=320~600 Ry
HTH
Giuseppe
Quoting José Carlos Conesa Cegarra :
I mean,
ecutwfc=1.0D-8
JC Conesa
El 14/02/2021 a las 20:38, Paolo Giannozzi escribió:
"decreasing" ?
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 8:16 PM José Carlos Conesa Cegarra
mailto:jccon...@icp.csic.es>> wrote:
De
I mean,
ecutwfc=1.0D-8
JC Conesa
El 14/02/2021 a las 20:38, Paolo Giannozzi escribió:
"decreasing" ?
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 8:16 PM José Carlos Conesa Cegarra
mailto:jccon...@icp.csic.es>> wrote:
Dear all,
Even decreasing ecutwfc by two orders of magnitude the e
: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:49:24 +0100
De: José Carlos Conesa Cegarra
Responder a: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum
Para: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum
Dear all,
I have found (several times) this error with qe-6.5
Dear all,
I have found (several times) this error with qe-6.5:
%%
Error in routine allocate_fft (1):
wrong ngm
%%
stopping
the
needed flags to DFLAGS, IFLAGS and LD_LIBS.
Do you think that it is better not to use libxc at all?
José C. Conesa
El 26/01/2021 a las 19:10, Fabrizio Ferrari escribió:
Hello,
are you compiling with libxc? Which version?
Fabrizio
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:39 PM José Carlos Conesa Cegarra
Dear all,
I tried compiling qe-6.7. The compilation fails with a number of
messages like these:
funct.f90(40): error #7002: Error in opening the compiled module file.
Check INCLUDE paths. [XC_F03_LIB_M]
USE xc_f03_lib_m
--^
funct.f90(424): error #6457: This derived type name has
Thanks for the indication. Would any pseudo of the ONCV_PBE collection
give the same result? Would any norm-conserving pseudo behave in the
same way?
all hte best,
José C. Conesa
El 19/11/2020 a las 10:21, Paolo Giannozzi escribió:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:12 AM José C. Conesa
Dear all,
Last 11th of september I sent a similar question, but the answer,
provided by Paolo Giannozzi, did not clarify much. I can say that in
that occasion I was using qe-6.5. Should I use qe -6.6?
Regards,
José C. Conesa
El 12/11/2020 a las 11:30, Pietro Delugas escribió:
Hi
which
Dear all,
I have found a problem with the number of atoms resulting in a
computation with pw.x. The essentials of the geometry specification are:
space_group=155, rhombohedral=.TRUE.
A=8.7018, B=8.7018, C=8.7018
cosAB=-0.0032742, cosAC=-0.0032742, cosBC=-0.0032742
nat=13, ntyp=4
...
uot;
http://www.quantum-simulation.org/potentials/sg15_oncv/upf/
HTH
Giuseppe
Quoting José Carlos Conesa Cegarra :
Hi all,
Could anyone provide a norm-conserving pseudopotential for Pb which
has been computed including spinorbit coupling?
--
José C. Conesa
Research Professor
Instituto de C
Hi all,
Could anyone provide a norm-conserving pseudopotential for Pb which has
been computed including spinorbit coupling?
--
José C. Conesa
Research Professor
Instituto de Catálisis y Petroleoquímica, CSIC
Marie Curie, 2; Campus de Cantoblanco
28028 Madrid (Spain)
Telef. +34 915854766
STI - IMX - THEOSand NCCR - MARVEL
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
+41 21 69 34 881
http://people.epfl.ch/265334
*From:* users on behalf of
José Carlos Conesa Cegarra
Dear colleagues,
I have found a problem when running hp.x after a pw.x calculation on a
nitride. The input to pw.x was the following:
title = 'calc CuGeSnN4'
calculation = 'scf'
restart_mode = 'from_scratch'
prefix = 'CuGeSnN4'
outdir = './tmp'
Dear Julien,
A slab can never be cubic. At most it can be forced to remain
tetragonal. But I see that your perovskite contains formamidinium
cations. Even if you force the dimensions of the bulk cell to remain
cubic, the internal symmetry after relaxation will not be cubic; those
organic
Hi,
I am interested in some earlier QE versions, for which the detailed
instructions for the input files (e.g. INPUT_PW) existed only in the
.def format. How can one transform this format into an easier to handle
one, like .html or .txt?
Thanks in advance,
--
José C. Conesa
Instituto de
Dear Paolo,
El 03/03/2019 a las 8:52, Paolo Giannozzi escribió:
With libxc only a few functionals - those "(with libxc)" and a few
others - currently work.
Paolo
What does "(with libxc)" mean here? I cannot find this expression in
parentheses in any of the QE documents.
In any case, and
Hi,
Sodium metal has an odd number of electrons per primitive unit cell
(which contains a single atom), and however is nonmagnetic. The same
applies to aluminum. This is the result of having a large overlap
between orbitals, making the (in principle) spin up and spin down energy
separation
17 matches
Mail list logo