Re: Support for Java 9+

A lot of libraries are not suitable for use with modulepath applications yet, like this one. I think using Maven modules with classpath (and optionally some ArchUnit rules to enforce some architectural rules about what can access what) is also a fine way to modularize a project. Nils. > Op 21

Re: Support for Java 9+

As far as I know this dependency is not suitable for use with JMS. Using JMS is optional in Java 9+. You can use this dependency when using classpath instead of modulepath. Nils. > Op 21 apr. 2023, om 15:31 heeft Rodrigo Bourbon > het volgende geschreven: > > Hi Karl, indeed I'm talking

Re: Support for Java 9+

Hi Karl, indeed I'm talking about Java's Module System. In essence, I'm using maven-model because I need to analyze POM files. Rodrigo. On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:27 AM Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > On 20.04.23 17:32, Rodrigo Bourbon wrote: > > Hi, I'm currently working with Java 11 and

Re: Support for Java 9+

Hi, On 20.04.23 17:32, Rodrigo Bourbon wrote: Hi, I'm currently working with Java 11 and my project relies upon the maven-model and maven-model-builder artifacts. The

Re: Support for Java 9+

Hi Nils, you're right, the thing is that I'm working with the modulepath. I'm in the process of modularizing my project and I got stuck because of the mentioned issue. Rodrigo. On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 8:49 PM Nils Breunese wrote: > As far as I know this is only an issue on Java 9+ if you use a

Support for Java 9+

Hi, I'm currently working with Java 11 and my project relies upon the maven-model and maven-model-builder artifacts. The problem is that both have the package

Re: Support for Java 9+

As far as I know this is only an issue on Java 9+ if you use a modulepath instead of a classpath. I can use these dependencies just fine on Java 11 and 17. Nils. > Op 20 apr. 2023, om 18:50 heeft Rodrigo Bourbon > het volgende geschreven: > > Hi, I'm currently working with Java 11 and my

Support for Java 9+

Hi, I'm currently working with Java 11 and my project relies upon the maven-model and maven-model-builder artifacts. The problem is that both have the package