RE: standardized Maven GAV URN?

Such a notation would be much more useful if it were 1. standardized and 2. unambiguous My personal preference would be "something like" groupId:artifactId(classifier):version;extension[scope] This way, the classifier, the extension, and the scope could be optional simp

Re: standardized Maven GAV URN?

internal Maven repo (and thus >> get >>> the advantage of Maven versioning), I have to jump through some >> dependency >>> plugin hoops to get it in the right place at the right time. I'd like to >> be >>> able to just give the Clover plugin a GAV U

Re: standardized Maven GAV URN?

Luke, are you aiming at IANA registration of the namespace identifier? (If not, please use a x- prefix to mark the NID as experimental: .) Best wishes, Andreas - To unsubscrib

Re: standardized Maven GAV URN?

os/cons of that vs. >> a format listed in the Maven docs[1] >> >> groupId:artifactId:packaging:classifier:version >> >> The format Brian listed seems to work better when some portions are >> optional. >> >> so maybe urn:maven:groupId:artifactId:versio

Re: standardized Maven GAV URN?

lassifier:version > > The format Brian listed seems to work better when some portions are > optional. > > so maybe urn:maven:groupId:artifactId:version:classifier:extension ? > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Maven_Coordinates > -- > View this message in context: > h

RE: standardized Maven GAV URN?

this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/standardized-Maven-GAV-URN-tp511480p512112.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org F

RE: standardized Maven GAV URN?

lugin a GAV URN and have it download what it > needs > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/standardized-Maven-GAV-URN-tp511480p511480.html > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --

Re: standardized Maven GAV URN?

sorry, I mean packaging vs extension. "ejb" packaging creates a "jar" extension 2010/6/29 Jochen Wiedmann > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:34 AM, nicolas de loof > wrote: > > > is le last part "type" or "packaging" ? > > Is there a difference? > > -- > Germanys national anthem is the most boring in

Re: standardized Maven GAV URN?

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:34 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: > is le last part "type" or "packaging" ? Is there a difference? -- Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: use

Re: standardized Maven GAV URN?

), I have to jump through some > dependency > > plugin hoops to get it in the right place at the right time. I'd like to > be > > able to just give the Clover plugin a GAV URN and have it download what > it > > needs > > > > > > -- > > Vi

Re: standardized Maven GAV URN?

and have it download what it > needs > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/standardized-Maven-GAV-URN-tp511480p511480.html > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ---

standardized Maven GAV URN?

ps to get it in the right place at the right time. I'd like to be able to just give the Clover plugin a GAV URN and have it download what it needs -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/standardized-Maven-GAV-URN-tp511480p511480.html Sent from the Maven - Users ma