Martin, Tobias,
Thanks for the info. I'm glad you confirmed there was no secret method of
emptying the hashtable that I'd missed. Also that my suspicions about
invalidating the enumerator if I enumerated-and-removed were correct.
In the end (a Friday afternoon deadline approaching) I decided to
Hi Graham,
If I get a chance, I'll try out your patch, this may take some weeks
to getting around to though.
Unfortunately, the patch contained a small bug. But I commited a
proper version to master on Monday (see [1]).
Regards,
Tobias
Hi,
strongSwan interoperates with any other IPsec implementation
supporting either the IKEv1 or IKEv2 standards. strongSwan
does not implement the IKEv1 Aggressive Mode, though.
Regards
Andreas
On 06/09/2010 02:33 PM, Dhanavel P wrote:
Hi All,
Greetings
Am new to this strongswan..
Here is the final announcement for the workshop:
http://www.linuxtag.org/2010/de/program/freies-vortragsprogramm/vortragsliste.html?talkid=643
See you in Berlin
Andreas
==
Andreas Steffen
Hi All,
Greetings
Am new to this strongswan.. I have a doubt ,can we establish IPSec
connection by configuring one host with strongswan and another Host with
some other Open source…
Or we can establish IPsec only by configuring Stronswan on both of the
ends….Is it like that?
Yes, such a setup is possible. For the configuration of the
strongSwan side have a look at the following example scenario:
http://www.strongswan.org/uml/testresults44/ikev1/host2host-cert/
Regards
Andreas
On 06/09/2010 03:08 PM, Harini Gopalakrishnan wrote:
Hi All,
Since I am new to strong
