Claus,
For me the plurality is not so important - but let's say it's the
wording used in all our educational books (in English) ... just dig
into any Signal Analysis book, etc., and what we're trying to name
here is exactly that, then it would be bad for Scilab to give it a
different name.
There are several software packages, not only Matlab, that call this
concept "periodic", for instance Octave, Scipy (from Python), DADiSP.
Regarding the last one, I've found an interesting reference:
https://www.dadisp.com/webhelp/mergedProjects/refman2/FncrefFK/FLATTOP.htm
Here, along with
Hi Federico
Thank you for being open to finding the right word.
I think other members of our small group should also be open.
For me the plurality is not so important - but let's say it's the
wording used in all our educational books (in English) ... just dig into
any Signal Analysis book,
Samuel:
As a general concept, you are right ... but with nuances. The problem is
deciding when something is really wrong and when it is just a question
of opinion or personal preference. It is wrong to say the Earth is flat,
no matter how many people say it. But is it right or wrong to call
Dear friends
I believe the initial question is related to giving more options to the
window functions, such that it can continue how it is today (aka
'symmetric') but also offer alternatives. If these additional options
makes sense, and can default such that they are not required (existing
Hello,
> De : Federico Miyara
> Envoyé : dimanche 11 avril 2021 02:08
>
> Like it or not, I guess these keywords come from Matlab, and as Matlab
> still seems to dominate the market, many people, including those
> willing to quit Matlab (as I did several years ago), are quite used to
> those
Samuel,
Like it or not, I guess these keywords come from Matlab, and as Matlab
still seems to dominate the market, many people, including those willing
to quit Matlab (as I did several years ago), are quite used to those
keywords. Other software such as Octave and scipy.signal (Python)
Dear Federico,
Thank you for the proposal.
I am afraid that the "symmetric" and "periodic" flag names are not
intuitive to me.
Indeed, the generated window is /always/ both periodic and symmetric. It
is anyway "algorithmically seen" as periodic (from a spectral point of
view), since it is
Dear all,
Just in case somebody finds this useful, I'm attaching a proposal of a
modified version of the function window() which includes three new
window functions: Blackman, Blackman-Harris and one out of many
different flat-top windows. It also allows a new argument, opt, which
can be either
Dear All,
I wonder why windowing functions such as Hann, Hamming, etc., provided
by window(), are only symmetric.
When used for spectral analysis by subsequent use of fft(), the periodic
weighting is better than the symmetric one. The symmetric window is
mainly used in the design of FIR
10 matches
Mail list logo
