On 15 May 2008 at 17:33, Richard Detwiler wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Richard Detwiler wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
Some mail/news programs do not respect the 'Reply-To' header and
also send to the 'From' address when using the 'Reply-All' button.
Those who use these non-compliant
On 15 May 2008 at 16:39, Larry Gusaas wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Knott
Sent: 2008/05/15 3:35 PM
Larry Gusaas wrote:
The problem is allowing unsubscribed postes to the list in the first
place. If they are allowed, at least their address should be added to
the
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
The problem is allowing unsubscribed postes to the list in the
first place. If they are allowed, at least their address should
be added to the 'Reply-To' header. Having to look to see
Harold Fuchs wrote:
2008/5/15 Bob Estes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
snip
Thanks for the info. I will try to remember to not use the Reply All
button in the future. By the way, could you explain the difference between
the Reply and Reply All functions? I'm sure that
Larry Gusaas wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Konzack
Sent: 2008/05/14 7:13 AM
Am 2008-05-11 17:14:39, schrieb Harold Fuchs:
James, are you talking about messages from Bob Estes
([EMAIL PROTECTED])?
Yes, and mee too, I get always to messages from Bob, one which come
On Thu, 15 May 2008 02:46:53 -0700
Bob Estes wrote:
In ageneralised *e-mail* discussion an email is sent To one person
(or more) and cc several others. Reply sends the reply *only* to the
sender of the message being replied to; Reply All sends the message
to that person plus all those
2008/5/15 Michael Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 15 May 2008 02:46:53 -0700
Bob Estes wrote:
In ageneralised *e-mail* discussion an email is sent To one person
(or more) and cc several others. Reply sends the reply *only* to the
sender of the message being replied to; Reply All
Harold Fuchs wrote:
Yep, thats how i CC the OP when they are non list members (moderated
posters).
Hmmm. What *exact* method (OP Sys, mail/news program, mail or news) do you
use to read/write the list? I currently use Thunderbird on one computer and
Google's web interface via Firefox on
Bob Estes wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Konzack
Sent: 2008/05/14 7:13 AM
Am 2008-05-11 17:14:39, schrieb Harold Fuchs:
James, are you talking about messages from Bob Estes
([EMAIL PROTECTED])?
Yes, and mee too, I get always to messages from
Richard Detwiler wrote:
Harold Fuchs wrote:
Yep, thats how i CC the OP when they are non list members (moderated
posters).
Hmmm. What *exact* method (OP Sys, mail/news program, mail or news)
do you
use to read/write the list? I currently use Thunderbird on one
computer and
Google's web
James Knott wrote:
Richard Detwiler wrote:
Harold Fuchs wrote:
Yep, thats how i CC the OP when they are non list members (moderated
posters).
Hmmm. What *exact* method (OP Sys, mail/news program, mail or news)
do you
use to read/write the list? I currently use Thunderbird on one
computer
On 15 May 2008 at 11:30, Richard Detwiler wrote:
...
I think you'll find the list sets the reply to to the list and reply
to overrides the originating address. So, when you hit reply all,
Thunderbird only sees the list address and not the originator.
I realize that is what happening.
Richard Detwiler wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Richard Detwiler wrote:
Harold Fuchs wrote:
at always puzzled me.)
I think you'll find the list sets the reply to to the list and reply
to overrides the originating address. So, when you hit reply all,
Thunderbird only sees the list address and
-Original Message-
From: Harold Fuchs
Sent: 2008/05/15 5:58 AM
2008/5/15 Michael Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 15 May 2008 02:46:53 -0700
Bob Estes wrote:
In ageneralised *e-mail* discussion an email is sent To one person
(or more) and cc several others. Reply sends the
Larry Gusaas wrote:
Some mail/news programs do not respect the 'Reply-To' header and also
send to the 'From' address when using the 'Reply-All' button. Those
who use these non-compliant programs can use 'Reply-All' button when
responding to unsubscribed OPs.
