multiple optimization jobs for pw.x only one of them completes and 
others stop in between at random places without finishing.
This problem does not occur in phonon calculation jobs in ph.x code. Please 
help me to understand the problem. My cluster admin told me that two jobs are 
interfering but why this is occurring only with optimization jobs? one pbs 
script is attached below.


#!/bin/bash
#PBS -N opt
#PBS -l select=4:ncpus=24:mem=120GB
#PBS -q long
#PBS -S /bin/bash
#PBS -V
mpirun -np 96 '/home/pramanik/qe-6.7/bin/pw.x'  
/work/pramanik/c332pbesolvc.out


Thanks,
Chirantan



Chirantan Pramanik
Postdoctoral Researcher
Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Weizmann Institute of Science
Rehovot, Israel
___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users