Le 14/09/2018 à 18:20, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit :
Hello all,
Integer types in Scilab are not smoothly implemented and there are
still some bugs and real questions to be discussed, specifically on
over/underflow, exceptions in divisions such as in
int8(1)/int8(0)
int8(-128)/int8(-1)
type of the result of mixed double/integer operations, such as
int8(1) + %pi
int8(1)/0.0
and so on. Other software related to Scilab, e.g. Matlab and Julia,
have different conventions and currently Scilab currently adopts a mix
of them, which does not help to make one's mind.
Integers types were a long-waited feature by people who needed it, so
I would like to have some developpers and user testimonies about the
way they do algebra with them.
Thanks in adavance,
S.
Hello all,
Do I have to conclude that the implementation is currently so incoherent
that *nobody* uses integer types in Scilab (other than Scilab code itself) ?
S.
--
Stéphane Mottelet
Ingénieur de recherche
EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable
Département Génie des Procédés Industriels
Sorbonne Universités - Université de Technologie de Compiègne
CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne cedex
Tel : +33(0)344234688
http://www.utc.fr/~mottelet
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
