Re: [Users] comments on 0.9.9

2005-07-07 Thread Paul Bagyenda
that's because SMIL is not MMS, hence the file is neither a valid MIME message nor a binary MMS message. P. On Jul 07, 2005, at 19:37, Mike Marchywka wrote: I took the smil / mime file and it claims is queued it AFTER spewing out a bunch of error mesages. The phone gets a message but it is

RE: [Users] comments on 0.9.9

2005-07-07 Thread Mike Marchywka
I took the smil / mime file and it claims is queued it AFTER spewing out a bunch of error mesages. The phone gets a message but it is blank. The file starts like this: From: blad To: foo Subject: etc... D. 2005-07-07 12:47:46 [19693] [0] ERROR: HTTP: Header does not contain a colon. BA D. 2005-07

Re: [Users] comments on 0.9.9

2005-07-07 Thread Paul Bagyenda
mmssend requires a valid mms file, either as MIME (text) or binary MMS. A quick-and-dirty test is to save a text email and send that. P. On Jul 07, 2005, at 18:48, Mike Marchywka wrote: I think having a known-good ascii file that I can send using mmssend would help. I was able to send a com

RE: [Users] comments on 0.9.9

2005-07-07 Thread Mike Marchywka
I think having a known-good ascii file that I can send using mmssend would help. I was able to send a compiled one generated with the nokia internet tools but I didn't immediately find a "Save as" option for mime/source code. I do have a small smil presentation that I sent using cingular's free smt

Re: [Users] comments on 0.9.9

2005-07-07 Thread Paul Bagyenda
On Jul 07, 2005, at 18:18, Mike Marchywka wrote: Thanks, I was afraid you might say that. I'm trying to get the mmssend to distinguish binary from text right now. At that point I should be able to send a diff. I'm also hoping to test with a kannel fetch to see what if any issues I avoided by us

RE: [Users] comments on 0.9.9

2005-07-07 Thread Mike Marchywka
Thanks, I was afraid you might say that. I'm trying to get the mmssend to distinguish binary from text right now. At that point I should be able to send a diff. I'm also hoping to test with a kannel fetch to see what if any issues I avoided by using the nokia/port 80 fetch. Have all of these issu

Re: [Users] comments on 0.9.9

2005-07-07 Thread Paul Bagyenda
Thanks Mike, Could you send me a unified diff so I can have a look and advise? Also, perhaps lets continue this discussion on the devel list... Thanks Paul. On Jul 07, 2005, at 14:36, Mike Marchywka wrote: Hi, I just got 0.9.9 to run with kannel 1.4.0 but I had to make a few patches an

[Users] comments on 0.9.9

2005-07-07 Thread Mike Marchywka
Hi, I just got 0.9.9 to run with kannel 1.4.0 but I had to make a few patches and I am curious to know if I patched "bugs" becuase I didn't unserstand how this is supposed to work. I used a nokia 6620 as a gsm modem and received notifications on port 80 using apache for reverse proxy. To get this