Re: v0.* QueryDatabaseTable vs v1 GenerateTableFetch

2016-08-15 Thread Matt Burgess
Oops sorry, had replied before I saw this :) > On Aug 15, 2016, at 11:15 PM, Peter Wicks (pwicks) wrote: > > Oh, disregard J. I misread GenerateTableFetch as being an actual data fetch > vs a query builder. > > From: Peter Wicks (pwicks) > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016

Re: v0.* QueryDatabaseTable vs v1 GenerateTableFetch

2016-08-15 Thread Matt Burgess
Peter, Another difference between the two (besides the paging) is that QueryDatabaseTable executes SQL and GenerateTableFetch generates SQL. With the paging capability (which with Remote Process Groups enables distributed fetch a la Sqoop), you're likely correct that GTF will replace /

RE: v0.* QueryDatabaseTable vs v1 GenerateTableFetch

2016-08-15 Thread Peter Wicks (pwicks)
Oh, disregard :). I misread GenerateTableFetch as being an actual data fetch vs a query builder. From: Peter Wicks (pwicks) Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 9:11 PM To: 'users@nifi.apache.org' Subject: v0.* QueryDatabaseTable vs v1 GenerateTableFetch What is the future of