to bind multiple plugin executions, of DIFFERENT
plugins, to a single phase and deterministically specify the execution
order.
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Controlling-order-of-plugin-execution-tp5794777p5794892.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list
phase and deterministically specify the execution
order.
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Controlling-order-of-plugin-execution-tp5794777p5794892.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 9:08 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Controlling order of plugin execution
That's usually a sign that you have wandered off The Maven Way™
There are ways back
[mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 9:08 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Controlling order of plugin execution
That's usually a sign that you have wandered off The Maven Way™
There are ways back onto the blessed path... they typically involve
writing
On Jun 4, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's usually a sign that you have wandered off The Maven Way™
No it's not. They have valid points and the implementation is deficient in this
regard. Everything that's presently here is not immutable.
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014, Jim Garrison jim.garri...@nwea.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
javascript:;]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 9:08 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Controlling order of plugin execution
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Jim Garrison jim.garri...@nwea.org wrote:
Consider the phrase ...you have wandered off The Maven Way™. I can't
tell if you intended this ironically or seriously. If it's the latter, it
seems like you're saying is Maven is perfect. If Maven doesn't handle your
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote:
On Jun 4, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
That's usually a sign that you have wandered off The Maven Way™
No it's not. They have valid points and the implementation is
We are not a cult.
If we already have a we, we are half way there!
Just short a charismatic leader and a Book of the Way.
Ron
On 04/06/2014 3:22 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Jun 4, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's usually a sign that you have
I, myself, have also found the lack of ordered plugin execution to be
wanting. Stephen does have a point: complex behavior is likely be better
encapsulated in a new plugin. I don't disagree, but that route can be steep
and I don't want to be detoured into always writing a new plugin. Many
times
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
I, myself, have also found the lack of ordered plugin execution to be
wanting. Stephen does have a point: complex behavior is likely be better
encapsulated in a new plugin. I don't disagree, but that route can be steep
and I
I don't think this existed when I first tried with Maven (my example was
from many moons ago), but this is another tool in my toolbox now. Thank
you! :-)
Cheers,
Paul
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014, Paul
Yes they forged a new path through the wilderness... And now we have
another Maven Way!
(Bonus points for making it independent of maven so that you are not tied
to us - if you love someone set them free... If they don't come back it was
not to be... Same goes for how maven should feel towards
I'm trying to set up a Maven build for CI/CD, and one of the requirements for
testing is to create, populate and tweak a database schema.
This involves interleaving various executions of maven-dependency-plugin,
sql-maven-plugin and exec-maven-plugin, and there aren't enough lifecycle
phases
Jim, I reopened the issue for you, but, please note, this was closed
because the issue was created 6 years ago and no one ever submitted a
patch. Hopefully, someone has the incentive to work on this or it will be
closed again. If you find this feature critical to your own work, do you
have time to
Agree sequencing is a pain. You may be able to get this working if you
move your sql plugin delaration below exec-m-p
-D
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
Jim, I reopened the issue for you, but, please note, this was closed
because the issue was
I agree with Dan. Last I check, IIRC, the order of operations of plugins is
defined by their sequential order in the POM. However, I also find this a
bit problematic with inheritance -- I don't know off the top of my head
what happens then.
Cheers,
Paul
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Dan Tran
17 matches
Mail list logo
