Stan Devitt-2 wrote: > > Why would the recommended format here be different than the format used by > the dependency plugin? > (e.g. junit:junit:jar:3.8.1:test ) >
I was looking more for a URN for Maven coordinates, which is slightly different than the flattened form of <dependency> elements. e.g. the <scope> portion isn't part of what I'm looking for, it is more a statement of how I rely upon it Brian Fox-3 wrote: > > Group:artifact:version:classifier:extension is pretty common > I'm trying to wrap my mind around the differences and pros/cons of that vs. a format listed in the Maven docs[1] groupId:artifactId:packaging:classifier:version The format Brian listed seems to work better when some portions are optional. so maybe urn:maven:groupId:artifactId:version:classifier:extension ? [1] http://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Maven_Coordinates -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/standardized-Maven-GAV-URN-tp511480p512112.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
