Hi Everyone,
I resolved this issue using below link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602267
But now it got stuck at below:
Any one any idea how we can resolve this..!!
Thanks
Vijay Sachdeva
From: Vijay Sachdeva
Date: Tuesday, 21 July 2020 at 9:00 AM
Hi Ritesh,
Currently I can’t use 4.4, I am using 4.3.8 for the deployment and now using
from CLI it got stuck here:
I want to understand, what actually it is trying to do in the backend. Is it
like trying to create the bridge and getting the network UP? As it is again
stuck for past
Hi Ritesh,
You mean 4.4 version?
Thanks
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, 09:29 Ritesh Chikatwar wrote:
> Hello Vijay...
>
>
> Please try with the latest appliance this issue has been fixed.
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:42 PM Vijay Sachdeva via Users
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> Tried installing
Hello Vijay...
Please try with the latest appliance this issue has been fixed.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:42 PM Vijay Sachdeva via Users
wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Tried installing using cockpit, got stuck at the same. Don't know what's
> wrong here and I am stuck from 2 days.
>
> Any help..!!
>
Hi All,
It tried deploying hosted engine using cli and got this error every time:
Can anyone please let me know what here is missing..!! As it would be a great
help.patri
Thanks
Vijay Sachdeva
___
Users mailing list --
AH! my apologies. It seemed very odd, so I reviewed, and discovered that I
messed up my testing of direct lun.
updated results are improved from my previous email, but not any better than
going through normal storage domain.
18156: 61.714: IO Summary: 110396 ops, 1836.964 ops/s, (921/907
FYI, I just tried it with direct lun.
it is as bad or worse.
I dont know about that sg io vs qemu initiator, but here is the results.
15223: 62.824: IO Summary: 83751 ops, 1387.166 ops/s, (699/681 r/w), 2.7mb/s,
619us cpu/op, 281.4ms latency
15761: 62.268: IO Summary: 77610 ops, 1287.908
yes I am testing small writes. "oltp workload" means, simulation of OLTP
database access.
You asked me to test the speed of iscsi from another host, which is very
reasonable. So here are the results,
run from another node in the ovirt cluster.
Setup is using:
- exact same vg device, exported
Il lun 20 lug 2020, 23:42 Nir Soffer ha scritto:
> I think you will get the best performance using direct LUN.
Is direct LUN using the QEMU iSCSI initiator, or SG_IO, and if so is it
using /dev/sg or has that been fixed? SG_IO is definitely not going to be
the fastest, especially with /dev/sg.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 8:51 PM Philip Brown wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get optimal iscsi performance. We're a heavy iscsi shop, with
> 10g net.
>
> I'mm experimenting with SSDs, and the performance in ovirt is way, way less
> than I would have hoped.
> More than an order of magnitude slower.
>
>
Hi Everyone,
Does anyone has any idea why hosted engine setup stuck at “Wait for host to be
up”.
It’s been 4 hours deployment is going on and got stuck. Any help please..!!
Thanks
Vijay Sachdeva
___
Users mailing list --
I'm trying to get optimal iscsi performance. We're a heavy iscsi shop, with 10g
net.
I'mm experimenting with SSDs, and the performance in ovirt is way, way less
than I would have hoped.
More than an order of magnitude slower.
here's a datapoint.
Im running filebench, with the OLTP workload.
Just copy/paste it in a browser.
На 20 юли 2020 г. 17:00:01 GMT+03:00, lu.alfo...@almaviva.it написа:
>Hello,
>
>the link is not available
>___
>Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
>To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
>Privacy
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:36 PM francesco--- via Users wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm facing a really slow export ov vms hosted on a single node cluster, in a
> local storage. The Vm disk is 600 GB and the effective usage is around 300
> GB. I estimated that the following process would take up
The Engine has the TimeZone types compiled, this may be an issue when one wants
to configure a Windows Machine to use UTC as a Timezone instead of GMT.
Using GMT sets the Windows VM to "London, Dublin" time which may cause issues
with daylight saving for some users.
There should be an option to
hello,
anyone are using OVIRT with a SDN controller?
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
Hello,
the link is not available
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
Hello,
I am new to oVirt.
I have a problem and I don't know how to deal with it, i added another
network besides the management network and after that the node did not
respond to the oVIrt manager.
I had to change the DNS to the new IP of the new network so that oVIrt
manager can manage it.
Now i
Hi,
Please find the output:
select * from images where image_group_id =
'd7bd480d-2c51-4141-a386-113abf75219e';
image_guid | creation_date | size |
it_guid| parentid |
imagestatus |
На 19 юли 2020 г. 21:09:14 GMT+03:00, David White via Users
написа:
>Thank you.
>So to make sure I understand what you're saying, it sounds like if I
>need 4 nodes (or more), I should NOT do a "hyperconverged"
>installation, but should instead prepare Gluster separately from the
>oVirt Manager
I don't quite understand what multipath is, but when I deployed it in my iSCSI
repository, only one ip address is specified when installing hosted-engine.
However, in order to specify the second subnet, I went to my host portal where
I was deploying the engine and added the second subnet in the
I have also seen this. Long time later the hosted-engine setup threw an error,
but after install from cockpit panel an error disappeared. Try this too)
Regards!
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi,
when setting hostnamectl set-hostname "FQDN", then engine will report the real
and correct "FQDN", but this is not a good fix.
With our older Debian and Ubuntu VMs, it is working correctly, although
hostname is only reporting the short hostname. hostname -f is reporting here
the correct
23 matches
Mail list logo
