Oops sorry, had replied before I saw this :)
> On Aug 15, 2016, at 11:15 PM, Peter Wicks (pwicks) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh, disregard J. I misread GenerateTableFetch as being an actual data fetch > vs a query builder. > > From: Peter Wicks (pwicks) > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 9:11 PM > To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]> > Subject: v0.* QueryDatabaseTable vs v1 GenerateTableFetch > > What is the future of QueryDatabaseTable? Unless I’m misunderstanding how it > works it looks like GenerateTableFetch can do everything QueryDatabaseTable > can do and then some. Is there a plan to phase out QueryDatabaseTable? Is > there a reason for a new processor instead of an update to > QueryDatabaseTable? It looked like the only user facing change was result > paging, which could have had a default of 0 (no paging). Just curious. > > Regards, > Peter
