Agree sequencing is a pain. You may be able to get this working if you move your sql plugin delaration below exec-m-p
-D On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: > Jim, I reopened the issue for you, but, please note, this was closed > because the issue was created 6 years ago and no one ever submitted a > patch. Hopefully, someone has the incentive to work on this or it will be > closed again. If you find this feature critical to your own work, do you > have time to take a detour and submit a patch? > > > Cheers, > Paul > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Jim Garrison <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm trying to set up a Maven build for CI/CD, and one of the requirements > > for testing is to create, populate and tweak a database schema. > > > > This involves interleaving various executions of maven-dependency-plugin, > > sql-maven-plugin and exec-maven-plugin, and there aren't enough lifecycle > > phases *-test-[re]sources to accommodate all the steps. > > > > I'd like to bind six executions as follows: > > > > 1 maven-dependency-plugin:unpack -> generate-test-resources > > 2 sql-maven-plugin:execute -> generate-test-resources > > 3 sql-maven-plugin:execute -> generate-test-resources > > 4 exec-maven-plugin:exec -> process-test-resources > > 5 exec-maven-plugin:exec -> process-test-resources > > 6 sql-maven-plugin:execute -> process-test-resources > > > > But this doesn't work as Maven wants to execute sql-maven-plugin (steps 2 > > & 3) before step 1 and I can't find a way to make it do things in the > > desired sequence. > > > > There's a bug in Jira for this http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3522 > > but it was closed as part of the "great Jira cleanup of 2014". > > > > This has been an issue for several years but seems to get no attention. > I > > don't think I should be required to write my own plugin to do what should > > be a common requirement. > > > > Can someone explain if there's an approved way to accomplish this? > > > > I know Maven is supposed to be declarative in nature, but sequencing > steps > > seems like a basic requirement. From the lack of attention, and from > > reading other posts in places like StackOverflow, it appears there may > be a > > philosophical objection to explicitly ordering executions. Can someone > > explain the reasoning for this? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
