i finaly soled it problem, my configs are :
cisco config is :
Router1#
hostname Router1
crypto isakmp policy 5
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
lifetime 3600
crypto isakmp key 123456 address 192.168.0.1
!
crypto ipsec transform-set MINE esp-3des esp-md5
!
ip access-list
Hi all,
Nobody's replied to this issue or my other, similar asymmetry issue (
https://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/2013-May/009245.html).
Really hoping someone could give me some pointers here on how this could be
further debugged... Is there anything else I can look at here, or should
My server is an Ubuntu 12.04 server with a public IP and the
Ubuntu-provided Strongswan 4.5.2-1.2 package installed. I'm trying to
set up a road warrior style configuration for an Android phone using
the official Strongswan client; it is on a NAT behind a firewall that I
have no control over.
Hi,
it seems that some IPsec kernel modules are missing on the
strongSwan VPN server. Please check against the following list of
mandatory modules:
http://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/KernelModules
Regards
Andreas
On 05/30/2013 04:53 PM, P. J. Reed wrote:
My server is an
Thank you! My server is running on a virtual machine using a kernel
provided by the host, and it seems it was missing some necessary
modules. After installing my own kernel, everything is working great.
P. J.
On 2013-05-30 11:01, Andreas Steffen wrote:
Hi,
it seems that some IPsec kernel
Strongswan version 5.01 [ 10.1.1.254 is the Cisco device].
We clearly see Strongswan sending the capability in MM1 and Cisco in MM4. For
what ever reason, Strongswan ignore that message.
Looks like a bug to me.
From: olivier_pele...@hotmail.com
To: users@lists.strongswan.org
Date: Wed, 29 May
