On 03/06/2018 10:50 AM, Ashton Hogan wrote:
> I, myself, as a user feel guilty benefitting as much as I do from
> NetBeans and never having to pay a dime for it
You could always assuage your guilt by joining the Community Acceptance
Testing program (NetCAT):
Hi,
I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-447
Gili
On 2018-03-06 12:34 PM, Paul Szudzik wrote:
Hopefully this would be an option flag.. Otherwise I wouldn't know if
I was overriding something by accident via a library load.. so, I
would vote for option check, where if it was
Hi,
Is there any way to use maven web app support modules of 8.2 in 9.0 beta?
I know that part of NB has not been 'donated' yet but maybe there is a
chance to copy those modules to 9.0 but I don't know which files to
copy/install and if there are compatibility issues
Thank you
I love NB
Enrico
--
I like it, I like it a lot. Let's do it!
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018, 17:01:20 GMT, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
Thanks for the enthusiasm. :-) As an Apache project, NetBeans will not be able
to earn money directly -- all money coming into Apache goes to the
Maybe a NetBeans field -- BeanField -- as in a field where beans are grown.
--
Johnny Muczynski
734-262-2045
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:13 PM Ashton Hogan
wrote:
> I like it, I like it a lot. Let's do it!
>
> On Tuesday, 6 March 2018, 17:01:20 GMT, Geertjan
Hopefully this would be an option flag.. Otherwise I wouldn't know if I was
overriding something by accident via a library load.. so, I would vote for
option check, where if it was CHECKED, would drop the fully qualified class
names for base and non-overridden functions.. If I do override a
It's available https://www.name.com/domain/search/netbeansfield.comSent from my Huawei Mobile Original Message Subject: Re: Long Live NetBeans!From: John Muczynski To: ashtonho...@ymail.com.invalidCC:
That’s something I’d like to have, too.
Regards,
Claus
> Am 06.03.2018 um 08:42 schrieb Thomas Kellerer :
>
> When using code-completion in JavaDocs (e.g. for a @see attribute), NetBeans
> always inserts fully qualifed class names for parameters, e.g.
>
> @see
Does Tomcat support Java EE 7?
Gj
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:46 PM, James Finnall wrote:
> The tutorial provided a reference to using GlassFish server. I do have
> the option for EE 7 on GlassFish. It did not mention Tomcat.
>
> When I choose Tomcat on a new project it only
https://netbeans.org/kb/docs/javaee/javaee-gettingstarted.html
Gj
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:30 PM, James Finnall wrote:
> What about Java EE 7 then?
>
> On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:16 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> >
> > Java EE 8 is not supported at this stage.
> >
> > Gj
>
The tutorial provided a reference to using GlassFish server. I do have
the option for EE 7 on GlassFish. It did not mention Tomcat.
When I choose Tomcat on a new project it only provides options for
version 6 and 5. It does not list version 7.
Thank you,
James
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:32
My server states it is using JVM 1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-0ubuntu0.16.04.2-
b12
I am told that indicates Java 8.
James
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:47 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Does Tomcat support Java EE 7?
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:46 PM, James Finnall
>
There's a pretty big difference between Java 8 and Java EE 8...
Gj
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:55 PM, James Finnall wrote:
> My server states it is using JVM 1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-0ubuntu0.16.04.2-
> b12
>
> I am told that indicates Java 8.
>
> James
>
> On Tue, 2018-03-06 at
You need tomcat 8/9 for servlet 3.1 support which is what j2ee 7 provides
On 6 Mar 2018 15:58, "Geertjan Wielenga"
wrote:
> There's a pretty big difference between Java 8 and Java EE 8...
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:55 PM, James Finnall
Hi all
Like all of you, I use NetBeans to build my own projects. Lately I've noticed a
particular competitor IDE being demanded more on job specs and wondered how
they managed to grow so big so quick. Turns out they sell licenses as well as
offering a free version. I, myself, as a user feel
15 matches
Mail list logo