The Mojo team is pleased to announce the release of the JBoss Packaging Maven
Plugin version 2.1.
http://mojo.codehaus.org/jboss-packaging-maven-plugin/
Some notable features in this release include handling for the par (process
archive) format.
To get this update, simply specify the
The variable properties are considered invalid reference in
archetype-metadata.xml ..
so one way is to include requiredProperty key=earname/ in
archetype-metadata.xml ..
and the ${earname} can be referenced in properties file (usually under
src/main/resources) in the project ..
Hi there!
I already searched google for some help but it seems that it's not
really common to use Maven for non-Java projects.
However, we plan to be platform and language-independent by supporting
e.g. embedded Java, C, C++ and Python. The question is if it is feasible
to use Maven for all
We are currently using it for flex in addition to java, for flex the builds
work fine the only negative is the plugins that allow direct IDE integration
are not as complete as they are for Java.
Regarding C/C++ I have tried to use this in the past, I think I was using
the nar plugin but can't be
I have a Maven 2.0.9 webapp build that uses the WAR plugin.
My pom lists just a single dependency foo version 2.0.
But when the plugin builds my WAR, the WEB-INF/lib directory contains all of
the different jars that constitute the foo dependency.
Is there a way to have JUST foo-2.0.jar show in
I have a multi-module build that depends upon the maven-antrun-plugin. This
module has to take a zip file and unzip it to a particular directory inside
the war. It's pretty straight forward, and it works fine on my machine.
Unfortunately, on our build system, the same build structure on the same
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Comerford,
Seansean.comerf...@espn3.com wrote:
I have a Maven 2.0.9 webapp build that uses the WAR plugin.
Is there a way to have JUST foo-2.0.jar show in WEB-INF/lib instead of all
the other jars?
Yes, have a look at the packagingExclude and packagingInclude
Sorry. I¹m didn¹t ask the question properly. Let me re-phrase:
Artifact foo has a shade plugin based build that generates a single
³with-dependencies² jar containing all classes and dependent classes.
I want that single jar (foo-2.0-with-dependencies.jar) to be placed in my
WAR artifact¹s
scopeprovided/scope
---
Thank You…
Mick Knutson, President
BASE Logic, Inc.
Enterprise Architecture, Design, Mentoring Agile Consulting
p. (866) BLiNC-411: (254-6241-1)
f. (415) 685-4233
Website: http://baselogic.com
Linked IN: http://linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
Vacation Rental:
Hi,
I want to deploy a project POM file only. I added maven-deploy plugin as
follows. When I run
mvn dpeloy:deploy-file
It still complains about missing modules directories. I dont want to build
the modules. I want to generate the pom file only. How can I do this ?
parent
I updated Maven on the build system to Maven 2.2.0, and that seemed to take
care of this issue. The antrun tasks are running.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:11 PM, David Weintraub qazw...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a multi-module build that depends upon the maven-antrun-plugin. This
module has to
I'm trying to get a profile to activate for my parent project but not
for the children. Unfortunately, the children inherit from the parent
to get dependency information. So, they also inherit everything else.
My solution (or so I thought) was to use the project.artifactId property
in my
I'm using maven-shade-plugin to make executable JAR. But, some of artifacts
are signed, and this is causes an exception
Exception in thread main java.lang.SecurityException: Invalid signature
file digest for Manifest main attributes
So, how can I configure plugin for removing of such data?
${project.artifactId} might help.
Jon
-Original Message-
From: David C. Hicks [mailto:dhi...@i-hicks.org]
Sent: 10 August 2009 18:12
To: Maven Users
Subject: Profile Activation Help?
I'm trying to get a profile to activate for my parent project
but not for the children.
That would substitute the actual name of the artifact in the name tag,
though, wouldn't it?
Jonathan Woods wrote:
${project.artifactId} might help.
Jon
-Original Message-
From: David C. Hicks [mailto:dhi...@i-hicks.org]
Sent: 10 August 2009 18:12
To: Maven Users
Subject:
I think it's probably a you issue. You refer to the top-level POM
as the parent, and it may well be so, but as such it has nothing to
do with the structure of the project or the relationship between the
children (aside from dependencyManagement). As far as the
multi-module nature is concerned,
I'd like to exclude web.xml from WAR packaging and tried
packagingExcludesWEB-INF/*.xml/packagingExcludes
and
webResources
resource
directorysrc/directory
excludes
if web.xml is excluded from war to be deployed
where would the container read the configuration servlet-mapping,welcome-file
?
