Re: Maven community maintaining popular JS lib deps? (was: Re: downloading JavaScript libraries)

2010-08-26 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Manos Batsis wrote: > > The only reason to package those javascript files in JARs and upload them to > the maven central repo is for other projects to reuse them as dependencies. > I don't think this is your case. This definitely wasn't what he asked

Re: downloading JavaScript libraries

2010-08-26 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Hi Jake, On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: > > I think this is where my comprehension is breaking down. In order for other > users to automatically download these new JavaScript library modules that I > would create, would these new modules need to be published in a Maven > rep

Maven community maintaining popular JS lib deps? (was: Re: downloading JavaScript libraries)

2010-08-26 Thread Manos Batsis
On 08/26/2010 06:51 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: On 10-08-26 11:27 AM, Jesse Farinacci wrote: Making them proper Maven modules and populating them ONE time manually when you create the artifact would enable all of your users to automatically download the artifact which contains the javascript library.

Re: downloading JavaScript libraries

2010-08-26 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi Jesse, On 10-08-26 11:27 AM, Jesse Farinacci wrote: Making them proper Maven modules and populating them ONE time manually when you create the artifact would enable all of your users to automatically download the artifact which contains the javascript library. I think this is where my compr

Re: downloading JavaScript libraries

2010-08-26 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: > > I'm new to Maven, and so I don't completely understand your answer. Why > would it be desirable to create a module for each JavaScript library in this > context, especially as this will not facilitate their automated downloading?

Re: downloading JavaScript libraries

2010-08-26 Thread Jacob Beard
Manos, Thanks for the reply. This makes good sense to me. Jake On 10-08-26 10:54 AM, Manos Batsis wrote: On 08/26/2010 05:44 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: My project includes dependencies on several JavaScript libraries, including Dojo, RequireJS and beautify-js. I'm currently using Ant's get task t

Re: downloading JavaScript libraries

2010-08-26 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi Jesse, I'm new to Maven, and so I don't completely understand your answer. Why would it be desirable to create a module for each JavaScript library in this context, especially as this will not facilitate their automated downloading? Also, it still seems like it would be desirable to instr

Re: downloading JavaScript libraries

2010-08-26 Thread Manos Batsis
On 08/26/2010 05:54 PM, Manos Batsis wrote: On 08/26/2010 05:44 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: My project includes dependencies on several JavaScript libraries, including Dojo, RequireJS and beautify-js. I'm currently using Ant's get task to download these dependencies, but I'd like to integrate this wi

Re: downloading JavaScript libraries

2010-08-26 Thread Manos Batsis
On 08/26/2010 05:44 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: My project includes dependencies on several JavaScript libraries, including Dojo, RequireJS and beautify-js. I'm currently using Ant's get task to download these dependencies, but I'd like to integrate this with my Maven build. The way I thought I would

Re: downloading JavaScript libraries

2010-08-25 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: > My project includes dependencies on several JavaScript libraries, including > Dojo, RequireJS and beautify-js. I'm currently using Ant's get task to > download these dependencies, but I'd like to integrate this with my Maven > buil

downloading JavaScript libraries

2010-08-25 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi, My project includes dependencies on several JavaScript libraries, including Dojo, RequireJS and beautify-js. I'm currently using Ant's get task to download these dependencies, but I'd like to integrate this with my Maven build. The way I thought I would do this would be to bind an antrun