Dag Wieers wrote:
Time to start fixing this mess ? Who is interested to make a list of base
packages that RPMforge replaces, and tag these SPEC files accordingly ?
Attached is my contribution. It is a list of all the package names that
conflict/match between 5.5 and rpmforge. I used a script
Hi!
Essential in getting the right answer is to ask the right question.
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 17:57 -0700, Mark wrote:
Question:
In my most recent attempts to update this, I get the following errors in yum:
Answer:
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
In the long
Am Freitag, den 03.09.2010, 13:25 +0200 schrieb Yury V. Zaytsev:
Hi!
Essential in getting the right answer is to ask the right question.
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 17:57 -0700, Mark wrote:
Question:
In my most recent attempts to update this, I get the following errors in
yum:
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 14:05 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
At least, rkhunter does not need it at all.
But perl-Net-SSLeay does and this is an dependency of rkhunter...
However, perl-Net-SSLeay is in base! Does rkhunter requires newer
perl-Net-SSLeay than 1.30?
--
Sincerely yours,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Freitag, den 03.09.2010, 14:38 +0200 schrieb Yury V. Zaytsev:
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 14:05 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
At least, rkhunter does not need it at all.
But perl-Net-SSLeay does and this is an dependency of rkhunter...
However,
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 16:10 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
%{?el6:# Tag: rfx}
%{?el5:# Tag: rfx}
%{?el4:# Tag: rf}
%{?el3:# Tag: rf}
Which is better IMO than forking into 4 SPEC files and maintaining each
seperately.
I think this is a very good idea.
Once we have a list and agree on the
On Sep 3, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 16:10 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
%{?el6:# Tag: rfx}
%{?el5:# Tag: rfx}
%{?el4:# Tag: rf}
%{?el3:# Tag: rf}
Which is better IMO than forking into 4 SPEC files and maintaining each
seperately.
I think this is a
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 16:10 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
%{?el6:# Tag: rfx}
%{?el5:# Tag: rfx}
%{?el4:# Tag: rf}
%{?el3:# Tag: rf}
Which is better IMO than forking into 4 SPEC files and maintaining each
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev y...@shurup.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 16:10 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
%{?el6:# Tag: rfx}
%{?el5:# Tag: rfx}
%{?el4:# Tag: rf}
%{?el3:# Tag: rf}
Which is better IMO than forking into 4 SPEC files and maintaining each
seperately.
I
I originally sent this to the CentOS list, but I was encouraged to
bring it here.
I have an old version of rkhunter installed on my CentOS 5 machine,
one I got from rpmforge.
In my most recent attempts to update this, I get the following errors in yum:
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running
10 matches
Mail list logo