Martin Gainty
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
Diese Nachricht ist
Usage of dependency scope is critical for project build, and I'd like to make
sure that I can use scopeimport/scope in a valid way.
Maven site documentation states
(http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#Dependency_Scope):
import (only available
Yes I don't need the POM, just the dependencies.
Jerome Lacoste-2 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:57 AM, bwarrenbrad.war...@usairways.com wrote:
I have a Webstart application that I'm generating a WAR file to deploy on
JBoss using the Maven Webstart plugin.
I have included the JBoss
Servlet 3.0 makes the web.xml completely optional and all of that information
can be specified using annotations in the Servlet itself. I'm trying a
Wicket sample and manually copy all the filter registration from web.xml
to META-INF/web-fragment.xml of wicket-1.4.0.jar and then remove web.xml.
I must have been blind when reading through my MDG last night. I found
what I believe will be my solution.
activation
file
existssrc/changes/changes.xml/exists
/file
/activation
Since this is the only module that will have a changes.xml file, this
should do the
I take it back. That doesn't help me, either.
I guess once the profile has been activated at the parent POM level, it
stays that way for all the children.
David C. Hicks wrote:
I must have been blind when reading through my MDG last night. I found
what I believe will be my solution.
I think you need to set failOnMissingWebXml to false in the plugin
configuration. See
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/war-mojo.html#failOnMissingWebXml
Justin
-Original Message-
From: arungupta [mailto:arun.gu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:15 PM
To:
Thanks, just figured that out.
Here is the exact fragment in case folks are wondering:
configuration
failOnMissingWebXmlfalse/failOnMissingWebXml
/configuration
-Arun
justinedelson wrote:
I think you need to set failOnMissingWebXml to
Let me try to clarify again:
We¹re currently using the shade plugin to generate a single, uber foo.jar
containing all of foo¹s classses as well as the class files of ALL
dependencies.
I want to apply that same idea to my my Maven war build as far as the stuff
going into /WEB-INF/lib
That is,
Just define all the _*plugins*_ in your profile as
inheritedfalse/inherited
2009/8/10 David C. Hicks dhi...@i-hicks.org
I take it back. That doesn't help me, either.
I guess once the profile has been activated at the parent POM level, it
stays that way for all the children.
David C. Hicks
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:12 PM, bwarrenbrad.war...@usairways.com wrote:
Yes I don't need the POM, just the dependencies.
Mmmm the code is supposed to only copy the artifacts of type jar or ejb-client
String type = artifact.getType();
if ( jar.equals( type ) ||
Hi Stephen,
I tried that, but it didn't seem to work. The plugin still tried to
execute for the sub-modules. I ended up punting. I run my
changes:announcement-mail goal in a completely separate Maven run after
my build is completed, but I give it the -N switch to keep it from
running child
Just put some skeleton stuff around the 2 POM snippets in the original email
and you should have it. I'm not sitting around and waiting or anything,
it's more of an FYI. If I get a chance I'll try to cook one up.
I decided I didn't want the whole world that comes with the JBoss client POM
You may be walking into a trap in a multi-module project. It is my
strong impression that activation decisions are not made
module-by-module in the reactor, but only once. When I tried what you
tried I found that, since the top-level project with the modules in it
didn't have the file, the profile
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:50 PM, David Hoffer dhoff...@gmail.com wrote:
We are currently using it for flex in addition to java, for flex the builds
work fine the only negative is the plugins that allow direct IDE
integration
are not as complete as they are for Java.
Regarding C/C++ I have
Then my experience, I would say, confirms that for both of us. My file
*is* in the top-level, and I found that the profile was activated for
all modules. I had arrived at the same conclusion that they are
evaluated once, at the start of execution.
Benson Margulies wrote:
You may be walking
We¹re currently using the shade plugin to generate a single, uber foo.jar
containing all of foo¹s classses as well as the class files of ALL
dependencies.
Assuming you've installed the foo-2.0-with-dependencies.jar file to
your repo, you should be able to depend on:
groupId: ??
artifactId: foo
34 matches
Mail list logo
