Hi Everyone,
I'm currently using both the latest qe-6.7 and qe-6.4.1 qmcpack in my
school computing HPC cluster and i've noticed that qe-6.4.1-qmcpack's
version of pw.x is several times faster than qe-6.7 when performing scf and
nscf runs. Both were configured for parallel runs using openmpi.
Thank you all for your suggestions. I think the best move would be to
increase the smearing value until I achieve convergence. I also wanted to
ask, but would mixing = 'local-tf' be a good mixing method for this system?
The crystal has been confirmed experimentally to be a metal, and I the
Hi Everyone,
I'm currently having issues achieving convergence for my SCF calculations
with SOC on nickel intercalated TaSe2. Since it is a metal, I've tried
increasing the total number of bands and that didn't really work. I've also
tried using local Thomas Fermi mixing due to address its
Hi Everyone,
I'm struggling on choosing a value for the correct number of bands
(num_bands) and number of wannier functions (num_wan). Is there a
systematic way of finding these values? I've typically use the outputs for
scf calculations as my reference, but from the examples, these don't
always
Dear Quantum Espresso community,
I'm currently trying to wannierize the wavefunctions for Co3Sn2S2 in my
calculations. To do so I must perform scf and nscf calculations, and for
the nscf calculations I must input the individual k-points in the crystal
representation. Unfortunately when I do this
Hi Everyone,
I've recently done electron-phonon coupling calculations using EPW and I
was curious about the format of the electron linewidth file. For example,
this is the start of the output.
# Electron linewidth = 2*Im(Sigma) (meV)
# ik ibnd E(ibnd)
Hi Everyone,
I'm currently using epw.x to calculate the electron self-energies and I'm
having trouble finding where those energies are stored in the outputs.
Could someone give me a heads up on where they are?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
*University of California, Berkeley*
*Department of Letter and
Hi Everyone!
I've recently ran a few of my first fermi surface calculations for the
crystal La(SiIr)2, but in order to compare it to experimental data (landau
oscillations of the physical crystal), I need to find regions where dS/dn
is zero, where n is the k-space vector of the magnetic field and
Hi Everyone,
I'm trying to replicate the results of example 2 in the
user/qe-6.5/PP/examples/example02/reference. While I successfully plotted
the fermi surface following the directions of README, can anyone please
help me figure out how they plotted the band structures of specific
orbitals
the
electrons you'll need.
Stephen
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 11:58 PM Poonam Kaushik
wrote:
> Dear Stephen Zhang,
> Thank you so much for your response.
> If this is the case, then will it create a problem in the rest part of the
> calculations?
> Should I need to change my pseudopot
Hi,
I had a similar problem too with lda calculations. You want to confirm that
your pseudopotential files have all the electrons necessary for non zero
magnetic moment. When I was getting zero magnetic moment, it was due to the
fact that a few of my pseudopotential files were missing electrons
Hi Everyone,
I just wanted to ask about the sort of k-point grids one would use for
larger crystals (about 20 basis atoms). I've tried experimenting with
different k-point densities with the crystal Co3Sn2S2 (7 basis atoms), and
found that increasing the k-point grid density for scf calculations
t helps
>
> Martin Matas
> Ph.D. student
> University of West Bohemia
>
>
> Pátek, Srpen 07, 2020 07:40 CEST, Stephen Zhang
> napsal:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Recently for many of my vc-relaxation calculations, the total
> magnetization
> >
Hi everyone,
Recently for many of my vc-relaxation calculations, the total magnetization
of the crystal keeps falling to zero. I know this is not correct since the
non-zero magnetization has been verified by others and this fall off to
zero has been happening for several compounds I've tried.
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to do a relaxation calculations with 15 atom types, however, I
run into the error
ntyp too large, increase NSX
I understand you have to change the error condition to to be larger than 10
and recompile QE in order to avoid this error and run the calculation.
However are
Hi everyone,
The compound Ba4Sn9Bi3 is rather complex, with 32 atoms in the unit cell.
I've tried a couple ways to make the calculation converge, setting the
mixing_beta = 0.2, decreasing the k point count to just 6 total k-points,
as well as increasing the degauss value, degauss = 0.1, but to no
Hi Everyone,
I have a compound that has 56 atoms in the unit cell, and my computer
cannot really seem to handle the computation load. Is there any advice
anyone could give to lighten up the load? I've pasted my input file below.
calculation = 'vc-relax'
prefix = 'TaCuO'
outdir =
Hi everyone,
I've encountered the issue of my vc-relax calculation not converging. Here
is my input,
calculation = 'vc-relax'
prefix = 'CoSnS'
outdir = './outdir'
pseudo_dir =
structures calculated in the link here
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-06088-2.pdf. Look for spin
up only
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:53 AM Stephen Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi Mona,
>
> Thank you for your response, I'll give it a try and let everyone know what
> happens!
>
&g
amin
>
> Graduate student
>
> Center for simulational physics
>
> University of Georgia
>
> --
>
> Email:mon...@uga.ed u
>
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 17:19:10 -0700
> From: Stephen Zhang
> To: user
Thank you Pietro, this has been very helpful
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 12:06 PM Pietro Delugas wrote:
>
> Dear Stephen Zhang
>
> crystal_b for positions is meaningless, it is used only for specifying
> K-POINTS paths in band structure calculations, that's why the program
> gets
Hi everyone,
Does anyone know how to plot separate spin up and spin down bands after
doing a bands calculation for pw.x? After running bands.x I get the error
The bands code with constrained magnetism has not been tested
Does anyone know any work around?
Thanks
Hi Everyone,
I'm currently doing a ferromagnetic spin polarized band structure
calculation for Co3Sn2S2. When trying to plot the bands, I receive
this error
The bands code with constrained magnetization has not been tested
Is there anyway that I can plot the bands for each spin separately as
a
Hi Everyone,
I am currently running relaxation computations with quantum Espresso,
and I am unsure what the units are for the {crystal_b} configuration
when determining the positions of the atoms, below is my input. I am
assuming that celldm(1) is in angstrom, however on xcrysden, it says
that
24 matches
Mail list logo