Re: [Scilab-users] Frequency response

2018-09-17 Thread Tan Chin Luh
On 18/9/2018 5:15 AM, Rafael Guerra wrote: Chin Luh: good to know but how does that solve Claus Futtrup specific problem? ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users just notice that the answer similar

Re: [Scilab-users] {EXT} Re: Frequency response

2018-09-17 Thread Rafael Guerra
Redundant qwant-fu'ing ... response was already provided ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Scilab-users] Frequency response

2018-09-17 Thread Rafael Guerra
Chin Luh: good to know but how does that solve Claus Futtrup specific problem? ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Scilab-users] algebra conventions with integer types to be discussed

2018-09-17 Thread Stéphane Mottelet
Le 14/09/2018 à 18:20, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit : Hello all, Integer types in Scilab are not smoothly implemented and there are still some bugs and real questions to be discussed, specifically on over/underflow, exceptions in divisions such as in int8(1)/int8(0) int8(-128)/int8(-1) type

Re: [Scilab-users] Frequency response

2018-09-17 Thread Tan Chin Luh
Hi, I was facing similar issue sometime ago while trying to translate from matlab to scilab, as both of them have diff way of representation. In Matlab/Octave, when we are using polynomial, we are defining them in vector/matrix form such as : num = [1 2 3 4]. The catch is here: when we use

Re: [Scilab-users] {EXT} Re: Frequency response

2018-09-17 Thread Dang Ngoc Chan, Christophe
Hello, > De : users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.scilab.org] De la part de Claus Futtrup > Envoyé : dimanche 16 septembre 2018 19:14 > > ZPK can mean many things (Google Search, I suppose) ... > but after search I understand it's something with Zero Pole ... > don't know what the letter K stands