Hi Josef, Thanks for the quick update! Meanwhile I tried to reproduce this situation but based on the known facts I was not able (Note: without any version change). I think it is connected to the version change indeed, but if you face with this ever again, please let me know!
Regards, Bence > On 2022. Dec 12., at 16:33, <josef.zahn...@swisscom.com> > <josef.zahn...@swisscom.com> wrote: > > Ok quick update on this. We investigated the changes on the *.snapshot files > on NiFi Registry. It seems that it’s mainly caused due to the fact that the > NiFi Version changes from 1.18.0 to 1.19.1 and some other facts caused due to > the upgrade. After commiting all the child PGs once the “Show Local Changes” > seems to behave as expected. > We have seen another issue caused only on the first commit of the child PGs > on v1.19.1, however I’ll not mention them as I’m guessing that this is highly > related to the last commits with the older NiFi version. > > Cheers Josef > > > From: "Zahner Josef, GSB-LR-TRW-LI" <josef.zahn...@swisscom.com > <mailto:josef.zahn...@swisscom.com>> > Date: Monday, 12 December 2022 at 14:44 > To: "users@nifi.apache.org <mailto:users@nifi.apache.org>" > <users@nifi.apache.org <mailto:users@nifi.apache.org>> > Subject: NiFi 1.19.1 Registry Nested Process Groups - Show Local Changes issue > > Hi guys > > Sorry that I’ve to bother you again. We just upgraded to NiFi 1.19.1 due to > the major issues with the NiFi Registry Client on NiFi 1.18.0. > > The following issue still persists in the new version. Let’s say everything > is up-to-date (parent and child PGs) from NiFi Registry perspective, now I do > change eg. a label directly in the parent PG. I do see on that parent PG, > that most likely every connection/service/processor has changed, even though > I’ve changed only one single label size, please check the screenshot for NiFi > Registry Client under “Show Local Changes”. > > <image001.png> > > Is this a cosmetical issue or do we have to worry about that (we had massive > NiFi registry issue on NiFi 1.18.0) ? Because in theory it makes no sense to > that NiFi tells that everything has changed if only one label changes. > > Thanks in advance > Josef