I'm not sure I'd call those
-Original Message-
From: Richard Detwiler
Sent: 2008/05/15 2:43 PM
Larry Gusaas wrote:
Some mail/news programs do not respect the 'Reply-To' header and also
send to the 'From' address when using the 'Reply-All' button. Those
who use these non-compliant programs can use 'Reply-All'
On Thu, 15 May 2008 12:58:39 +0100
Harold Fuchs wrote:
2008/5/15 Michael Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 15 May 2008 02:46:53 -0700
Bob Estes wrote:
In ageneralised *e-mail* discussion an email is sent To one
person(or more) and cc several others. Reply sends the reply
James Knott wrote:
Richard Detwiler wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
Some mail/news programs do not respect the 'Reply-To' header and
also send to the 'From' address when using the 'Reply-All' button.
Those who use these non-compliant programs can use 'Reply-All'
button when responding to
Larry Gusaas wrote:
The problem is allowing unsubscribed postes to the list in the first
place. If they are allowed, at least their address should be added to
the 'Reply-To' header. Having to look to see if a post is delivered to
the moderator before replying is idiotic.
Does reply to
Richard Detwiler wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Richard Detwiler wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
Some mail/news programs do not respect the 'Reply-To' header and
also send to the 'From' address when using the 'Reply-All' button.
Those who use these non-compliant programs can use 'Reply-All'
button
-Original Message-
From: James Knott
Sent: 2008/05/15 3:35 PM
Larry Gusaas wrote:
The problem is allowing unsubscribed postes to the list in the first
place. If they are allowed, at least their address should be added to
the 'Reply-To' header. Having to look to see if a post is
James Knott wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
The problem is allowing unsubscribed postes to the list in the first
place. If they are allowed, at least their address should be added to
the 'Reply-To' header. Having to look to see if a post is delivered
to the moderator before replying is idiotic.
James Knott wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
The problem is allowing unsubscribed postes to the list in the
first place. If they are allowed, at least their address should be
added to the 'Reply-To' header. Having to look to see if a post is
delivered to the moderator before replying is idiotic.
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
The problem is allowing unsubscribed postes to the list in the
first place. If they are allowed, at least their address should be
added to the 'Reply-To' header. Having to look to see if a post is
delivered to the moderator before
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
The problem is allowing unsubscribed postes to the list in the
first place. If they are allowed, at least their address should be
added to the 'Reply-To' header. Having to look to see if a post is
delivered to the moderator before
I'll respond to two of your messages in one post. See below
-Original Message-
From: James Knott
Sent: 2008/05/15 7:28 PM
How did you set two reply-to addresses? What does the header look like?
Add a new address to be sent to. Click 'To' and select 'Reply-to'. This
should work the
James Knott wrote:
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
The problem is allowing unsubscribed postes to the list in the
first place. If they are allowed, at least their address should
be added to the 'Reply-To' header. Having to look to see if a
post is delivered
(was Re: [users] Re: Download
time for open office)
James Knott wrote:
Harold Fuchs wrote:
On 11/05/2008 14:32, James Knott wrote:
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 11 May 2008 13:06:39 James Knott wrote:
We don't need two copies of all your
messages.
I'm only getting one, James
PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [users] Re: Duplicated Messages (was Re: [users] Re: Download
time for open office)
James Knott wrote
Hello Brad,
Am 2008-05-11 17:21:10, schrieb Brad Rogers:
Like James, I've received two copies of messages from Bob. One set is
via the moderation route, the other direct to the list.
Currently, there's weirdness going on at the openoffice.org domain
(again) as I can't post from one address
And here is an example where I received it via the moderator. Both this
message and the original were sent at the same time, so it appears the mail
list is messing up.
I think the answer may be that the 'return-path:' for the moderated and
non-moderated messages are different.
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Konzack
Sent: 2008/05/14 7:13 AM
Am 2008-05-11 17:14:39, schrieb Harold Fuchs:
James, are you talking about messages from Bob Estes
([EMAIL PROTECTED])?
Yes, and mee too, I get always to messages from Bob, one which come
directly into the
James Knott wrote:
Harold Fuchs wrote:
On 11/05/2008 14:32, James Knott wrote:
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 11 May 2008 13:06:39 James Knott wrote:
We don't need two copies of all your
messages.
I'm only getting one, James. The one that is coming direct to the
list.
I flag
On 12 May 2008 at 3:54, Bob Estes wrote:
...
If you find out what is going on, and if it is my fault, let me know so
that I can correct it.
I don't think you in particular are causing any problem, Bob.
This issue goes back a while. I've been keeping copies of most
questions to the OOo list
34 matches
Mail list logo
